Winners of Low-Carbon Cities Funding AnnouncedClimate Change
「Winners of Low-Carbon Cities Funding AnnouncedClimate Change」於資料集「MajorEnvironmentalPolicies」由單位「行政院環境保護署」的陳小姐所提供，聯繫電話是(02)23117722#2753,(02)23117722#2756，最近更新時間為：2023-07-30 01:03:45。 欄位編號的內容是2754 ， 欄位標題的內容是Winners of Low-Carbon Cities Funding Announced ， 欄位摘要的內容是Climate Change
Winners of Low-Carbon Cities Funding Announced
Following a year of intense competition on 4 August 2011 the EPA finally announced four municipalities selected to be transformed into model low-carbon municipalities. They are New Taipei City, Taichung City, Tainan City, and Yilan County, representing the northern, central, southern, and eastern administrative areas of Taiwan, respectively.
Local governments from across Taiwan participated in the Low-Carbon Model Cities Funding Contest. The selection process was divided into two stages. During the first stage, local governments submitted the primary conceptual outlines of their plans. Those selected to go on to the second stage then had to review and analyze the content of the projects in depth and select the most specific and feasible flagship model projects to be presented by the local government leaders and their team members. Among the 11 participating municipalities that reached the second stage, eight of them sent delegations led by their mayor or county magistrate, who personally gave a presentation on their municipality’s administrative outlook and the task of planning for their low-carbon models.
The EPA is keen to stress that the form of the low-carbon model cities funding contest differed from traditional single-theme plan competitions due to the complexity of the “energy conservation and carbon reduction” issues involved. These encompassed such diverse fields as environmental protection, energy, transportation, architecture, land use planning, and regulations. The winning municipalities therefore needed to demonstrate strong administrative abilities and the determination to integrate and clearly delineate interdepartmental responsibilities, in addition to the ability to incorporate industrial, academic, and R&D resources to formulate a comprehensive mechanism to execute their low-carbon plans. The object of the dual-stage selection process was not to automatically choose the municipalities that promised the greatest carbon reductions, but instead favor those that already had some experience implementing carbon reduction schemes. The winners also submitted plans that combined creativity, high levels of feasibility and carbon reduction potential, while taking into account the unique features of the local environment.
In order to achieve complete objectivity and fairness, and ensure that selection criteria were met, the EPA put together the Low-Carbon Cities Selection Panel to take charge of the selection process, and also designed different evaluating criteria for each of the stages.
The second-stage requirements differed from the first-stage carbon reduction conceptual outlines in a number of ways. Specific carbon-reduction measures and targets were required, financial plans and cost-benefit analyses of any commercial operations had to be included, and candidate municipalities’ written and oral presentations were evaluated. The selection team also conducted on-site inspections, which afforded the team a better understanding of the environmental suitability or limitations of the respective plans, orders of priorities, the reasons for choosing particular areas or proposing particular measures, and any unresolved problems. By visiting all of the sites – each with its own unique environment – the selection team was able to better evaluate how each plan had creatively taken account of local conditions such as unique geographical and other features. The winning plans took local circumstances into account by prioritizing projects to solve the most pressing local problems first.
The EPA has drawn up a summation of the selection team’s conclusions, which show the main reasons behind the selection of the four winning municipalities were the keen interest shown by the leaders and the overall administrative capabilities of their governments. Also taken into consideration was the extent to which local environmental conditions and unique features were harmonized with medium- and long-term development prospects. The core plans that were accepted were flagship plans that functioned as clear quality indicators.
The four winning low-carbon model city plans also include forward-looking and unique designs for new infrastructure. New Taipei City plans to build the Coastal Zone Green Energy and Resource Recycling Living Spheres, the New Metropolitan Green Energy Low Carbon City Center, and the Mountain Area Carbon Sink Ecological Fun Park. Taichung City has drawn up the Smart Traffic and Transport System Flagship Plan and the Low-Carbon Gateway Park Flagship Plan. Tainan City has its primary Creating Sustainable Low-Carbon Communities Plan, and has also drawn up two benchmark plans for promoting low-carbon cultural tourism and employing diverse sources of green energy. In Yilan County, two green infrastructure plans have been formulated: the Low-Carbon Transport and Mobile Roaming Networks Plan and the New Green Lanyang Plan.
It is estimated that by 2014 the combined carbon reduction targets set out in the low-carbon model city plans of the four municipalities will result in the reduction of approximately 12 million tonnes of carbon emissions. ， 欄位全文的內容是Climate Change
Winners of Low-Carbon Cities Funding Announced
Following a year of intense competition on 4 August 2011 the EPA finally announced four municipalities selected to be transformed into model low-carbon municipalities. They are New Taipei City, Taichung City, Tainan City, and Yilan County, representing the northern, central, southern, and eastern administrative areas of Taiwan, respectively.
Local governments from across Taiwan participated in the Low-Carbon Model Cities Funding Contest. The selection process was divided into two stages. During the first stage, local governments submitted the primary conceptual outlines of their plans. Those selected to go on to the second stage then had to review and analyze the content of the projects in depth and select the most specific and feasible flagship model projects to be presented by the local government leaders and their team members. Among the 11 participating municipalities that reached the second stage, eight of them sent delegations led by their mayor or county magistrate, who personally gave a presentation on their municipality’s administrative outlook and the task of planning for their low-carbon models.
The EPA is keen to stress that the form of the low-carbon model cities funding contest differed from traditional single-theme plan competitions due to the complexity of the “energy conservation and carbon reduction” issues involved. These encompassed such diverse fields as environmental protection, energy, transportation, architecture, land use planning, and regulations. The winning municipalities therefore needed to demonstrate strong administrative abilities and the determination to integrate and clearly delineate interdepartmental responsibilities, in addition to the ability to incorporate industrial, academic, and R&D resources to formulate a comprehensive mechanism to execute their low-carbon plans. The object of the dual-stage selection process was not to automatically choose the municipalities that promised the greatest carbon reductions, but instead favor those that already had some experience implementing carbon reduction schemes. The winners also submitted plans that combined creativity, high levels of feasibility and carbon reduction potential, while taking into account the unique features of the local environment.
In order to achieve complete objectivity and fairness, and ensure that selection criteria were met, the EPA put together the Low-Carbon Cities Selection Panel to take charge of the selection process, and also designed different evaluating criteria for each of the stages.
The second-stage requirements differed from the first-stage carbon reduction conceptual outlines in a number of ways. Specific carbon-reduction measures and targets were required, financial plans and cost-benefit analyses of any commercial operations had to be included, and candidate municipalities’ written and oral presentations were evaluated. The selection team also conducted on-site inspections, which afforded the team a better understanding of the environmental suitability or limitations of the respective plans, orders of priorities, the reasons for choosing particular areas or proposing particular measures, and any unresolved problems. By visiting all of the sites – each with its own unique environment – the selection team was able to better evaluate how each plan had creatively taken account of local conditions such as unique geographical and other features. The winning plans took local circumstances into account by prioritizing projects to solve the most pressing local problems first.
The EPA has drawn up a summation of the selection team’s conclusions, which show the main reasons behind the selection of the four winning municipalities were the keen interest shown by the leaders and the overall administrative capabilities of their governments. Also taken into consideration was the extent to which local environmental conditions and unique features were harmonized with medium- and long-term development prospects. The core plans that were accepted were flagship plans that functioned as clear quality indicators.
The four winning low-carbon model city plans also include forward-looking and unique designs for new infrastructure. New Taipei City plans to build the Coastal Zone Green Energy and Resource Recycling Living Spheres, the New Metropolitan Green Energy Low Carbon City Center, and the Mountain Area Carbon Sink Ecological Fun Park. Taichung City has drawn up the Smart Traffic and Transport System Flagship Plan and the Low-Carbon Gateway Park Flagship Plan. Tainan City has its primary Creating Sustainable Low-Carbon Communities Plan, and has also drawn up two benchmark plans for promoting low-carbon cultural tourism and employing diverse sources of green energy. In Yilan County, two green infrastructure plans have been formulated: the Low-Carbon Transport and Mobile Roaming Networks Plan and the New Green Lanyang Plan.
It is estimated that by 2014 the combined carbon reduction targets set out in the low-carbon model city plans of the four municipalities will result in the reduction of approximately 12 million tonnes of carbon emissions. ， 欄位年度的內容是2011 ， 欄位月份的內容是9 ， 欄位卷的內容是14 ， 欄位期的內容是9 ， 欄位順序的內容是1 ， 欄位倒序的內容是2 ， 欄位分類的內容是Climate Change ， 欄位標題2的內容是Winners of Low-Carbon Cities Funding Announced ， 欄位檔案位置的內容是V14/V14-09 。
編號
2754
標題
Winners of Low-Carbon Cities Funding Announced
摘要
Climate Change Winners of Low-Carbon Cities Funding Announced Following a year of intense competition on 4 August 2011 the EPA finally announced four municipalities selected to be transformed into model low-carbon municipalities. They are New Taipei City, Taichung City, Tainan City, and Yilan County, representing the northern, central, southern, and eastern administrative areas of Taiwan, respectively. Local governments from across Taiwan participated in the Low-Carbon Model Cities Funding Contest. The selection process was divided into two stages. During the first stage, local governments submitted the primary conceptual outlines of their plans. Those selected to go on to the second stage then had to review and analyze the content of the projects in depth and select the most specific and feasible flagship model projects to be presented by the local government leaders and their team members. Among the 11 participating municipalities that reached the second stage, eight of them sent delegations led by their mayor or county magistrate, who personally gave a presentation on their municipality’s administrative outlook and the task of planning for their low-carbon models. The EPA is keen to stress that the form of the low-carbon model cities funding contest differed from traditional single-theme plan competitions due to the complexity of the “energy conservation and carbon reduction” issues involved. These encompassed such diverse fields as environmental protection, energy, transportation, architecture, land use planning, and regulations. The winning municipalities therefore needed to demonstrate strong administrative abilities and the determination to integrate and clearly delineate interdepartmental responsibilities, in addition to the ability to incorporate industrial, academic, and R&D resources to formulate a comprehensive mechanism to execute their low-carbon plans. The object of the dual-stage selection process was not to automatically choose the municipalities that promised the greatest carbon reductions, but instead favor those that already had some experience implementing carbon reduction schemes. The winners also submitted plans that combined creativity, high levels of feasibility and carbon reduction potential, while taking into account the unique features of the local environment. In order to achieve complete objectivity and fairness, and ensure that selection criteria were met, the EPA put together the Low-Carbon Cities Selection Panel to take charge of the selection process, and also designed different evaluating criteria for each of the stages. The second-stage requirements differed from the first-stage carbon reduction conceptual outlines in a number of ways. Specific carbon-reduction measures and targets were required, financial plans and cost-benefit analyses of any commercial operations had to be included, and candidate municipalities’ written and oral presentations were evaluated. The selection team also conducted on-site inspections, which afforded the team a better understanding of the environmental suitability or limitations of the respective plans, orders of priorities, the reasons for choosing particular areas or proposing particular measures, and any unresolved problems. By visiting all of the sites – each with its own unique environment – the selection team was able to better evaluate how each plan had creatively taken account of local conditions such as unique geographical and other features. The winning plans took local circumstances into account by prioritizing projects to solve the most pressing local problems first. The EPA has drawn up a summation of the selection team’s conclusions, which show the main reasons behind the selection of the four winning municipalities were the keen interest shown by the leaders and the overall administrative capabilities of their governments. Also taken into consideration was the extent to which local environmental conditions and unique features were harmonized with medium- and long-term development prospects. The core plans that were accepted were flagship plans that functioned as clear quality indicators. The four winning low-carbon model city plans also include forward-looking and unique designs for new infrastructure. New Taipei City plans to build the Coastal Zone Green Energy and Resource Recycling Living Spheres, the New Metropolitan Green Energy Low Carbon City Center, and the Mountain Area Carbon Sink Ecological Fun Park. Taichung City has drawn up the Smart Traffic and Transport System Flagship Plan and the Low-Carbon Gateway Park Flagship Plan. Tainan City has its primary Creating Sustainable Low-Carbon Communities Plan, and has also drawn up two benchmark plans for promoting low-carbon cultural tourism and employing diverse sources of green energy. In Yilan County, two green infrastructure plans have been formulated: the Low-Carbon Transport and Mobile Roaming Networks Plan and the New Green Lanyang Plan. It is estimated that by 2014 the combined carbon reduction targets set out in the low-carbon model city plans of the four municipalities will result in the reduction of approximately 12 million tonnes of carbon emissions.
全文
Climate Change Winners of Low-Carbon Cities Funding Announced Following a year of intense competition on 4 August 2011 the EPA finally announced four municipalities selected to be transformed into model low-carbon municipalities. They are New Taipei City, Taichung City, Tainan City, and Yilan County, representing the northern, central, southern, and eastern administrative areas of Taiwan, respectively. Local governments from across Taiwan participated in the Low-Carbon Model Cities Funding Contest. The selection process was divided into two stages. During the first stage, local governments submitted the primary conceptual outlines of their plans. Those selected to go on to the second stage then had to review and analyze the content of the projects in depth and select the most specific and feasible flagship model projects to be presented by the local government leaders and their team members. Among the 11 participating municipalities that reached the second stage, eight of them sent delegations led by their mayor or county magistrate, who personally gave a presentation on their municipality’s administrative outlook and the task of planning for their low-carbon models. The EPA is keen to stress that the form of the low-carbon model cities funding contest differed from traditional single-theme plan competitions due to the complexity of the “energy conservation and carbon reduction” issues involved. These encompassed such diverse fields as environmental protection, energy, transportation, architecture, land use planning, and regulations. The winning municipalities therefore needed to demonstrate strong administrative abilities and the determination to integrate and clearly delineate interdepartmental responsibilities, in addition to the ability to incorporate industrial, academic, and R&D resources to formulate a comprehensive mechanism to execute their low-carbon plans. The object of the dual-stage selection process was not to automatically choose the municipalities that promised the greatest carbon reductions, but instead favor those that already had some experience implementing carbon reduction schemes. The winners also submitted plans that combined creativity, high levels of feasibility and carbon reduction potential, while taking into account the unique features of the local environment. In order to achieve complete objectivity and fairness, and ensure that selection criteria were met, the EPA put together the Low-Carbon Cities Selection Panel to take charge of the selection process, and also designed different evaluating criteria for each of the stages. The second-stage requirements differed from the first-stage carbon reduction conceptual outlines in a number of ways. Specific carbon-reduction measures and targets were required, financial plans and cost-benefit analyses of any commercial operations had to be included, and candidate municipalities’ written and oral presentations were evaluated. The selection team also conducted on-site inspections, which afforded the team a better understanding of the environmental suitability or limitations of the respective plans, orders of priorities, the reasons for choosing particular areas or proposing particular measures, and any unresolved problems. By visiting all of the sites – each with its own unique environment – the selection team was able to better evaluate how each plan had creatively taken account of local conditions such as unique geographical and other features. The winning plans took local circumstances into account by prioritizing projects to solve the most pressing local problems first. The EPA has drawn up a summation of the selection team’s conclusions, which show the main reasons behind the selection of the four winning municipalities were the keen interest shown by the leaders and the overall administrative capabilities of their governments. Also taken into consideration was the extent to which local environmental conditions and unique features were harmonized with medium- and long-term development prospects. The core plans that were accepted were flagship plans that functioned as clear quality indicators. The four winning low-carbon model city plans also include forward-looking and unique designs for new infrastructure. New Taipei City plans to build the Coastal Zone Green Energy and Resource Recycling Living Spheres, the New Metropolitan Green Energy Low Carbon City Center, and the Mountain Area Carbon Sink Ecological Fun Park. Taichung City has drawn up the Smart Traffic and Transport System Flagship Plan and the Low-Carbon Gateway Park Flagship Plan. Tainan City has its primary Creating Sustainable Low-Carbon Communities Plan, and has also drawn up two benchmark plans for promoting low-carbon cultural tourism and employing diverse sources of green energy. In Yilan County, two green infrastructure plans have been formulated: the Low-Carbon Transport and Mobile Roaming Networks Plan and the New Green Lanyang Plan. It is estimated that by 2014 the combined carbon reduction targets set out in the low-carbon model city plans of the four municipalities will result in the reduction of approximately 12 million tonnes of carbon emissions.
年度
2011
月份
9
卷
14
期
9
順序
1
倒序
2
分類
Climate Change
標題2
Winners of Low-Carbon Cities Funding Announced
檔案位置
V14/V14-09
「Winners of Low-Carbon Cities Funding AnnouncedClimate Change」所屬的資料集：「MajorEnvironmentalPolicies」的其他資料
編號：
758
標題：
Construction Site Runoff Water Placed Under Regulation
摘要：
The EPA will begin introducing a series of regulations aimed at enterprises that are frequently the
全文：
The EPA will begin introducing a series of regulations aimed at enterprises that are frequently the
編號：
3528
標題：
Monitoring Resources Integrated For Better Information Sharing and Service
摘要：
Environmental Monitoring
Monitoring Resources Integrated For Better Information Sharing and Service
全文：
Monitoring Resources Integrated For Better Information Sharing and Service
To provide more transpare
編號：
3606
標題：
Sediment Inspection Information Disclosed on a Regular Basis
摘要：
Soil & groundwater
Sediment Inspection Information Disclosed on a Regular Basis
全文：
Sediment Inspection Information Disclosed on a Regular Basis
To help people understand the quality
編號：
487
標題：
EPA Phases Out Leaded Gas Vehicles
摘要：
In light of the prohibition on the sale of leaded gasoline in Taiwan in October of 1999 the China Pe
全文：
In light of the prohibition on the sale of leaded gasoline in Taiwan in October of 1999 the China Pe
編號：
163
標題：
Government Purchasing Act to Add Article on Green Consumerism
摘要：
Eco-labeling According to Article 96 of the Government Purchasing Act passed by the Legislative Yu
全文：
Eco-labeling According to Article 96 of the Government Purchasing Act passed by the Legislative Yu
編號：
2444
標題：
Wastewater Management Regulations under Revision to Improve Industrial Zone Effluent
摘要：
Water Quality
Wastewater Mana
全文：
Water Quality
Wastewater Mana
編號：
606
標題：
Executive Yuan Holds Summit on Industrial Waste Management
摘要：
Problems with industrial waste treatment are beginning to turn heads in high places. The Executive
全文：
Problems with industrial waste treatment are beginning to turn heads in high places. The Executive
編號：
1305
標題：
Dioxin Emission Controls Enhanced at Ore Sintering Plants
摘要：
Continually exacting tight control over dioxin emissions the EPA has already announced dioxin contro
全文：
Continually exacting tight control over dioxin emissions the EPA has already announced dioxin contro
編號：
3967
標題：
EPA Launches New Environmental Options on Food Delivery App
摘要：
For the first time, the EPA is collaborating with the food delivery service Foodpanda, the Environme
全文：
Food delivery services have become very popular lately. According to the statistics provided by the
編號：
191
標題：
EPA Conducts Over 3000 Air Pollution Technical Assistance Cases
摘要：
The EPA has continued to assist firms with air pollution source improvements. Over the past two year
全文：
The EPA has continued to assist firms with air pollution source improvements. Over the past two year
編號：
251
標題：
Recycling Fund Management Committee Established
摘要：
A Recycling Fund Management Committee (RFMC) was formally established on October 7. The RFMC will ho
全文：
A Recycling Fund Management Committee (RFMC) was formally established on October 7. The RFMC will ho
編號：
218
標題：
Installation Standards for Environmental Agent Factories Announced
摘要：
On August 12 after consulting with the Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) and the Council of Labor
全文：
On August 12 after consulting with the Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) and the Council of Labor
編號：
3658
標題：
Management Regulations for Reuse of Common Industrial Waste Announced
摘要：
Waste
Management Regulations for Reuse of Common Industrial Waste Announced
全文：
Management Regulations for Reuse of Common Industrial Waste Announced
To carry out resource recyclin
編號：
3811
標題：
Environmental Agencies Take Action in Response to Poor Air Quality in Western Taiwan
摘要：
Western Taiwan experienced poor air quality on 2-3 October 2019, which the EPA explained was caused
全文：
The EPA stated that six counties/cities (New Taipei City, Taichung City, Chiayi County, Kaohsiung Ci
編號：
473
標題：
Measures to Reduce Plastic Bag Use Underway
摘要：
The EPA has set sales targets of electric motorbikes (e-bikes) for various county and city governmen
全文：
The EPA has set sales targets of electric motorbikes (e-bikes) for various county and city governmen
編號：
301
標題：
Draft of Marine Pollution Control Act Readied
摘要：
As drafting of the Marine Pollution Control Act nears completion guidelines have been established to
全文：
As drafting of the Marine Pollution Control Act nears completion guidelines have been established to
編號：
3581
標題：
Oil Storage Tank Maintenance Urged to Prevent Leakage
摘要：
Water
Oil Storage Tank Maintenance Urged to Prevent Leakage
River water quality has been seriously
全文：
Oil Storage Tank Maintenance Urged to Prevent Leakage
River water quality has been seriously impact
編號：
3301
標題：
Cherish the Earth and Consume with Care to Celebrate World Environment Day
摘要：
Environmental Education Cherish the Earth and Consume with Care to Celebrate World Environment Day
全文：
Cherish the Earth and Consume with Care to Celebrate World Environment Day
To echo the United Natio
編號：
4286
標題：
European and Asian Experts Discuss Future of Resource Circulation in International Conference
摘要：
On 29 May 2023, the EPA and the EU once again jointly organized the 2023 Resource Circulation Intern
全文：
Maive Rute: Ensuring the circular economy for global sustainable economic development is crucial
Dur
編號：
4239
標題：
Plastic Blister Packaging to Be Announced as Mandatory Recyclables
摘要：
To increase the recycling efficiency of flat plastic packaging materials and reduce the impact of pl
全文：
More and more packaging materials and methods are being invented and used in the market. Common ones
編號：
4017
標題：
Major Accomplishments of Environmental impact assessment (EIA) and environmental education promotion
摘要：
全文：
(1) During April, the EPA held two EIA review committee meetings, one special task group meeting to
編號：
148
標題：
Inspection Efforts of Toxics-using Facilities to be Intensified
摘要：
Environmental Inspection R.O.C. Premier Vincent Siew recently requested that overall public and in
全文：
Environmental Inspection R.O.C. Premier Vincent Siew recently requested that overall public and in
編號：
3478
標題：
Subsidies for Dual-fuel Vehicles Extended to the End of 2018
摘要：
Air Subsidies for Dual-fuel Vehicles Extended to the End of 2018
全文：
Subsidies for Dual-fuel Vehicles Extended to the End of 2018
The liquid petroleum gas (LPG)/petrol d
編號：
367
標題：
21 Additional Chemical Substances Listed as Toxic
摘要：
The EPA plans to list as toxic over 200 chemical substances before November 1999. On August 16 as a
全文：
The EPA plans to list as toxic over 200 chemical substances before November 1999. On August 16 as a
編號：
3997
標題：
Free Recycling for Household Appliances before Lunar New Year
摘要：
The Lunar New Year Festival is a time when people like to replace old household appliances with new
全文：
According to the EPA, there are three options to recycle home appliances:
1. Buyers of new televisi
編號：
3893
標題：
Revisions of the Management Regulations for Reuse of Common Industrial Waste Preannounced
摘要：
Waste
3. Revisions of the Management Regulations for Reuse of Common Industrial Waste Preannounced
T
全文：
The EPA states that the revisions not only modified relevant clauses concerning the integration of r
編號：
1238
標題：
Taiwan to Recycle 900 Tons/Day of Food Waste by End of 2004
摘要：
Taipei City has taken the lead in food waste recycling through a cooperation program between The Tai
全文：
Taipei City has taken the lead in food waste recycling through a cooperation program between The Tai
編號：
3873
標題：
2019 Circular Economy Evaluation Results
摘要：
Waste
2019 Circular Economy Evaluation Results
To encourage businesses that actively support waste
全文：
In response to international concern for plastic waste, the EPA carried out an evaluation of plastic
編號：
2792
標題：
Energy Efficient Low-Carbon Garbage Trucks Mark New Era in Refuse Disposal
摘要：
climate change
Energy Efficient Low-Carbon Garbage Trucks Mark New Era in Refuse Disposal
The EP
全文：
climate change
Energy Efficient Low-Carbon Garbage Trucks Mark New Era in Refuse Disposal
The EP
編號：
401
標題：
EPA Asks Formosa Plastics to Come Up With Local Treatment Plan
摘要：
Due to the difficulties of having a controversial batch of mercury-tainted sludge treated abroad the
全文：
Due to the difficulties of having a controversial batch of mercury-tainted sludge treated abroad the
行政院環境保護署 的其他資料集
生物源網格空氣污染排放量(TWD97)
不定期更新更新,237柏小姐 | 02-23712121#6106 | 2022-01-14 01:05:47
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_臺中市_豐原站
每1時更新,307陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:58:00
行政院環境保護署噪音實收罰鍰
每年更新更新,83謝小姐 | 02-23117722#2103 | 2022-01-14 01:22:42
行政院環境保護署空氣品質監測日最大值
每1日更新,197陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:57:18
行政院環境保護署營建署事業廢棄物再利用機構資料
不定期更新更新,127李小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2633 | 2022-01-14 01:26:14
行政院環境保護署
建檔公廁明細-嘉義縣
不定期更新更新,238曾小姐 | (02)2311-7722#2760,(02)2311-7722#2894 | 2022-01-15 01:15:04
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_新北市_淡水站
每小時更新更新,331謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:03:29
行政院環境保護署新竹縣水量水質自動監測連線傳輸監測紀錄值即時資料集
不定期更新更新,53程先生 | 02-2311-7722#2833 | 2023-08-09 01:04:14
行政院環境保護署清潔人員執行職務死亡濟助申請程序
半年更新,57陳小姐 | (04)2252-1718#5358 | 2022-01-14 01:18:01
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_雲林縣_崙背站
每1時更新,322陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:57:52
行政院環境保護署
環評會議公告
每2月更新,181黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-05 01:01:22
行政院環境保護署公民營製造業、用水、電力及燃氣供應業污染防治支出
每1年更新,61顏先生 | 02-23117722#2109 | 2023-07-30 01:00:38
行政院環境保護署高雄市水量水質自動監測連線傳輸監測紀錄值即時資料集
不定期更新更新,51程先生 | 02-2311-7722#2833 | 2023-08-09 01:04:09
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_臺北市_士林站
每1時更新,307陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:58:14
行政院環境保護署因應對策專案小組初審會議紀錄
不定期更新更新,62劉先生 | 02-23117722#2743 | 2022-01-15 01:12:39
行政院環境保護署
毒性化學物質釋放量公開資訊
不定期更新更新,140李小姐 | (02)23257399#55318 | 2023-07-27 01:00:19
行政院環境保護署自備餐具優惠店家資料
不定期更新更新,194林先生 | 02-2311-7722#2614 | 2022-01-14 01:24:15
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_高雄市_美濃站
每1時更新,180陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:57:44
行政院環境保護署環保集點制度補助作業要點
不定期更新,50王先生 | 02-2311-7722#2921 | 2022-01-15 01:13:29
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_高雄市_楠梓站
每1時更新,433陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:57:40
行政院環境保護署
環境影響評估報告書環境敏感區位調查表
每2月更新,240黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-05 01:00:55
行政院環境保護署空氣品質監測站基本資料
不定期更新更新,177陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-07 01:01:47
行政院環境保護署非甲烷碳氫化合物(NMHC)監測小時值(每小時提供)
每1時更新,129陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-08 00:58:48
行政院環境保護署噪音陳情管道
不定期更新更新,55王先生 | 02-23712121#6401 | 2022-01-14 01:18:43
行政院環境保護署中油三輕環境監測資料
每季更新更新,68陳先生 | 04-22521718#51207 | 2022-01-15 01:14:21
行政院環境保護署
訴願審議委員會委員名單
不定期更新更新,55謝先生 | 02-2311-7722#2962 | 2022-01-15 01:12:54
行政院環境保護署台灣地區垃圾處理場（廠）互惠緊急支援要點
不定期更新,50蔡先生 | 04-2252-1718#53508 | 2022-01-15 01:13:13
行政院環境保護署南投縣水量水質自動監測連線傳輸監測紀錄值即時資料集
不定期更新更新,48程先生 | 02-2311-7722#2833 | 2023-08-09 01:04:11
行政院環境保護署列管社區下水道名單
不定期更新,64洪先生 | 02-2311-7722#2833 | 2022-01-14 01:23:07
行政院環境保護署EPQSummary_InternationalIssues
不定期更新更新,159郭先生 | 02-2311-7722 EXT.2399 | 2022-01-15 01:14:16
行政院環境保護署