Study Released on Environmental Awareness in TaiwanGeneral Policy
「Study Released on Environmental Awareness in TaiwanGeneral Policy」於資料集「MajorEnvironmentalPolicies」由單位「行政院環境保護署」的陳小姐所提供，聯繫電話是(02)23117722#2753,(02)23117722#2756，最近更新時間為：2023-07-30 01:03:45。 欄位編號的內容是414 ， 欄位標題的內容是Study Released on Environmental Awareness in Taiwan ， 欄位摘要的內容是The EPA recently finished a study on students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection. The study revealed that the public's level of knowledge about recycling fell with age and that although 70% of college-level students could recognize the EPA’s eco-label, the Green Mark, only 25% of students were willing to give priority to Green Mark products in their purchasing habits.
In order to better understand students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection and their recognition of and satisfaction with public awareness oriented policies, in 1998 the EPA commissioned Tung Wu University to organize a study on the environmental knowledge of students and the general public. The results of the study were recently released.
In the section dealing with air quality and noise pollution, the study points out that 37% of students and the public feel that there are unbearable levels of noise near their residence. For elementary, middle and high school students, 52%, 41% and 44%, respectively, felt the same. Of these, between 48% and 56% felt traffic to be the main cause.
As for resource recycling and trash disposal, 57% of the general public recognized the recycling symbol while close to 70% of college level, high school and middle school students could recognize the symbol. Also, 87% of elementary school students, the youngest group surveyed, recognized the symbol. When asked whether they knew of the government’s effort to promote recycling, the general public ranked the highest at 91% while 87% of others surveyed said they were aware. When asked what “resourcable trash” was, the higher age groups were better informed with 78% college level students and 73% of the general public aware.
When asked about environmental education 45-86% said they got information about basic environmental protection from the television and newspapers. Over 40% of the public and college level students and 60% of middle and high school students said they also obtained information about the environment from publicity items about environmental activities.
The study further revealed that although 76% of the public and 66% of college-level students drink tap water, those living further south tend to drink more mountain spring water. There was an overall discrepancy of 26 to 30 percentage points between the north and south. Close to 60% of those polled first boiled the water before drinking, while close to 30% first used a water purifier and then boiled the water. Only 6-10% drank water directly after putting it through a water purifier. In areas where tap water tends to be hard, 67% of the public and college level students thought it should be softened more.
In looking at the sources of drinking water for schools, the study showed that the proportion of students who drink school water rises according to age, from 49% of high school students to only 23% of elementary students. Also, 67% of elementary students paid attention to the cleanliness of a water fountain before use, with more female than male students expressing concern with this point.
In the section pertaining to pollution, around 50% of both the public at large and college-level students felt that pig raising and factories were two serious sources of pollution to water resources and should be strictly prohibited. Second to these were trash dumps and the use of agricultural pesticides and fertilizers, with around 30% feeling that they should be prohibited. Additionally, 69% of high school and 55% of middle school students knew that "river pollution" means pollution to both the water and to the riverbed. Over 96% of students knew that dumping kitchen leftovers into drain pipes or ditches to increase the nutrients in lakes and rivers is wrong. 87% of high school students knew that septic tanks cannot go long periods of time without cleaning or else they lose effectiveness.
68% of college level students correctly identified the Green Mark, better than the general public's 50%. However, only 41% of college level students would give priority to purchasing a product with the Green Mark as opposed to 59% of the general public. Interestingly, public desire to purchase Green Mark products is higher than public recognition of the mark. Over 60% of the students and the general public were willing to apply for "environmental” credit cards (a fraction of the charge is donated to environmental activities) and over 70% were willing to participate in community environmental protection activities.
The EPA will continue to work to interpret the findings of the study and use them as a future administrative reference. ， 欄位全文的內容是The EPA recently finished a study on students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection. The study revealed that the public's level of knowledge about recycling fell with age and that although 70% of college-level students could recognize the EPA’s eco-label, the Green Mark, only 25% of students were willing to give priority to Green Mark products in their purchasing habits.
In order to better understand students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection and their recognition of and satisfaction with public awareness oriented policies, in 1998 the EPA commissioned Tung Wu University to organize a study on the environmental knowledge of students and the general public. The results of the study were recently released.
In the section dealing with air quality and noise pollution, the study points out that 37% of students and the public feel that there are unbearable levels of noise near their residence. For elementary, middle and high school students, 52%, 41% and 44%, respectively, felt the same. Of these, between 48% and 56% felt traffic to be the main cause.
As for resource recycling and trash disposal, 57% of the general public recognized the recycling symbol while close to 70% of college level, high school and middle school students could recognize the symbol. Also, 87% of elementary school students, the youngest group surveyed, recognized the symbol. When asked whether they knew of the government’s effort to promote recycling, the general public ranked the highest at 91% while 87% of others surveyed said they were aware. When asked what “resourcable trash” was, the higher age groups were better informed with 78% college level students and 73% of the general public aware.
When asked about environmental education 45-86% said they got information about basic environmental protection from the television and newspapers. Over 40% of the public and college level students and 60% of middle and high school students said they also obtained information about the environment from publicity items about environmental activities.
The study further revealed that although 76% of the public and 66% of college-level students drink tap water, those living further south tend to drink more mountain spring water. There was an overall discrepancy of 26 to 30 percentage points between the north and south. Close to 60% of those polled first boiled the water before drinking, while close to 30% first used a water purifier and then boiled the water. Only 6-10% drank water directly after putting it through a water purifier. In areas where tap water tends to be hard, 67% of the public and college level students thought it should be softened more.
In looking at the sources of drinking water for schools, the study showed that the proportion of students who drink school water rises according to age, from 49% of high school students to only 23% of elementary students. Also, 67% of elementary students paid attention to the cleanliness of a water fountain before use, with more female than male students expressing concern with this point.
In the section pertaining to pollution, around 50% of both the public at large and college-level students felt that pig raising and factories were two serious sources of pollution to water resources and should be strictly prohibited. Second to these were trash dumps and the use of agricultural pesticides and fertilizers, with around 30% feeling that they should be prohibited. Additionally, 69% of high school and 55% of middle school students knew that "river pollution" means pollution to both the water and to the riverbed. Over 96% of students knew that dumping kitchen leftovers into drain pipes or ditches to increase the nutrients in lakes and rivers is wrong. 87% of high school students knew that septic tanks cannot go long periods of time without cleaning or else they lose effectiveness.
68% of college level students correctly identified the Green Mark, better than the general public's 50%. However, only 41% of college level students would give priority to purchasing a product with the Green Mark as opposed to 59% of the general public. Interestingly, public desire to purchase Green Mark products is higher than public recognition of the mark. Over 60% of the students and the general public were willing to apply for "environmental” credit cards (a fraction of the charge is donated to environmental activities) and over 70% were willing to participate in community environmental protection activities.
The EPA will continue to work to interpret the findings of the study and use them as a future administrative reference. ， 欄位年度的內容是2000 ， 欄位月份的內容是3 ， 欄位卷的內容是3 ， 欄位期的內容是3 ， 欄位順序的內容是1 ， 欄位倒序的內容是2 ， 欄位分類的內容是General Policy ， 欄位標題2的內容是Study Released on Environmental Awareness in Taiwan ， 欄位檔案位置的內容是V3/V3-03 。
編號
414
標題
Study Released on Environmental Awareness in Taiwan
摘要
The EPA recently finished a study on students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection. The study revealed that the public's level of knowledge about recycling fell with age and that although 70% of college-level students could recognize the EPA’s eco-label, the Green Mark, only 25% of students were willing to give priority to Green Mark products in their purchasing habits. In order to better understand students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection and their recognition of and satisfaction with public awareness oriented policies, in 1998 the EPA commissioned Tung Wu University to organize a study on the environmental knowledge of students and the general public. The results of the study were recently released. In the section dealing with air quality and noise pollution, the study points out that 37% of students and the public feel that there are unbearable levels of noise near their residence. For elementary, middle and high school students, 52%, 41% and 44%, respectively, felt the same. Of these, between 48% and 56% felt traffic to be the main cause. As for resource recycling and trash disposal, 57% of the general public recognized the recycling symbol while close to 70% of college level, high school and middle school students could recognize the symbol. Also, 87% of elementary school students, the youngest group surveyed, recognized the symbol. When asked whether they knew of the government’s effort to promote recycling, the general public ranked the highest at 91% while 87% of others surveyed said they were aware. When asked what “resourcable trash” was, the higher age groups were better informed with 78% college level students and 73% of the general public aware. When asked about environmental education 45-86% said they got information about basic environmental protection from the television and newspapers. Over 40% of the public and college level students and 60% of middle and high school students said they also obtained information about the environment from publicity items about environmental activities. The study further revealed that although 76% of the public and 66% of college-level students drink tap water, those living further south tend to drink more mountain spring water. There was an overall discrepancy of 26 to 30 percentage points between the north and south. Close to 60% of those polled first boiled the water before drinking, while close to 30% first used a water purifier and then boiled the water. Only 6-10% drank water directly after putting it through a water purifier. In areas where tap water tends to be hard, 67% of the public and college level students thought it should be softened more. In looking at the sources of drinking water for schools, the study showed that the proportion of students who drink school water rises according to age, from 49% of high school students to only 23% of elementary students. Also, 67% of elementary students paid attention to the cleanliness of a water fountain before use, with more female than male students expressing concern with this point. In the section pertaining to pollution, around 50% of both the public at large and college-level students felt that pig raising and factories were two serious sources of pollution to water resources and should be strictly prohibited. Second to these were trash dumps and the use of agricultural pesticides and fertilizers, with around 30% feeling that they should be prohibited. Additionally, 69% of high school and 55% of middle school students knew that "river pollution" means pollution to both the water and to the riverbed. Over 96% of students knew that dumping kitchen leftovers into drain pipes or ditches to increase the nutrients in lakes and rivers is wrong. 87% of high school students knew that septic tanks cannot go long periods of time without cleaning or else they lose effectiveness. 68% of college level students correctly identified the Green Mark, better than the general public's 50%. However, only 41% of college level students would give priority to purchasing a product with the Green Mark as opposed to 59% of the general public. Interestingly, public desire to purchase Green Mark products is higher than public recognition of the mark. Over 60% of the students and the general public were willing to apply for "environmental” credit cards (a fraction of the charge is donated to environmental activities) and over 70% were willing to participate in community environmental protection activities. The EPA will continue to work to interpret the findings of the study and use them as a future administrative reference.
全文
The EPA recently finished a study on students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection. The study revealed that the public's level of knowledge about recycling fell with age and that although 70% of college-level students could recognize the EPA’s eco-label, the Green Mark, only 25% of students were willing to give priority to Green Mark products in their purchasing habits. In order to better understand students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection and their recognition of and satisfaction with public awareness oriented policies, in 1998 the EPA commissioned Tung Wu University to organize a study on the environmental knowledge of students and the general public. The results of the study were recently released. In the section dealing with air quality and noise pollution, the study points out that 37% of students and the public feel that there are unbearable levels of noise near their residence. For elementary, middle and high school students, 52%, 41% and 44%, respectively, felt the same. Of these, between 48% and 56% felt traffic to be the main cause. As for resource recycling and trash disposal, 57% of the general public recognized the recycling symbol while close to 70% of college level, high school and middle school students could recognize the symbol. Also, 87% of elementary school students, the youngest group surveyed, recognized the symbol. When asked whether they knew of the government’s effort to promote recycling, the general public ranked the highest at 91% while 87% of others surveyed said they were aware. When asked what “resourcable trash” was, the higher age groups were better informed with 78% college level students and 73% of the general public aware. When asked about environmental education 45-86% said they got information about basic environmental protection from the television and newspapers. Over 40% of the public and college level students and 60% of middle and high school students said they also obtained information about the environment from publicity items about environmental activities. The study further revealed that although 76% of the public and 66% of college-level students drink tap water, those living further south tend to drink more mountain spring water. There was an overall discrepancy of 26 to 30 percentage points between the north and south. Close to 60% of those polled first boiled the water before drinking, while close to 30% first used a water purifier and then boiled the water. Only 6-10% drank water directly after putting it through a water purifier. In areas where tap water tends to be hard, 67% of the public and college level students thought it should be softened more. In looking at the sources of drinking water for schools, the study showed that the proportion of students who drink school water rises according to age, from 49% of high school students to only 23% of elementary students. Also, 67% of elementary students paid attention to the cleanliness of a water fountain before use, with more female than male students expressing concern with this point. In the section pertaining to pollution, around 50% of both the public at large and college-level students felt that pig raising and factories were two serious sources of pollution to water resources and should be strictly prohibited. Second to these were trash dumps and the use of agricultural pesticides and fertilizers, with around 30% feeling that they should be prohibited. Additionally, 69% of high school and 55% of middle school students knew that "river pollution" means pollution to both the water and to the riverbed. Over 96% of students knew that dumping kitchen leftovers into drain pipes or ditches to increase the nutrients in lakes and rivers is wrong. 87% of high school students knew that septic tanks cannot go long periods of time without cleaning or else they lose effectiveness. 68% of college level students correctly identified the Green Mark, better than the general public's 50%. However, only 41% of college level students would give priority to purchasing a product with the Green Mark as opposed to 59% of the general public. Interestingly, public desire to purchase Green Mark products is higher than public recognition of the mark. Over 60% of the students and the general public were willing to apply for "environmental” credit cards (a fraction of the charge is donated to environmental activities) and over 70% were willing to participate in community environmental protection activities. The EPA will continue to work to interpret the findings of the study and use them as a future administrative reference.
年度
2000
月份
3
卷
3
期
3
順序
1
倒序
2
分類
General Policy
標題2
Study Released on Environmental Awareness in Taiwan
檔案位置
V3/V3-03
「Study Released on Environmental Awareness in TaiwanGeneral Policy」所屬的資料集：「MajorEnvironmentalPolicies」的其他資料
編號：
4191
標題：
Regulations Governing EIA Document Review Fees Revised and Announced
摘要：
To reflect the cost of environmental impact assessment (EIA) reviews, to examine and adjust the fees
全文：
Enterprises Invited to Participate in Expanded Smart Management of Wastewater Treatment Trial Projec
編號：
3958
標題：
Incineration Plants Awarded for Great Performance in Energy Production and Bottom Ash Recycling
摘要：
inspection Incineration Plants Awarded for Great Performance in Energy Production and Bottom Ash Rec
全文：
On 7 September 2020, the EPA held the 2019 Incineration Plant and Bottom Ash Recycling Evaluation an
編號：
4076
標題：
Ammonium Nitrate and Hydrogen Fluoride Added to List of Concerned Chemical Substances
摘要：
chemicals
Ammonium Nitrate and Hydrogen Fluoride Added to List of Concerned Chemical Substances
The
全文：
These two substances are now announced as harmful concerned chemical substances because of their haz
編號：
3411
標題：
Recycling Fee Rates for Five Types of Containers Starting March 2016
摘要：
recycling
Recycling Fee Rates for Five Types of Containers Starting March 2016
全文：
Recycling Fee Rates for Five Types of Containers Starting March 2016
The recycling fee rates for ir
編號：
3597
標題：
Continual Upgrading of Environmental Testing
摘要：
Environmental Analysis
Continual Upgrading of Environmental Testing
Environmental protection work r
全文：
Continual Upgrading of Environmental Testing
Environmental protection work relies on environmental
編號：
3623
標題：
Taiwan Hosts the APEC Roundtable Discussion for Sustainability of the Marine Environment
摘要：
International Cooperation
Taiwan Hosts the APEC Roundtable Discussion for Sustainability of the Mari
全文：
Taiwan Hosts the APEC Roundtable Discussion for Sustainability of the Marine Environment
On 16-17 Oc
編號：
3533
標題：
Amendments to Stationary Source Air Pollution Fee Rates Preannounced
摘要：
Air
全文：
Amendments to Stationary Source Air Pollution Fee Rates Preannounced
編號：
3568
標題：
Twenty-five Communities Awarded for Low-carbon Sustainability and Climate Change Achievements
摘要：
General Policy
Twenty-five Communities Awarded for Low-carbon Sustainability and Climate Change Achi
全文：
Twenty-five Communities Awarded for Low-carbon Sustainability and Climate Change Achievements
On
編號：
3351
標題：
EPA Assists Local Governments in Incinerating Crops from Polluted Land and Compensating Farmers’ Los
摘要：
Soil and Groundwater EPA Assists Local Governments in Incinerating Crops from Polluted Land and Comp
全文：
EPA Assists Local Governments in Incinerating Crops from Polluted Land and Compensating Farmers’ Los
編號：
3928
標題：
Reporting Procedures Simplified for Regulated Recyclable Waste Responsible Enterprises
摘要：
Reporting Procedures Simplified for Regulated Recyclable Waste Responsible Enterprises The revised
全文：
Reporting Procedures Simplified for Regulated Recyclable Waste Responsible Enterprises
The revised
編號：
1253
標題：
Tightened Inspections on Illegal Dumping of Hazardous Solvents
摘要：
In recent years the EPA has discovered two consecutive cases of illegal dumping of hazardous solvent
全文：
In recent years the EPA has discovered two consecutive cases of illegal dumping of hazardous solvent
編號：
54
標題：
EPA Promotes Coastal Clean-up and Protection Plan
摘要：
Environmental Sanitation Through coordination with coastal management units of city environmental p
全文：
Environmental Sanitation Through coordination with coastal management units of city environmental p
編號：
3675
標題：
IoT Smart Enforcement Application Wins 2018 Smart City Innovative Application Award
摘要：
Env. Monitoring
IoT Smart Enforcement Application Wins 2018 Smart City Innovative Application Award
全文：
IoT Smart Enforcement Application Wins 2018 Smart City Innovative Application Award
The 2018 Smar
編號：
3646
標題：
Green Point Scheme Expanded to Help Build a Green Economy
摘要：
Ecolabeling
Green Point Scheme Expanded to Help Build a Green Economy
On 12 December 2017, the EPA a
全文：
Green Point Scheme Expanded to Help Build a Green Economy
On 12 December 2017, the EPA announced tha
編號：
3864
標題：
Taichung City Subsidized for Dongda River Water
Environment Improvement
摘要：
Water Taichung City Subsidized for Dongda River Water
Environment Improvement
The EPA is subsidizing
全文：
As part of the third phase of the Forward-looking
Infrastructure Development Program, the Fazi River
編號：
3069
標題：
EPA and Transport Companies Sign Eco-Driving Agreement
摘要：
Air Quality
EPA and Transport Companies Sign Eco-Driving Agreement
In order to encourage energy sa
全文：
Air Quality
EPA and Transport Companies Sign Eco-Driving Agreement
In order to encourage energy sa
編號：
338
標題：
Hazardous Waste Solvent Treatment Controls to be Strengthened
摘要：
The EPA will strengthen regulatory controls on hazardous waste solvents. Through the process of reve
全文：
The EPA will strengthen regulatory controls on hazardous waste solvents. Through the process of reve
編號：
4055
標題：
Revision Preannounced for Emergency Measures to Prevent Serious Worsening of Air Quality
摘要：
The Regulations Governing Emergency Measures to Prevent Serious Worsening of Air Quality was revised
全文：
編號：
3247
標題：
Non-profit Organization INDEX Visits Taiwan to Share Danish Experiences in Environmental Education
摘要：
Environmental Education Non-profit Organization INDEX Visits Taiwan to Share Danish Experiences in E
全文：
Non-profit Organization INDEX Visits Taiwan to Share Danish Experiences in Environmental Education
編號：
830
標題：
Special Demonstration Zone for Recycling to be Established
摘要：
The EPA as part of its efforts to further the development of a recycling-conscious society, has draw
全文：
The EPA as part of its efforts to further the development of a recycling-conscious society, has draw
編號：
3382
標題：
Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Registration Required for Large Emission Sources
摘要：
Climate Change
Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Registration Required for Large Emission Sources
全文：
Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Registration Required for Large Emission Sources
On 5 January 2016, the
編號：
3620
標題：
Taiwan and US Jointly Hold Global Environmental Education Partnership Meeting
摘要：
International Cooperation
Taiwan and US Jointly Hold Global Environmental Education Partnership Meet
全文：
Taiwan and US Jointly Hold Global Environmental Education Partnership Meeting
A meeting of the Globa
編號：
3831
標題：
Boiler Improvements Effectively Cut Down Air Pollution
摘要：
Implementing the Air Pollution Prevention Action Plan (空氣污染防制行動方案), the EPA and the Ministry of Econ
全文：
To expedite the phasing out of boilers and strengthen pollution emission reduction, the EPA has empl
編號：
2436
標題：
Noise Control Policy in Taiwan
摘要：
Feature Column
Noise Control Pol
全文：
Feature Column
Noise Control Pol
編號：
3962
標題：
EPA and Taoyuan City Government Jointly Promote Livestock Biogas for Energy Generation
摘要：
waste EPA and Taoyuan City Government Jointly Promote Livestock Biogas for Energy Generation
全文：
The EPA and the Taoyuan City Government worked together to install anaerobic fermentation tanks and
編號：
96
標題：
EIA Air Pollution Technology Criteria to be Studied
摘要：
Environmental Impact Assessment According to Article 49 of the recently announced Work Procedures f
全文：
Environmental Impact Assessment According to Article 49 of the recently announced Work Procedures f
編號：
74
標題：
Regulations Concerning Public Nuisance Prevention Agreements to be Amended
摘要：
Supervision Evaluation & Dispute Resolution On November 5 amendments to the Public Dispute Settleme
全文：
Supervision Evaluation & Dispute Resolution On November 5 amendments to the Public Dispute Settleme
編號：
860
標題：
Future Administrative Priorities and Budgeting
摘要：
General policy Future Administrative Priorities and Budgeting Environmental protection work absolute
全文：
“Environmental protection work absolutely requires the participation of all citizens; it is not some
編號：
3754
標題：
Thirty-six Recycling Institutes Awarded for Excellent Performance
摘要：
Recycling
Thirty-six Recycling Institutes Awarded for Excellent Performance
On 29 March 2019, the EP
全文：
Thirty-six Recycling Institutes Awarded for Excellent Performance
On 29 March 2019, the EPA held an
編號：
52
標題：
EPA Assesses AmCham Suggestions on Regulatory Affairs
摘要：
International Affairs The American Chamber of Commerce in Taiwan issued a “Taiwan White Paper” in S
全文：
International Affairs The American Chamber of Commerce in Taiwan issued a “Taiwan White Paper” in S
行政院環境保護署 的其他資料集
環境教育人員認證得採計之專業領域課程(ODS)
不定期更新更新,53盧小姐 | (03)4020789分機606 | 2023-08-09 01:05:24
行政院環境保護署全國場址公告與解列情形統計表
每1年更新,186呂小姐 | 02-2383-2389#8110 | 2023-07-30 01:03:52
行政院環境保護署大眾捷運系統之開發類別環境影響說明書
每2月更新,60黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-05 01:01:14
行政院環境保護署訴願審議委員會委員名單
不定期更新更新,50謝先生 | 02-2311-7722#2962 | 2022-01-15 01:12:54
行政院環境保護署淡水河系水環境優化願景聯繫會報委員會議
不定期更新,56葉先生 | 02-2311-7722#2846 | 2022-01-15 01:12:48
行政院環境保護署
環境空氣戴奧辛監測資料
每6月更新,142戴先生 | 02-2371-2121#6210 | 2023-08-07 01:03:23
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_南投縣_竹山站
每1時更新,368陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:57:28
行政院環境保護署環境影響說明書附表五：施工階段
每2月更新,144黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-05 01:00:54
行政院環境保護署地方環保局環保罰鍰金額
每1月更新,171顏先生 | 02-23117722#2109 | 2023-07-27 01:01:11
行政院環境保護署行政院環境保護署環境教育人員認證展延研習開課申請書
不定期更新更新,59盧小姐 | (03)4020789分機606 | 2023-08-09 01:05:21
行政院環境保護署
縣市(高雄市)小時值-每小時
每小時更新更新,177謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:01:08
行政院環境保護署貨品通關事前聲明確認作業指引簡報
不定期更新,59金先生 | 23257399＃55315 | 2022-01-14 01:22:22
行政院環境保護署歷年土壤調查_環保署土壤重金屬含量調查(25公頃)
不定期更新更新,138謝小姐 | (02)23832389*8302 | 2022-01-14 01:20:17
行政院環境保護署環境教育人員認證資料
每1月更新,71盧小姐 | 03-4020789#606 | 2023-07-27 01:04:48
行政院環境保護署重點事業廢棄物-爐碴之產出及清理流向
每月更新更新,103陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2682 | 2022-01-14 01:24:19
行政院環境保護署
空氣品質監測小時值資料(一般污染物,每日更新)
每日更新更新,143謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:00:20
行政院環境保護署全國年度例行性計畫成果統計表 （摘要）
不定期更新更新,143楊小姐 | 02-2383-2389#8106 | 2022-01-14 01:22:08
行政院環境保護署金門縣重要環保統計資料
每月更新更新,134謝小姐 | 02-23117722#2103 | 2022-01-14 01:21:48
行政院環境保護署空氣污染稽查次數
每年更新更新,174謝小姐 | 02-23117722#2103 | 2022-01-14 01:22:38
行政院環境保護署花蓮縣重要環保統計資料
每1月更新,164顏先生 | 02-23117722#2109 | 2023-08-07 01:00:00
行政院環境保護署
地方環保局環保實收罰鍰
每月更新更新,184謝小姐 | 02-23117722#2103 | 2022-01-14 01:21:32
行政院環境保護署河川水質監測站位置圖
不定期更新更新,45謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-15 01:16:38
行政院環境保護署行政院環境保護署「資料開放諮詢小組」會議資料
不定期更新更新,64林小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2365 | 2022-01-15 01:10:05
行政院環境保護署核能一廠、二廠相關計畫環評監督委員會會議紀錄
不定期更新更新,37陳先生 | 04-22521718#51207 | 2023-08-09 01:05:12
行政院環境保護署PM10小時值(每小時提供)
每1時更新,123陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-08 00:58:46
行政院環境保護署
經過活動斷層範圍環境影響說明書
每2月更新,97黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-05 01:01:11
行政院環境保護署彰化縣水量水質自動監測連線傳輸監測紀錄值即時資料集
不定期更新更新,63許先生 | 02-2311-7722#2831 | 2022-01-18 01:24:46
行政院環境保護署公害糾紛處理法
不定期更新更新,57陳小姐 | (02)2311-7722分機2932 | 2023-07-30 01:02:09
行政院環境保護署再生粒料毒性特性溶出試驗結果
不定期更新更新,62許先生 | 02-2311-7722#2641 | 2022-01-14 01:18:39
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_南投縣_埔里站
每1時更新,294陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:57:26
行政院環境保護署