Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant
「Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant」於資料集「MajorEnvironmentalPolicies」由單位「行政院環境保護署」的陳小姐所提供，聯繫電話是(02)23117722#2753,(02)23117722#2756，最近更新時間為：2023-07-30 01:03:45。 欄位編號的內容是567 ， 欄位標題的內容是Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant ， 欄位摘要的內容是In a recent explanation of his stance on construction of Taiwan's fourth nuclear power plant EPA Administrator Edgar Lin stated that previous policy decisions surrounding the plant were not made in an open manner, and that he therefore opposes the construction of the facility. Administrator Lin stated that he would respect the results of a current reevaluation of the facility no matter the outcome. The Administrator further emphasized that because the previous environmental impact assessment was biased, and due to the unresolved problem of radioactive waste treatment, the EPA is currently considering whether to require the planned facility to undergo another EIA.
Due to recent political disputes over the fate of Taiwan’s planned fourth nuclear power plant (hereafter referred to as “Plant 4”), the Legislative Yuan has been actively questioning administration officials on the topic. On May 25, EPA Administrator Edgar Lin visited the Legislative Yuan’s Health, Environment and Public Welfare Committee to report on the future direction of the EPA. During his report, Lin explained that his longstanding opposition to Plant 4 grew out of his opposition to what he perceived as a “dictatorship.” Due to the recent victory of opposition candidate Chen Shui-Bian as president, however, Lin argued that the dictatorship no longer exists, and that he thus no longer steadfastly opposes Plant 4.
Questions over the meaning of Lin’s statement prompted him to offer clarification the following day. He stated that by “dictatorship” he meant the decision-making processes regarding Plant 4. He pointed out that he opposed Plant 4 because the processes were neither open, fair, nor democratic, not because of an administrative dictatorship. If in the future, decisions regarding Plant 4 are made in an open and transparent manner, Lin will accept the results, whatever they may be. He remains very concerned, however, over the enormous decommissioning costs the plant will entail at the end of its life.
Lin also stated his opinion that Plant 4 should undergo another environmental impact assessment (EIA). He supported this suggestion with several claims. First, Lin considers the findings of the previous EIA to be biased. The job of an EIA review committee, he argued, is to review an environmental impact report, not issue an opinion. Second, waste from Taiwan’s other nuclear plants have still not been subject to final treatment and disposal. Plant 1 is currently storing more than 29,000 barrels of waste, while Plant 2 is temporarily storing on site over 32,000 barrels. The US and Europe no longer have the capacity to treat nuclear waste. In Taiwan, the problem of treatment is magnified by the island’s high population density and shortage of land. Moreover, economically advanced countries such as the UK and the US no longer build nuclear power plants due to factors such as waste treatment costs and safety concerns. Lin asked, in light of these trends, if it was not strange that Taiwan should be pursuing a fourth plant.
Lin also refuted the argument that Taiwan needs nuclear power to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. He pointed out that Taiwan's development policies still permit development of large industrial facilities, such as the Bing-Nan Industrial Complex and the Eighth Naptha Cracker, which if completed would be very large sources of CO2 emissions. Taiwan's industrial structure must be readjusted to resolve this contradiction.
Lin emphasized that Taiwan’s energy policy should follow a “small is beautiful” path that utilizes energy from multiple renewable sources. Constructing a fourth nuclear power plant would be a step back from the goal of energy source diversification and could have a serious impact on the island’s environment. Plant 4 would derail alternative energy projects, and built rashly without could entail even greater future costs. For these two reasons, Administrator Lin hopes to begin a new EIA for the facility. He repeatedly emphasized that any future EIA process must be open and transparent. ， 欄位全文的內容是In a recent explanation of his stance on construction of Taiwan's fourth nuclear power plant EPA Administrator Edgar Lin stated that previous policy decisions surrounding the plant were not made in an open manner, and that he therefore opposes the construction of the facility. Administrator Lin stated that he would respect the results of a current reevaluation of the facility no matter the outcome. The Administrator further emphasized that because the previous environmental impact assessment was biased, and due to the unresolved problem of radioactive waste treatment, the EPA is currently considering whether to require the planned facility to undergo another EIA.
Due to recent political disputes over the fate of Taiwan’s planned fourth nuclear power plant (hereafter referred to as “Plant 4”), the Legislative Yuan has been actively questioning administration officials on the topic. On May 25, EPA Administrator Edgar Lin visited the Legislative Yuan’s Health, Environment and Public Welfare Committee to report on the future direction of the EPA. During his report, Lin explained that his longstanding opposition to Plant 4 grew out of his opposition to what he perceived as a “dictatorship.” Due to the recent victory of opposition candidate Chen Shui-Bian as president, however, Lin argued that the dictatorship no longer exists, and that he thus no longer steadfastly opposes Plant 4.
Questions over the meaning of Lin’s statement prompted him to offer clarification the following day. He stated that by “dictatorship” he meant the decision-making processes regarding Plant 4. He pointed out that he opposed Plant 4 because the processes were neither open, fair, nor democratic, not because of an administrative dictatorship. If in the future, decisions regarding Plant 4 are made in an open and transparent manner, Lin will accept the results, whatever they may be. He remains very concerned, however, over the enormous decommissioning costs the plant will entail at the end of its life.
Lin also stated his opinion that Plant 4 should undergo another environmental impact assessment (EIA). He supported this suggestion with several claims. First, Lin considers the findings of the previous EIA to be biased. The job of an EIA review committee, he argued, is to review an environmental impact report, not issue an opinion. Second, waste from Taiwan’s other nuclear plants have still not been subject to final treatment and disposal. Plant 1 is currently storing more than 29,000 barrels of waste, while Plant 2 is temporarily storing on site over 32,000 barrels. The US and Europe no longer have the capacity to treat nuclear waste. In Taiwan, the problem of treatment is magnified by the island’s high population density and shortage of land. Moreover, economically advanced countries such as the UK and the US no longer build nuclear power plants due to factors such as waste treatment costs and safety concerns. Lin asked, in light of these trends, if it was not strange that Taiwan should be pursuing a fourth plant.
Lin also refuted the argument that Taiwan needs nuclear power to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. He pointed out that Taiwan's development policies still permit development of large industrial facilities, such as the Bing-Nan Industrial Complex and the Eighth Naptha Cracker, which if completed would be very large sources of CO2 emissions. Taiwan's industrial structure must be readjusted to resolve this contradiction.
Lin emphasized that Taiwan’s energy policy should follow a “small is beautiful” path that utilizes energy from multiple renewable sources. Constructing a fourth nuclear power plant would be a step back from the goal of energy source diversification and could have a serious impact on the island’s environment. Plant 4 would derail alternative energy projects, and built rashly without could entail even greater future costs. For these two reasons, Administrator Lin hopes to begin a new EIA for the facility. He repeatedly emphasized that any future EIA process must be open and transparent. ， 欄位年度的內容是2000 ， 欄位月份的內容是3 ， 欄位卷的內容是3 ， 欄位期的內容是13 ， 欄位順序的內容是1 ， 欄位倒序的內容是2 ， 欄位分類的內容是Climate Change ， 欄位標題2的內容是Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan s Fourth Nuclear Plant ， 欄位檔案位置的內容是V1/V3-13 。
編號
567
標題
Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant
摘要
In a recent explanation of his stance on construction of Taiwan's fourth nuclear power plant EPA Administrator Edgar Lin stated that previous policy decisions surrounding the plant were not made in an open manner, and that he therefore opposes the construction of the facility. Administrator Lin stated that he would respect the results of a current reevaluation of the facility no matter the outcome. The Administrator further emphasized that because the previous environmental impact assessment was biased, and due to the unresolved problem of radioactive waste treatment, the EPA is currently considering whether to require the planned facility to undergo another EIA. Due to recent political disputes over the fate of Taiwan’s planned fourth nuclear power plant (hereafter referred to as “Plant 4”), the Legislative Yuan has been actively questioning administration officials on the topic. On May 25, EPA Administrator Edgar Lin visited the Legislative Yuan’s Health, Environment and Public Welfare Committee to report on the future direction of the EPA. During his report, Lin explained that his longstanding opposition to Plant 4 grew out of his opposition to what he perceived as a “dictatorship.” Due to the recent victory of opposition candidate Chen Shui-Bian as president, however, Lin argued that the dictatorship no longer exists, and that he thus no longer steadfastly opposes Plant 4. Questions over the meaning of Lin’s statement prompted him to offer clarification the following day. He stated that by “dictatorship” he meant the decision-making processes regarding Plant 4. He pointed out that he opposed Plant 4 because the processes were neither open, fair, nor democratic, not because of an administrative dictatorship. If in the future, decisions regarding Plant 4 are made in an open and transparent manner, Lin will accept the results, whatever they may be. He remains very concerned, however, over the enormous decommissioning costs the plant will entail at the end of its life. Lin also stated his opinion that Plant 4 should undergo another environmental impact assessment (EIA). He supported this suggestion with several claims. First, Lin considers the findings of the previous EIA to be biased. The job of an EIA review committee, he argued, is to review an environmental impact report, not issue an opinion. Second, waste from Taiwan’s other nuclear plants have still not been subject to final treatment and disposal. Plant 1 is currently storing more than 29,000 barrels of waste, while Plant 2 is temporarily storing on site over 32,000 barrels. The US and Europe no longer have the capacity to treat nuclear waste. In Taiwan, the problem of treatment is magnified by the island’s high population density and shortage of land. Moreover, economically advanced countries such as the UK and the US no longer build nuclear power plants due to factors such as waste treatment costs and safety concerns. Lin asked, in light of these trends, if it was not strange that Taiwan should be pursuing a fourth plant. Lin also refuted the argument that Taiwan needs nuclear power to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. He pointed out that Taiwan's development policies still permit development of large industrial facilities, such as the Bing-Nan Industrial Complex and the Eighth Naptha Cracker, which if completed would be very large sources of CO2 emissions. Taiwan's industrial structure must be readjusted to resolve this contradiction. Lin emphasized that Taiwan’s energy policy should follow a “small is beautiful” path that utilizes energy from multiple renewable sources. Constructing a fourth nuclear power plant would be a step back from the goal of energy source diversification and could have a serious impact on the island’s environment. Plant 4 would derail alternative energy projects, and built rashly without could entail even greater future costs. For these two reasons, Administrator Lin hopes to begin a new EIA for the facility. He repeatedly emphasized that any future EIA process must be open and transparent.
全文
In a recent explanation of his stance on construction of Taiwan's fourth nuclear power plant EPA Administrator Edgar Lin stated that previous policy decisions surrounding the plant were not made in an open manner, and that he therefore opposes the construction of the facility. Administrator Lin stated that he would respect the results of a current reevaluation of the facility no matter the outcome. The Administrator further emphasized that because the previous environmental impact assessment was biased, and due to the unresolved problem of radioactive waste treatment, the EPA is currently considering whether to require the planned facility to undergo another EIA. Due to recent political disputes over the fate of Taiwan’s planned fourth nuclear power plant (hereafter referred to as “Plant 4”), the Legislative Yuan has been actively questioning administration officials on the topic. On May 25, EPA Administrator Edgar Lin visited the Legislative Yuan’s Health, Environment and Public Welfare Committee to report on the future direction of the EPA. During his report, Lin explained that his longstanding opposition to Plant 4 grew out of his opposition to what he perceived as a “dictatorship.” Due to the recent victory of opposition candidate Chen Shui-Bian as president, however, Lin argued that the dictatorship no longer exists, and that he thus no longer steadfastly opposes Plant 4. Questions over the meaning of Lin’s statement prompted him to offer clarification the following day. He stated that by “dictatorship” he meant the decision-making processes regarding Plant 4. He pointed out that he opposed Plant 4 because the processes were neither open, fair, nor democratic, not because of an administrative dictatorship. If in the future, decisions regarding Plant 4 are made in an open and transparent manner, Lin will accept the results, whatever they may be. He remains very concerned, however, over the enormous decommissioning costs the plant will entail at the end of its life. Lin also stated his opinion that Plant 4 should undergo another environmental impact assessment (EIA). He supported this suggestion with several claims. First, Lin considers the findings of the previous EIA to be biased. The job of an EIA review committee, he argued, is to review an environmental impact report, not issue an opinion. Second, waste from Taiwan’s other nuclear plants have still not been subject to final treatment and disposal. Plant 1 is currently storing more than 29,000 barrels of waste, while Plant 2 is temporarily storing on site over 32,000 barrels. The US and Europe no longer have the capacity to treat nuclear waste. In Taiwan, the problem of treatment is magnified by the island’s high population density and shortage of land. Moreover, economically advanced countries such as the UK and the US no longer build nuclear power plants due to factors such as waste treatment costs and safety concerns. Lin asked, in light of these trends, if it was not strange that Taiwan should be pursuing a fourth plant. Lin also refuted the argument that Taiwan needs nuclear power to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. He pointed out that Taiwan's development policies still permit development of large industrial facilities, such as the Bing-Nan Industrial Complex and the Eighth Naptha Cracker, which if completed would be very large sources of CO2 emissions. Taiwan's industrial structure must be readjusted to resolve this contradiction. Lin emphasized that Taiwan’s energy policy should follow a “small is beautiful” path that utilizes energy from multiple renewable sources. Constructing a fourth nuclear power plant would be a step back from the goal of energy source diversification and could have a serious impact on the island’s environment. Plant 4 would derail alternative energy projects, and built rashly without could entail even greater future costs. For these two reasons, Administrator Lin hopes to begin a new EIA for the facility. He repeatedly emphasized that any future EIA process must be open and transparent.
年度
2000
月份
3
卷
3
期
13
順序
1
倒序
2
分類
Climate Change
標題2
Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan s Fourth Nuclear Plant
檔案位置
V1/V3-13
「Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant」所屬的資料集：「MajorEnvironmentalPolicies」的其他資料
編號：
325
標題：
Semiconductor Industry Expenditures on Air Pollution Control Expected to Hit NT$1.2 Billion
摘要：
By July 2000 all current semiconductor production operations must meet emission standards as stipula
全文：
By July 2000 all current semiconductor production operations must meet emission standards as stipula
編號：
3366
標題：
PCNs Preannounced as Class 1 Toxic Chemical Substances
摘要：
Toxic Substance PCNs Preannounced as Class 1 Toxic Chemical Substances
Due to the international tre
全文：
PCNs Preannounced as Class 1 Toxic Chemical Substances
Due to the international trend toward restric
編號：
277
標題：
Recycling Improvement Measures for PET Bottles and Discarded Tires Confirmed
摘要：
The EPA is actively developing response measures to the PET Bottle Recycling Fund's red ink and the
全文：
The EPA is actively developing response measures to the PET Bottle Recycling Fund's red ink and the
編號：
3819
標題：
Draft Revisions Preannounced for Regulations Concerning Toxic Chemical Substances Emergency Equipmen
摘要：
Chemicals
全文：
On 5 September 2019, the EPA preannounced draft revisions to the Concerning Toxic Chemical Substance
編號：
810
標題：
EPA Promotes Putzu River Basin Clean up
摘要：
The government will allocate NT$ 3.86 billion for the Putzu River basin remediation project in order
全文：
The government will allocate NT$ 3.86 billion for the Putzu River basin remediation project in order
編號：
3917
標題：
Use of Food Waste as Fertilizer Promoted for Better Harvests, Cleaner Rivers, and Lower Production C
摘要：
Environmental Inspection
4. Use of Food Waste as Fertilizer Promoted for Better Harvests, Cleaner Ri
全文：
At the conference, the county government displayed organic matter products made with recycled food w
編號：
3980
標題：
Taiwan and U.K. Join Hands to Launch First Report on Carbon Pricing
摘要：
The EPA cooperated with the British Office in Taipei in July 2020 to commission the Grantham Researc
全文：
The EPA explains that the cooperation with the international research think tank directly represents
編號：
3450
標題：
Taiwan and US hold International Air Quality Monitoring Camp for Youth in Thailand
摘要：
Environmental Monitoring
Taiwan and US hold International Air Quality Monitoring Camp for Youth in T
全文：
Taiwan and US hold International Air Quality Monitoring Camp for Youth in Thailand
From 21-24 June 2
編號：
3373
標題：
Urban Mining Promoted for Full-scale E-waste Recycling
摘要：
Waste Urban Mining Promoted for Full-scale E-waste Recycling
From 12-15 October 2015, the Taiwan
全文：
Urban Mining Promoted for Full-scale E-waste Recycling
From 12-15 October 2015, the Taiwan and US
編號：
3400
標題：
EPA’s Environmental Incidents Specialist Teams Acquire ISO Certification
摘要：
General Policy
EPA’s Environmental Incidents Specialist Teams Acquire ISO Certification
全文：
EPA’s Environmental Incidents Specialist Teams Acquire ISO Certification
To standardize the preparat
編號：
3069
標題：
EPA and Transport Companies Sign Eco-Driving Agreement
摘要：
Air Quality
EPA and Transport Companies Sign Eco-Driving Agreement
In order to encourage energy sa
全文：
Air Quality
EPA and Transport Companies Sign Eco-Driving Agreement
In order to encourage energy sa
編號：
559
標題：
Public Hearing Held for Draft GHG Control Act
摘要：
Based on a resolution from the National Energy Conference the EPA has proposed a draft Green House G
全文：
Based on a resolution from the National Energy Conference the EPA has proposed a draft Green House G
編號：
3739
標題：
Regulations Governing Incentives for Energy Efficiency Compliance Standards Amended
摘要：
Climate Change
Regulations Governing Incentives for Energy Efficiency Compliance Standards Amended
全文：
Regulations Governing Incentives for Energy Efficiency Compliance Standards Amended
The EPA announc
編號：
3585
標題：
Environmental Fleet Mobilized for Nationwide Ocean Clean-up
摘要：
Water
Environmental Fleet Mobilized for Nationwide Ocean Clean-up
In response to 2017 World Oceans D
全文：
Environmental Fleet Mobilized for Nationwide Ocean Clean-up
編號：
3676
標題：
Central and Local Governments Jointly Build Educational Park to Purify Nankan River
摘要：
Water
Central and Local Governments Jointly Build Educational Park to Purify Nankan River
On 26 Marc
全文：
Central and Local Governments Jointly Build Educational Park to Purify Nankan River
On 26 March, the
編號：
3815
標題：
EPA Implements Control Measures for Continuous Air Quality Improvement
摘要：
The nationwide concentrations of various air pollutants have been dropping since the beginning of 20
全文：
The number of red alerts based on the Air Quality Index (AQI) set off over the years are as follows:
編號：
4111
標題：
The EPA Hosts Net Zero Urban Action Forum during UN Climate Change Convention COP26
摘要：
climate change
The EPA Hosts Net Zero Urban Action Forum during UN Climate Change Convention COP26
T
全文：
The EPA stated that a 2021 report published by the International Energy Agency found that more than
編號：
798
標題：
EPA Developing Funding Sources for Water Pollution Control
摘要：
Current local government budgeting practices often leave little funding for water pollution control
全文：
Current local government budgeting practices often leave little funding for water pollution control
編號：
3925
標題：
Maximum Fine for Tampering with Monitoring Data Increased to NT$20 Million
摘要：
Maximum Fine for Tampering with Monitoring Data Increased to NT$20 Million
On 10 June 2020, the EPA
全文：
Maximum Fine for Tampering with Monitoring Data Increased to NT$20 Million. The Fine Determination C
編號：
2081
標題：
First Foreign Firm to Enter ESTP Commences Operations
摘要：
Waste Management
First Foreign Fi
全文：
Waste Management
First Foreign Fi
編號：
4062
標題：
First Soil Pollution Remediation Site Caused by Disposal Taken Off Control List in 2021
摘要：
The EPA has striven to ensure sustainable and safe soil and groundwater environments across Taiwan.
全文：
On 20 May 2011, Tainan City Hall announced the site as a listed soil pollution control site based on
編號：
3990
標題：
Subsidies Available with Online Application to Replace Large Old Diesel Vehicles
摘要：
For the Subsidizations for Replacing Large Old Diesel Vehicles (大型柴油車汰舊換新補助) and the Subsidizations
全文：
The EPA said that the online system for applying for all subsidies for Phases 1-3 large diesel vehic
編號：
238
標題：
7 EPA Takes Steps to Improve PET Bottle Recycling System
摘要：
The PET Bottle Recycling Fund has suffered losses to date of about NT$770 million. The reasons for t
全文：
The PET Bottle Recycling Fund has suffered losses to date of about NT$770 million. The reasons for t
編號：
3791
標題：
Regulations Regarding Air Pollution Control Units/Personnel Amended
摘要：
Air Regulations Regarding Air Pollution Control Units/Personnel Amended
全文：
According to the revisions to the Air Pollution Control Act announced on 1 August 2018, designated p
編號：
461
標題：
Inspection of Oil Quality on Diesel Trucks Begins in Taichung County
摘要：
The black market in petroleum products is flourishing in Taiwan. Smuggled oil products distribution
全文：
The black market in petroleum products is flourishing in Taiwan. Smuggled oil products distribution
編號：
3684
標題：
2018 Green Vehicles Announced
摘要：
Air Quality
2018 Green Vehicles Announced
Vehicle exhaust accounts for approximately one-third of PM
全文：
2018 Green Vehicles Announced
Vehicle exhaust accounts for approximately one-third of PM2.5 emission
編號：
3460
標題：
Fifteen Towns and Cities Receive Subsidies to Create Eco-friendly Living Environments
摘要：
Environmental Sanitation
Fifteen Towns and Cities Receive Subsidies to Create Eco-friendly Living En
全文：
Fifteen Towns and Cities Receive Subsidies to Create Eco-friendly Living Environments
The EPA has a
編號：
54
標題：
EPA Promotes Coastal Clean-up and Protection Plan
摘要：
Environmental Sanitation Through coordination with coastal management units of city environmental p
全文：
Environmental Sanitation Through coordination with coastal management units of city environmental p
編號：
4054
標題：
Motorcycle Exhaust Inspections Postponed to End of 2021
摘要：
In light of the Central Epidemic Command Center raising the COVID-19 alert to level 3 recently, the
全文：
The EPA explained that motorcycles that have registration documents and have been out of the factory
編號：
4242
標題：
The Management Regulations for Reuse of Industrial Wastes was announced on 19 January 2012 and was l
摘要：
The EPA organized the 2022 Environmental Technology Forum and Achievement Presentation on 5 December
全文：
The 2022 Environmental Technology Forum and Achievement Presentation covered a wide range of issues,
行政院環境保護署 的其他資料集
環評主管機關受理審查之環境影響說明書
每2月更新,125黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-06 01:04:32
行政院環境保護署公害糾紛裁決書
每1年更新,45李先生 | 02-2311-7722#2962 | 2023-08-09 01:04:45
行政院環境保護署病媒防治業許可執照資料
每3月更新,115薛先生 | 02-2325-7399#55413 | 2023-07-27 01:02:57
行政院環境保護署環境教育人員認證展延研習30小時課程規劃參考表
不定期更新,37蘇小姐 | (03)4020789分機669 | 2022-01-15 01:11:11
行政院環境保護署建檔公廁明細-金門縣
不定期更新更新,123賴先生 | 04-2252-1718#53686 | 2023-07-27 01:02:07
行政院環境保護署
廢棄物罰鍰次數
每年更新更新,91謝小姐 | 02-23117722#2103 | 2022-01-14 01:22:30
行政院環境保護署核能一廠、二廠相關計畫環評監督委員會會議紀錄
不定期更新更新,34陳先生 | 04-22521718#51207 | 2023-08-09 01:05:12
行政院環境保護署縣市(嘉義縣)小時值-每小時
每小時更新更新,95謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:01:00
行政院環境保護署建檔公廁明細-彰化縣
不定期更新更新,138賴先生 | 04-2252-1718#53686 | 2023-07-27 01:01:58
行政院環境保護署環境教育(教學)人員(專長)認證申請書
不定期更新更新,42盧小姐 | (03)4020789分機606 | 2023-08-09 01:05:28
行政院環境保護署
固定污染源CEMS監測數據紀錄值資料集(1小時紀錄值)
每1時更新,177洪小姐 | 02-23117722#6221 | 2023-08-02 00:58:28
行政院環境保護署重點事業廢棄物-有害性集塵灰之產出及清理流向
每1月更新,203林先生 | 02-2311-7722#2671 | 2023-08-07 01:01:56
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_高雄市_楠梓站
每1時更新,331陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:57:40
行政院環境保護署焚化廠飛灰穩定化檢測資料
每月更新更新,118吳先生 | 04-22521718#53526 | 2022-01-15 01:15:34
行政院環境保護署EPQSummary_Air
不定期更新更新,322郭先生 | 02-2311-7722 EXT.2399 | 2022-01-15 01:13:50
行政院環境保護署
自來水水質抽驗檢驗結果
每1月更新,115顏先生 | 02-23117722#2109 | 2023-07-27 01:01:26
行政院環境保護署環境現況差異分析及對策檢討報告專案小組審查會議紀錄
每2月更新,78黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-06 01:02:16
行政院環境保護署行政院環境保護署毒物及化學物質局會計月報
每1月更新,53陳小姐 | 02-23257399#55433 | 2023-08-09 01:05:41
行政院環境保護署水庫水質監測站位置圖
不定期更新更新,57陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-07 01:04:22
行政院環境保護署臺南市重要環保統計資料
每月更新更新,155謝小姐 | 02-23117722#2103 | 2022-01-14 01:20:38
行政院環境保護署
歷年毒性化學物質環境流布調查成果手冊
每年更新更新,37陳小姐 | 23257399#55337 | 2022-01-14 01:22:52
行政院環境保護署貨品通關事前聲明確認作業指引簡報
不定期更新,54金先生 | 23257399＃55315 | 2022-01-14 01:22:22
行政院環境保護署本署核准成立之環境保護財團法人名單
不定期更新更新,83黃小姐 | (02)2311-7722#2714 | 2023-08-07 01:01:13
行政院環境保護署環保署職員官等年齡統計資料
不定期更新更新,44黃小姐 | 02-23117722分機2132 | 2022-01-15 01:12:56
行政院環境保護署機動車輛測定機構許可資料
每1月更新,57楊先生 | (03)491-5818轉2103 | 2023-07-27 01:01:43
行政院環境保護署
行政院環境保護署環境保護基金附屬單位法定預算
每1年更新,46郭小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2164 | 2023-08-09 01:05:43
行政院環境保護署事業廢棄物共同清除、處理機構許可資料
不定期更新更新,163何先生 | 02-2311-7722#2653 | 2022-01-14 01:26:04
行政院環境保護署底泥品質檢測資料
每月更新更新,135張小姐 | 02-2383-2389 #8401 | 2022-01-14 01:20:32
行政院環境保護署通過逐車審驗運送車輛
每月更新更新,140林先生 | 02-2325-7399#55232 | 2022-01-14 01:25:47
行政院環境保護署因應對策專案小組初審會議紀錄
不定期更新更新,50劉先生 | 02-23117722#2743 | 2022-01-15 01:12:39
行政院環境保護署