EY Gives Green Light to Draft of Soil Pollution ActSoil and Groundwater
「EY Gives Green Light to Draft of Soil Pollution ActSoil and Groundwater」於資料集「Environmental Policy Monthly」由單位「行政院環境保護署」的楊先生所提供，聯繫電話是(02)23117722#2217,(02)23117722#2216，最近更新時間為：2022-01-15 01:13:03。 欄位編號的內容是380 ， 欄位標題的內容是EY Gives Green Light to Draft of Soil Pollution Act ， 欄位摘要的內容是The Executive Yuan (EY) recently completed its review of the proposed Soil Pollution Control Act. During review the EY changed the name of the draft act to the “Soil Pollution Remediation Act” in order to clearly define the Act’s focus on standardizing soil pollution remediation. Changes to the Act's content include narrowing of soil pollution liability and basing collection of soil pollution control fees on specified soil pollutants. The Act’s framework and other provisions shall remain as found in the EPA’s submitted version.
In August 1998, the EPA submitted a draft Soil Pollution Control Act to the Executive Yuan (EY) for review. Following extensive discussion with related agencies, the EY completed its review of the now-entitled “Soil Pollution Remediation Act” draft, which was then sent to the Legislative Yuan on June 24 1999 for deliberation.
The Executive Yuan Review Committee’s first decision was to change the original name of the Act, from “Soil Pollution Control Act” to “Soil Pollution Remediation Act.” Although this may seem like a minor change, the new name more accurately expresses what the EY sees as the Act’s key point -- the remediation of soil after it has been contaminated.
In terms of soil pollution prevention, the role of the Act will be to work in conjunction with other environmental regulations. That is to say, if soil contamination is discovered, control and removal of the pollution source should be in accordance with other environmental regulations. For example, an incident of industrial waste dumping should be handled according to the Waste Disposal Act, even though the incident results in soil contamination.
The greatest differences between the draft of the Act reviewed by the Executive Yuan and that originally submitted by the EPA lie in the much disputed issue of liability for soil cleanup and in the issue of sources for the soil pollution control fund.
As for the scope of cleanup liability, the EPA’s original draft defined liability very broadly. In addition to placing liability with the polluters, it also placed liability with the land owners and users. As such land owners and users do not necessarily possess the capabilities necessary for pollution prevention, the use of this method to expand liability was met with fairly extensive opposition.
Following EY review, the new version of the draft Act sees land owners and users as “relevant parties.” Even though they must do their best to properly manage related affairs, land owners and users will not be held jointly liable for cleanup and compensation, unless an egregious violation on their part leads to contamination.
As for the sources of the soil pollution control fund, the EY ruled out establishing the fund by drawing yearly payments from funds set up by other environmental laws. Instead, the EY adopted a model based on the Superfund model in the U.S. “Soil remediation fees” will be collected from importers and manufacturers of specified chemical substances according to the imported or manufactured quantity. Categories of specified chemical substances will be established based on considerations of the soil contamination risks of the substances in question. Chemical substances will be separately specified and announced by the EPA (according to the EPA’s initial description in the Act, this will likely include benzene, vinyl chloride, cadmium, mercury, and many other chemical substances).
To enhance the effectiveness of applying the Act, the EY maintained the retroactive model, whereby cases of soil pollution discovered or under remediation prior to the Act coming into effect must still abide by the Act’s clearance, treatment and compensation clauses.
Future soil remediation efforts will still proceed on a dual-track system. When contamination is discovered, liability will lie mostly with the polluter. However, so that remediation may occur as soon as possible, under special circumstances the local competent authority should act to determine remediation plans, which will be implemented after approval by the central competent authority.
Because soil pollution can easily lead to groundwater contamination, the spread of contamination must be stopped as soon as possible. The draft Act stipulates that, following evidence of groundwater contamination at listed sites, plans for groundwater remediation must also be established. The EPA is currently drafting amendments of the Water Pollution Control Act and has already included provisions concerning groundwater contamination.
Remaining details of the draft Act, such as soil pollution monitoring standards, soil pollution control standards, and soil analysis methods will be drafted by the EPA. ， 欄位全文的內容是The Executive Yuan (EY) recently completed its review of the proposed Soil Pollution Control Act. During review the EY changed the name of the draft act to the “Soil Pollution Remediation Act” in order to clearly define the Act’s focus on standardizing soil pollution remediation. Changes to the Act's content include narrowing of soil pollution liability and basing collection of soil pollution control fees on specified soil pollutants. The Act’s framework and other provisions shall remain as found in the EPA’s submitted version.
In August 1998, the EPA submitted a draft Soil Pollution Control Act to the Executive Yuan (EY) for review. Following extensive discussion with related agencies, the EY completed its review of the now-entitled “Soil Pollution Remediation Act” draft, which was then sent to the Legislative Yuan on June 24 1999 for deliberation.
The Executive Yuan Review Committee’s first decision was to change the original name of the Act, from “Soil Pollution Control Act” to “Soil Pollution Remediation Act.” Although this may seem like a minor change, the new name more accurately expresses what the EY sees as the Act’s key point -- the remediation of soil after it has been contaminated.
In terms of soil pollution prevention, the role of the Act will be to work in conjunction with other environmental regulations. That is to say, if soil contamination is discovered, control and removal of the pollution source should be in accordance with other environmental regulations. For example, an incident of industrial waste dumping should be handled according to the Waste Disposal Act, even though the incident results in soil contamination.
The greatest differences between the draft of the Act reviewed by the Executive Yuan and that originally submitted by the EPA lie in the much disputed issue of liability for soil cleanup and in the issue of sources for the soil pollution control fund.
As for the scope of cleanup liability, the EPA’s original draft defined liability very broadly. In addition to placing liability with the polluters, it also placed liability with the land owners and users. As such land owners and users do not necessarily possess the capabilities necessary for pollution prevention, the use of this method to expand liability was met with fairly extensive opposition.
Following EY review, the new version of the draft Act sees land owners and users as “relevant parties.” Even though they must do their best to properly manage related affairs, land owners and users will not be held jointly liable for cleanup and compensation, unless an egregious violation on their part leads to contamination.
As for the sources of the soil pollution control fund, the EY ruled out establishing the fund by drawing yearly payments from funds set up by other environmental laws. Instead, the EY adopted a model based on the Superfund model in the U.S. “Soil remediation fees” will be collected from importers and manufacturers of specified chemical substances according to the imported or manufactured quantity. Categories of specified chemical substances will be established based on considerations of the soil contamination risks of the substances in question. Chemical substances will be separately specified and announced by the EPA (according to the EPA’s initial description in the Act, this will likely include benzene, vinyl chloride, cadmium, mercury, and many other chemical substances).
To enhance the effectiveness of applying the Act, the EY maintained the retroactive model, whereby cases of soil pollution discovered or under remediation prior to the Act coming into effect must still abide by the Act’s clearance, treatment and compensation clauses.
Future soil remediation efforts will still proceed on a dual-track system. When contamination is discovered, liability will lie mostly with the polluter. However, so that remediation may occur as soon as possible, under special circumstances the local competent authority should act to determine remediation plans, which will be implemented after approval by the central competent authority.
Because soil pollution can easily lead to groundwater contamination, the spread of contamination must be stopped as soon as possible. The draft Act stipulates that, following evidence of groundwater contamination at listed sites, plans for groundwater remediation must also be established. The EPA is currently drafting amendments of the Water Pollution Control Act and has already included provisions concerning groundwater contamination.
Remaining details of the draft Act, such as soil pollution monitoring standards, soil pollution control standards, and soil analysis methods will be drafted by the EPA. ， 欄位年度的內容是2000 ， 欄位月份的內容是3 ， 欄位卷的內容是3 ， 欄位期的內容是1 ， 欄位順序的內容是1 ， 欄位倒序的內容是2 ， 欄位分類的內容是Soil and Groundwater ， 欄位標題2的內容是EY Gives Green Light to Draft of Soil Pollution Act ， 欄位檔案位置的內容是print/V3/V3-01 。
編號
380
標題
EY Gives Green Light to Draft of Soil Pollution Act
摘要
The Executive Yuan (EY) recently completed its review of the proposed Soil Pollution Control Act. During review the EY changed the name of the draft act to the “Soil Pollution Remediation Act” in order to clearly define the Act’s focus on standardizing soil pollution remediation. Changes to the Act's content include narrowing of soil pollution liability and basing collection of soil pollution control fees on specified soil pollutants. The Act’s framework and other provisions shall remain as found in the EPA’s submitted version. In August 1998, the EPA submitted a draft Soil Pollution Control Act to the Executive Yuan (EY) for review. Following extensive discussion with related agencies, the EY completed its review of the now-entitled “Soil Pollution Remediation Act” draft, which was then sent to the Legislative Yuan on June 24 1999 for deliberation. The Executive Yuan Review Committee’s first decision was to change the original name of the Act, from “Soil Pollution Control Act” to “Soil Pollution Remediation Act.” Although this may seem like a minor change, the new name more accurately expresses what the EY sees as the Act’s key point -- the remediation of soil after it has been contaminated. In terms of soil pollution prevention, the role of the Act will be to work in conjunction with other environmental regulations. That is to say, if soil contamination is discovered, control and removal of the pollution source should be in accordance with other environmental regulations. For example, an incident of industrial waste dumping should be handled according to the Waste Disposal Act, even though the incident results in soil contamination. The greatest differences between the draft of the Act reviewed by the Executive Yuan and that originally submitted by the EPA lie in the much disputed issue of liability for soil cleanup and in the issue of sources for the soil pollution control fund. As for the scope of cleanup liability, the EPA’s original draft defined liability very broadly. In addition to placing liability with the polluters, it also placed liability with the land owners and users. As such land owners and users do not necessarily possess the capabilities necessary for pollution prevention, the use of this method to expand liability was met with fairly extensive opposition. Following EY review, the new version of the draft Act sees land owners and users as “relevant parties.” Even though they must do their best to properly manage related affairs, land owners and users will not be held jointly liable for cleanup and compensation, unless an egregious violation on their part leads to contamination. As for the sources of the soil pollution control fund, the EY ruled out establishing the fund by drawing yearly payments from funds set up by other environmental laws. Instead, the EY adopted a model based on the Superfund model in the U.S. “Soil remediation fees” will be collected from importers and manufacturers of specified chemical substances according to the imported or manufactured quantity. Categories of specified chemical substances will be established based on considerations of the soil contamination risks of the substances in question. Chemical substances will be separately specified and announced by the EPA (according to the EPA’s initial description in the Act, this will likely include benzene, vinyl chloride, cadmium, mercury, and many other chemical substances). To enhance the effectiveness of applying the Act, the EY maintained the retroactive model, whereby cases of soil pollution discovered or under remediation prior to the Act coming into effect must still abide by the Act’s clearance, treatment and compensation clauses. Future soil remediation efforts will still proceed on a dual-track system. When contamination is discovered, liability will lie mostly with the polluter. However, so that remediation may occur as soon as possible, under special circumstances the local competent authority should act to determine remediation plans, which will be implemented after approval by the central competent authority. Because soil pollution can easily lead to groundwater contamination, the spread of contamination must be stopped as soon as possible. The draft Act stipulates that, following evidence of groundwater contamination at listed sites, plans for groundwater remediation must also be established. The EPA is currently drafting amendments of the Water Pollution Control Act and has already included provisions concerning groundwater contamination. Remaining details of the draft Act, such as soil pollution monitoring standards, soil pollution control standards, and soil analysis methods will be drafted by the EPA.
全文
The Executive Yuan (EY) recently completed its review of the proposed Soil Pollution Control Act. During review the EY changed the name of the draft act to the “Soil Pollution Remediation Act” in order to clearly define the Act’s focus on standardizing soil pollution remediation. Changes to the Act's content include narrowing of soil pollution liability and basing collection of soil pollution control fees on specified soil pollutants. The Act’s framework and other provisions shall remain as found in the EPA’s submitted version. In August 1998, the EPA submitted a draft Soil Pollution Control Act to the Executive Yuan (EY) for review. Following extensive discussion with related agencies, the EY completed its review of the now-entitled “Soil Pollution Remediation Act” draft, which was then sent to the Legislative Yuan on June 24 1999 for deliberation. The Executive Yuan Review Committee’s first decision was to change the original name of the Act, from “Soil Pollution Control Act” to “Soil Pollution Remediation Act.” Although this may seem like a minor change, the new name more accurately expresses what the EY sees as the Act’s key point -- the remediation of soil after it has been contaminated. In terms of soil pollution prevention, the role of the Act will be to work in conjunction with other environmental regulations. That is to say, if soil contamination is discovered, control and removal of the pollution source should be in accordance with other environmental regulations. For example, an incident of industrial waste dumping should be handled according to the Waste Disposal Act, even though the incident results in soil contamination. The greatest differences between the draft of the Act reviewed by the Executive Yuan and that originally submitted by the EPA lie in the much disputed issue of liability for soil cleanup and in the issue of sources for the soil pollution control fund. As for the scope of cleanup liability, the EPA’s original draft defined liability very broadly. In addition to placing liability with the polluters, it also placed liability with the land owners and users. As such land owners and users do not necessarily possess the capabilities necessary for pollution prevention, the use of this method to expand liability was met with fairly extensive opposition. Following EY review, the new version of the draft Act sees land owners and users as “relevant parties.” Even though they must do their best to properly manage related affairs, land owners and users will not be held jointly liable for cleanup and compensation, unless an egregious violation on their part leads to contamination. As for the sources of the soil pollution control fund, the EY ruled out establishing the fund by drawing yearly payments from funds set up by other environmental laws. Instead, the EY adopted a model based on the Superfund model in the U.S. “Soil remediation fees” will be collected from importers and manufacturers of specified chemical substances according to the imported or manufactured quantity. Categories of specified chemical substances will be established based on considerations of the soil contamination risks of the substances in question. Chemical substances will be separately specified and announced by the EPA (according to the EPA’s initial description in the Act, this will likely include benzene, vinyl chloride, cadmium, mercury, and many other chemical substances). To enhance the effectiveness of applying the Act, the EY maintained the retroactive model, whereby cases of soil pollution discovered or under remediation prior to the Act coming into effect must still abide by the Act’s clearance, treatment and compensation clauses. Future soil remediation efforts will still proceed on a dual-track system. When contamination is discovered, liability will lie mostly with the polluter. However, so that remediation may occur as soon as possible, under special circumstances the local competent authority should act to determine remediation plans, which will be implemented after approval by the central competent authority. Because soil pollution can easily lead to groundwater contamination, the spread of contamination must be stopped as soon as possible. The draft Act stipulates that, following evidence of groundwater contamination at listed sites, plans for groundwater remediation must also be established. The EPA is currently drafting amendments of the Water Pollution Control Act and has already included provisions concerning groundwater contamination. Remaining details of the draft Act, such as soil pollution monitoring standards, soil pollution control standards, and soil analysis methods will be drafted by the EPA.
年度
2000
月份
3
卷
3
期
1
順序
1
倒序
2
分類
Soil and Groundwater
標題2
EY Gives Green Light to Draft of Soil Pollution Act
檔案位置
print/V3/V3-01
「EY Gives Green Light to Draft of Soil Pollution ActSoil and Groundwater」所屬的資料集：「Environmental Policy Monthly」的其他資料
編號：
78
標題：
A Word From the Bureau of Performance Evaluation and Dispute Settlement: The EPA's Policy on Eco-lab
摘要：
Supervision Evaluation & Dispute Resolution In 1993 the EPA launched an eco-labeling program in Tai
全文：
Supervision Evaluation & Dispute Resolution In 1993 the EPA launched an eco-labeling program in Tai
編號：
941
標題：
Recycling of Waste Fluorescent Light Tubes Begins
摘要：
The EPA began the recycling of waste fluorescent light tubes on January 1 of this year (only straigh
全文：
The EPA began the recycling of waste fluorescent light tubes on January 1 of this year (only straigh
編號：
332
標題：
Complete Remediation Necessary for Granting Building Permit at Former RCA Site
摘要：
The Ministry of the Interior (MOI) reviewed the former RCA site land-use rezoning case on April 7. T
全文：
The Ministry of the Interior (MOI) reviewed the former RCA site land-use rezoning case on April 7. T
編號：
897
標題：
Establishment of Four Environmental Industry Zones
摘要：
With the volume of Taiwan’s waste steadily increasing choosing the proper methods for waste recyclin
全文：
With the volume of Taiwan’s waste steadily increasing choosing the proper methods for waste recyclin
編號：
301
標題：
Control of Air Analysis Organizations to be Strengthened
摘要：
Due to the close relationship between pollution monitoring systems and the recently revised systems
全文：
Due to the close relationship between pollution monitoring systems and the recently revised systems
編號：
80
標題：
Certain Users of Waste Lubricants and Tires to be Recognized as Resource Recycling Factories
摘要：
Recycling Factories that use waste lubricants to manufacture refined oil products or as fuel to man
全文：
Recycling Factories that use waste lubricants to manufacture refined oil products or as fuel to man
編號：
147
標題：
Guidelines for Toxics Use Registration Formally Announced
摘要：
Toxic Substance The Toxic Chemical Substance Control Act amended last year designates three systems
全文：
Toxic Substance Management The Toxic Chemical Substance Control Act amended last year designates t
編號：
1001
標題：
Economic Processing Zone Administration to Review Waste Disposal Plans
摘要：
To simplify industrial waste disposal plan review procedures on August 13 the EPA formally commissio
全文：
To simplify industrial waste disposal plan review procedures on August 13 the EPA formally commissio
編號：
641
標題：
EPA Lists 4 Types of Insecticides Effective 2002
摘要：
Many different insecticides from roach traps to mosquito sprays, can be found in the market today.
全文：
Many different insecticides from roach traps to mosquito sprays, can be found in the market today.
編號：
187
標題：
Study Recommends Strengthening EMS Incentives
摘要：
In addition to implementing research and discussion on EMS related policies the EPA has contracted
全文：
In addition to implementing research and discussion on EMS related policies the EPA has contracted
編號：
503
標題：
Environmental Police Make Strong Showing
摘要：
On July 1 1999, the EPA established the Environmental Protection Police Force as a means of strength
全文：
On July 1 1999, the EPA established the Environmental Protection Police Force as a means of strength
編號：
76
標題：
Toxic Chemicals Control Act Substantially Amended
摘要：
Toxic Substance On November 19 the Toxic Chemicals Control Act was amended and promulgated by presi
全文：
Toxic Substance Management On November 19 the Toxic Chemicals Control Act was amended and promulgat
編號：
646
標題：
Minimization and Recycling to be Top Priority of Future Waste Management
摘要：
The EPA expects to achieve zero growth in waste volume by 2001. While previous waste management stra
全文：
The EPA expects to achieve zero growth in waste volume by 2001. While previous waste management stra
編號：
597
標題：
Public Hearing on Polystyrene Controls Held
摘要：
To address the environmental problems surrounding the disposal of polystyrene (“styrofoam”) items th
全文：
To address the environmental problems surrounding the disposal of polystyrene (“styrofoam”) items th
編號：
796
標題：
Economic Development Advisory Committee Resolutions Implemented
摘要：
When the nearly month-long Economic Development Advisory Committee Conference ended recently its fiv
全文：
When the nearly month-long Economic Development Advisory Committee Conference ended recently its fiv
編號：
338
標題：
Feature Article The Results and Status of Taiwan’s Incinerator Promotion Efforts
摘要：
To further the construction of incinerators in Taiwan the EPA approved the Taiwan Area Refuse Resour
全文：
To further the construction of incinerators in Taiwan the EPA approved the Taiwan Area Refuse Resour
編號：
450
標題：
Tighter Controls for Heavy Metals in Dry-cell Batteries
摘要：
Beginning next year the EPA plans to either prohibit sales or double recycling fees for all batterie
全文：
Beginning next year the EPA plans to either prohibit sales or double recycling fees for all batterie
編號：
496
標題：
Mandatory Recycling of Fluorescent Lightbulbs On the Way
摘要：
Because discarded fluorescent lightbulbs contain mercury they have a significant impact on the envir
全文：
Because discarded fluorescent lightbulbs contain mercury they have a significant impact on the envir
編號：
98
標題：
Enforcement Rules for Environmental Agents Control Act Submitted to Executive Yuan
摘要：
Toxic Substancet On January 9 1998, a draft version of the Environmental Agents Control Act Enforce
全文：
Toxic Substance Management On January 9 1998, a draft version of the Environmental Agents Control A
編號：
587
標題：
Dioxin Emission Standards for Small and Medium-Sized Incinerators Under Discussion
摘要：
The EPA has proposed draft dioxin emission standards for small and medium-sized incinerators. In th
全文：
The EPA has proposed draft dioxin emission standards for small and medium-sized incinerators. In th
編號：
757
標題：
Water Act Implementation Rules Simplified
摘要：
The EPA recently proposed draft amendments to the Water Pollution Control Act Implementation Rules t
全文：
The EPA recently proposed draft amendments to the Water Pollution Control Act Implementation Rules t
編號：
43
標題：
EPA Readies Regulations for Second Stage Air Pollution Control Fee Collection
摘要：
Air Quality Beginning July 1 1998, fees for air emissions from fixed pollution sources will be coll
全文：
Air Quality Beginning July 1 1998, fees for air emissions from fixed pollution sources will be coll
編號：
401
標題：
Compilation of Agenda 21 Kicks Into High Gear
摘要：
In order to keep abreast of global trends and articulate an Agenda 21 strategy the EPA has finished
全文：
In order to keep abreast of global trends and articulate an Agenda 21 strategy the EPA has finished
編號：
753
標題：
Gas Station Subsidy Extended 1 Year
摘要：
The EPA continues to promote control of gas station volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions. To s
全文：
The EPA continues to promote control of gas station volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions. To s
編號：
232
標題：
Government Budgets to Be Coordinated with Sustainable Development Work
摘要：
To integrate administrative agency budget allotments into sustainable development work the EPA will
全文：
To integrate administrative agency budget allotments into sustainable development work the EPA will
編號：
982
標題：
Conference on the Establishment of Environmental Accounting Systems
摘要：
The EPA invited more than 20 domestic accounting system specialists and representatives of private b
全文：
The EPA invited more than 20 domestic accounting system specialists and representatives of private b
編號：
47
標題：
Premier Orders Quick Resolution to Garbage Disposal Problems
摘要：
Waste Management Shortly after taking office Premier Vincent Siew, paid a visit to the EPA on Septe
全文：
Waste Management Shortly after taking office Premier Vincent Siew, paid a visit to the EPA on Septe
編號：
396
標題：
Solid Waste Complaints Still #1
摘要：
The EPA has released a white paper on the handling of public nuisance complaints which reveals that
全文：
The EPA has released a white paper on the handling of public nuisance complaints which reveals that
編號：
204
標題：
Amendment to Toxics Detection and Warning Guidelines Announced
摘要：
August 5 the EPA formally announced an amendment to Articles 4 and 5 of the Toxic Chemical Substance
全文：
August 5 the EPA formally announced an amendment to Articles 4 and 5 of the Toxic Chemical Substance
編號：
623
標題：
EPA Tightens Industrial Waste Requirements During EIA Review
摘要：
In the wake of the recent problems regarding solid waste management EPA Administrator Edgar Lin has
全文：
In the wake of the recent problems regarding solid waste management EPA Administrator Edgar Lin has
行政院環境保護署 的其他資料集
EPQSummary_ChemicalSubstanceManagement
不定期更新更新,209陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-07-30 01:01:48
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_雲林縣_崙背站
每1時更新,127陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:57:52
行政院環境保護署行政院環境保護署環境保護人員訓練所法定預算
每1年更新,39陳先生 | 03-4020789#580 | 2023-08-09 01:05:49
行政院環境保護署大甲媽祖遶境即時空品監測成果(全部)
不定期更新更新,136陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2341 | 2022-01-14 01:02:40
行政院環境保護署噪音實收罰鍰
每年更新更新,51謝小姐 | 02-23117722#2103 | 2022-01-14 01:22:42
行政院環境保護署
空氣品質小時值_新北市_板橋站
每1時更新,92陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:58:18
行政院環境保護署EPQSummary_SoilAndGroundwater
不定期更新更新,188郭先生 | 02-2311-7722 EXT.2399 | 2022-01-15 01:13:52
行政院環境保護署縣市(臺中市)小時值-每小時
每1時更新,92陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:58:50
行政院環境保護署建檔公廁明細-新北市
不定期更新更新,121賴先生 | 04-2252-1718#53686 | 2023-07-27 01:02:01
行政院環境保護署建檔公廁明細-宜蘭縣
不定期更新更新,162賴先生 | 04-2252-1718#53686 | 2023-07-27 01:02:08
行政院環境保護署
空氣品質小時值_彰化縣_線西站
每1時更新,98陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:57:55
行政院環境保護署APEC Ocean and Fisheries Working Group (OFWG)
不定期更新更新,63陳小姐 | (02)23117722#2753 | 2023-08-02 01:03:43
行政院環境保護署環境科技論壇論文集
每1年更新,35賀先生 | 23117722#2981 | 2023-08-06 01:06:11
行政院環境保護署柴油新車審驗資料-合格證明
不定期更新更新,37李小姐 | 02-2311-7722#6311 | 2023-08-09 01:04:48
行政院環境保護署沼液沼渣農地肥分使用計畫
不定期更新更新,40吳小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2842 | 2023-08-09 01:05:34
行政院環境保護署
0800資源回收免費專線-查詢廢乾電池、照明光源統計
每年更新更新,47莊先生 | 02-23705888#3108 | 2022-01-14 01:24:28
行政院環境保護署各公告類別事業廢棄物自行處理申報量統計
每月更新更新,97陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2682 | 2022-01-14 01:25:33
行政院環境保護署行政院環境保護署補助地方政府自行車道路線資料
不定期更新更新,48詹小姐 | 02-23117722#6401 | 2023-08-09 01:05:50
行政院環境保護署應回收廢棄物處理業者(廢鉛蓄電池類)最大處理量資料
每年更新更新,36廖小姐 | 02-2370-5888#3103 | 2022-01-14 01:23:59
行政院環境保護署事業廢棄物委託或共同處理申報量統計
每月更新更新,138陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2682 | 2022-01-14 01:24:34
行政院環境保護署
底泥品質檢測資料
每月更新更新,115張小姐 | 02-2383-2389 #8401 | 2022-01-14 01:20:32
行政院環境保護署水污染源許可及申報資料
每半年更新更新,79陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2827 | 2022-01-15 01:12:30
行政院環境保護署土壤319公頃_一公頃一採樣點位置圖
不更新更新,41謝先生 | (02)23832389*8302 | 2022-01-15 01:15:53
行政院環境保護署金門縣重要環保統計資料
每月更新更新,99謝小姐 | 02-23117722#2103 | 2022-01-14 01:21:48
行政院環境保護署登錄證明文件繳費通知單
不定期更新更新,37沈小姐 | 02-23491031 | 2022-01-14 01:22:59
行政院環境保護署
環保專案摘要資料_廢棄物管理
不定期更新更新,164郭先生 | 02-2311-7722 EXT.2399 | 2022-01-15 01:13:38
行政院環境保護署火點資料
不定期更新更新,76謝先生 | 02-23117722轉2386 | 2022-01-14 01:05:53
行政院環境保護署縣市(新竹市)小時值-每小時
每小時更新更新,164謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:00:48
行政院環境保護署環境影響說明書審查結論
每2月更新,57黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-05 00:59:41
行政院環境保護署補助地方設置巨大廢棄物回收再利用廠一覽
不定期更新更新,42林小姐 | 04-22521718#53511 | 2023-08-07 00:59:54
行政院環境保護署