The Many Facets of Water Pollution Controlwater2002
「The Many Facets of Water Pollution Controlwater2002」於資料集「Environmental Policy Monthly」由單位「行政院環境保護署」的楊先生所提供，聯繫電話是(02)23117722#2217,(02)23117722#2216，最近更新時間為：2022-01-15 01:13:03。 欄位編號的內容是998 ， 欄位標題的內容是The Many Facets of Water Pollution Control ， 欄位摘要的內容是Since EPA Administrator Hau Lung-bin's formal announcement at the end of last year that 2002 would be "River and Waterway Pollution Remediation Action Year" water pollution remediation has become a main focus of the EPA's administrative efforts. In addition, the revision of the Water Pollution Control Act in May of this year took a big step towards improved industrial wastewater management and the collection of water pollution fees.
The quality of water in rivers and waterways deteriorated as Taiwan's economy developed, sometimes even to the point of endangering human health. Hoping to improve the nation's water quality, the EPA has expressly declared this year "River and Waterway Pollution Remediation Action Year," and has poured massive resources into remediation work. In addition, to put water pollution control and management on a sound legal foundation, the Legislative Yuan passed the revised version of the Water Pollution Control Act (水污染防治法) in May of this year. We have therefore interviewed the EPA Bureau of Water Quality Protection in this issue, and report on the current state of River and Waterway Pollution Remediation Action Year implementation and future management policies and systems.
Waterway Remediation Efforts Underscore Government’s Determination
Rivers and waterways are the lifeblood of ecological systems. Hoping to remedy increasingly severe water pollution, EPA Administrator Hau Lung-bin declared that 2002 would be "River and Waterway Pollution Remediation Action Year," and had the EPA formulate the Taiwan River Basin and Ocean Management Program (台灣地區河川流域及海洋經營管理方案); following its approval by the Executive Yuan, this program has become the basis of the country's future river, waterway, and marine water quality management work.
To make good on River and Waterway Pollution Remediation Action Year, the EPA has selected nine rivers – the Nankan River (南崁溪), Koya River (客雅溪), Chungkang River (中港溪), Peikang River (北港溪), Putzu River (朴子溪), Chiangchun River (將軍溪), Erhjen River (二仁溪), Tienpao River (典寶溪), and Kaoping River (高屏溪) – for priority remediation work, and plans to eventually improve the quality of rivers and waterways throughout all of Taiwan.
To show the government's determination to implement the Taiwan River Basin and Ocean Management Program and clean up water pollution, the EPA alone has budgeted NT$555 million for river and waterway remediation in 2002. Of this sum, NT$371 million (67%) has been allocated for the cleanup of the nine rivers mentioned above, while the remaining NT$184 million (33%) is being used for general services and the cleanup of other rivers and waterways. The EPA plans to spend NT$795 million on river and waterway cleanup in 2003, and hopes to budget NT$600 million for this work in each of the subsequent years.
Pollution Control through Construction, Auditing, and Public Participation
Water pollution remediation efforts in Taiwan include many pollution reduction construction projects. These projects include the construction of sewage treatment facilities in drinking water source protection zones, the construction of wastewater sewer systems in river basins, the closure and revegetation of riverbed waste dumps, the establishment of ecological parks, and various restoration and conservation tasks.
Apart from the improvement of hardware and infrastructure, the implementation of environmental management audits is another essential part of water quality improvement work. For example, environmental protection and agriculture authorities have embarked on a campaign to ban hog raising in water source protection zones. Aerial and satellite imaging and computerized geographical data on hog farms are now being used to prevent hog raising from making a comeback in these sensitive areas.
Furthermore, environmental protection authorities have begun vigorously cracking down on polluters in nine river basins with severe industrial wastewater pollution problems. Taking the Tienpao River in Kaohsiung County and Nankan River in Taoyuan County as examples, pollution has been bad enough at some times to turn the water a strange color. Before commencing the recent anti-pollution campaign, Administrator Hau invited the enterprises along these rivers to meetings, announced that the government is determined to clean up pollution and requested the enterprises' cooperation. Numerous law-breaking firms have been fined and forced to shut down in the crackdown that followed, and the water quality in the Tienpao and Nankan rivers has improved significantly.
To better integrate remediation work and coordinate joint implementation by local authorities, the EPA has established cleanup task forces in 11 cities and counties along the nine rivers. According to the Bureau of Water Quality Protection, taking the Kaoping River as an example, the establishment of river basin management committees in Pingtung County, Kaohsiung City and Kaohsiung County has put remediation work on a systematic basis throughout the basin. And while water conservancy and environmental protection authorities did things in different ways during past campaigns to clean up and beautify rivers, nowadays remediation work is done using ecological-friendly methods with the dual goal of flood control and environmental protection.
But in spite of this progress, river and waterway remediation work cannot be completed by government alone. Besides appealing to the public via television to turn in illicit polluters and help the government clean up river and waterway pollution, the EPA is also assisting in the planning of school courses on rivers and waterways and the implementation of water quality and ecological monitoring projects. The EPA is sponsoring public river and waterway visits, photography sessions, and painting contests, and is encouraging private organizations to keep watch over the environment between inspections by government units.
The EPA is pleased to announce that, thanks to the joint involvement of the government and private parties, water quality in these nine rivers has improved dramatically, and the improvement of water quality in the Kaoping River has been especially noticeable. Not only have fish started reappearing in parts of the river, but the amount of chemicals needed to treat drinking water has decreased significantly.
Streamlining and Optimization of Industrial Wastewater Management
While the government actively cleans up rivers and waterways, the enactment of the revised Water Pollution Control Act during May of this year established another milestone in the nation's pollution prevention efforts.
One major change in the new Water Pollution Control Act is that water pollution discharge permit regulations will put industrial wastewater management on a more rational footing. The regulations specify that, in the future, environmental protection authorities may authorize the management of science-based industrial parks, export processing zones, and industrial park land controlled by the central competent authorities in charge of the industries in question to directly issue water pollution permits. The past application processes required enterprises to apply to several separate agencies for permits. The Bureau of Water Quality Protection says this change in administrative procedures will centralize science-based industrial park and industrial park management and significantly shorten the time needed to open new factories.
Outside of industrial parks, electroplating and metal surface processing firms that do not comply with land-use zoning regulations are finding their room to operate severely constricted after a continuous series of audits and crackdowns by environmental authorities. Unable to obtain discharge permits, many of these firms are either shutting their doors or giving binding promises to move to industrial parks within a certain period of time.
Because of the successive completion of wastewater treatment facility projects in many industrial parks, and because many plants have downsized operations due to the economic slump, the EPA has found that many industrial park wastewater treatment plants currently have a great deal of excess capacity. While environmental authorities previously allowed only parties with their own pipe systems to send their wastewater to treatment facilities in industrial parks, the EPA now seeks to capitalize on these presently underutilized water treatment resources. It is therefore taking steps to facilitate the treatment of wastewater and sewage from nearby schools, communities, and individual factories at industrial park treatment facilities. To reduce treatment costs, the EPA is also busy revising regulations governing the outsourcing of wastewater (sewage) treatment in order to allow operators to transport liquid wastes using tank trucks and other means of transportation.
As for the phenomena of factories taking advantage of irrigation canals to discharge wastewater, in the wake of the enactment of the Soil and Groundwater Pollution Remediation Act and the outbreak of many farmland pollution incidents, the EPA and Council of Agriculture (COA) have reached a consensus that legislation must be enacted in the future to explicitly forbid the use of dedicated irrigation canals for the discharge of wastewater.
Effluent Discharge Fees Provide Incentives for Pollution Reduction
Another main purpose of revising the Water Pollution Control Act is to provide for the collection of water pollution fees – a matter of considerable concern for industry. The revised act specifies that water pollution prevention fees shall be collected according to the quality and amount of discharged wastewater from households, wastewater sewer systems, and businesses that discharge wastewater (sewage) into bodies of surface water. The money obtained in this manner will be put into a special fund for exclusive use for the remediation of surface water pollution, the improvement of water quality in drinking water protection zones, and the construction of public wastewater sewage systems. Apart from being held responsible for interest on back payments, users who fail to pay water pollution fees on time will be subject to fines and will be ordered by the courts to make payments.
In accordance with a Legislative Yuan resolution on the subject, water pollution fees will be collected first from specific types of firms – including the most severe polluters – during the initial period, and further consideration will be given to collecting fees from ordinary households at a further point in time. The EPA will complete deployment of relevant systems within a year's time.
The Bureau of Water Quality Protection reminds readers that the EPA announced the Effluent Discharge Fee Collection Regulations (廢(污)水排放收費辦法) as early 1998. To provide a solid basis for a water pollution fee system, the EPA will in the future revise these regulations based on the framework of the original regulations, the recent revision of the Water Pollution Control Act, and various parties' views concerning the fees.
Apart from the revision of fee collection regulations, the determination of fee rates is yet another great challenge. Planned fee items currently include chemical oxygen demand (COD), suspended solids, heavy metals, cyanide compounds, total phosphorus, total nitrogen, organic halogen compounds, and phenolic derivatives. In addition, different pollution fee calculation regulations may be established in light of the particular characteristics of specific industries.
To smoothly establish effective water pollution fee collection mechanisms, this year the Bureau of Water Quality Protection commissioned National Taiwan University to perform a full-scale study of fee collection mechanisms, laws and rates, etc., and provide its recommendations. Furthermore, the views of all interested parties will be collected and used to guide the drafting and revision of relevant laws and regulations.
The Bureau of Water Quality Protection emphasizes that the purpose of the water pollution fee system is to provide economic incentives for the reduction of pollution output, while the money collected by the system will be used exclusively for water pollution prevention tasks. The system will consequently have an extremely great impact on water pollution prevention work in Taiwan. The EPA is taking a fully open and transparent approach to the formulation of water pollution fee collection regulations and fee rates, and hopes that thoroughgoing discussion with interested parties will allow the implementation of a fair and effective fee collection system compatible with the principle of sustainable development.
Caption: EPA Administrator Hau Lung-bin has made river and waterway pollution remediation a major focus of the EPA's administrative efforts in 2002. ， 欄位全文的內容是Since EPA Administrator Hau Lung-bin's formal announcement at the end of last year that 2002 would be "River and Waterway Pollution Remediation Action Year" water pollution remediation has become a main focus of the EPA's administrative efforts. In addition, the revision of the Water Pollution Control Act in May of this year took a big step towards improved industrial wastewater management and the collection of water pollution fees.
The quality of water in rivers and waterways deteriorated as Taiwan's economy developed, sometimes even to the point of endangering human health. Hoping to improve the nation's water quality, the EPA has expressly declared this year "River and Waterway Pollution Remediation Action Year," and has poured massive resources into remediation work. In addition, to put water pollution control and management on a sound legal foundation, the Legislative Yuan passed the revised version of the Water Pollution Control Act (水污染防治法) in May of this year. We have therefore interviewed the EPA Bureau of Water Quality Protection in this issue, and report on the current state of River and Waterway Pollution Remediation Action Year implementation and future management policies and systems.
Waterway Remediation Efforts Underscore Government’s Determination
Rivers and waterways are the lifeblood of ecological systems. Hoping to remedy increasingly severe water pollution, EPA Administrator Hau Lung-bin declared that 2002 would be "River and Waterway Pollution Remediation Action Year," and had the EPA formulate the Taiwan River Basin and Ocean Management Program (台灣地區河川流域及海洋經營管理方案); following its approval by the Executive Yuan, this program has become the basis of the country's future river, waterway, and marine water quality management work.
To make good on River and Waterway Pollution Remediation Action Year, the EPA has selected nine rivers – the Nankan River (南崁溪), Koya River (客雅溪), Chungkang River (中港溪), Peikang River (北港溪), Putzu River (朴子溪), Chiangchun River (將軍溪), Erhjen River (二仁溪), Tienpao River (典寶溪), and Kaoping River (高屏溪) – for priority remediation work, and plans to eventually improve the quality of rivers and waterways throughout all of Taiwan.
To show the government's determination to implement the Taiwan River Basin and Ocean Management Program and clean up water pollution, the EPA alone has budgeted NT$555 million for river and waterway remediation in 2002. Of this sum, NT$371 million (67%) has been allocated for the cleanup of the nine rivers mentioned above, while the remaining NT$184 million (33%) is being used for general services and the cleanup of other rivers and waterways. The EPA plans to spend NT$795 million on river and waterway cleanup in 2003, and hopes to budget NT$600 million for this work in each of the subsequent years.
Pollution Control through Construction, Auditing, and Public Participation
Water pollution remediation efforts in Taiwan include many pollution reduction construction projects. These projects include the construction of sewage treatment facilities in drinking water source protection zones, the construction of wastewater sewer systems in river basins, the closure and revegetation of riverbed waste dumps, the establishment of ecological parks, and various restoration and conservation tasks.
Apart from the improvement of hardware and infrastructure, the implementation of environmental management audits is another essential part of water quality improvement work. For example, environmental protection and agriculture authorities have embarked on a campaign to ban hog raising in water source protection zones. Aerial and satellite imaging and computerized geographical data on hog farms are now being used to prevent hog raising from making a comeback in these sensitive areas.
Furthermore, environmental protection authorities have begun vigorously cracking down on polluters in nine river basins with severe industrial wastewater pollution problems. Taking the Tienpao River in Kaohsiung County and Nankan River in Taoyuan County as examples, pollution has been bad enough at some times to turn the water a strange color. Before commencing the recent anti-pollution campaign, Administrator Hau invited the enterprises along these rivers to meetings, announced that the government is determined to clean up pollution and requested the enterprises' cooperation. Numerous law-breaking firms have been fined and forced to shut down in the crackdown that followed, and the water quality in the Tienpao and Nankan rivers has improved significantly.
To better integrate remediation work and coordinate joint implementation by local authorities, the EPA has established cleanup task forces in 11 cities and counties along the nine rivers. According to the Bureau of Water Quality Protection, taking the Kaoping River as an example, the establishment of river basin management committees in Pingtung County, Kaohsiung City and Kaohsiung County has put remediation work on a systematic basis throughout the basin. And while water conservancy and environmental protection authorities did things in different ways during past campaigns to clean up and beautify rivers, nowadays remediation work is done using ecological-friendly methods with the dual goal of flood control and environmental protection.
But in spite of this progress, river and waterway remediation work cannot be completed by government alone. Besides appealing to the public via television to turn in illicit polluters and help the government clean up river and waterway pollution, the EPA is also assisting in the planning of school courses on rivers and waterways and the implementation of water quality and ecological monitoring projects. The EPA is sponsoring public river and waterway visits, photography sessions, and painting contests, and is encouraging private organizations to keep watch over the environment between inspections by government units.
The EPA is pleased to announce that, thanks to the joint involvement of the government and private parties, water quality in these nine rivers has improved dramatically, and the improvement of water quality in the Kaoping River has been especially noticeable. Not only have fish started reappearing in parts of the river, but the amount of chemicals needed to treat drinking water has decreased significantly.
Streamlining and Optimization of Industrial Wastewater Management
While the government actively cleans up rivers and waterways, the enactment of the revised Water Pollution Control Act during May of this year established another milestone in the nation's pollution prevention efforts.
One major change in the new Water Pollution Control Act is that water pollution discharge permit regulations will put industrial wastewater management on a more rational footing. The regulations specify that, in the future, environmental protection authorities may authorize the management of science-based industrial parks, export processing zones, and industrial park land controlled by the central competent authorities in charge of the industries in question to directly issue water pollution permits. The past application processes required enterprises to apply to several separate agencies for permits. The Bureau of Water Quality Protection says this change in administrative procedures will centralize science-based industrial park and industrial park management and significantly shorten the time needed to open new factories.
Outside of industrial parks, electroplating and metal surface processing firms that do not comply with land-use zoning regulations are finding their room to operate severely constricted after a continuous series of audits and crackdowns by environmental authorities. Unable to obtain discharge permits, many of these firms are either shutting their doors or giving binding promises to move to industrial parks within a certain period of time.
Because of the successive completion of wastewater treatment facility projects in many industrial parks, and because many plants have downsized operations due to the economic slump, the EPA has found that many industrial park wastewater treatment plants currently have a great deal of excess capacity. While environmental authorities previously allowed only parties with their own pipe systems to send their wastewater to treatment facilities in industrial parks, the EPA now seeks to capitalize on these presently underutilized water treatment resources. It is therefore taking steps to facilitate the treatment of wastewater and sewage from nearby schools, communities, and individual factories at industrial park treatment facilities. To reduce treatment costs, the EPA is also busy revising regulations governing the outsourcing of wastewater (sewage) treatment in order to allow operators to transport liquid wastes using tank trucks and other means of transportation.
As for the phenomena of factories taking advantage of irrigation canals to discharge wastewater, in the wake of the enactment of the Soil and Groundwater Pollution Remediation Act and the outbreak of many farmland pollution incidents, the EPA and Council of Agriculture (COA) have reached a consensus that legislation must be enacted in the future to explicitly forbid the use of dedicated irrigation canals for the discharge of wastewater.
Effluent Discharge Fees Provide Incentives for Pollution Reduction
Another main purpose of revising the Water Pollution Control Act is to provide for the collection of water pollution fees – a matter of considerable concern for industry. The revised act specifies that water pollution prevention fees shall be collected according to the quality and amount of discharged wastewater from households, wastewater sewer systems, and businesses that discharge wastewater (sewage) into bodies of surface water. The money obtained in this manner will be put into a special fund for exclusive use for the remediation of surface water pollution, the improvement of water quality in drinking water protection zones, and the construction of public wastewater sewage systems. Apart from being held responsible for interest on back payments, users who fail to pay water pollution fees on time will be subject to fines and will be ordered by the courts to make payments.
In accordance with a Legislative Yuan resolution on the subject, water pollution fees will be collected first from specific types of firms – including the most severe polluters – during the initial period, and further consideration will be given to collecting fees from ordinary households at a further point in time. The EPA will complete deployment of relevant systems within a year's time.
The Bureau of Water Quality Protection reminds readers that the EPA announced the Effluent Discharge Fee Collection Regulations (廢(污)水排放收費辦法) as early 1998. To provide a solid basis for a water pollution fee system, the EPA will in the future revise these regulations based on the framework of the original regulations, the recent revision of the Water Pollution Control Act, and various parties' views concerning the fees.
Apart from the revision of fee collection regulations, the determination of fee rates is yet another great challenge. Planned fee items currently include chemical oxygen demand (COD), suspended solids, heavy metals, cyanide compounds, total phosphorus, total nitrogen, organic halogen compounds, and phenolic derivatives. In addition, different pollution fee calculation regulations may be established in light of the particular characteristics of specific industries.
To smoothly establish effective water pollution fee collection mechanisms, this year the Bureau of Water Quality Protection commissioned National Taiwan University to perform a full-scale study of fee collection mechanisms, laws and rates, etc., and provide its recommendations. Furthermore, the views of all interested parties will be collected and used to guide the drafting and revision of relevant laws and regulations.
The Bureau of Water Quality Protection emphasizes that the purpose of the water pollution fee system is to provide economic incentives for the reduction of pollution output, while the money collected by the system will be used exclusively for water pollution prevention tasks. The system will consequently have an extremely great impact on water pollution prevention work in Taiwan. The EPA is taking a fully open and transparent approach to the formulation of water pollution fee collection regulations and fee rates, and hopes that thoroughgoing discussion with interested parties will allow the implementation of a fair and effective fee collection system compatible with the principle of sustainable development.
Caption: EPA Administrator Hau Lung-bin has made river and waterway pollution remediation a major focus of the EPA's administrative efforts in 2002. ， 欄位年度的內容是2002 ， 欄位月份的內容是5 ， 欄位卷的內容是5 ， 欄位期的內容是8 ， 欄位順序的內容是1 ， 欄位倒序的內容是2 ， 欄位分類的內容是water ， 欄位標題2的內容是The Many Facets of Water Pollution Control ， 欄位檔案位置的內容是print/V5/V5-08 。
編號
998
標題
The Many Facets of Water Pollution Control
摘要
Since EPA Administrator Hau Lung-bin's formal announcement at the end of last year that 2002 would be "River and Waterway Pollution Remediation Action Year" water pollution remediation has become a main focus of the EPA's administrative efforts. In addition, the revision of the Water Pollution Control Act in May of this year took a big step towards improved industrial wastewater management and the collection of water pollution fees. The quality of water in rivers and waterways deteriorated as Taiwan's economy developed, sometimes even to the point of endangering human health. Hoping to improve the nation's water quality, the EPA has expressly declared this year "River and Waterway Pollution Remediation Action Year," and has poured massive resources into remediation work. In addition, to put water pollution control and management on a sound legal foundation, the Legislative Yuan passed the revised version of the Water Pollution Control Act (水污染防治法) in May of this year. We have therefore interviewed the EPA Bureau of Water Quality Protection in this issue, and report on the current state of River and Waterway Pollution Remediation Action Year implementation and future management policies and systems. Waterway Remediation Efforts Underscore Government’s Determination Rivers and waterways are the lifeblood of ecological systems. Hoping to remedy increasingly severe water pollution, EPA Administrator Hau Lung-bin declared that 2002 would be "River and Waterway Pollution Remediation Action Year," and had the EPA formulate the Taiwan River Basin and Ocean Management Program (台灣地區河川流域及海洋經營管理方案); following its approval by the Executive Yuan, this program has become the basis of the country's future river, waterway, and marine water quality management work. To make good on River and Waterway Pollution Remediation Action Year, the EPA has selected nine rivers – the Nankan River (南崁溪), Koya River (客雅溪), Chungkang River (中港溪), Peikang River (北港溪), Putzu River (朴子溪), Chiangchun River (將軍溪), Erhjen River (二仁溪), Tienpao River (典寶溪), and Kaoping River (高屏溪) – for priority remediation work, and plans to eventually improve the quality of rivers and waterways throughout all of Taiwan. To show the government's determination to implement the Taiwan River Basin and Ocean Management Program and clean up water pollution, the EPA alone has budgeted NT$555 million for river and waterway remediation in 2002. Of this sum, NT$371 million (67%) has been allocated for the cleanup of the nine rivers mentioned above, while the remaining NT$184 million (33%) is being used for general services and the cleanup of other rivers and waterways. The EPA plans to spend NT$795 million on river and waterway cleanup in 2003, and hopes to budget NT$600 million for this work in each of the subsequent years. Pollution Control through Construction, Auditing, and Public Participation Water pollution remediation efforts in Taiwan include many pollution reduction construction projects. These projects include the construction of sewage treatment facilities in drinking water source protection zones, the construction of wastewater sewer systems in river basins, the closure and revegetation of riverbed waste dumps, the establishment of ecological parks, and various restoration and conservation tasks. Apart from the improvement of hardware and infrastructure, the implementation of environmental management audits is another essential part of water quality improvement work. For example, environmental protection and agriculture authorities have embarked on a campaign to ban hog raising in water source protection zones. Aerial and satellite imaging and computerized geographical data on hog farms are now being used to prevent hog raising from making a comeback in these sensitive areas. Furthermore, environmental protection authorities have begun vigorously cracking down on polluters in nine river basins with severe industrial wastewater pollution problems. Taking the Tienpao River in Kaohsiung County and Nankan River in Taoyuan County as examples, pollution has been bad enough at some times to turn the water a strange color. Before commencing the recent anti-pollution campaign, Administrator Hau invited the enterprises along these rivers to meetings, announced that the government is determined to clean up pollution and requested the enterprises' cooperation. Numerous law-breaking firms have been fined and forced to shut down in the crackdown that followed, and the water quality in the Tienpao and Nankan rivers has improved significantly. To better integrate remediation work and coordinate joint implementation by local authorities, the EPA has established cleanup task forces in 11 cities and counties along the nine rivers. According to the Bureau of Water Quality Protection, taking the Kaoping River as an example, the establishment of river basin management committees in Pingtung County, Kaohsiung City and Kaohsiung County has put remediation work on a systematic basis throughout the basin. And while water conservancy and environmental protection authorities did things in different ways during past campaigns to clean up and beautify rivers, nowadays remediation work is done using ecological-friendly methods with the dual goal of flood control and environmental protection. But in spite of this progress, river and waterway remediation work cannot be completed by government alone. Besides appealing to the public via television to turn in illicit polluters and help the government clean up river and waterway pollution, the EPA is also assisting in the planning of school courses on rivers and waterways and the implementation of water quality and ecological monitoring projects. The EPA is sponsoring public river and waterway visits, photography sessions, and painting contests, and is encouraging private organizations to keep watch over the environment between inspections by government units. The EPA is pleased to announce that, thanks to the joint involvement of the government and private parties, water quality in these nine rivers has improved dramatically, and the improvement of water quality in the Kaoping River has been especially noticeable. Not only have fish started reappearing in parts of the river, but the amount of chemicals needed to treat drinking water has decreased significantly. Streamlining and Optimization of Industrial Wastewater Management While the government actively cleans up rivers and waterways, the enactment of the revised Water Pollution Control Act during May of this year established another milestone in the nation's pollution prevention efforts. One major change in the new Water Pollution Control Act is that water pollution discharge permit regulations will put industrial wastewater management on a more rational footing. The regulations specify that, in the future, environmental protection authorities may authorize the management of science-based industrial parks, export processing zones, and industrial park land controlled by the central competent authorities in charge of the industries in question to directly issue water pollution permits. The past application processes required enterprises to apply to several separate agencies for permits. The Bureau of Water Quality Protection says this change in administrative procedures will centralize science-based industrial park and industrial park management and significantly shorten the time needed to open new factories. Outside of industrial parks, electroplating and metal surface processing firms that do not comply with land-use zoning regulations are finding their room to operate severely constricted after a continuous series of audits and crackdowns by environmental authorities. Unable to obtain discharge permits, many of these firms are either shutting their doors or giving binding promises to move to industrial parks within a certain period of time. Because of the successive completion of wastewater treatment facility projects in many industrial parks, and because many plants have downsized operations due to the economic slump, the EPA has found that many industrial park wastewater treatment plants currently have a great deal of excess capacity. While environmental authorities previously allowed only parties with their own pipe systems to send their wastewater to treatment facilities in industrial parks, the EPA now seeks to capitalize on these presently underutilized water treatment resources. It is therefore taking steps to facilitate the treatment of wastewater and sewage from nearby schools, communities, and individual factories at industrial park treatment facilities. To reduce treatment costs, the EPA is also busy revising regulations governing the outsourcing of wastewater (sewage) treatment in order to allow operators to transport liquid wastes using tank trucks and other means of transportation. As for the phenomena of factories taking advantage of irrigation canals to discharge wastewater, in the wake of the enactment of the Soil and Groundwater Pollution Remediation Act and the outbreak of many farmland pollution incidents, the EPA and Council of Agriculture (COA) have reached a consensus that legislation must be enacted in the future to explicitly forbid the use of dedicated irrigation canals for the discharge of wastewater. Effluent Discharge Fees Provide Incentives for Pollution Reduction Another main purpose of revising the Water Pollution Control Act is to provide for the collection of water pollution fees – a matter of considerable concern for industry. The revised act specifies that water pollution prevention fees shall be collected according to the quality and amount of discharged wastewater from households, wastewater sewer systems, and businesses that discharge wastewater (sewage) into bodies of surface water. The money obtained in this manner will be put into a special fund for exclusive use for the remediation of surface water pollution, the improvement of water quality in drinking water protection zones, and the construction of public wastewater sewage systems. Apart from being held responsible for interest on back payments, users who fail to pay water pollution fees on time will be subject to fines and will be ordered by the courts to make payments. In accordance with a Legislative Yuan resolution on the subject, water pollution fees will be collected first from specific types of firms – including the most severe polluters – during the initial period, and further consideration will be given to collecting fees from ordinary households at a further point in time. The EPA will complete deployment of relevant systems within a year's time. The Bureau of Water Quality Protection reminds readers that the EPA announced the Effluent Discharge Fee Collection Regulations (廢(污)水排放收費辦法) as early 1998. To provide a solid basis for a water pollution fee system, the EPA will in the future revise these regulations based on the framework of the original regulations, the recent revision of the Water Pollution Control Act, and various parties' views concerning the fees. Apart from the revision of fee collection regulations, the determination of fee rates is yet another great challenge. Planned fee items currently include chemical oxygen demand (COD), suspended solids, heavy metals, cyanide compounds, total phosphorus, total nitrogen, organic halogen compounds, and phenolic derivatives. In addition, different pollution fee calculation regulations may be established in light of the particular characteristics of specific industries. To smoothly establish effective water pollution fee collection mechanisms, this year the Bureau of Water Quality Protection commissioned National Taiwan University to perform a full-scale study of fee collection mechanisms, laws and rates, etc., and provide its recommendations. Furthermore, the views of all interested parties will be collected and used to guide the drafting and revision of relevant laws and regulations. The Bureau of Water Quality Protection emphasizes that the purpose of the water pollution fee system is to provide economic incentives for the reduction of pollution output, while the money collected by the system will be used exclusively for water pollution prevention tasks. The system will consequently have an extremely great impact on water pollution prevention work in Taiwan. The EPA is taking a fully open and transparent approach to the formulation of water pollution fee collection regulations and fee rates, and hopes that thoroughgoing discussion with interested parties will allow the implementation of a fair and effective fee collection system compatible with the principle of sustainable development. Caption: EPA Administrator Hau Lung-bin has made river and waterway pollution remediation a major focus of the EPA's administrative efforts in 2002.
全文
Since EPA Administrator Hau Lung-bin's formal announcement at the end of last year that 2002 would be "River and Waterway Pollution Remediation Action Year" water pollution remediation has become a main focus of the EPA's administrative efforts. In addition, the revision of the Water Pollution Control Act in May of this year took a big step towards improved industrial wastewater management and the collection of water pollution fees. The quality of water in rivers and waterways deteriorated as Taiwan's economy developed, sometimes even to the point of endangering human health. Hoping to improve the nation's water quality, the EPA has expressly declared this year "River and Waterway Pollution Remediation Action Year," and has poured massive resources into remediation work. In addition, to put water pollution control and management on a sound legal foundation, the Legislative Yuan passed the revised version of the Water Pollution Control Act (水污染防治法) in May of this year. We have therefore interviewed the EPA Bureau of Water Quality Protection in this issue, and report on the current state of River and Waterway Pollution Remediation Action Year implementation and future management policies and systems. Waterway Remediation Efforts Underscore Government’s Determination Rivers and waterways are the lifeblood of ecological systems. Hoping to remedy increasingly severe water pollution, EPA Administrator Hau Lung-bin declared that 2002 would be "River and Waterway Pollution Remediation Action Year," and had the EPA formulate the Taiwan River Basin and Ocean Management Program (台灣地區河川流域及海洋經營管理方案); following its approval by the Executive Yuan, this program has become the basis of the country's future river, waterway, and marine water quality management work. To make good on River and Waterway Pollution Remediation Action Year, the EPA has selected nine rivers – the Nankan River (南崁溪), Koya River (客雅溪), Chungkang River (中港溪), Peikang River (北港溪), Putzu River (朴子溪), Chiangchun River (將軍溪), Erhjen River (二仁溪), Tienpao River (典寶溪), and Kaoping River (高屏溪) – for priority remediation work, and plans to eventually improve the quality of rivers and waterways throughout all of Taiwan. To show the government's determination to implement the Taiwan River Basin and Ocean Management Program and clean up water pollution, the EPA alone has budgeted NT$555 million for river and waterway remediation in 2002. Of this sum, NT$371 million (67%) has been allocated for the cleanup of the nine rivers mentioned above, while the remaining NT$184 million (33%) is being used for general services and the cleanup of other rivers and waterways. The EPA plans to spend NT$795 million on river and waterway cleanup in 2003, and hopes to budget NT$600 million for this work in each of the subsequent years. Pollution Control through Construction, Auditing, and Public Participation Water pollution remediation efforts in Taiwan include many pollution reduction construction projects. These projects include the construction of sewage treatment facilities in drinking water source protection zones, the construction of wastewater sewer systems in river basins, the closure and revegetation of riverbed waste dumps, the establishment of ecological parks, and various restoration and conservation tasks. Apart from the improvement of hardware and infrastructure, the implementation of environmental management audits is another essential part of water quality improvement work. For example, environmental protection and agriculture authorities have embarked on a campaign to ban hog raising in water source protection zones. Aerial and satellite imaging and computerized geographical data on hog farms are now being used to prevent hog raising from making a comeback in these sensitive areas. Furthermore, environmental protection authorities have begun vigorously cracking down on polluters in nine river basins with severe industrial wastewater pollution problems. Taking the Tienpao River in Kaohsiung County and Nankan River in Taoyuan County as examples, pollution has been bad enough at some times to turn the water a strange color. Before commencing the recent anti-pollution campaign, Administrator Hau invited the enterprises along these rivers to meetings, announced that the government is determined to clean up pollution and requested the enterprises' cooperation. Numerous law-breaking firms have been fined and forced to shut down in the crackdown that followed, and the water quality in the Tienpao and Nankan rivers has improved significantly. To better integrate remediation work and coordinate joint implementation by local authorities, the EPA has established cleanup task forces in 11 cities and counties along the nine rivers. According to the Bureau of Water Quality Protection, taking the Kaoping River as an example, the establishment of river basin management committees in Pingtung County, Kaohsiung City and Kaohsiung County has put remediation work on a systematic basis throughout the basin. And while water conservancy and environmental protection authorities did things in different ways during past campaigns to clean up and beautify rivers, nowadays remediation work is done using ecological-friendly methods with the dual goal of flood control and environmental protection. But in spite of this progress, river and waterway remediation work cannot be completed by government alone. Besides appealing to the public via television to turn in illicit polluters and help the government clean up river and waterway pollution, the EPA is also assisting in the planning of school courses on rivers and waterways and the implementation of water quality and ecological monitoring projects. The EPA is sponsoring public river and waterway visits, photography sessions, and painting contests, and is encouraging private organizations to keep watch over the environment between inspections by government units. The EPA is pleased to announce that, thanks to the joint involvement of the government and private parties, water quality in these nine rivers has improved dramatically, and the improvement of water quality in the Kaoping River has been especially noticeable. Not only have fish started reappearing in parts of the river, but the amount of chemicals needed to treat drinking water has decreased significantly. Streamlining and Optimization of Industrial Wastewater Management While the government actively cleans up rivers and waterways, the enactment of the revised Water Pollution Control Act during May of this year established another milestone in the nation's pollution prevention efforts. One major change in the new Water Pollution Control Act is that water pollution discharge permit regulations will put industrial wastewater management on a more rational footing. The regulations specify that, in the future, environmental protection authorities may authorize the management of science-based industrial parks, export processing zones, and industrial park land controlled by the central competent authorities in charge of the industries in question to directly issue water pollution permits. The past application processes required enterprises to apply to several separate agencies for permits. The Bureau of Water Quality Protection says this change in administrative procedures will centralize science-based industrial park and industrial park management and significantly shorten the time needed to open new factories. Outside of industrial parks, electroplating and metal surface processing firms that do not comply with land-use zoning regulations are finding their room to operate severely constricted after a continuous series of audits and crackdowns by environmental authorities. Unable to obtain discharge permits, many of these firms are either shutting their doors or giving binding promises to move to industrial parks within a certain period of time. Because of the successive completion of wastewater treatment facility projects in many industrial parks, and because many plants have downsized operations due to the economic slump, the EPA has found that many industrial park wastewater treatment plants currently have a great deal of excess capacity. While environmental authorities previously allowed only parties with their own pipe systems to send their wastewater to treatment facilities in industrial parks, the EPA now seeks to capitalize on these presently underutilized water treatment resources. It is therefore taking steps to facilitate the treatment of wastewater and sewage from nearby schools, communities, and individual factories at industrial park treatment facilities. To reduce treatment costs, the EPA is also busy revising regulations governing the outsourcing of wastewater (sewage) treatment in order to allow operators to transport liquid wastes using tank trucks and other means of transportation. As for the phenomena of factories taking advantage of irrigation canals to discharge wastewater, in the wake of the enactment of the Soil and Groundwater Pollution Remediation Act and the outbreak of many farmland pollution incidents, the EPA and Council of Agriculture (COA) have reached a consensus that legislation must be enacted in the future to explicitly forbid the use of dedicated irrigation canals for the discharge of wastewater. Effluent Discharge Fees Provide Incentives for Pollution Reduction Another main purpose of revising the Water Pollution Control Act is to provide for the collection of water pollution fees – a matter of considerable concern for industry. The revised act specifies that water pollution prevention fees shall be collected according to the quality and amount of discharged wastewater from households, wastewater sewer systems, and businesses that discharge wastewater (sewage) into bodies of surface water. The money obtained in this manner will be put into a special fund for exclusive use for the remediation of surface water pollution, the improvement of water quality in drinking water protection zones, and the construction of public wastewater sewage systems. Apart from being held responsible for interest on back payments, users who fail to pay water pollution fees on time will be subject to fines and will be ordered by the courts to make payments. In accordance with a Legislative Yuan resolution on the subject, water pollution fees will be collected first from specific types of firms – including the most severe polluters – during the initial period, and further consideration will be given to collecting fees from ordinary households at a further point in time. The EPA will complete deployment of relevant systems within a year's time. The Bureau of Water Quality Protection reminds readers that the EPA announced the Effluent Discharge Fee Collection Regulations (廢(污)水排放收費辦法) as early 1998. To provide a solid basis for a water pollution fee system, the EPA will in the future revise these regulations based on the framework of the original regulations, the recent revision of the Water Pollution Control Act, and various parties' views concerning the fees. Apart from the revision of fee collection regulations, the determination of fee rates is yet another great challenge. Planned fee items currently include chemical oxygen demand (COD), suspended solids, heavy metals, cyanide compounds, total phosphorus, total nitrogen, organic halogen compounds, and phenolic derivatives. In addition, different pollution fee calculation regulations may be established in light of the particular characteristics of specific industries. To smoothly establish effective water pollution fee collection mechanisms, this year the Bureau of Water Quality Protection commissioned National Taiwan University to perform a full-scale study of fee collection mechanisms, laws and rates, etc., and provide its recommendations. Furthermore, the views of all interested parties will be collected and used to guide the drafting and revision of relevant laws and regulations. The Bureau of Water Quality Protection emphasizes that the purpose of the water pollution fee system is to provide economic incentives for the reduction of pollution output, while the money collected by the system will be used exclusively for water pollution prevention tasks. The system will consequently have an extremely great impact on water pollution prevention work in Taiwan. The EPA is taking a fully open and transparent approach to the formulation of water pollution fee collection regulations and fee rates, and hopes that thoroughgoing discussion with interested parties will allow the implementation of a fair and effective fee collection system compatible with the principle of sustainable development. Caption: EPA Administrator Hau Lung-bin has made river and waterway pollution remediation a major focus of the EPA's administrative efforts in 2002.
年度
2002
月份
5
卷
5
期
8
順序
1
倒序
2
分類
water
標題2
The Many Facets of Water Pollution Control
檔案位置
print/V5/V5-08
「The Many Facets of Water Pollution Controlwater2002」所屬的資料集：「Environmental Policy Monthly」的其他資料
編號：
798
標題：
Eight Measures for Improving EIA Reviews
摘要：
The lack of efficiency in conducting environmental impact assessment reviews has draw attention from
全文：
The lack of efficiency in conducting environmental impact assessment reviews has draw attention from
編號：
694
標題：
Tests Show Marine Water Quality Good Around Coastal Aquaculture
摘要：
Media reports of coastal oyster farms being polluted has captured the attention of Taiwanese society
全文：
Media reports of coastal oyster farms being polluted has captured the attention of Taiwanese society
編號：
886
標題：
Feature Article: Bureau of Environmental Monitoring and Data Processing: The EPA’s Information Clear
摘要：
Many of the EPA’s services are intimately connected with everyday life. For instance the EPA’s daily
全文：
Many of the EPA’s services are intimately connected with everyday life. For instance the EPA’s daily
編號：
542
標題：
Environment Opened as Alternative to Military Service
摘要：
As a means to shore up environmental protection human resources environmental protection has been sp
全文：
As a means to shore up environmental protection human resources environmental protection has been sp
編號：
1001
標題：
Economic Processing Zone Administration to Review Waste Disposal Plans
摘要：
To simplify industrial waste disposal plan review procedures on August 13 the EPA formally commissio
全文：
To simplify industrial waste disposal plan review procedures on August 13 the EPA formally commissio
編號：
558
標題：
EPA Drafts Supporting Laws for Marine Pollution Control Act
摘要：
While the draft Marine Pollution Control Act is under review by the Legislative Yuan the EPA has beg
全文：
While the draft Marine Pollution Control Act is under review by the Legislative Yuan the EPA has beg
編號：
955
標題：
Marine Pollution Emergency Response System Activated Due to Disabled Oil Tanker
摘要：
Having suffered mechanical problems in Japanese waters on May 2 an oil tanker fully loaded with crud
全文：
Having suffered mechanical problems in Japanese waters on May 2 an oil tanker fully loaded with crud
編號：
442
標題：
EPA Composes White Paper on 25 Years of Water Quality Protection
摘要：
As a means of using history to look into the future the EPA has begun composition of a "White Paper
全文：
As a means of using history to look into the future the EPA has begun composition of a "White Paper
編號：
3269
標題：
Toxic Chemicals Management and POP Restrictions
摘要：
Toxic Substance Toxic Chemicals Management and POP Restrictions To minimize the long-term harmful e
全文：
Toxic Chemicals Management and POP Restrictions
編號：
994
標題：
Reporting of Toxic Chemical Substances Allowed over Internet
摘要：
The online reporting of toxic chemical substances allowed by the EPA since July 1, will not only mak
全文：
The online reporting of toxic chemical substances allowed by the EPA since July 1, will not only mak
編號：
195
標題：
EPA to Review Eco-Label System Inline with ISO Standards
摘要：
With ISO 14020 approval expected before year-end Green Mark Committee members have recommended that
全文：
With ISO 14020 approval expected before year-end Green Mark Committee members have recommended that
編號：
516
標題：
Total Pollution Quantity Controls Promoted in Kao-Ping Air Quality District
摘要：
Due to the relatively poor air quality in the Kaohsiung-Pingtung area the EPA has decided to initiat
全文：
Due to the relatively poor air quality in the Kaohsiung-Pingtung area the EPA has decided to initiat
編號：
479
標題：
Post-Disaster Emergency Construction Projects Exempted from Air Pollution Fee
摘要：
On December 15 the EPA modified the Regulations Governing the Collection of Air Pollution Control Fe
全文：
On December 15 the EPA modified the Regulations Governing the Collection of Air Pollution Control Fe
編號：
932
標題：
Green Mark Standards to be Set for Mobile Phones and Other Products
摘要：
The EPA hired a professional organization to perform a product survey in order to better understand
全文：
The EPA hired a professional organization to perform a product survey in order to better understand
編號：
451
標題：
Waste Glass Cleared for Reuse as Construction Material
摘要：
The EPA recently released revised standards for factories recycling waste containers which now permi
全文：
The EPA recently released revised standards for factories recycling waste containers which now permi
編號：
522
標題：
Drinking Water Safety Promoted On-line
摘要：
The EPA recently announced that the "Drinking Water Management Information System" has been formally
全文：
The EPA recently announced that the "Drinking Water Management Information System" has been formally
編號：
788
標題：
NIR Monitoring Results for Base Stations Released
摘要：
On July 24 the EPA released the first set of monitoring data on levels of non-ionizing radiation gen
全文：
On July 24 the EPA released the first set of monitoring data on levels of non-ionizing radiation gen
編號：
335
標題：
EPA Developing Plans for Large-Scale Groundwater Survey
摘要：
The EPA is pressing for the development of plans to conduct a large-scale subsurface survey to asses
全文：
The EPA is pressing for the development of plans to conduct a large-scale subsurface survey to asses
編號：
231
標題：
Feature Article Feature Article:Industrial Waste Control Center Plan Moves Forward
摘要：
In 1996 an industrial waste management center was established and in August of this year, an industr
全文：
In 1996 an industrial waste management center was established and in August of this year, an industr
編號：
165
標題：
Methane to be Eliminated from VOC Standards
摘要：
As methane is not a precursor of ozone and related testing techniques are already mature the EPA rec
全文：
As methane is not a precursor of ozone and related testing techniques are already mature the EPA rec
編號：
760
標題：
Confirming Scrap Rubber and Kitchen Waste Reuse Methods
摘要：
The EPA announced in May that it has revised and expanded some items in General Industrial Waste Reu
全文：
The EPA announced in May that it has revised and expanded some items in General Industrial Waste Reu
編號：
592
標題：
EPA To Set Recycling Guidelines for Fast Food Industry
摘要：
The pollution problems arising from fast food consumption are receiving greater attention. Because f
全文：
The pollution problems arising from fast food consumption are receiving greater attention. Because f
編號：
40
標題：
Effluent Standards to be Substantially Amended
摘要：
Water Quality The EPA has recently made several significant amendments to Taiwan’s Effluent Standar
全文：
Water Quality The EPA has recently made several significant amendments to Taiwan’s Effluent Standar
編號：
126
標題：
Discarded Tires and Waste Lubricants to be Used as Fuel
摘要：
Recycling On March 2 1998, the EPA announced discarded tire and waste lubricant “resource factories
全文：
Recycling On March 2 1998, the EPA announced discarded tire and waste lubricant “resource factories
編號：
747
標題：
EPA Targets Container Industry to Reduce Evasion of Recycling Fees
摘要：
The PET Container Recycling Fund has been operating at a loss for a long period of time. After takin
全文：
The PET Container Recycling Fund has been operating at a loss for a long period of time. After takin
編號：
1000
標題：
2002 World Summit Response Strategy Conference Held
摘要：
To jointly draft response strategies for the main issues discussed at the UN World Summit recently h
全文：
To jointly draft response strategies for the main issues discussed at the UN World Summit recently h
編號：
970
標題：
Everlight Chemical Severely Punished for Violation of Waste Disposal Act
摘要：
Responding to the recent dumping of hazardous industrial waste in Nankan Creek Luchu Township, Taoyu
全文：
Responding to the recent dumping of hazardous industrial waste in Nankan Creek Luchu Township, Taoyu
編號：
748
標題：
EPA Urges Local Governments to Properly Treat Medical Waste
摘要：
Taiwan has sufficient treatment capacity to handle all the domestically generated infectious medical
全文：
Taiwan has sufficient treatment capacity to handle all the domestically generated infectious medical
編號：
421
標題：
Environmental Database for Disputes Prone Areas Under Construction
摘要：
The EPA will continue to push the construction of an environmental database for dispute prone areas.
全文：
The EPA will continue to push the construction of an environmental database for dispute prone areas.
編號：
185
標題：
R.O.C. and Canada Initiate Mutual Recognition of Eco-label Schemes
摘要：
Following Canada's lead the EPA's Eco-label Review Committee recently passed jointly developed draft
全文：
Following Canada's lead the EPA's Eco-label Review Committee recently passed jointly developed draft
行政院環境保護署 的其他資料集
生物源網格空氣污染排放量(TWD97)
不定期更新更新,160柏小姐 | 02-23712121#6106 | 2022-01-14 01:05:47
行政院環境保護署行政院環境保護署環境檢驗所單位決算
每年更新更新,30洪小姐 | 03-4915818#3001 | 2022-01-15 01:09:40
行政院環境保護署環保署官等年資統計資料
不定期更新更新,40黃小姐 | 02-23117722分機2132 | 2022-01-15 01:13:00
行政院環境保護署0800資源回收免費專線-一般件問題查詢廢電子電器統計
每1年更新,42莊先生 | 02-23705888#3108 | 2023-07-27 01:00:02
行政院環境保護署貨品通關事前聲明確認作業指引折頁
不定期更新,39金先生 | 23257399＃55315 | 2022-01-14 01:22:21
行政院環境保護署
土壤319公頃_一公頃一採樣點位置圖
不更新更新,41謝先生 | (02)23832389*8302 | 2022-01-15 01:15:53
行政院環境保護署列管事業污染源裁處資料
每1月更新,92陳小姐 | 04-2252-1718#51310 | 2023-08-07 01:02:41
行政院環境保護署環境保護許可管理系統(暨解除列管)對象基本資料
每日更新更新,212陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2682 | 2022-01-15 01:12:25
行政院環境保護署環境教育活動人時
每3月更新,66李小姐 | 02-23117722#2724 | 2023-08-07 01:01:27
行政院環境保護署臺南市水量水質自動監測連線傳輸監測紀錄值即時資料集
不定期更新更新,38許先生 | 02-2311-7722#2831 | 2022-01-18 01:24:49
行政院環境保護署
變更內容對照表專案小組初審會議紀錄
不定期更新更新,66劉先生 | 02-23117722#2743 | 2022-01-15 01:12:37
行政院環境保護署行政院環境保護署環境保護基金附屬單位會計月報
不定期更新,38蘇小姐 | 02-23117722#2193 | 2022-01-15 01:09:33
行政院環境保護署機車排氣檢驗站執行機車排氣檢驗業務費用
每1月更新,33李先生 | 02-23117722#6314 | 2023-07-27 01:03:50
行政院環境保護署縣市(非直轄市)小時值-每小時
每小時更新更新,119謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:00:27
行政院環境保護署環評監督委員會設置要點
不定期更新更新,38陳先生 | 04-22521718#51207 | 2023-08-09 01:05:13
行政院環境保護署
應回收廢棄物(廢乾電池類)回收量資料
每年更新更新,50廖小姐 | 02-2370-5888#3103 | 2022-01-14 01:24:39
行政院環境保護署新化學物質登錄資訊系統工具(Chemist)
不定期更新更新,39蔡小姐 | 23257399#55723 | 2022-01-14 01:23:00
行政院環境保護署環保署社會參與辦理情形
不定期更新更新,55黃先生 | (02)23117722#2228 | 2023-08-09 01:05:32
行政院環境保護署紫外線即時監測資料
每1時更新,243陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:57:05
行政院環境保護署事業廢棄物再利用申報量統計
每1月更新,93林先生 | 02-2311-7722#2671 | 2023-08-07 01:02:11
行政院環境保護署
地方環保局環保罰鍰次數
每月更新更新,97謝小姐 | 02-23117722#2103 | 2022-01-14 01:21:26
行政院環境保護署固定污染源CEMS監測數據紀錄值資料集(6分鐘紀錄值)
每小時更新更新,166陳小姐 | 02-23117722分機6216 | 2022-01-14 01:02:55
行政院環境保護署符合噪音管制標準車輛-進口機車
不定期更新更新,123林先生 | 02-23712121-6403 | 2022-01-14 01:18:59
行政院環境保護署已公告之飲用水取水口一定距離一覽表
不定期更新更新,108黃先生 | 02-23117722#2881 | 2023-07-27 01:02:59
行政院環境保護署工程會列管重大公共建設計畫
每1月更新,154蕭先生 | 02-2311-7722#2344 | 2023-07-28 11:38:59
行政院環境保護署
空氣品質小時值_臺北市_古亭站
每1時更新,122陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:58:11
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_高雄市_鳳山站
每1時更新,134陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:57:42
行政院環境保護署噪音陳情案件數(依年度)
不定期更新更新,47謝先生 | 02-23712121-6403 | 2023-07-27 01:03:47
行政院環境保護署花蓮縣重要環保統計資料
每1月更新,124顏先生 | 02-23117722#2109 | 2023-08-07 01:00:00
行政院環境保護署政策評估說明書專案小組意見徵詢會議紀錄
每2月更新,57黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-05 00:59:43
行政院環境保護署