Interim Effluent Standards Expirewater2000
「Interim Effluent Standards Expirewater2000」於資料集「MajorEnvironmentalPolicies」由單位「行政院環境保護署」的陳小姐所提供，聯繫電話是(02)23117722#2753,(02)23117722#2756，最近更新時間為：2023-07-30 01:03:45。 欄位編號的內容是472 ， 欄位標題的內容是Interim Effluent Standards Expire ， 欄位摘要的內容是After the 1998 interim effluent standards expire industries using the interim standards will need to prepare for a slightly modified draft of the 1998 Effluent Standards to take effect. In the draft proposed by the EPA, to encourage recycling in the paper industry, different COD limits will be set according to wastepaper recycling rates. Also, due to the use of different testing methods the standard for true-color value will be adjusted to 550. After completing a public hearing, the EPA presented the draft standards to the Executive Yuan for approval.
The reasonability of effluent standards has once again become a topic of contention. Effluent standards were first set in 1991 in Taiwan, and tightened successively in 1993 and 1998. However, before implementation of the 1998 standards, the EPA received a constant stream of industry feedback, asking it to loosen pollutant limits set in standards they claimed were too tough.
In the face of scientific evidence and documentation presented for the industry case, on December 24, 1997 the EPA made a well intentioned gesture by creating interim standards for seven large industries; chemicals, paper, pulp, petrochemicals, livestock, leather, and printing and dyeing. Industries were required to come up with improvement plans, and after submitting the plans would be subject to the interim standards for two years.
However, after two years, as the interim standards were set to expire, the reasonability of the 1998 effluent standards has once again been brought to the table. The seven large industries have one-by-one presented studies showing that the 1998 standards are too tough, and asking that the interim standards be maintained as the new 2000 standards.
Because COD (chemical oxygen demand) and SS (suspended solids) are the main items toughened in the 1998 standards, most industry suggestions were directed at maintaining the interim restrictions for these two standards. Industry representatives noted that due to low sewerage hookup rates in Taiwan, it is impossible to jointly treat industrial and residential wastewater. In this situation, there is no way to adjust the mixture of COD and BOD levels to optimum proportions, lowering the effectiveness of organic wastewater treatment.
In addition, industry representatives also pointed out that traditional secondary bio-treatment methods are insufficient to further lower COD discharges, so chemical treatment methods must be used. After the use of large quantities of chemical additives, operating costs and quantities of waste sludge will both increase, as well as the bio-toxicity of wastewater discharges.
To come up with a set of reasonable, workable effluent standards, the EPA called numerous meeting between experts and academics; industrial groups; the Industrial Development Bureau (IDB) and the Council of Agriculture, to discuss the standards in light of the current status of industry improvements, technological feasibility and environmental impact. A total of nine different meetings resulted in changes to the draft standards that ensure effluent management will be more reasonable and practicable. Changes include:
1. Due to a change in the testing method for true-color value, the control standard for true-color value should be 550. Thus, the control standard for all target industries was changed to 550 and the proscribed testing method will remain the current method in use.
2.
Due to a major switch to wastepaper as a raw material by the paper industry in order to comply with recycling policies, the current shape of the paper industry and the character of it's effluent stream have changed completely. For this reason, paper companies where wastepaper makes up over 60% of raw materials used are allowed a COD limit of 180mg/L. For companies where wastepaper consists of below 60% of raw materials, the COD limit will be 160mg/L, and companies that do not use wastepaper will have to comply with the COD 100mg/L standard.
The EPA emphasized that in 1988 and 1987, 2,000 companies made use of the interim standards and signed pledges to continue improvements to pollution prevention. In total pig raising was decreased by almost 280,000 head and around 2.2 billion NTD were invested in order to meet the 1998 effluent standards. Moreover, statistics compiled from onsite audits by local EPBs revealed that compliance with COD standards averages around 81% among industry groups (see graph), with the additional 19% able to meet interim standards. To totally readjust effluent standard values only for the sake of this 19% of problem industries would be a step in the wrong direction and be a violation of the EPA's mandate to protect water quality. Accordingly, the effluent standard values will not be changed again during the current phase.
Over the next half year, the EPA will check to see if industries have made any of the pollution prevention improvements suggested over the course of their meetings. Some methods suggested include the separation of solid and liquid wastes from pig-rearing, removal of high salt and chlorine liquid wastes in the dying materials and leather industry, or the removal of dying materials and treatment additives from wastewater in the dying industry. If these changes are reflected in the solid waste online reporting system or by audit numbers, or it can be shown that companies are properly using wastewater treatment facilities but are still stuck at the edge of the control standards due to technology bottlenecks, the EPA will deal with new them on a case-by-case basis. After onsite verification by special personnel, the possibility of opening a subcategory standard can be assessed and discussed. ， 欄位全文的內容是After the 1998 interim effluent standards expire industries using the interim standards will need to prepare for a slightly modified draft of the 1998 Effluent Standards to take effect. In the draft proposed by the EPA, to encourage recycling in the paper industry, different COD limits will be set according to wastepaper recycling rates. Also, due to the use of different testing methods the standard for true-color value will be adjusted to 550. After completing a public hearing, the EPA presented the draft standards to the Executive Yuan for approval.
The reasonability of effluent standards has once again become a topic of contention. Effluent standards were first set in 1991 in Taiwan, and tightened successively in 1993 and 1998. However, before implementation of the 1998 standards, the EPA received a constant stream of industry feedback, asking it to loosen pollutant limits set in standards they claimed were too tough.
In the face of scientific evidence and documentation presented for the industry case, on December 24, 1997 the EPA made a well intentioned gesture by creating interim standards for seven large industries; chemicals, paper, pulp, petrochemicals, livestock, leather, and printing and dyeing. Industries were required to come up with improvement plans, and after submitting the plans would be subject to the interim standards for two years.
However, after two years, as the interim standards were set to expire, the reasonability of the 1998 effluent standards has once again been brought to the table. The seven large industries have one-by-one presented studies showing that the 1998 standards are too tough, and asking that the interim standards be maintained as the new 2000 standards.
Because COD (chemical oxygen demand) and SS (suspended solids) are the main items toughened in the 1998 standards, most industry suggestions were directed at maintaining the interim restrictions for these two standards. Industry representatives noted that due to low sewerage hookup rates in Taiwan, it is impossible to jointly treat industrial and residential wastewater. In this situation, there is no way to adjust the mixture of COD and BOD levels to optimum proportions, lowering the effectiveness of organic wastewater treatment.
In addition, industry representatives also pointed out that traditional secondary bio-treatment methods are insufficient to further lower COD discharges, so chemical treatment methods must be used. After the use of large quantities of chemical additives, operating costs and quantities of waste sludge will both increase, as well as the bio-toxicity of wastewater discharges.
To come up with a set of reasonable, workable effluent standards, the EPA called numerous meeting between experts and academics; industrial groups; the Industrial Development Bureau (IDB) and the Council of Agriculture, to discuss the standards in light of the current status of industry improvements, technological feasibility and environmental impact. A total of nine different meetings resulted in changes to the draft standards that ensure effluent management will be more reasonable and practicable. Changes include:
1. Due to a change in the testing method for true-color value, the control standard for true-color value should be 550. Thus, the control standard for all target industries was changed to 550 and the proscribed testing method will remain the current method in use.
2.
Due to a major switch to wastepaper as a raw material by the paper industry in order to comply with recycling policies, the current shape of the paper industry and the character of it's effluent stream have changed completely. For this reason, paper companies where wastepaper makes up over 60% of raw materials used are allowed a COD limit of 180mg/L. For companies where wastepaper consists of below 60% of raw materials, the COD limit will be 160mg/L, and companies that do not use wastepaper will have to comply with the COD 100mg/L standard.
The EPA emphasized that in 1988 and 1987, 2,000 companies made use of the interim standards and signed pledges to continue improvements to pollution prevention. In total pig raising was decreased by almost 280,000 head and around 2.2 billion NTD were invested in order to meet the 1998 effluent standards. Moreover, statistics compiled from onsite audits by local EPBs revealed that compliance with COD standards averages around 81% among industry groups (see graph), with the additional 19% able to meet interim standards. To totally readjust effluent standard values only for the sake of this 19% of problem industries would be a step in the wrong direction and be a violation of the EPA's mandate to protect water quality. Accordingly, the effluent standard values will not be changed again during the current phase.
Over the next half year, the EPA will check to see if industries have made any of the pollution prevention improvements suggested over the course of their meetings. Some methods suggested include the separation of solid and liquid wastes from pig-rearing, removal of high salt and chlorine liquid wastes in the dying materials and leather industry, or the removal of dying materials and treatment additives from wastewater in the dying industry. If these changes are reflected in the solid waste online reporting system or by audit numbers, or it can be shown that companies are properly using wastewater treatment facilities but are still stuck at the edge of the control standards due to technology bottlenecks, the EPA will deal with new them on a case-by-case basis. After onsite verification by special personnel, the possibility of opening a subcategory standard can be assessed and discussed. ， 欄位年度的內容是2000 ， 欄位月份的內容是3 ， 欄位卷的內容是3 ， 欄位期的內容是7 ， 欄位順序的內容是1 ， 欄位倒序的內容是2 ， 欄位分類的內容是water ， 欄位標題2的內容是Interim Effluent Standards Expire ， 欄位檔案位置的內容是V3/V3-07 。
編號
472
標題
Interim Effluent Standards Expire
摘要
After the 1998 interim effluent standards expire industries using the interim standards will need to prepare for a slightly modified draft of the 1998 Effluent Standards to take effect. In the draft proposed by the EPA, to encourage recycling in the paper industry, different COD limits will be set according to wastepaper recycling rates. Also, due to the use of different testing methods the standard for true-color value will be adjusted to 550. After completing a public hearing, the EPA presented the draft standards to the Executive Yuan for approval. The reasonability of effluent standards has once again become a topic of contention. Effluent standards were first set in 1991 in Taiwan, and tightened successively in 1993 and 1998. However, before implementation of the 1998 standards, the EPA received a constant stream of industry feedback, asking it to loosen pollutant limits set in standards they claimed were too tough. In the face of scientific evidence and documentation presented for the industry case, on December 24, 1997 the EPA made a well intentioned gesture by creating interim standards for seven large industries; chemicals, paper, pulp, petrochemicals, livestock, leather, and printing and dyeing. Industries were required to come up with improvement plans, and after submitting the plans would be subject to the interim standards for two years. However, after two years, as the interim standards were set to expire, the reasonability of the 1998 effluent standards has once again been brought to the table. The seven large industries have one-by-one presented studies showing that the 1998 standards are too tough, and asking that the interim standards be maintained as the new 2000 standards. Because COD (chemical oxygen demand) and SS (suspended solids) are the main items toughened in the 1998 standards, most industry suggestions were directed at maintaining the interim restrictions for these two standards. Industry representatives noted that due to low sewerage hookup rates in Taiwan, it is impossible to jointly treat industrial and residential wastewater. In this situation, there is no way to adjust the mixture of COD and BOD levels to optimum proportions, lowering the effectiveness of organic wastewater treatment. In addition, industry representatives also pointed out that traditional secondary bio-treatment methods are insufficient to further lower COD discharges, so chemical treatment methods must be used. After the use of large quantities of chemical additives, operating costs and quantities of waste sludge will both increase, as well as the bio-toxicity of wastewater discharges. To come up with a set of reasonable, workable effluent standards, the EPA called numerous meeting between experts and academics; industrial groups; the Industrial Development Bureau (IDB) and the Council of Agriculture, to discuss the standards in light of the current status of industry improvements, technological feasibility and environmental impact. A total of nine different meetings resulted in changes to the draft standards that ensure effluent management will be more reasonable and practicable. Changes include: 1. Due to a change in the testing method for true-color value, the control standard for true-color value should be 550. Thus, the control standard for all target industries was changed to 550 and the proscribed testing method will remain the current method in use. 2. Due to a major switch to wastepaper as a raw material by the paper industry in order to comply with recycling policies, the current shape of the paper industry and the character of it's effluent stream have changed completely. For this reason, paper companies where wastepaper makes up over 60% of raw materials used are allowed a COD limit of 180mg/L. For companies where wastepaper consists of below 60% of raw materials, the COD limit will be 160mg/L, and companies that do not use wastepaper will have to comply with the COD 100mg/L standard. The EPA emphasized that in 1988 and 1987, 2,000 companies made use of the interim standards and signed pledges to continue improvements to pollution prevention. In total pig raising was decreased by almost 280,000 head and around 2.2 billion NTD were invested in order to meet the 1998 effluent standards. Moreover, statistics compiled from onsite audits by local EPBs revealed that compliance with COD standards averages around 81% among industry groups (see graph), with the additional 19% able to meet interim standards. To totally readjust effluent standard values only for the sake of this 19% of problem industries would be a step in the wrong direction and be a violation of the EPA's mandate to protect water quality. Accordingly, the effluent standard values will not be changed again during the current phase. Over the next half year, the EPA will check to see if industries have made any of the pollution prevention improvements suggested over the course of their meetings. Some methods suggested include the separation of solid and liquid wastes from pig-rearing, removal of high salt and chlorine liquid wastes in the dying materials and leather industry, or the removal of dying materials and treatment additives from wastewater in the dying industry. If these changes are reflected in the solid waste online reporting system or by audit numbers, or it can be shown that companies are properly using wastewater treatment facilities but are still stuck at the edge of the control standards due to technology bottlenecks, the EPA will deal with new them on a case-by-case basis. After onsite verification by special personnel, the possibility of opening a subcategory standard can be assessed and discussed.
全文
After the 1998 interim effluent standards expire industries using the interim standards will need to prepare for a slightly modified draft of the 1998 Effluent Standards to take effect. In the draft proposed by the EPA, to encourage recycling in the paper industry, different COD limits will be set according to wastepaper recycling rates. Also, due to the use of different testing methods the standard for true-color value will be adjusted to 550. After completing a public hearing, the EPA presented the draft standards to the Executive Yuan for approval. The reasonability of effluent standards has once again become a topic of contention. Effluent standards were first set in 1991 in Taiwan, and tightened successively in 1993 and 1998. However, before implementation of the 1998 standards, the EPA received a constant stream of industry feedback, asking it to loosen pollutant limits set in standards they claimed were too tough. In the face of scientific evidence and documentation presented for the industry case, on December 24, 1997 the EPA made a well intentioned gesture by creating interim standards for seven large industries; chemicals, paper, pulp, petrochemicals, livestock, leather, and printing and dyeing. Industries were required to come up with improvement plans, and after submitting the plans would be subject to the interim standards for two years. However, after two years, as the interim standards were set to expire, the reasonability of the 1998 effluent standards has once again been brought to the table. The seven large industries have one-by-one presented studies showing that the 1998 standards are too tough, and asking that the interim standards be maintained as the new 2000 standards. Because COD (chemical oxygen demand) and SS (suspended solids) are the main items toughened in the 1998 standards, most industry suggestions were directed at maintaining the interim restrictions for these two standards. Industry representatives noted that due to low sewerage hookup rates in Taiwan, it is impossible to jointly treat industrial and residential wastewater. In this situation, there is no way to adjust the mixture of COD and BOD levels to optimum proportions, lowering the effectiveness of organic wastewater treatment. In addition, industry representatives also pointed out that traditional secondary bio-treatment methods are insufficient to further lower COD discharges, so chemical treatment methods must be used. After the use of large quantities of chemical additives, operating costs and quantities of waste sludge will both increase, as well as the bio-toxicity of wastewater discharges. To come up with a set of reasonable, workable effluent standards, the EPA called numerous meeting between experts and academics; industrial groups; the Industrial Development Bureau (IDB) and the Council of Agriculture, to discuss the standards in light of the current status of industry improvements, technological feasibility and environmental impact. A total of nine different meetings resulted in changes to the draft standards that ensure effluent management will be more reasonable and practicable. Changes include: 1. Due to a change in the testing method for true-color value, the control standard for true-color value should be 550. Thus, the control standard for all target industries was changed to 550 and the proscribed testing method will remain the current method in use. 2. Due to a major switch to wastepaper as a raw material by the paper industry in order to comply with recycling policies, the current shape of the paper industry and the character of it's effluent stream have changed completely. For this reason, paper companies where wastepaper makes up over 60% of raw materials used are allowed a COD limit of 180mg/L. For companies where wastepaper consists of below 60% of raw materials, the COD limit will be 160mg/L, and companies that do not use wastepaper will have to comply with the COD 100mg/L standard. The EPA emphasized that in 1988 and 1987, 2,000 companies made use of the interim standards and signed pledges to continue improvements to pollution prevention. In total pig raising was decreased by almost 280,000 head and around 2.2 billion NTD were invested in order to meet the 1998 effluent standards. Moreover, statistics compiled from onsite audits by local EPBs revealed that compliance with COD standards averages around 81% among industry groups (see graph), with the additional 19% able to meet interim standards. To totally readjust effluent standard values only for the sake of this 19% of problem industries would be a step in the wrong direction and be a violation of the EPA's mandate to protect water quality. Accordingly, the effluent standard values will not be changed again during the current phase. Over the next half year, the EPA will check to see if industries have made any of the pollution prevention improvements suggested over the course of their meetings. Some methods suggested include the separation of solid and liquid wastes from pig-rearing, removal of high salt and chlorine liquid wastes in the dying materials and leather industry, or the removal of dying materials and treatment additives from wastewater in the dying industry. If these changes are reflected in the solid waste online reporting system or by audit numbers, or it can be shown that companies are properly using wastewater treatment facilities but are still stuck at the edge of the control standards due to technology bottlenecks, the EPA will deal with new them on a case-by-case basis. After onsite verification by special personnel, the possibility of opening a subcategory standard can be assessed and discussed.
年度
2000
月份
3
卷
3
期
7
順序
1
倒序
2
分類
water
標題2
Interim Effluent Standards Expire
檔案位置
V3/V3-07
「Interim Effluent Standards Expirewater2000」所屬的資料集：「MajorEnvironmentalPolicies」的其他資料
編號：
3830
標題：
Promoting Marine Protection at the APEC Marine Environment Sustainability Meeting
摘要：
On 2-3 October, the EPA held the 20th APEC Roundtable Meeting on the Involvement of Business/Private
全文：
APEC is an important international organization in which Taiwan participates. Strengthening public-p
編號：
3842
標題：
Results of Food Safety Policies Examined to Enhance Control
摘要：
chemicals
Results of Food Safety Policies Examined to Enhance Control
On 10 December 2019, the Exe
全文：
The meeting was also attended by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, the Council of Agriculture, the
編號：
3428
標題：
Local Governments Promoting Low-carbon Sustainable Homeland Awarded
摘要：
General Policy
Local Governments Promoting Low-carbon Sustainable Homeland Awarded
全文：
Local Governments Promoting Low-carbon Sustainable Homeland Awarded
On 23 April 2016, the EPA awarde
編號：
3780
標題：
Foundation Set for a Low-carbon Homeland, Communities Take Action
摘要：
Environmental Management
Foundation Set for a Low-carbon Homeland, Communities Take Action
To raise
全文：
Foundation Set for a Low-carbon Homeland, Communities Take Action
To raise awareness of climate cha
編號：
412
標題：
Regulations Loosened for Use of Tetrachloroethylene by Dry Cleaners in Residential Districts
摘要：
To cope with difficulties faced by dry cleaning stores in complying with toxic substance control reg
全文：
To cope with difficulties faced by dry cleaning stores in complying with toxic substance control reg
編號：
3552
標題：
Extra Green Points Awarded to Encourage Green Transportation on Poor Air Quality Days
摘要：
Ecolabeling
Extra Green Points Awarded to Encourage Green Transportation on Poor Air Quality Days
To
全文：
Extra Green Points Awarded to Encourage Green Transportation on Poor Air Quality Days
To encourage t
編號：
3370
標題：
High Tech Applied to Protect Taiwan’s Environment
摘要：
Environmental Monitoring High Tech Applied to Protect Taiwan’s Environment
Taiwan’s 2015 IT Mont
全文：
High Tech Applied to Protect Taiwan’s Environment
Taiwan’s 2015 IT Month kicked off in November w
編號：
4053
標題：
Revisions of Three Water Pollution-Related Regulations Announced
摘要：
On 31 May, the EPA announced the revisions to the Evaluation Regulations Concerning Water Pollution
全文：
Under all the revisions, “oil storage sites” in the original three Regulations are changed to "stora
編號：
2287
標題：
EPA Rolls Out New Measures for 2009
摘要：
General Policy
EPA Rolls Out New Meas
全文：
General Policy
EPA Rolls Out New Meas
編號：
1808
標題：
Recycling Organizations and Individuals Awarded for Top Performance
摘要：
The EPA held a special award ceremony on 27 July 2006 to increase citizen awareness of progress towa
全文：
The EPA held a special award ceremony on 27 July 2006 to increase citizen awareness of progress towa
編號：
404
標題：
First Wave of Energy Star Program Underway in September
摘要：
In July EPA Administrator Hsung-Hsiung Tsai visited the U.S and signed the Energy Star Program. The
全文：
In July EPA Administrator Hsung-Hsiung Tsai visited the U.S and signed the Energy Star Program. The
編號：
3766
標題：
Everyone Joins Hands to Plant Trees for Dust-prevention and Greening
摘要：
Air
Everyone Joins Hands to Plant Trees for Dust-prevention and Greening
On April 22– Earth Day – t
全文：
Everyone Joins Hands to Plant Trees for Dust-prevention and Greening
On April 22– Earth Day – the E
編號：
4031
標題：
Major Accomplishments of Water quality protection
摘要：
全文：
(1) The Taichung City Lyu-Chuan Canal Improvement Plan was officially completed on 14 April. EPA Dep
編號：
550
標題：
Year 2000 Evaluation of EIA Consultants Underway
摘要：
In 1997 the EPA began to carry out yearly evaluations of the EIA consulting industry to help raise t
全文：
In 1997 the EPA began to carry out yearly evaluations of the EIA consulting industry to help raise t
編號：
3916
標題：
Management Regulations Announced for the Reuse of Incinerator Bottom Ash
摘要：
Waste
3. Management Regulations Announced for the Reuse of Incinerator Bottom Ash
On 18 May 2020, th
全文：
The main points of this announcement are as follows:
(1) New uses of aggregate are added, including
編號：
4059
標題：
Taiwan and EU Jointly Hold Online Seminar on EU's Green Deal
摘要：
Together with the European Institute for Asian Studies, the Taipei Representative Office in the EU a
全文：
In his opening speech, Minister Chang talked about the close collaboration between Taiwan and the EU
編號：
3822
標題：
Technology Applied to Trace Pollution Sources in Southern Taiwan and Stop Deterioration of Air Quali
摘要：
Technology Applied to Trace Pollution Sources in Southern Taiwan and Stop Deterioration of Air Quali
全文：
On 1 November 2019, the Fourth Meeting of the air quality Southern Response Team was held, not only
編號：
3929
標題：
Environmental Management
摘要：
“Green Lifestyle for All” Promotes Environment-Friendly Approaches in Daily Life Facing the post-CO
全文：
“Green Lifestyle for All” Promotes Environment-Friendly Approaches in Daily Life
Facing the post-CO
編號：
3548
標題：
Amendments to Working Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessments Preannounced
摘要：
EIA
Amendments to Working Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessments Preannounced
To shorten th
全文：
Amendments to Working Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessments Preannounced
To shorten the fi
編號：
3246
標題：
EPA Police and Prosecutors Join Forces to Prevent Illegal Discharge of Electroplating Effluents
摘要：
Water EPA Police and Prosecutors Join Forces to Prevent Illegal Discharge of Electroplating Effluent
全文：
EPA Police and Prosecutors Join Forces to Prevent Illegal Discharge of Electroplating Effluents
Dur
編號：
3749
標題：
Chemicals Source Control to Safeguard Food Safety
摘要：
Chemicals
Chemicals Source Control to Safeguard Food Safety
Since the launch of the Toxic and Chemic
全文：
Chemicals Source Control to Safeguard Food Safety
Since the launch of the Toxic and Chemical Substan
編號：
3885
標題：
Taiwan’s 2030 Environmental Protection Goals Set In Line
with International Sustainable Development
摘要：
General Policy
Taiwan’s 2030 Environmental Protection Goals Set In Line
with International Sustainab
全文：
The National Environmental Protection Plan is
based on the Additional Articles of the Constitution
o
編號：
3518
標題：
Representatives of Asian Countries Meet in Taiwan to Discuss Carbon Market Schemes
摘要：
Climate Change
Representatives of Asian Countries Meet in Taiwan to Discuss Carbon Market Schemes
Th
全文：
Representatives of Asian Countries Meet in Taiwan to Discuss Carbon Market Schemes
The 22nd Conferen
編號：
4276
標題：
Regulations to Be Revised as Responsibility of Managing Automobile Exhaust Inspections Returns to EP
摘要：
The EPA preannounced revisions to six regulations: the Air Emission Standards for Mobile Sources (移動
全文：
The preannounced revisions to the six regulations and announcements regarding automobile exhaust ins
編號：
4125
標題：
EPA-ITRI Joint Efforts Create New Value from Used Lithium Batteries
摘要：
EPA-ITRI Joint Efforts Create New Value from Used Lithium Batteries In the midst of widespread elec
全文：
Turning waste batteries to gold in the face of a booming need for batteries
In light of the booming
編號：
3588
標題：
Manufacture, Import, and Sale of Cosmetics and Personal Care Products Containing Microbeads to be Ba
摘要：
Waste
Manufacture, Import, and Sale of Cosmetics and Personal Care Products Containing Microbeads to
全文：
Manufacture, Import, and Sale of Cosmetics and Personal Care Products Containing Microbeads to be Ba
編號：
462
標題：
Legislative Yuan Requests Formation of Environmental Police Bureau Speeded Up
摘要：
The Environmental Police Force was established in July of this year. Due to its effectiveness to dat
全文：
The Environmental Police Force was established in July of this year. Due to its effectiveness to dat
編號：
3945
標題：
Central and Local Governments Jointly Launch 2020 Taiwan AI Water Alarm Network
摘要：
environmental monitoring Central and Local Governments Jointly Launch 2020 Taiwan AI Water Alarm Net
全文：
The “2020 Taiwan AI Water Alarm Network” launch event was held in Hsinchu City on 17 August 2020, fe
編號：
3545
標題：
Amendments to Prohibitions on Activities Causing Water Pollution Preannounced
摘要：
Water
Amendments to Prohibitions on Activities Causing Water Pollution Preannounced
全文：
Amendments to Prohibitions on Activities Causing Water Pollution Preannounced
On 16 February 2017,
編號：
4113
標題：
Science and Technology Projects Achievement Presentation Event Displays Technology Applications towa
摘要：
sustainable development
Science and Technology Projects Achievement Presentation Event Displays Tech
全文：
In his speech, EPA Deputy Minister Hung-Teh Tsai stated that the EPA's science and technology projec
行政院環境保護署 的其他資料集
大甲媽祖遶境即時空品監測成果(全部)
不定期更新更新,137陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2341 | 2022-01-14 01:02:40
行政院環境保護署包裝及盛裝飲用水水源水質抽驗結果
每季更新更新,107黃先生 | 02-23117722#2881 | 2022-01-15 01:10:25
行政院環境保護署地方環保局環保稽查次數
每月更新更新,114謝小姐 | 02-23117722#2103 | 2022-01-14 01:21:24
行政院環境保護署土壤污染物監測及管制標準
不定期更新更新,63王先生 | 02-23832389#8307 | 2022-01-14 01:20:21
行政院環境保護署公告應回收廢物品及容器回收量
每1月更新,64顏先生 | 02-23117722#2109 | 2023-07-30 01:00:53
行政院環境保護署
各月份場址更新率統計報表
不定期更新更新,126賴小姐 | 02-2383-2389#8102 | 2022-01-15 01:12:17
行政院環境保護署環保署環境影響評估審查委員會會議資料
每2月更新,71黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-05 01:00:47
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_高雄市_前鎮站
每1時更新,134陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:57:38
行政院環境保護署總碳氫化合物（THC）監測小時值
每1日更新,103陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:58:32
行政院環境保護署行政院環境保護署環境保護產品驗證機構管理要點
每季更新更新,43孫小姐 | 02-23117722#2926 | 2022-01-15 01:13:11
行政院環境保護署
固定污染源設置、變更、操作許可申請家數統計
每3月更新,82江先生 | 02-23117722#6201 | 2023-08-03 01:03:09
行政院環境保護署重點事業廢棄物-有害污泥之產出及清理流向
每月更新更新,110陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2682 | 2022-01-14 01:24:17
行政院環境保護署經過地質敏感區之環境影響說明書件
每2月更新,133黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-06 01:04:09
行政院環境保護署環保旅店旅館資訊
每1月更新,151林先生 | 02-23117722#2926 | 2023-07-27 01:02:28
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_臺北市_士林站
每1時更新,116陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:58:14
行政院環境保護署
EPQSummary_WaterQualityProtection
不定期更新更新,140郭先生 | 02-2311-7722 EXT.2399 | 2022-01-15 01:13:47
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_臺東縣_關山站
每小時更新更新,154謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:04:50
行政院環境保護署0800資源回收免費專線-一般件問題查詢廢容器統計
每1年更新,57莊先生 | 02-23705888#3108 | 2023-07-27 00:59:59
行政院環境保護署環境影響說明書專案小組初審會議紀錄
不定期更新更新,57劉先生 | 02-2311-7722#2743 | 2022-01-15 01:12:35
行政院環境保護署EPQSummary_EnvironmentalHealth
不定期更新更新,125陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-01 01:01:21
行政院環境保護署
全國飲用水水源水質保護區範圍圖
不定期更新更新,46黃先生 | 02-23117722#2881 | 2022-01-15 01:16:20
行政院環境保護署酸雨成份分析值
每6月更新,148許小姐 | 02-23117722#6113 | 2023-07-28 18:51:41
行政院環境保護署各公告類別申報事業廢棄物流向統計
每1年更新,107林先生 | 02-2311-7722#2671 | 2023-08-07 01:02:02
行政院環境保護署環保專案摘要資料_國際性議題
不定期更新更新,69郭先生 | 02-2311-7722 EXT.2399 | 2022-01-15 01:13:45
行政院環境保護署垃圾清運（處理）作業安全講習會執行成果
不定期更新更新,42謝先生 | (04)2252-1718#53408 | 2023-08-09 01:04:49
行政院環境保護署
核能一廠用過核燃料中期貯存計畫環境監測資料
不定期更新更新,53陳先生 | 04-22521718#51207 | 2022-01-14 01:21:59
行政院環境保護署酸雨監測小時值(每小時提供)
每小時更新更新,75謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:05:11
行政院環境保護署環保集點制度補助作業要點
不定期更新,33王先生 | 02-2311-7722#2921 | 2022-01-15 01:13:29
行政院環境保護署車機型號妥善率報表
每月更新更新,114林先生 | 02-2325-7399#55232 | 2022-01-14 01:18:34
行政院環境保護署全國場址新增列管及解列統計表
不定期更新更新,117賴小姐 | 02-2383-2389#8102 | 2022-01-15 01:12:12
行政院環境保護署