Heavy Metal Classifications for Agricultural Soils to be Applied
「Heavy Metal Classifications for Agricultural Soils to be Applied」於資料集「MajorEnvironmentalPolicies」由單位「行政院環境保護署」的陳小姐所提供，聯繫電話是(02)23117722#2753,(02)23117722#2756，最近更新時間為：2023-07-30 01:03:45。 欄位編號的內容是422 ， 欄位標題的內容是Heavy Metal Classifications for Agricultural Soils to be Applied to Industrial Lands ， 欄位摘要的內容是Due to the frequency of incidents of industrial-use land pollution and illegal dumping in Taiwan the EPA has decided to expand the use of a table for classifying soil concentrations of heavy metals in agricultural land, to monitoring for industrial and other lands. The classifications will be used as the basis for future monitoring and remediation plans. Also, priority remediation values for agricultural land will be added to the original Class V standards.
In the past, when working with agricultural lands, the EPA set a table for concentrations of heavy metals in soil to divide monitoring results into five classifications. But, because of the recent number of incidents of industrial land pollution and illegal dumping, the EPA has decided to expand use of these classifications for the monitoring results of industrial and other land uses. The classifications will also be the basis for drawing up future soil monitoring and remediation plans.
According to the table, heavy metal-contaminated land is divided into five classes. Class I indicates that monitoring of the soil has revealed it to be deficient of copper, zinc, and other elements essential for agricultural lands. Class II land contains soil with a heavy metal content lower than environmental background values, while Class III land has soil with contaminant levels equivalent to environmental background values. The heavy metal concentrations in Class IV land are defined as being at observation levels, and a ranking of Class V means that land has been polluted by an exterior source of heavy metals, and should be listed as a key area for pollution controls. In addition, the EPA has decided to add to Class V a column for priority remediation values for agricultural land. Agricultural lands falling within this scope are assigned priority and will undergo remediation, depending on the environmental necessity and the willingness of local farmers.
The EPA explains that parcels of land categorized as Class I, II, or III do not have heavy metal soil pollution problems. County and city governments should put their main efforts into Class IV and V parcels. Although Class IV lands have exceeded environmental background values, this may be precipitated by geographical or environmental factors. According to plans, government efforts should center on identifying sources of external pollution, and if they exist strengthening pollution checks and controls. For land listed as Class V, county and city governments should perform regular monitoring of heavy metal concentrations in the soil, and determine priority for remediation accordingly. Monitoring results should also be sent to agricultural and health agencies for reference.
However, to avoid pollution to rice stocks, if cadmium or mercury values exceed 1mg/kg in land used to plant rice, the land must be listed as Class V and assigned priority for monitoring and remediation. If rice plantings tested do not conform with food product health standards (for cadmium and mercury), local EPBs must meet with relevant agencies to discuss which lands should be left fallow, and provide support for follow-up work efforts.
In June of this year the Executive Yuan approved a draft of the Soil Pollution Remediation Act which was then sent to the Legislative Yuan for review. Before passage of the act there are as of yet no procedures to follow for soil pollution control in Taiwan. For example, in the case of the pollution of industrial land, unless the identity of the polluter is clear, responsibility for remediation is extremely difficult to ascertain. Because the Soil Pollution Remediation Act has not yet passed, the classification table above is offered only as a reference for county and city governments. To cope with soil pollution problems for the time being, the EPA suggests county and city governments use the table to determine the polluted industrial lands and then determine the presence or absence of a pollution source. Governments should then request the removal of existing pollution sources according to the relevant laws for water, air and solid waste pollution, and should wait for further clarification of responsibility to begin soil remediation.
Addition of the priority remediation values for agricultural land is primarily intended to make county and city governments determine priority and begin remediation for those more seriously polluted sites. An EPA official stressed though that even if monitoring results do not fall within priority remediation values, remediation can still be undertaken. If the county or city government judges the site to be dangerous a remediation plan can be proposed and begun.
Table: Taiwan Land Classifications for Heavy Metal Concentrations in Soil
Pollutant
Class I
Class II
Class III
(Env. Background Levels)
Class IV
(Observation Levels)
Class V
Monitoring Levels
Priority Remediation Levels For Agricultural Lands
Arsenic
topsoil<4
bottom soil<4
4-9
4-15
10-60
16-60
>60
>60
>60
>60
Cadmium
<0.05
0.05-0.39
0.40-10
>10
>10
Chromium
<0.10
0.10-10
11-16
>16
>40
Copper
<1
1-11
12-20
21-100
>100
>200
Mercury
<0.10
0.10-0.39
0.40-20
>20
>20
Nickel
<2
2-10
11-100
>100
>200
Lead
<1
1-15
16-120
>120
>200
Zinc
<1.5
1.6-10
11-25
26-80
>80
>500
* Measurements in mg/kg ， 欄位全文的內容是Due to the frequency of incidents of industrial-use land pollution and illegal dumping in Taiwan the EPA has decided to expand the use of a table for classifying soil concentrations of heavy metals in agricultural land, to monitoring for industrial and other lands. The classifications will be used as the basis for future monitoring and remediation plans. Also, priority remediation values for agricultural land will be added to the original Class V standards.
In the past, when working with agricultural lands, the EPA set a table for concentrations of heavy metals in soil to divide monitoring results into five classifications. But, because of the recent number of incidents of industrial land pollution and illegal dumping, the EPA has decided to expand use of these classifications for the monitoring results of industrial and other land uses. The classifications will also be the basis for drawing up future soil monitoring and remediation plans.
According to the table, heavy metal-contaminated land is divided into five classes. Class I indicates that monitoring of the soil has revealed it to be deficient of copper, zinc, and other elements essential for agricultural lands. Class II land contains soil with a heavy metal content lower than environmental background values, while Class III land has soil with contaminant levels equivalent to environmental background values. The heavy metal concentrations in Class IV land are defined as being at observation levels, and a ranking of Class V means that land has been polluted by an exterior source of heavy metals, and should be listed as a key area for pollution controls. In addition, the EPA has decided to add to Class V a column for priority remediation values for agricultural land. Agricultural lands falling within this scope are assigned priority and will undergo remediation, depending on the environmental necessity and the willingness of local farmers.
The EPA explains that parcels of land categorized as Class I, II, or III do not have heavy metal soil pollution problems. County and city governments should put their main efforts into Class IV and V parcels. Although Class IV lands have exceeded environmental background values, this may be precipitated by geographical or environmental factors. According to plans, government efforts should center on identifying sources of external pollution, and if they exist strengthening pollution checks and controls. For land listed as Class V, county and city governments should perform regular monitoring of heavy metal concentrations in the soil, and determine priority for remediation accordingly. Monitoring results should also be sent to agricultural and health agencies for reference.
However, to avoid pollution to rice stocks, if cadmium or mercury values exceed 1mg/kg in land used to plant rice, the land must be listed as Class V and assigned priority for monitoring and remediation. If rice plantings tested do not conform with food product health standards (for cadmium and mercury), local EPBs must meet with relevant agencies to discuss which lands should be left fallow, and provide support for follow-up work efforts.
In June of this year the Executive Yuan approved a draft of the Soil Pollution Remediation Act which was then sent to the Legislative Yuan for review. Before passage of the act there are as of yet no procedures to follow for soil pollution control in Taiwan. For example, in the case of the pollution of industrial land, unless the identity of the polluter is clear, responsibility for remediation is extremely difficult to ascertain. Because the Soil Pollution Remediation Act has not yet passed, the classification table above is offered only as a reference for county and city governments. To cope with soil pollution problems for the time being, the EPA suggests county and city governments use the table to determine the polluted industrial lands and then determine the presence or absence of a pollution source. Governments should then request the removal of existing pollution sources according to the relevant laws for water, air and solid waste pollution, and should wait for further clarification of responsibility to begin soil remediation.
Addition of the priority remediation values for agricultural land is primarily intended to make county and city governments determine priority and begin remediation for those more seriously polluted sites. An EPA official stressed though that even if monitoring results do not fall within priority remediation values, remediation can still be undertaken. If the county or city government judges the site to be dangerous a remediation plan can be proposed and begun.
Table: Taiwan Land Classifications for Heavy Metal Concentrations in Soil
Pollutant
Class I
Class II
Class III
(Env. Background Levels)
Class IV
(Observation Levels)
Class V
Monitoring Levels
Priority Remediation Levels For Agricultural Lands
Arsenic
topsoil<4
bottom soil<4
4-9
4-15
10-60
16-60
>60
>60
>60
>60
Cadmium
<0.05
0.05-0.39
0.40-10
>10
>10
Chromium
<0.10
0.10-10
11-16
>16
>40
Copper
<1
1-11
12-20
21-100
>100
>200
Mercury
<0.10
0.10-0.39
0.40-20
>20
>20
Nickel
<2
2-10
11-100
>100
>200
Lead
<1
1-15
16-120
>120
>200
Zinc
<1.5
1.6-10
11-25
26-80
>80
>500
* Measurements in mg/kg ， 欄位年度的內容是2000 ， 欄位月份的內容是3 ， 欄位卷的內容是3 ， 欄位期的內容是4 ， 欄位順序的內容是1 ， 欄位倒序的內容是2 ， 欄位分類的內容是Soil and Groundwater ， 欄位標題2的內容是Heavy Metal Classifications for Agricultural Soils to be Applied to Industrial Lands ， 欄位檔案位置的內容是V3/V3-04 。
編號
422
標題
Heavy Metal Classifications for Agricultural Soils to be Applied to Industrial Lands
摘要
Due to the frequency of incidents of industrial-use land pollution and illegal dumping in Taiwan the EPA has decided to expand the use of a table for classifying soil concentrations of heavy metals in agricultural land, to monitoring for industrial and other lands. The classifications will be used as the basis for future monitoring and remediation plans. Also, priority remediation values for agricultural land will be added to the original Class V standards. In the past, when working with agricultural lands, the EPA set a table for concentrations of heavy metals in soil to divide monitoring results into five classifications. But, because of the recent number of incidents of industrial land pollution and illegal dumping, the EPA has decided to expand use of these classifications for the monitoring results of industrial and other land uses. The classifications will also be the basis for drawing up future soil monitoring and remediation plans. According to the table, heavy metal-contaminated land is divided into five classes. Class I indicates that monitoring of the soil has revealed it to be deficient of copper, zinc, and other elements essential for agricultural lands. Class II land contains soil with a heavy metal content lower than environmental background values, while Class III land has soil with contaminant levels equivalent to environmental background values. The heavy metal concentrations in Class IV land are defined as being at observation levels, and a ranking of Class V means that land has been polluted by an exterior source of heavy metals, and should be listed as a key area for pollution controls. In addition, the EPA has decided to add to Class V a column for priority remediation values for agricultural land. Agricultural lands falling within this scope are assigned priority and will undergo remediation, depending on the environmental necessity and the willingness of local farmers. The EPA explains that parcels of land categorized as Class I, II, or III do not have heavy metal soil pollution problems. County and city governments should put their main efforts into Class IV and V parcels. Although Class IV lands have exceeded environmental background values, this may be precipitated by geographical or environmental factors. According to plans, government efforts should center on identifying sources of external pollution, and if they exist strengthening pollution checks and controls. For land listed as Class V, county and city governments should perform regular monitoring of heavy metal concentrations in the soil, and determine priority for remediation accordingly. Monitoring results should also be sent to agricultural and health agencies for reference. However, to avoid pollution to rice stocks, if cadmium or mercury values exceed 1mg/kg in land used to plant rice, the land must be listed as Class V and assigned priority for monitoring and remediation. If rice plantings tested do not conform with food product health standards (for cadmium and mercury), local EPBs must meet with relevant agencies to discuss which lands should be left fallow, and provide support for follow-up work efforts. In June of this year the Executive Yuan approved a draft of the Soil Pollution Remediation Act which was then sent to the Legislative Yuan for review. Before passage of the act there are as of yet no procedures to follow for soil pollution control in Taiwan. For example, in the case of the pollution of industrial land, unless the identity of the polluter is clear, responsibility for remediation is extremely difficult to ascertain. Because the Soil Pollution Remediation Act has not yet passed, the classification table above is offered only as a reference for county and city governments. To cope with soil pollution problems for the time being, the EPA suggests county and city governments use the table to determine the polluted industrial lands and then determine the presence or absence of a pollution source. Governments should then request the removal of existing pollution sources according to the relevant laws for water, air and solid waste pollution, and should wait for further clarification of responsibility to begin soil remediation. Addition of the priority remediation values for agricultural land is primarily intended to make county and city governments determine priority and begin remediation for those more seriously polluted sites. An EPA official stressed though that even if monitoring results do not fall within priority remediation values, remediation can still be undertaken. If the county or city government judges the site to be dangerous a remediation plan can be proposed and begun. Table: Taiwan Land Classifications for Heavy Metal Concentrations in Soil Pollutant Class I Class II Class III (Env. Background Levels) Class IV (Observation Levels) Class V Monitoring Levels Priority Remediation Levels For Agricultural Lands Arsenic topsoil<4 bottom soil<4 4-9 4-15 10-60 16-60 >60 >60 >60 >60 Cadmium <0.05 0.05-0.39 0.40-10 >10 >10 Chromium <0.10 0.10-10 11-16 >16 >40 Copper <1 1-11 12-20 21-100 >100 >200 Mercury <0.10 0.10-0.39 0.40-20 >20 >20 Nickel <2 2-10 11-100 >100 >200 Lead <1 1-15 16-120 >120 >200 Zinc <1.5 1.6-10 11-25 26-80 >80 >500 * Measurements in mg/kg
全文
Due to the frequency of incidents of industrial-use land pollution and illegal dumping in Taiwan the EPA has decided to expand the use of a table for classifying soil concentrations of heavy metals in agricultural land, to monitoring for industrial and other lands. The classifications will be used as the basis for future monitoring and remediation plans. Also, priority remediation values for agricultural land will be added to the original Class V standards. In the past, when working with agricultural lands, the EPA set a table for concentrations of heavy metals in soil to divide monitoring results into five classifications. But, because of the recent number of incidents of industrial land pollution and illegal dumping, the EPA has decided to expand use of these classifications for the monitoring results of industrial and other land uses. The classifications will also be the basis for drawing up future soil monitoring and remediation plans. According to the table, heavy metal-contaminated land is divided into five classes. Class I indicates that monitoring of the soil has revealed it to be deficient of copper, zinc, and other elements essential for agricultural lands. Class II land contains soil with a heavy metal content lower than environmental background values, while Class III land has soil with contaminant levels equivalent to environmental background values. The heavy metal concentrations in Class IV land are defined as being at observation levels, and a ranking of Class V means that land has been polluted by an exterior source of heavy metals, and should be listed as a key area for pollution controls. In addition, the EPA has decided to add to Class V a column for priority remediation values for agricultural land. Agricultural lands falling within this scope are assigned priority and will undergo remediation, depending on the environmental necessity and the willingness of local farmers. The EPA explains that parcels of land categorized as Class I, II, or III do not have heavy metal soil pollution problems. County and city governments should put their main efforts into Class IV and V parcels. Although Class IV lands have exceeded environmental background values, this may be precipitated by geographical or environmental factors. According to plans, government efforts should center on identifying sources of external pollution, and if they exist strengthening pollution checks and controls. For land listed as Class V, county and city governments should perform regular monitoring of heavy metal concentrations in the soil, and determine priority for remediation accordingly. Monitoring results should also be sent to agricultural and health agencies for reference. However, to avoid pollution to rice stocks, if cadmium or mercury values exceed 1mg/kg in land used to plant rice, the land must be listed as Class V and assigned priority for monitoring and remediation. If rice plantings tested do not conform with food product health standards (for cadmium and mercury), local EPBs must meet with relevant agencies to discuss which lands should be left fallow, and provide support for follow-up work efforts. In June of this year the Executive Yuan approved a draft of the Soil Pollution Remediation Act which was then sent to the Legislative Yuan for review. Before passage of the act there are as of yet no procedures to follow for soil pollution control in Taiwan. For example, in the case of the pollution of industrial land, unless the identity of the polluter is clear, responsibility for remediation is extremely difficult to ascertain. Because the Soil Pollution Remediation Act has not yet passed, the classification table above is offered only as a reference for county and city governments. To cope with soil pollution problems for the time being, the EPA suggests county and city governments use the table to determine the polluted industrial lands and then determine the presence or absence of a pollution source. Governments should then request the removal of existing pollution sources according to the relevant laws for water, air and solid waste pollution, and should wait for further clarification of responsibility to begin soil remediation. Addition of the priority remediation values for agricultural land is primarily intended to make county and city governments determine priority and begin remediation for those more seriously polluted sites. An EPA official stressed though that even if monitoring results do not fall within priority remediation values, remediation can still be undertaken. If the county or city government judges the site to be dangerous a remediation plan can be proposed and begun. Table: Taiwan Land Classifications for Heavy Metal Concentrations in Soil Pollutant Class I Class II Class III (Env. Background Levels) Class IV (Observation Levels) Class V Monitoring Levels Priority Remediation Levels For Agricultural Lands Arsenic topsoil<4 bottom soil<4 4-9 4-15 10-60 16-60 >60 >60 >60 >60 Cadmium <0.05 0.05-0.39 0.40-10 >10 >10 Chromium <0.10 0.10-10 11-16 >16 >40 Copper <1 1-11 12-20 21-100 >100 >200 Mercury <0.10 0.10-0.39 0.40-20 >20 >20 Nickel <2 2-10 11-100 >100 >200 Lead <1 1-15 16-120 >120 >200 Zinc <1.5 1.6-10 11-25 26-80 >80 >500 * Measurements in mg/kg
年度
2000
月份
3
卷
3
期
4
順序
1
倒序
2
分類
Soil and Groundwater
標題2
Heavy Metal Classifications for Agricultural Soils to be Applied to Industrial Lands
檔案位置
V3/V3-04
「Heavy Metal Classifications for Agricultural Soils to be Applied」所屬的資料集：「MajorEnvironmentalPolicies」的其他資料
編號：
3637
標題：
Plastic-Free Ocean Promoted in Response to
International Trend
摘要：
waste
Plastic-Free Ocean Promoted in Response to
International Trend
Starting 1 January 2018, the EP
全文：
Plastic-Free Ocean Promoted in Response to
International Trend
Starting 1 January 2018, the EPA impl
編號：
1532
標題：
NCSD Reviews Reasons for Low ESI Ranking
摘要：
The 2005 Environmental Sustainability Index assessment report has been released and Taiwan is ranked
全文：
The 2005 Environmental Sustainability Index assessment report has been released and Taiwan is ranked
編號：
1990
標題：
Leading the Privatization of Environmental Services
摘要：
Feature Column
Leading the Priv
全文：
Feature Column
Leading the Priv
編號：
3627
標題：
EPA Minister Lee Exhibits Taiwan’s Role in Global Carbon Reduction at COP23 in Germany
摘要：
Climate Change
EPA Minister Lee Exhibits Taiwan’s Role in Global Carbon Reduction at COP23 in German
全文：
EPA Minister Lee Exhibits Taiwan’s Role in Global Carbon Reduction at COP23 in Germany
The main inf
編號：
56
標題：
EPA to Enforce Recycling Logo Requirements
摘要：
Recycling In accordance with the “Four-in-one” recycling plan the EPA announced in June of this yea
全文：
Recycling In accordance with the “Four-in-one” recycling plan the EPA announced in June of this yea
編號：
4111
標題：
The EPA Hosts Net Zero Urban Action Forum during UN Climate Change Convention COP26
摘要：
climate change
The EPA Hosts Net Zero Urban Action Forum during UN Climate Change Convention COP26
T
全文：
The EPA stated that a 2021 report published by the International Energy Agency found that more than
編號：
3445
標題：
First Year Implementation of the Greenhouse Gas Reduction and Management Act
摘要：
Climate Change First Year Implementation of the Greenhouse Gas Reduction and Management Act
全文：
First Year Implementation of the Greenhouse Gas Reduction and Management Act
Taiwan’s Greenhouse G
編號：
3900
標題：
EPA Cooperates with Tzu Chi to Promote Environmental Sustainability
摘要：
Environmental Education EPA Cooperates with Tzu Chi to Promote Environmental Sustainability
EPA Mini
全文：
It has been 33 years since the EPA was founded and 30 years since Tzu Chi started participating in e
編號：
711
標題：
EY Marine Pollution Incident Taskforce Begins Operation
摘要：
On March 23 the EPA convened the first meeting of the Executive Yuan Severe Marine Pollution Inciden
全文：
On March 23 the EPA convened the first meeting of the Executive Yuan Severe Marine Pollution Inciden
編號：
93
標題：
Amendments to the Enforcement Rules for Toxics Act Submitted to Executive Yuan
摘要：
Toxic Substance On November 19 1997, the Toxic Chemical Substances Control Act was amended and annou
全文：
Toxic Substance Management On November 19 1997, the Toxic Chemical Substances Control Act was amend
編號：
433
標題：
87% Drop in Recycling Fee Charged for Button-style Lithium Batteries
摘要：
Mercury content in button-style lithium batteries is on average extremely low and cadmium and lead a
全文：
Mercury content in button-style lithium batteries is on average extremely low and cadmium and lead a
編號：
3727
標題：
Regulations Regarding Collection of Water Pollution Control Fees from Households Amended
摘要：
Water
Regulations Regarding Collection of Water Pollution Control Fees from Households Amended
Amen
全文：
Regulations Regarding Collection of Water Pollution Control Fees from Households Amended
Amendments
編號：
142
標題：
EPA Drafts Tougher Motorcycle Emission Standards
摘要：
Air Quality Following numerous discussions with industry the EPA finally completed a draft of the
全文：
Air Quality Following numerous discussions with industry the EPA finally completed a draft of the
編號：
1584
標題：
Garbage Sorting to Be Implemented Ahead of Schedule
摘要：
The first stage of the compulsory garbage sorting policy went into effect on 1 January 2005 in ten c
全文：
The first stage of the compulsory garbage sorting policy went into effect on 1 January 2005 in ten c
編號：
3379
標題：
New Environmental Measures Take Effect on 1 January 2016
摘要：
General Policy
New Environmental Measures Take Effect on 1 January 2016
New Environmental Measures
全文：
New Environmental Measures Take Effect on 1 January 2016
To simplify administration for the public
編號：
4132
標題：
Prosecutors Office, Police, and Investigation Bureau Cooperate in Apprehending Group for Dumping Ha
摘要：
On the night of 17 September 2020, the Environmental Protection Bureau of Kaohsiung City received co
全文：
The EPA said that at first, footage from surveillance cameras in the vicinity of the factory was exa
編號：
3770
標題：
Banning Personal Care Products Containing Synthetic Polymers
摘要：
Waste
Banning Personal Care Products Containing Synthetic Polymers
Since the Manufacturing, Import,
全文：
Banning Personal Care Products Containing Synthetic Polymers
Since the Manufacturing, Import, and S
編號：
102
標題：
EPA to Establish Legislative Streamlining Committee
摘要：
General Policy According to a National Development Committee summary report on economic development
全文：
General Policy According to a National Development Committee summary report on economic development
編號：
3754
標題：
Thirty-six Recycling Institutes Awarded for Excellent Performance
摘要：
Recycling
Thirty-six Recycling Institutes Awarded for Excellent Performance
On 29 March 2019, the EP
全文：
Thirty-six Recycling Institutes Awarded for Excellent Performance
On 29 March 2019, the EPA held an
編號：
2936
標題：
EPA Leads Greater Cooperation on Pacific Greenhouse Gas Monitoring
摘要：
GHG Reduction
EPA Leads Greater Cooperation on Pacific Greenhouse Gas Monitoring
On 24 September 2
全文：
GHG Reduction
EPA Leads Greater Cooperation on Pacific Greenhouse Gas Monitoring
On 24 September 2
編號：
4176
標題：
Guidelines Announced to Assist Enterprises in Inventory of Greenhouse Gas Emissions
摘要：
Guidelines Announced to Assist Enterprises in Inventory of Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Recently, the E
全文：
To date, 5,200 enterprises in over 130 countries have proposed goals and timetables to achieve net-z
編號：
4271
標題：
Aiming for a 30% Usage Rate of Recycled Plastic in Packaging Materials
摘要：
To promote domestic plastic recycling and waste reduction, the EPA encourages industries to mix recy
全文：
Internationally, efforts have been made to promote net-zero emissions and sustainable development in
編號：
3863
標題：
Qiaotou Science Park Enters Second Phase EIA
摘要：
EIA Qiaotou Science Park Enters Second Phase EIA
The EPA recently announced that the development pro
全文：
The following is the list of information to be covered in
the EIA report for the second phase of rev
編號：
4225
標題：
18 Countries Jointly Promote Atmospheric Mercury Monitoring at the 11th APMMN Annual Meeting
摘要：
On 2 Nov. 2022, the Eleventh annual meeting of the Asia-Pacific Mercury Monitoring Network (APMMN) w
全文：
18 Countries Jointly Promote Atmospheric Mercury Monitoring at the 11th APMMN Annual Meeting
On 2 No
編號：
3460
標題：
Fifteen Towns and Cities Receive Subsidies to Create Eco-friendly Living Environments
摘要：
Environmental Sanitation
Fifteen Towns and Cities Receive Subsidies to Create Eco-friendly Living En
全文：
Fifteen Towns and Cities Receive Subsidies to Create Eco-friendly Living Environments
The EPA has a
編號：
3752
標題：
Three Toxic Chemicals Added to Align with the Stockholm Convention
摘要：
Chemicals
Three Toxic Chemicals Added to Align with the Stockholm Convention
In response to the new
全文：
Three Toxic Chemicals Added to Align with the Stockholm Convention
In response to the new items adde
編號：
3298
標題：
Operating Principles for Greenhouse Gas Analysis and Auditing Organizations Promulgated
摘要：
Climate change Operating Principles for Greenhouse Gas Analysis and Auditing Organizations Promulgat
全文：
Operating Principles for Greenhouse Gas Analysis and Auditing Organizations Promulgated
編號：
3948
標題：
Waste Food Waste Repurposed to Achieve a Circular Economy
摘要：
全文：
The “2030 Future Beyond the Circle, Future All Together”, a four-day exhibition on circular economy,
編號：
391
標題：
PCB Containing Capacitors and Transformers Must be Reported by the End of October
摘要：
The EPA stated that users of capacitors or transformers whose insulating fluids contain above 1000pp
全文：
The EPA stated that users of capacitors or transformers whose insulating fluids contain above 1000pp
編號：
4150
標題：
Near 90% Satisfaction Rate Marks Anniversary of Acoustic Camera Deployment for Law Enforcement
摘要：
noise control
Near 90% Satisfaction Rate Marks Anniversary of Acoustic Camera Deployment for Law Enf
全文：
Both the EPA and local governments have been receiving letters from the public every month requestin
行政院環境保護署 的其他資料集
行政院環境保護署環境保護基金附屬單位法定預算
每1年更新,43郭小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2164 | 2023-08-09 01:05:43
行政院環境保護署通訊傳播事業廢棄物再利用機構資料
每年更新更新,55李小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2633 | 2022-01-14 01:26:20
行政院環境保護署環保專案摘要資料_毒物管理
不定期更新更新,135郭先生 | 02-2311-7722 EXT.2399 | 2022-01-15 01:13:39
行政院環境保護署環境教育人員認證得採計之專業領域課程(ODS)
不定期更新更新,39盧小姐 | (03)4020789分機606 | 2023-08-09 01:05:24
行政院環境保護署毒性化學物質釋放量公開資訊
不定期更新更新,114李小姐 | (02)23257399#55318 | 2023-07-27 01:00:19
行政院環境保護署
新化學物質簡易登錄表單
不定期更新更新,37蔡先生 | 02-23257399#55723 | 2023-08-09 01:04:23
行政院環境保護署環評監督追蹤之作業架構
不定期更新更新,42陳先生 | 04-22521718#51207 | 2022-01-15 01:13:26
行政院環境保護署地方環保局環保稽查次數
每月更新更新,114謝小姐 | 02-23117722#2103 | 2022-01-14 01:21:24
行政院環境保護署臺中市重要環保統計資料
每1月更新,138顏先生 | 02-23117722#2109 | 2023-08-07 01:00:21
行政院環境保護署土壤及地下水污染管制區公告資料
每月更新更新,122賴小姐 | 02-2383-2389#8102 | 2022-01-15 01:12:32
行政院環境保護署
公民營廢棄物甲級清除機構許可資料
每1月更新,176盧小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2651 | 2023-07-27 01:03:17
行政院環境保護署廢棄物質最終處置資訊網相關新聞
每月更新更新,53許先生 | 02-2311-7722#2641 | 2022-01-14 01:24:14
行政院環境保護署廠商獲頒產品數統計(第一類)
每1月更新,87盧小姐 | 02-23117722#2943 | 2023-08-02 01:02:54
行政院環境保護署行政院環境保護署法定預算
每1年更新,55鄭小姐 | 02-23117722#2156 | 2023-08-09 01:05:49
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_南投縣_埔里站
每1時更新,166陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:57:26
行政院環境保護署
經過海岸保護區之環境影響評估報告書件
每2月更新,52黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-06 01:04:05
行政院環境保護署全國年度例行性計畫成果統計表（詳情）
不定期更新更新,139賴小姐 | 02-2383-2389#8102 | 2022-01-15 01:12:15
行政院環境保護署公告事業廢棄物清運機具資料
每月更新更新,232陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2682 | 2022-01-14 01:24:05
行政院環境保護署歷年土壤調查_環保署土壤重金屬含量調查(1公頃)
不定期更新更新,126謝小姐 | (02)23832389*8302 | 2022-01-14 01:20:18
行政院環境保護署環保專案摘要資料_資源循環
不定期更新更新,55陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-07-30 01:01:42
行政院環境保護署
環訓所年度年報彙編
每年更新更新,48湯小姐 | 03-4020789#544 | 2022-01-15 01:10:11
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_新北市_林口站
每1時更新,242陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:58:15
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_新北市_永和站
每1時更新,125陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:57:27
行政院環境保護署環評主管機關受理審查之環境影響調查報告
每2月更新,86黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-05 01:01:16
行政院環境保護署環保旅店旅館資訊
每1月更新,152林先生 | 02-23117722#2926 | 2023-07-27 01:02:28
行政院環境保護署
固定污染源戴奧辛、重金屬（鉛、鎘、汞）及氯化氫排放檢測資料
每季更新更新,261江先生 | 02-23117722#6201 | 2022-01-15 01:12:33
行政院環境保護署酸雨監測小時值(每小時提供)
每小時更新更新,77謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:05:11
行政院環境保護署環境教育課程開辦統計資料
每1月更新,44李小姐 | 02-23117722#2724 | 2023-07-30 01:04:33
行政院環境保護署歷年土壤調查_環保署土壤重金屬含量調查(25公頃)
不定期更新更新,114謝小姐 | (02)23832389*8302 | 2022-01-14 01:20:17
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_桃園市_中壢站
每1時更新,128陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:57:29
行政院環境保護署