Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant
「Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant」於資料集「MajorEnvironmentalPolicies」由單位「行政院環境保護署」的陳小姐所提供，聯繫電話是(02)23117722#2753,(02)23117722#2756，最近更新時間為：2023-07-30 01:03:45。 欄位編號的內容是567 ， 欄位標題的內容是Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant ， 欄位摘要的內容是In a recent explanation of his stance on construction of Taiwan's fourth nuclear power plant EPA Administrator Edgar Lin stated that previous policy decisions surrounding the plant were not made in an open manner, and that he therefore opposes the construction of the facility. Administrator Lin stated that he would respect the results of a current reevaluation of the facility no matter the outcome. The Administrator further emphasized that because the previous environmental impact assessment was biased, and due to the unresolved problem of radioactive waste treatment, the EPA is currently considering whether to require the planned facility to undergo another EIA.
Due to recent political disputes over the fate of Taiwan’s planned fourth nuclear power plant (hereafter referred to as “Plant 4”), the Legislative Yuan has been actively questioning administration officials on the topic. On May 25, EPA Administrator Edgar Lin visited the Legislative Yuan’s Health, Environment and Public Welfare Committee to report on the future direction of the EPA. During his report, Lin explained that his longstanding opposition to Plant 4 grew out of his opposition to what he perceived as a “dictatorship.” Due to the recent victory of opposition candidate Chen Shui-Bian as president, however, Lin argued that the dictatorship no longer exists, and that he thus no longer steadfastly opposes Plant 4.
Questions over the meaning of Lin’s statement prompted him to offer clarification the following day. He stated that by “dictatorship” he meant the decision-making processes regarding Plant 4. He pointed out that he opposed Plant 4 because the processes were neither open, fair, nor democratic, not because of an administrative dictatorship. If in the future, decisions regarding Plant 4 are made in an open and transparent manner, Lin will accept the results, whatever they may be. He remains very concerned, however, over the enormous decommissioning costs the plant will entail at the end of its life.
Lin also stated his opinion that Plant 4 should undergo another environmental impact assessment (EIA). He supported this suggestion with several claims. First, Lin considers the findings of the previous EIA to be biased. The job of an EIA review committee, he argued, is to review an environmental impact report, not issue an opinion. Second, waste from Taiwan’s other nuclear plants have still not been subject to final treatment and disposal. Plant 1 is currently storing more than 29,000 barrels of waste, while Plant 2 is temporarily storing on site over 32,000 barrels. The US and Europe no longer have the capacity to treat nuclear waste. In Taiwan, the problem of treatment is magnified by the island’s high population density and shortage of land. Moreover, economically advanced countries such as the UK and the US no longer build nuclear power plants due to factors such as waste treatment costs and safety concerns. Lin asked, in light of these trends, if it was not strange that Taiwan should be pursuing a fourth plant.
Lin also refuted the argument that Taiwan needs nuclear power to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. He pointed out that Taiwan's development policies still permit development of large industrial facilities, such as the Bing-Nan Industrial Complex and the Eighth Naptha Cracker, which if completed would be very large sources of CO2 emissions. Taiwan's industrial structure must be readjusted to resolve this contradiction.
Lin emphasized that Taiwan’s energy policy should follow a “small is beautiful” path that utilizes energy from multiple renewable sources. Constructing a fourth nuclear power plant would be a step back from the goal of energy source diversification and could have a serious impact on the island’s environment. Plant 4 would derail alternative energy projects, and built rashly without could entail even greater future costs. For these two reasons, Administrator Lin hopes to begin a new EIA for the facility. He repeatedly emphasized that any future EIA process must be open and transparent. ， 欄位全文的內容是In a recent explanation of his stance on construction of Taiwan's fourth nuclear power plant EPA Administrator Edgar Lin stated that previous policy decisions surrounding the plant were not made in an open manner, and that he therefore opposes the construction of the facility. Administrator Lin stated that he would respect the results of a current reevaluation of the facility no matter the outcome. The Administrator further emphasized that because the previous environmental impact assessment was biased, and due to the unresolved problem of radioactive waste treatment, the EPA is currently considering whether to require the planned facility to undergo another EIA.
Due to recent political disputes over the fate of Taiwan’s planned fourth nuclear power plant (hereafter referred to as “Plant 4”), the Legislative Yuan has been actively questioning administration officials on the topic. On May 25, EPA Administrator Edgar Lin visited the Legislative Yuan’s Health, Environment and Public Welfare Committee to report on the future direction of the EPA. During his report, Lin explained that his longstanding opposition to Plant 4 grew out of his opposition to what he perceived as a “dictatorship.” Due to the recent victory of opposition candidate Chen Shui-Bian as president, however, Lin argued that the dictatorship no longer exists, and that he thus no longer steadfastly opposes Plant 4.
Questions over the meaning of Lin’s statement prompted him to offer clarification the following day. He stated that by “dictatorship” he meant the decision-making processes regarding Plant 4. He pointed out that he opposed Plant 4 because the processes were neither open, fair, nor democratic, not because of an administrative dictatorship. If in the future, decisions regarding Plant 4 are made in an open and transparent manner, Lin will accept the results, whatever they may be. He remains very concerned, however, over the enormous decommissioning costs the plant will entail at the end of its life.
Lin also stated his opinion that Plant 4 should undergo another environmental impact assessment (EIA). He supported this suggestion with several claims. First, Lin considers the findings of the previous EIA to be biased. The job of an EIA review committee, he argued, is to review an environmental impact report, not issue an opinion. Second, waste from Taiwan’s other nuclear plants have still not been subject to final treatment and disposal. Plant 1 is currently storing more than 29,000 barrels of waste, while Plant 2 is temporarily storing on site over 32,000 barrels. The US and Europe no longer have the capacity to treat nuclear waste. In Taiwan, the problem of treatment is magnified by the island’s high population density and shortage of land. Moreover, economically advanced countries such as the UK and the US no longer build nuclear power plants due to factors such as waste treatment costs and safety concerns. Lin asked, in light of these trends, if it was not strange that Taiwan should be pursuing a fourth plant.
Lin also refuted the argument that Taiwan needs nuclear power to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. He pointed out that Taiwan's development policies still permit development of large industrial facilities, such as the Bing-Nan Industrial Complex and the Eighth Naptha Cracker, which if completed would be very large sources of CO2 emissions. Taiwan's industrial structure must be readjusted to resolve this contradiction.
Lin emphasized that Taiwan’s energy policy should follow a “small is beautiful” path that utilizes energy from multiple renewable sources. Constructing a fourth nuclear power plant would be a step back from the goal of energy source diversification and could have a serious impact on the island’s environment. Plant 4 would derail alternative energy projects, and built rashly without could entail even greater future costs. For these two reasons, Administrator Lin hopes to begin a new EIA for the facility. He repeatedly emphasized that any future EIA process must be open and transparent. ， 欄位年度的內容是2000 ， 欄位月份的內容是3 ， 欄位卷的內容是3 ， 欄位期的內容是13 ， 欄位順序的內容是1 ， 欄位倒序的內容是2 ， 欄位分類的內容是Climate Change ， 欄位標題2的內容是Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan s Fourth Nuclear Plant ， 欄位檔案位置的內容是V1/V3-13 。
編號
567
標題
Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant
摘要
In a recent explanation of his stance on construction of Taiwan's fourth nuclear power plant EPA Administrator Edgar Lin stated that previous policy decisions surrounding the plant were not made in an open manner, and that he therefore opposes the construction of the facility. Administrator Lin stated that he would respect the results of a current reevaluation of the facility no matter the outcome. The Administrator further emphasized that because the previous environmental impact assessment was biased, and due to the unresolved problem of radioactive waste treatment, the EPA is currently considering whether to require the planned facility to undergo another EIA. Due to recent political disputes over the fate of Taiwan’s planned fourth nuclear power plant (hereafter referred to as “Plant 4”), the Legislative Yuan has been actively questioning administration officials on the topic. On May 25, EPA Administrator Edgar Lin visited the Legislative Yuan’s Health, Environment and Public Welfare Committee to report on the future direction of the EPA. During his report, Lin explained that his longstanding opposition to Plant 4 grew out of his opposition to what he perceived as a “dictatorship.” Due to the recent victory of opposition candidate Chen Shui-Bian as president, however, Lin argued that the dictatorship no longer exists, and that he thus no longer steadfastly opposes Plant 4. Questions over the meaning of Lin’s statement prompted him to offer clarification the following day. He stated that by “dictatorship” he meant the decision-making processes regarding Plant 4. He pointed out that he opposed Plant 4 because the processes were neither open, fair, nor democratic, not because of an administrative dictatorship. If in the future, decisions regarding Plant 4 are made in an open and transparent manner, Lin will accept the results, whatever they may be. He remains very concerned, however, over the enormous decommissioning costs the plant will entail at the end of its life. Lin also stated his opinion that Plant 4 should undergo another environmental impact assessment (EIA). He supported this suggestion with several claims. First, Lin considers the findings of the previous EIA to be biased. The job of an EIA review committee, he argued, is to review an environmental impact report, not issue an opinion. Second, waste from Taiwan’s other nuclear plants have still not been subject to final treatment and disposal. Plant 1 is currently storing more than 29,000 barrels of waste, while Plant 2 is temporarily storing on site over 32,000 barrels. The US and Europe no longer have the capacity to treat nuclear waste. In Taiwan, the problem of treatment is magnified by the island’s high population density and shortage of land. Moreover, economically advanced countries such as the UK and the US no longer build nuclear power plants due to factors such as waste treatment costs and safety concerns. Lin asked, in light of these trends, if it was not strange that Taiwan should be pursuing a fourth plant. Lin also refuted the argument that Taiwan needs nuclear power to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. He pointed out that Taiwan's development policies still permit development of large industrial facilities, such as the Bing-Nan Industrial Complex and the Eighth Naptha Cracker, which if completed would be very large sources of CO2 emissions. Taiwan's industrial structure must be readjusted to resolve this contradiction. Lin emphasized that Taiwan’s energy policy should follow a “small is beautiful” path that utilizes energy from multiple renewable sources. Constructing a fourth nuclear power plant would be a step back from the goal of energy source diversification and could have a serious impact on the island’s environment. Plant 4 would derail alternative energy projects, and built rashly without could entail even greater future costs. For these two reasons, Administrator Lin hopes to begin a new EIA for the facility. He repeatedly emphasized that any future EIA process must be open and transparent.
全文
In a recent explanation of his stance on construction of Taiwan's fourth nuclear power plant EPA Administrator Edgar Lin stated that previous policy decisions surrounding the plant were not made in an open manner, and that he therefore opposes the construction of the facility. Administrator Lin stated that he would respect the results of a current reevaluation of the facility no matter the outcome. The Administrator further emphasized that because the previous environmental impact assessment was biased, and due to the unresolved problem of radioactive waste treatment, the EPA is currently considering whether to require the planned facility to undergo another EIA. Due to recent political disputes over the fate of Taiwan’s planned fourth nuclear power plant (hereafter referred to as “Plant 4”), the Legislative Yuan has been actively questioning administration officials on the topic. On May 25, EPA Administrator Edgar Lin visited the Legislative Yuan’s Health, Environment and Public Welfare Committee to report on the future direction of the EPA. During his report, Lin explained that his longstanding opposition to Plant 4 grew out of his opposition to what he perceived as a “dictatorship.” Due to the recent victory of opposition candidate Chen Shui-Bian as president, however, Lin argued that the dictatorship no longer exists, and that he thus no longer steadfastly opposes Plant 4. Questions over the meaning of Lin’s statement prompted him to offer clarification the following day. He stated that by “dictatorship” he meant the decision-making processes regarding Plant 4. He pointed out that he opposed Plant 4 because the processes were neither open, fair, nor democratic, not because of an administrative dictatorship. If in the future, decisions regarding Plant 4 are made in an open and transparent manner, Lin will accept the results, whatever they may be. He remains very concerned, however, over the enormous decommissioning costs the plant will entail at the end of its life. Lin also stated his opinion that Plant 4 should undergo another environmental impact assessment (EIA). He supported this suggestion with several claims. First, Lin considers the findings of the previous EIA to be biased. The job of an EIA review committee, he argued, is to review an environmental impact report, not issue an opinion. Second, waste from Taiwan’s other nuclear plants have still not been subject to final treatment and disposal. Plant 1 is currently storing more than 29,000 barrels of waste, while Plant 2 is temporarily storing on site over 32,000 barrels. The US and Europe no longer have the capacity to treat nuclear waste. In Taiwan, the problem of treatment is magnified by the island’s high population density and shortage of land. Moreover, economically advanced countries such as the UK and the US no longer build nuclear power plants due to factors such as waste treatment costs and safety concerns. Lin asked, in light of these trends, if it was not strange that Taiwan should be pursuing a fourth plant. Lin also refuted the argument that Taiwan needs nuclear power to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. He pointed out that Taiwan's development policies still permit development of large industrial facilities, such as the Bing-Nan Industrial Complex and the Eighth Naptha Cracker, which if completed would be very large sources of CO2 emissions. Taiwan's industrial structure must be readjusted to resolve this contradiction. Lin emphasized that Taiwan’s energy policy should follow a “small is beautiful” path that utilizes energy from multiple renewable sources. Constructing a fourth nuclear power plant would be a step back from the goal of energy source diversification and could have a serious impact on the island’s environment. Plant 4 would derail alternative energy projects, and built rashly without could entail even greater future costs. For these two reasons, Administrator Lin hopes to begin a new EIA for the facility. He repeatedly emphasized that any future EIA process must be open and transparent.
年度
2000
月份
3
卷
3
期
13
順序
1
倒序
2
分類
Climate Change
標題2
Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan s Fourth Nuclear Plant
檔案位置
V1/V3-13
「Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant」所屬的資料集：「MajorEnvironmentalPolicies」的其他資料
編號：
373
標題：
Efficiency of the Air Quality Monitoring Data System Improved
摘要：
The EPA's "air quality monitoring network" has collected thousands of reams of data and created a bo
全文：
The EPA's "air quality monitoring network" has collected thousands of reams of data and created a bo
編號：
2535
標題：
Taiwan's First Group of Hotels Certified with the Green Mark
摘要：
Eco-labeling
Taiwan's First Group of
全文：
Eco-labeling
Taiwan's First Group of
編號：
3506
標題：
Government Agencies Join Forces to Promote Circular Economy for Livestock Industry
摘要：
Water
Government Agencies Join Forces to Promote Circular Economy for Livestock Industry
For almost
全文：
Government Agencies Join Forces to Promote Circular Economy for Livestock Industry
For almost one y
編號：
4171
標題：
Measures Announced to Streamline and Improve Regular Testing of Stationary Pollution Sources
摘要：
Measures Announced to Streamline and Improve Regular Testing of Stationary Pollution Sources
The EP
全文：
To improve the existing testing scheme of stationary sources, the air pollutant emission testing sch
編號：
1210
標題：
Tightened Waste Control for Nine Industries
摘要：
Harnessing stricter and more effective control over the industrial waste flow the EPA has focused at
全文：
Harnessing stricter and more effective control over the industrial waste flow the EPA has focused at
編號：
4110
標題：
Inter-ministerial Cooperation to Strengthen the Life Cycle Management of Hazardous Substances
摘要：
Chemicals
Inter-ministerial Cooperation to Strengthen the Life Cycle Management of Hazardous Substan
全文：
The EPA stated that, in accordance with the National Chemical Substance Management Policy Guidelines
編號：
555
標題：
EPA Drafts Supporting Laws for Marine Pollution Control Act
摘要：
While the draft Marine Pollution Control Act is under review by the Legislative Yuan the EPA has beg
全文：
While the draft Marine Pollution Control Act is under review by the Legislative Yuan the EPA has beg
編號：
104
標題：
Structure of Marine Pollution Control Act to be Drafted
摘要：
Water Quality Marine resource welfare and protection from pollution is becoming increasingly import
全文：
Water Quality Marine resource welfare and protection from pollution is becoming increasingly import
編號：
3794
標題：
Toxic Chemicals Management Regulations Amended in Accordance to the Minamata Convention on Mercury
摘要：
Toxic Substance Management Toxic Chemicals Management Regulations Amended in Accordance to the Mina
全文：
The EPA noted mercury primarily enters the human body through inhalation or ingestion. Once mercury
編號：
4058
標題：
Founding of the Office of Recycling and the Office of Climate Change
摘要：
Taiwan has been actively working on various resource recycling projects as well as strategic plans f
全文：
Aiming at "maximizing recycling and minimizing waste disposal," the Office of Recycling will strive
編號：
6
標題：
From the Administrator's Desk
摘要：
Welcome to the first of the ENVIRON-MENTAL POLICY MONTHLY. As environmental protection affairs becom
全文：
General Policy Welcome to the first of the ENVIRON-MENTAL POLICY MONTHLY. As environmental protecti
編號：
492
標題：
Installation of Gas Vapor Recovery Equipment to be Strictly Enforced
摘要：
Volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from Taiwan’s 1800 gas stations comprise 6% of total stati
全文：
Volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from Taiwan’s 1800 gas stations comprise 6% of total stati
編號：
3421
標題：
Free App Available for Finding Shops Selling Green Mark Products
摘要：
Ecolabeling
Free App Available for Finding Shops Selling Green Mark Products
全文：
Free App Available for Finding Shops Selling Green Mark Products
Starting in 1992, the EPA has promo
編號：
530
標題：
Seven Star Green Building Label Awarded to NIEA Building
摘要：
Taiwan Ministry of the Interior has established a program to distinguish buildings that make use of
全文：
Taiwan Ministry of the Interior has established a program to distinguish buildings that make use of
編號：
3531
標題：
Amendments to Drinking Water Standards Announced
摘要：
Toxic Substance
Amendments to Drinking Water Standards Announced
To strengthen drinking water qualit
全文：
Amendments to Drinking Water Standards Announced
To strengthen drinking water quality management and
編號：
1492
標題：
35% HCFC Reduction Target Reached
摘要：
In response to the Montreal Protocol Taiwan has successfully attained its 2004 goal to reduce HCFC c
全文：
In response to the Montreal Protocol Taiwan has successfully attained its 2004 goal to reduce HCFC c
編號：
3342
標題：
Reducing Ozone-depleting Substances: Strategies and Results
摘要：
air Reducing Ozone-depleting Substances: Strategies and Results
全文：
Reducing Ozone-depleting Substances: Strategies and Results
In response to ozone depletion Taiwan
編號：
4053
標題：
Revisions of Three Water Pollution-Related Regulations Announced
摘要：
On 31 May, the EPA announced the revisions to the Evaluation Regulations Concerning Water Pollution
全文：
Under all the revisions, “oil storage sites” in the original three Regulations are changed to "stora
編號：
3991
標題：
From Farm to Table: Protecting Food Safety
摘要：
Food safety requires effective and closely coordinated control from farm to table. Since its establ
全文：
The three agencies jointly hold quarterly Environmental Protection and Food Safety Coordination Mee
編號：
3840
標題：
EPA and MOEA Continue to Reduce Air Pollution of State-run Industries
摘要：
Air
EPA and MOEA Continue to Reduce Air Pollution of State-run Industries
The EPA and the Ministry
全文：
The EPA said that under its joint efforts with the MOEA, state-run industries have seen reduction of
編號：
4123
標題：
Regulations Governing the Certification and Management of Environmental Education Personnel Revised
摘要：
Environmental Education
Regulations Governing the Certification and Management of Environmental Educ
全文：
Given that many years of Environmental Education Act implementation and environmental education pers
編號：
3460
標題：
Fifteen Towns and Cities Receive Subsidies to Create Eco-friendly Living Environments
摘要：
Environmental Sanitation
Fifteen Towns and Cities Receive Subsidies to Create Eco-friendly Living En
全文：
Fifteen Towns and Cities Receive Subsidies to Create Eco-friendly Living Environments
The EPA has a
編號：
3930
標題：
Chemicals
摘要：
2019 Environmental Agent Inspection Results Announced to Promote Legal Sales
In an attempt to ensure
全文：
2019 Environmental Agent Inspection Results Announced to Promote Legal Sales
In an attempt to ensure
編號：
163
標題：
Government Purchasing Act to Add Article on Green Consumerism
摘要：
Eco-labeling According to Article 96 of the Government Purchasing Act passed by the Legislative Yu
全文：
Eco-labeling According to Article 96 of the Government Purchasing Act passed by the Legislative Yu
編號：
3673
標題：
Capacity Building for Environmental Monitoring
摘要：
Env. Monitoring
Capacity Building for Environmental Monitoring
Taiwan’s environmental monitoring op
全文：
Capacity Building for Environmental Monitoring
Taiwan’s environmental monitoring operations began w
編號：
3535
標題：
Mobile Source Pollution Control in Taiwan
摘要：
Air
Mobile Source Pollution Control in Taiwan
Mobile pollution source control is one of the EPA’s m
全文：
Mobile Source Pollution Control in Taiwan
Mobile pollution source control is one of the EPA’s major
編號：
4207
標題：
Li Yue Copper Refinery Becomes First Remediation Site to Incorporate New Risk Management Focus
摘要：
Incorporate New Risk Management Focus
Li Yue Copper Refinery is one of Taiwan’s significant large-sc
全文：
Li Yue Copper Refinery Becomes First Remediation Site to Incorporate New Risk Management Focus
Li Yu
編號：
4124
標題：
Revisions to the Regulations Governing Management of Industrial Waste Reuse Preannounced
摘要：
waste Revisions to the Regulations Governing Management of Industrial Waste Reuse Preannounced To i
全文：
One focus of public concern is whether or not aggregate-type intermediate products produced from ind
編號：
3732
標題：
Air Pollution Control Act Revised for Source to End-of- Pipe Controls
摘要：
Air
Air Pollution Control Act Revised for Source to End-of- Pipe Controls
Revisions of the Air Poll
全文：
Air Pollution Control Act Revised for Source to End-of- Pipe Controls
Revisions of the Air Pollutio
編號：
2822
標題：
Soil and Groundwater Pollution Emergency Response
摘要：
Feature Article
Soil and Groundwater Pollution Emergency Response
The Taiwan government has establ
全文：
Feature Article
Soil and Groundwater Pollution Emergency Response
The Taiwan government has establ
行政院環境保護署 的其他資料集
南投縣重要環保統計資料
每1月更新,309顏先生 | 02-23117722#2109 | 2023-08-07 01:00:08
行政院環境保護署焚化廠空污監測資料
每月更新更新,158吳先生 | 04-22521718#53526 | 2022-01-15 01:15:31
行政院環境保護署公文統計資料
不定期更新更新,70賴先生 | 02-2311-7722#2347 | 2022-01-14 01:22:15
行政院環境保護署固定污染源空氣污染防制費收費統計
每年更新更新,107黃先生 | 02-23712121#6210 | 2022-01-15 01:09:43
行政院環境保護署應回收廢棄物處理業者(廢輪胎類)最大處理量資料
每年更新更新,57廖小姐 | 02-2370-5888#3103 | 2022-01-14 01:24:00
行政院環境保護署
水污染稽查次數
每年更新更新,190謝小姐 | 02-23117722#2103 | 2022-01-14 01:22:26
行政院環境保護署農業事業廢棄物再利用機構資料
每1年更新,152李小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2626 | 2023-07-27 00:59:35
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_新北市_菜寮站
每1時更新,179陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:58:16
行政院環境保護署光化測站(朴子)小時值資料
每月更新更新,241謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:05:29
行政院環境保護署紫外線測站位置圖
不定期更新更新,54陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-09 01:04:55
行政院環境保護署
綠色消費暨環境保護產品審議會設置要點
每季更新更新,40陳先生 | 02-23117722#2936 | 2022-01-15 01:13:12
行政院環境保護署光化測站(小港)小時值資料
不定期更新更新,158陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-07 01:03:32
行政院環境保護署行政院環境保護署「資料開放諮詢小組」會議紀錄
每半年更新更新,48林小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2365 | 2022-01-15 01:12:46
行政院環境保護署全國場址更新率統計報表
不定期更新更新,207賴小姐 | 02-2383-2389#8102 | 2022-01-15 01:12:16
行政院環境保護署空氣品質監測站位置圖
不定期更新更新,60謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-15 01:16:06
行政院環境保護署
環境影響說明書完成審查件數
每年更新更新,103謝小姐 | 02-23117722#2103 | 2022-01-14 01:22:24
行政院環境保護署環保專案摘要資料_毒物管理
不定期更新更新,179郭先生 | 02-2311-7722 EXT.2399 | 2022-01-15 01:13:39
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_桃園市_桃園站
每1時更新,134陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:58:09
行政院環境保護署縣市(彰化縣)小時值-每小時
每1時更新,205陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:58:50
行政院環境保護署噪音陳情管道
不定期更新更新,53王先生 | 02-23712121#6401 | 2022-01-14 01:18:43
行政院環境保護署
光化測站(臺南)小時值資料
不定期更新更新,176陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-07 01:03:35
行政院環境保護署管制事業、下水道系統下水道查核、處分資料資訊平台
不定期更新更新,48陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2827 | 2023-08-09 01:04:16
行政院環境保護署建檔公廁明細-南投縣
不定期更新更新,150賴先生 | 04-2252-1718#53686 | 2023-07-27 01:02:06
行政院環境保護署再生粒料毒性特性溶出試驗結果
不定期更新更新,63許先生 | 02-2311-7722#2641 | 2022-01-14 01:18:39
行政院環境保護署光化測站(臺西)小時值資料
每1月更新,168陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-07 01:03:36
行政院環境保護署
空氣品質小時值_高雄市_楠梓站
每1時更新,431陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:57:40
行政院環境保護署公民營廢棄物清除機構資料
每月更新更新,170何先生 | 02-2311-7722#2653 | 2022-01-14 01:26:25
行政院環境保護署全國飲用水水源水質保護區範圍圖
不定期更新更新,52黃先生 | 02-23117722#2881 | 2022-01-15 01:16:20
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_雲林縣_麥寮站
每小時更新更新,158謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:04:51
行政院環境保護署政策評估說明書專案小組意見徵詢會議紀錄
每2月更新,74黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-05 00:59:43
行政院環境保護署