Interim Effluent Standards Expirewater2000
「Interim Effluent Standards Expirewater2000」於資料集「MajorEnvironmentalPolicies」由單位「行政院環境保護署」的陳小姐所提供，聯繫電話是(02)23117722#2753,(02)23117722#2756，最近更新時間為：2023-07-30 01:03:45。 欄位編號的內容是472 ， 欄位標題的內容是Interim Effluent Standards Expire ， 欄位摘要的內容是After the 1998 interim effluent standards expire industries using the interim standards will need to prepare for a slightly modified draft of the 1998 Effluent Standards to take effect. In the draft proposed by the EPA, to encourage recycling in the paper industry, different COD limits will be set according to wastepaper recycling rates. Also, due to the use of different testing methods the standard for true-color value will be adjusted to 550. After completing a public hearing, the EPA presented the draft standards to the Executive Yuan for approval.
The reasonability of effluent standards has once again become a topic of contention. Effluent standards were first set in 1991 in Taiwan, and tightened successively in 1993 and 1998. However, before implementation of the 1998 standards, the EPA received a constant stream of industry feedback, asking it to loosen pollutant limits set in standards they claimed were too tough.
In the face of scientific evidence and documentation presented for the industry case, on December 24, 1997 the EPA made a well intentioned gesture by creating interim standards for seven large industries; chemicals, paper, pulp, petrochemicals, livestock, leather, and printing and dyeing. Industries were required to come up with improvement plans, and after submitting the plans would be subject to the interim standards for two years.
However, after two years, as the interim standards were set to expire, the reasonability of the 1998 effluent standards has once again been brought to the table. The seven large industries have one-by-one presented studies showing that the 1998 standards are too tough, and asking that the interim standards be maintained as the new 2000 standards.
Because COD (chemical oxygen demand) and SS (suspended solids) are the main items toughened in the 1998 standards, most industry suggestions were directed at maintaining the interim restrictions for these two standards. Industry representatives noted that due to low sewerage hookup rates in Taiwan, it is impossible to jointly treat industrial and residential wastewater. In this situation, there is no way to adjust the mixture of COD and BOD levels to optimum proportions, lowering the effectiveness of organic wastewater treatment.
In addition, industry representatives also pointed out that traditional secondary bio-treatment methods are insufficient to further lower COD discharges, so chemical treatment methods must be used. After the use of large quantities of chemical additives, operating costs and quantities of waste sludge will both increase, as well as the bio-toxicity of wastewater discharges.
To come up with a set of reasonable, workable effluent standards, the EPA called numerous meeting between experts and academics; industrial groups; the Industrial Development Bureau (IDB) and the Council of Agriculture, to discuss the standards in light of the current status of industry improvements, technological feasibility and environmental impact. A total of nine different meetings resulted in changes to the draft standards that ensure effluent management will be more reasonable and practicable. Changes include:
1. Due to a change in the testing method for true-color value, the control standard for true-color value should be 550. Thus, the control standard for all target industries was changed to 550 and the proscribed testing method will remain the current method in use.
2.
Due to a major switch to wastepaper as a raw material by the paper industry in order to comply with recycling policies, the current shape of the paper industry and the character of it's effluent stream have changed completely. For this reason, paper companies where wastepaper makes up over 60% of raw materials used are allowed a COD limit of 180mg/L. For companies where wastepaper consists of below 60% of raw materials, the COD limit will be 160mg/L, and companies that do not use wastepaper will have to comply with the COD 100mg/L standard.
The EPA emphasized that in 1988 and 1987, 2,000 companies made use of the interim standards and signed pledges to continue improvements to pollution prevention. In total pig raising was decreased by almost 280,000 head and around 2.2 billion NTD were invested in order to meet the 1998 effluent standards. Moreover, statistics compiled from onsite audits by local EPBs revealed that compliance with COD standards averages around 81% among industry groups (see graph), with the additional 19% able to meet interim standards. To totally readjust effluent standard values only for the sake of this 19% of problem industries would be a step in the wrong direction and be a violation of the EPA's mandate to protect water quality. Accordingly, the effluent standard values will not be changed again during the current phase.
Over the next half year, the EPA will check to see if industries have made any of the pollution prevention improvements suggested over the course of their meetings. Some methods suggested include the separation of solid and liquid wastes from pig-rearing, removal of high salt and chlorine liquid wastes in the dying materials and leather industry, or the removal of dying materials and treatment additives from wastewater in the dying industry. If these changes are reflected in the solid waste online reporting system or by audit numbers, or it can be shown that companies are properly using wastewater treatment facilities but are still stuck at the edge of the control standards due to technology bottlenecks, the EPA will deal with new them on a case-by-case basis. After onsite verification by special personnel, the possibility of opening a subcategory standard can be assessed and discussed. ， 欄位全文的內容是After the 1998 interim effluent standards expire industries using the interim standards will need to prepare for a slightly modified draft of the 1998 Effluent Standards to take effect. In the draft proposed by the EPA, to encourage recycling in the paper industry, different COD limits will be set according to wastepaper recycling rates. Also, due to the use of different testing methods the standard for true-color value will be adjusted to 550. After completing a public hearing, the EPA presented the draft standards to the Executive Yuan for approval.
The reasonability of effluent standards has once again become a topic of contention. Effluent standards were first set in 1991 in Taiwan, and tightened successively in 1993 and 1998. However, before implementation of the 1998 standards, the EPA received a constant stream of industry feedback, asking it to loosen pollutant limits set in standards they claimed were too tough.
In the face of scientific evidence and documentation presented for the industry case, on December 24, 1997 the EPA made a well intentioned gesture by creating interim standards for seven large industries; chemicals, paper, pulp, petrochemicals, livestock, leather, and printing and dyeing. Industries were required to come up with improvement plans, and after submitting the plans would be subject to the interim standards for two years.
However, after two years, as the interim standards were set to expire, the reasonability of the 1998 effluent standards has once again been brought to the table. The seven large industries have one-by-one presented studies showing that the 1998 standards are too tough, and asking that the interim standards be maintained as the new 2000 standards.
Because COD (chemical oxygen demand) and SS (suspended solids) are the main items toughened in the 1998 standards, most industry suggestions were directed at maintaining the interim restrictions for these two standards. Industry representatives noted that due to low sewerage hookup rates in Taiwan, it is impossible to jointly treat industrial and residential wastewater. In this situation, there is no way to adjust the mixture of COD and BOD levels to optimum proportions, lowering the effectiveness of organic wastewater treatment.
In addition, industry representatives also pointed out that traditional secondary bio-treatment methods are insufficient to further lower COD discharges, so chemical treatment methods must be used. After the use of large quantities of chemical additives, operating costs and quantities of waste sludge will both increase, as well as the bio-toxicity of wastewater discharges.
To come up with a set of reasonable, workable effluent standards, the EPA called numerous meeting between experts and academics; industrial groups; the Industrial Development Bureau (IDB) and the Council of Agriculture, to discuss the standards in light of the current status of industry improvements, technological feasibility and environmental impact. A total of nine different meetings resulted in changes to the draft standards that ensure effluent management will be more reasonable and practicable. Changes include:
1. Due to a change in the testing method for true-color value, the control standard for true-color value should be 550. Thus, the control standard for all target industries was changed to 550 and the proscribed testing method will remain the current method in use.
2.
Due to a major switch to wastepaper as a raw material by the paper industry in order to comply with recycling policies, the current shape of the paper industry and the character of it's effluent stream have changed completely. For this reason, paper companies where wastepaper makes up over 60% of raw materials used are allowed a COD limit of 180mg/L. For companies where wastepaper consists of below 60% of raw materials, the COD limit will be 160mg/L, and companies that do not use wastepaper will have to comply with the COD 100mg/L standard.
The EPA emphasized that in 1988 and 1987, 2,000 companies made use of the interim standards and signed pledges to continue improvements to pollution prevention. In total pig raising was decreased by almost 280,000 head and around 2.2 billion NTD were invested in order to meet the 1998 effluent standards. Moreover, statistics compiled from onsite audits by local EPBs revealed that compliance with COD standards averages around 81% among industry groups (see graph), with the additional 19% able to meet interim standards. To totally readjust effluent standard values only for the sake of this 19% of problem industries would be a step in the wrong direction and be a violation of the EPA's mandate to protect water quality. Accordingly, the effluent standard values will not be changed again during the current phase.
Over the next half year, the EPA will check to see if industries have made any of the pollution prevention improvements suggested over the course of their meetings. Some methods suggested include the separation of solid and liquid wastes from pig-rearing, removal of high salt and chlorine liquid wastes in the dying materials and leather industry, or the removal of dying materials and treatment additives from wastewater in the dying industry. If these changes are reflected in the solid waste online reporting system or by audit numbers, or it can be shown that companies are properly using wastewater treatment facilities but are still stuck at the edge of the control standards due to technology bottlenecks, the EPA will deal with new them on a case-by-case basis. After onsite verification by special personnel, the possibility of opening a subcategory standard can be assessed and discussed. ， 欄位年度的內容是2000 ， 欄位月份的內容是3 ， 欄位卷的內容是3 ， 欄位期的內容是7 ， 欄位順序的內容是1 ， 欄位倒序的內容是2 ， 欄位分類的內容是water ， 欄位標題2的內容是Interim Effluent Standards Expire ， 欄位檔案位置的內容是V3/V3-07 。
編號
472
標題
Interim Effluent Standards Expire
摘要
After the 1998 interim effluent standards expire industries using the interim standards will need to prepare for a slightly modified draft of the 1998 Effluent Standards to take effect. In the draft proposed by the EPA, to encourage recycling in the paper industry, different COD limits will be set according to wastepaper recycling rates. Also, due to the use of different testing methods the standard for true-color value will be adjusted to 550. After completing a public hearing, the EPA presented the draft standards to the Executive Yuan for approval. The reasonability of effluent standards has once again become a topic of contention. Effluent standards were first set in 1991 in Taiwan, and tightened successively in 1993 and 1998. However, before implementation of the 1998 standards, the EPA received a constant stream of industry feedback, asking it to loosen pollutant limits set in standards they claimed were too tough. In the face of scientific evidence and documentation presented for the industry case, on December 24, 1997 the EPA made a well intentioned gesture by creating interim standards for seven large industries; chemicals, paper, pulp, petrochemicals, livestock, leather, and printing and dyeing. Industries were required to come up with improvement plans, and after submitting the plans would be subject to the interim standards for two years. However, after two years, as the interim standards were set to expire, the reasonability of the 1998 effluent standards has once again been brought to the table. The seven large industries have one-by-one presented studies showing that the 1998 standards are too tough, and asking that the interim standards be maintained as the new 2000 standards. Because COD (chemical oxygen demand) and SS (suspended solids) are the main items toughened in the 1998 standards, most industry suggestions were directed at maintaining the interim restrictions for these two standards. Industry representatives noted that due to low sewerage hookup rates in Taiwan, it is impossible to jointly treat industrial and residential wastewater. In this situation, there is no way to adjust the mixture of COD and BOD levels to optimum proportions, lowering the effectiveness of organic wastewater treatment. In addition, industry representatives also pointed out that traditional secondary bio-treatment methods are insufficient to further lower COD discharges, so chemical treatment methods must be used. After the use of large quantities of chemical additives, operating costs and quantities of waste sludge will both increase, as well as the bio-toxicity of wastewater discharges. To come up with a set of reasonable, workable effluent standards, the EPA called numerous meeting between experts and academics; industrial groups; the Industrial Development Bureau (IDB) and the Council of Agriculture, to discuss the standards in light of the current status of industry improvements, technological feasibility and environmental impact. A total of nine different meetings resulted in changes to the draft standards that ensure effluent management will be more reasonable and practicable. Changes include: 1. Due to a change in the testing method for true-color value, the control standard for true-color value should be 550. Thus, the control standard for all target industries was changed to 550 and the proscribed testing method will remain the current method in use. 2. Due to a major switch to wastepaper as a raw material by the paper industry in order to comply with recycling policies, the current shape of the paper industry and the character of it's effluent stream have changed completely. For this reason, paper companies where wastepaper makes up over 60% of raw materials used are allowed a COD limit of 180mg/L. For companies where wastepaper consists of below 60% of raw materials, the COD limit will be 160mg/L, and companies that do not use wastepaper will have to comply with the COD 100mg/L standard. The EPA emphasized that in 1988 and 1987, 2,000 companies made use of the interim standards and signed pledges to continue improvements to pollution prevention. In total pig raising was decreased by almost 280,000 head and around 2.2 billion NTD were invested in order to meet the 1998 effluent standards. Moreover, statistics compiled from onsite audits by local EPBs revealed that compliance with COD standards averages around 81% among industry groups (see graph), with the additional 19% able to meet interim standards. To totally readjust effluent standard values only for the sake of this 19% of problem industries would be a step in the wrong direction and be a violation of the EPA's mandate to protect water quality. Accordingly, the effluent standard values will not be changed again during the current phase. Over the next half year, the EPA will check to see if industries have made any of the pollution prevention improvements suggested over the course of their meetings. Some methods suggested include the separation of solid and liquid wastes from pig-rearing, removal of high salt and chlorine liquid wastes in the dying materials and leather industry, or the removal of dying materials and treatment additives from wastewater in the dying industry. If these changes are reflected in the solid waste online reporting system or by audit numbers, or it can be shown that companies are properly using wastewater treatment facilities but are still stuck at the edge of the control standards due to technology bottlenecks, the EPA will deal with new them on a case-by-case basis. After onsite verification by special personnel, the possibility of opening a subcategory standard can be assessed and discussed.
全文
After the 1998 interim effluent standards expire industries using the interim standards will need to prepare for a slightly modified draft of the 1998 Effluent Standards to take effect. In the draft proposed by the EPA, to encourage recycling in the paper industry, different COD limits will be set according to wastepaper recycling rates. Also, due to the use of different testing methods the standard for true-color value will be adjusted to 550. After completing a public hearing, the EPA presented the draft standards to the Executive Yuan for approval. The reasonability of effluent standards has once again become a topic of contention. Effluent standards were first set in 1991 in Taiwan, and tightened successively in 1993 and 1998. However, before implementation of the 1998 standards, the EPA received a constant stream of industry feedback, asking it to loosen pollutant limits set in standards they claimed were too tough. In the face of scientific evidence and documentation presented for the industry case, on December 24, 1997 the EPA made a well intentioned gesture by creating interim standards for seven large industries; chemicals, paper, pulp, petrochemicals, livestock, leather, and printing and dyeing. Industries were required to come up with improvement plans, and after submitting the plans would be subject to the interim standards for two years. However, after two years, as the interim standards were set to expire, the reasonability of the 1998 effluent standards has once again been brought to the table. The seven large industries have one-by-one presented studies showing that the 1998 standards are too tough, and asking that the interim standards be maintained as the new 2000 standards. Because COD (chemical oxygen demand) and SS (suspended solids) are the main items toughened in the 1998 standards, most industry suggestions were directed at maintaining the interim restrictions for these two standards. Industry representatives noted that due to low sewerage hookup rates in Taiwan, it is impossible to jointly treat industrial and residential wastewater. In this situation, there is no way to adjust the mixture of COD and BOD levels to optimum proportions, lowering the effectiveness of organic wastewater treatment. In addition, industry representatives also pointed out that traditional secondary bio-treatment methods are insufficient to further lower COD discharges, so chemical treatment methods must be used. After the use of large quantities of chemical additives, operating costs and quantities of waste sludge will both increase, as well as the bio-toxicity of wastewater discharges. To come up with a set of reasonable, workable effluent standards, the EPA called numerous meeting between experts and academics; industrial groups; the Industrial Development Bureau (IDB) and the Council of Agriculture, to discuss the standards in light of the current status of industry improvements, technological feasibility and environmental impact. A total of nine different meetings resulted in changes to the draft standards that ensure effluent management will be more reasonable and practicable. Changes include: 1. Due to a change in the testing method for true-color value, the control standard for true-color value should be 550. Thus, the control standard for all target industries was changed to 550 and the proscribed testing method will remain the current method in use. 2. Due to a major switch to wastepaper as a raw material by the paper industry in order to comply with recycling policies, the current shape of the paper industry and the character of it's effluent stream have changed completely. For this reason, paper companies where wastepaper makes up over 60% of raw materials used are allowed a COD limit of 180mg/L. For companies where wastepaper consists of below 60% of raw materials, the COD limit will be 160mg/L, and companies that do not use wastepaper will have to comply with the COD 100mg/L standard. The EPA emphasized that in 1988 and 1987, 2,000 companies made use of the interim standards and signed pledges to continue improvements to pollution prevention. In total pig raising was decreased by almost 280,000 head and around 2.2 billion NTD were invested in order to meet the 1998 effluent standards. Moreover, statistics compiled from onsite audits by local EPBs revealed that compliance with COD standards averages around 81% among industry groups (see graph), with the additional 19% able to meet interim standards. To totally readjust effluent standard values only for the sake of this 19% of problem industries would be a step in the wrong direction and be a violation of the EPA's mandate to protect water quality. Accordingly, the effluent standard values will not be changed again during the current phase. Over the next half year, the EPA will check to see if industries have made any of the pollution prevention improvements suggested over the course of their meetings. Some methods suggested include the separation of solid and liquid wastes from pig-rearing, removal of high salt and chlorine liquid wastes in the dying materials and leather industry, or the removal of dying materials and treatment additives from wastewater in the dying industry. If these changes are reflected in the solid waste online reporting system or by audit numbers, or it can be shown that companies are properly using wastewater treatment facilities but are still stuck at the edge of the control standards due to technology bottlenecks, the EPA will deal with new them on a case-by-case basis. After onsite verification by special personnel, the possibility of opening a subcategory standard can be assessed and discussed.
年度
2000
月份
3
卷
3
期
7
順序
1
倒序
2
分類
water
標題2
Interim Effluent Standards Expire
檔案位置
V3/V3-07
「Interim Effluent Standards Expirewater2000」所屬的資料集：「MajorEnvironmentalPolicies」的其他資料
編號：
3354
標題：
EIA Requirement Considered for Carbon Capture and Storage Projects
摘要：
EIA EIA Requirement Considered for Carbon Capture and Storage Projects
EIA EIA Requirement Conside
全文：
EIA Requirement Considered for Carbon Capture and Storage Projects
On 21 January 2010 the EPA anno
編號：
503
標題：
Executive Yuan Passes Initial Review of Draft Marine Pollution Act
摘要：
The Executive Yuan has finished initial review of the draft Marine Pollution Control Act. According
全文：
The Executive Yuan has finished initial review of the draft Marine Pollution Control Act. According
編號：
4072
標題：
Acoustic Camera Enforcement Proven Effective
摘要：
noise control
Acoustic Camera Enforcement Proven Effective
The EPA started to implement acoustic ca
全文：
The EPA stated that acoustic cameras have been effective in deterring noisy vehicles, indicated by a
編號：
47
標題：
Premier Orders Quick Resolution to Garbage Disposal Problems
摘要：
Waste Management Shortly after taking office Premier Vincent Siew, paid a visit to the EPA on Septe
全文：
Waste Management Shortly after taking office Premier Vincent Siew, paid a visit to the EPA on Septe
編號：
2025
標題：
EPA Celebrates 20th Anniversary
摘要：
General Policy
EPA Ce
全文：
General Policy
EPA Ce
編號：
3411
標題：
Recycling Fee Rates for Five Types of Containers Starting March 2016
摘要：
recycling
Recycling Fee Rates for Five Types of Containers Starting March 2016
全文：
Recycling Fee Rates for Five Types of Containers Starting March 2016
The recycling fee rates for ir
編號：
124
標題：
Amendments of EIA Act Enforcement Rules Pave Way for EIA Certification System
摘要：
Environmental Impact Assessment To establish an EIA certification system that will simplify the EIA
全文：
Environmental Impact Assessment To establish an EIA certification system that will simplify the EIA
編號：
3332
標題：
EPA Continuing to Assist Local Governments against Dengue Fever
摘要：
Environmental Sanitation
EPA Continuing to Assist Local Governments against Dengue Fever
全文：
EPA Continuing to Assist Local Governments against Dengue Fever
To help local governments prevent th
編號：
3508
標題：
EPA and Tainan City Government Jointly Hold Toxic Substance Emergency Response Drill
摘要：
Toxic substance
EPA and Tainan City Government Jointly Hold Toxic Substance Emergency Response Drill
全文：
EPA and Tainan City Government Jointly Hold Toxic Substance Emergency Response Drill
編號：
3345
標題：
Climate Change Private Sector Opinions Gathered to Formulate Greenhouse Gas Reduction and Management
摘要：
Climate Change Private Sector Opinions Gathered to Formulate Greenhouse Gas Reduction and Management
全文：
Private Sector Opinions Gathered to Formulate Greenhouse Gas Reduction and Management Act Bylaws
編號：
52
標題：
EPA Assesses AmCham Suggestions on Regulatory Affairs
摘要：
International Affairs The American Chamber of Commerce in Taiwan issued a “Taiwan White Paper” in S
全文：
International Affairs The American Chamber of Commerce in Taiwan issued a “Taiwan White Paper” in S
編號：
489
標題：
Executive Yuan Approves Draft Amendments to Noise Act
摘要：
The ROC Executive Yuan recently approved amendments to the Noise Pollution Control Act. Revisions t
全文：
The ROC Executive Yuan recently approved amendments to the Noise Pollution Control Act. Revisions t
編號：
459
標題：
EPA's Electronic Library Comes Online
摘要：
General policy In support of environmental protection technology research and development the EPA re
全文：
In support of environmental protection technology research and development the EPA recently establis
編號：
516
標題：
Data Management System for Environmental Agents Goes On-line
摘要：
To enhance management efficiency and provide a convenient window for public comment the EPA recently
全文：
To enhance management efficiency and provide a convenient window for public comment the EPA recently
編號：
3318
標題：
Climate Change Exhibition Opens in Changhua
摘要：
Climate Change Climate Change Exhibition Opens in Changhua
全文：
Climate Change Exhibition Opens in Changhua
On 25 June 2015 the Leading to a Future of Our Choice: C
編號：
3403
標題：
Public Nuisance Pollution Hotspot System Established
摘要：
Control and evaluation Public Nuisance Pollution Hotspot System Established
全文：
Public Nuisance Pollution Hotspot System Established
In 2015, the EPA constructed a public nuisance
編號：
94
標題：
Definition of Petrochemicals Industry Within Water Pollution Act Expanded
摘要：
Water Quality On December 27 1997, the EPA amended the Water Pollution Control Act to merge several
全文：
Water Quality On December 27 1997, the EPA amended the Water Pollution Control Act to merge several
編號：
560
標題：
Recycling of Computer Printers to be Kicked off in January 2001
摘要：
Beginning January 2001 the EPA will begin enforcing the recycling of computer printers. At a recent
全文：
Beginning January 2001 the EPA will begin enforcing the recycling of computer printers. At a recent
編號：
546
標題：
Premier Siew Makes Farewell Visit to the EPA
摘要：
With the transition to a new cabinet approaching Premier Vincent Siew took an inspection tour of the
全文：
With the transition to a new cabinet approaching Premier Vincent Siew took an inspection tour of the
編號：
1615
標題：
2005 Taiwan International Conference on Atmosphere Protection
摘要：
The EPA has convened the 2005 Taiwan International Conference on Atmosphere Protection with around 2
全文：
The EPA has convened the 2005 Taiwan International Conference on Atmosphere Protection with around 2
編號：
440
標題：
EPA Considers Stricter Air Emissions Standards for Power Generation Facilities and Industrial Boiler
摘要：
The EPA is currently drafting modifications to air emission standards for power generation facilitie
全文：
The EPA is currently drafting modifications to air emission standards for power generation facilitie
編號：
3282
標題：
2014 Environmental Agents Inspection Results Released
摘要：
Environmental Sanitation 2014 Environmental Agents Inspection Results Released
全文：
2014 Environmental Agents Inspection Results Released
On 2 March 2015 the EPA released the results o
編號：
270
標題：
5-River Remediation Plan Passes
摘要：
The Executive Yuan recently passed the EPA's plan to remediate the catchment basins of 5 rivers incl
全文：
The Executive Yuan recently passed the EPA's plan to remediate the catchment basins of 5 rivers incl
編號：
3619
標題：
Taiwan and Germany Exchange Experiences on Carbon Market Mechanisms and Practices
摘要：
Climate Change
Taiwan and Germany Exchange Experiences on Carbon Market Mechanisms and Practices
On
全文：
Taiwan and Germany Exchange Experiences on Carbon Market Mechanisms and Practices
On 31 October, the
編號：
485
標題：
Drinking Water Protection Zones Now Viewable Online
摘要：
Drinking water statutes require the delineation of protection zones for sources of drinking water.
全文：
Drinking water statutes require the delineation of protection zones for sources of drinking water.
編號：
3913
標題：
EPA Strengthens Public Area Disinfection Work during Labor Day Weekend
摘要：
Environmental Sanitation EPA Strengthens Public Area Disinfection Work during Labor Day Weekend
全文：
During the Labor Day weekend, the EPA worked with local governments and mobilized the disinfection t
編號：
3745
標題：
Raising Public Awareness in Plastic Reduction
摘要：
Waste
全文：
Raising Public Awareness in Plastic Reduction
Plastic reduction was a highly discussed and focused
編號：
662
標題：
Taiwan Has Potential to Establish Eco-Industrial Parks
摘要：
In discussing Taiwan’s challenges in industrial solid waste recovery and reuse EPA Deputy Administra
全文：
In discussing Taiwan’s challenges in industrial solid waste recovery and reuse EPA Deputy Administra
編號：
4131
標題：
Three Green Eating Tips for Lunar New Year
摘要：
Three Green Eating Tips for Lunar New Year
The Year of the Tiger has arrived, and together with th
全文：
Food is a precious resource of the Earth. According to a United Nations report, 1/3 of food is waste
編號：
3329
標題：
Fifteen Cities Townships and Districts Receive Subsidies to Create High Quality Environment
摘要：
Environmental sanitation Fifteen Cities Townships and Districts Receive Subsidies to Create High Qu
全文：
Fifteen Cities Townships and Districts Receive Subsidies to Create High Quality Environment
From 201
行政院環境保護署 的其他資料集
環保標章產品審查通過及有效數資料(第一類)
每季更新更新,154孫小姐 | 02-23117722#2926 | 2022-01-14 01:17:21
行政院環境保護署空氣污染防制區劃分結果
2年更新,175柏小姐 | 02-23712121#6106 | 2022-01-14 01:05:04
行政院環境保護署應回收廢棄物(廢電子電器及廢資訊物品類)回收量資料
每年更新更新,59廖小姐 | 02-2370-5888#3103 | 2022-01-14 01:24:38
行政院環境保護署環保署職員官等性別統計資料
每3月更新,60嚴小姐 | 02-23117722#2133 | 2023-07-30 01:02:14
行政院環境保護署環保標章產品(環保產品)
每1月更新,306盧小姐 | 02-23117722#2943 | 2023-07-27 01:01:49
行政院環境保護署
沼液沼渣農地肥分使用計畫
不定期更新更新,51吳小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2842 | 2023-08-09 01:05:34
行政院環境保護署噪音陳情案件數(依音源)
不定期更新更新,62謝先生 | 02-23712121-6403 | 2023-07-27 01:03:47
行政院環境保護署建檔公廁明細-基隆市
不定期更新更新,310曾小姐 | (02)2311-7722#2760,(02)2311-7722#2894 | 2022-01-15 01:14:53
行政院環境保護署符合噪音管制標準車輛-國產汽油引擎車
不定期更新更新,334章小姐 | 02-23712121#6406 | 2023-07-28 11:37:57
行政院環境保護署機關綠色採購績效評核作業要點
不定期更新更新,53王先生 | 02-23117722#2921 | 2022-01-14 01:18:00
行政院環境保護署
PM10日均值(每日提供)
每日更新更新,92謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:05:15
行政院環境保護署已公告之飲用水水源水質保護區一覽表
不定期更新更新,78黃先生 | 02-23117722#2881 | 2022-01-15 01:10:25
行政院環境保護署行政院環境保護署環境保護基金附屬單位決算
每1年更新,50林小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2169 | 2023-08-09 01:05:50
行政院環境保護署旅館或觀光旅館之興建或擴建類別環境影響說明書
每2月更新,68黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-05 01:01:08
行政院環境保護署經過山坡地之環境影響說明書件
每2月更新,272黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-05 01:01:01
行政院環境保護署
教育部事業廢棄物再利用機構資料
每年更新更新,43李小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2633 | 2022-01-14 01:26:13
行政院環境保護署行政院環境保護署推動產品碳足跡管理要點
不定期更新更新,42陳先生 | 02-23117722#2932 | 2023-08-09 01:05:36
行政院環境保護署0800資源回收免費專線-一般件問題查詢廢容器統計
每1年更新,67莊先生 | 02-23705888#3108 | 2023-07-27 00:59:59
行政院環境保護署行政院環境保護署法定預算
每1年更新,67鄭小姐 | 02-23117722#2156 | 2023-08-09 01:05:49
行政院環境保護署彰化縣重要環保統計資料
每1月更新,177陳先生 | 02-23117722#2108 | 2023-08-07 01:00:11
行政院環境保護署
歷年土壤調查_環保署土壤重金屬含量調查(100公頃)
不定期更新更新,192謝小姐 | (02)23832389*8302 | 2022-01-14 01:20:16
行政院環境保護署二氧化碳-小時值-每小時
每1時更新,262陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-07 00:58:21
行政院環境保護署應回收廢棄物處理業者(廢乾電池類)最大處理量資料
每年更新更新,55廖小姐 | 02-2370-5888#3103 | 2022-01-14 01:24:03
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_高雄市_復興站
每小時更新更新,210謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:04:45
行政院環境保護署環保署官等年資統計資料
不定期更新更新,49黃小姐 | 02-23117722分機2132 | 2022-01-15 01:13:00
行政院環境保護署
營運中公有掩埋場掩埋場容量統計表
不定期更新更新,133彭先生 | 04-22521718#53510 | 2023-08-07 01:02:35
行政院環境保護署道路之開發類別環境影響說明書
每2月更新,112黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-05 01:01:14
行政院環境保護署自來水水質抽驗結果(依件數)
不定期更新更新,230黃先生 | 02-23117722#2881 | 2023-07-27 01:04:53
行政院環境保護署環境影響評估案件摘要資料
每2月更新,250黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-06 01:03:57
行政院環境保護署廢(污)水產生量及排放量
每1年更新,145顏先生 | 02-23117722#2109 | 2023-07-30 01:01:05
行政院環境保護署