Study Released on Environmental Awareness in TaiwanGeneral Policy
「Study Released on Environmental Awareness in TaiwanGeneral Policy」於資料集「MajorEnvironmentalPolicies」由單位「行政院環境保護署」的陳小姐所提供，聯繫電話是(02)23117722#2753,(02)23117722#2756，最近更新時間為：2023-07-30 01:03:45。 欄位編號的內容是414 ， 欄位標題的內容是Study Released on Environmental Awareness in Taiwan ， 欄位摘要的內容是The EPA recently finished a study on students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection. The study revealed that the public's level of knowledge about recycling fell with age and that although 70% of college-level students could recognize the EPA’s eco-label, the Green Mark, only 25% of students were willing to give priority to Green Mark products in their purchasing habits.
In order to better understand students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection and their recognition of and satisfaction with public awareness oriented policies, in 1998 the EPA commissioned Tung Wu University to organize a study on the environmental knowledge of students and the general public. The results of the study were recently released.
In the section dealing with air quality and noise pollution, the study points out that 37% of students and the public feel that there are unbearable levels of noise near their residence. For elementary, middle and high school students, 52%, 41% and 44%, respectively, felt the same. Of these, between 48% and 56% felt traffic to be the main cause.
As for resource recycling and trash disposal, 57% of the general public recognized the recycling symbol while close to 70% of college level, high school and middle school students could recognize the symbol. Also, 87% of elementary school students, the youngest group surveyed, recognized the symbol. When asked whether they knew of the government’s effort to promote recycling, the general public ranked the highest at 91% while 87% of others surveyed said they were aware. When asked what “resourcable trash” was, the higher age groups were better informed with 78% college level students and 73% of the general public aware.
When asked about environmental education 45-86% said they got information about basic environmental protection from the television and newspapers. Over 40% of the public and college level students and 60% of middle and high school students said they also obtained information about the environment from publicity items about environmental activities.
The study further revealed that although 76% of the public and 66% of college-level students drink tap water, those living further south tend to drink more mountain spring water. There was an overall discrepancy of 26 to 30 percentage points between the north and south. Close to 60% of those polled first boiled the water before drinking, while close to 30% first used a water purifier and then boiled the water. Only 6-10% drank water directly after putting it through a water purifier. In areas where tap water tends to be hard, 67% of the public and college level students thought it should be softened more.
In looking at the sources of drinking water for schools, the study showed that the proportion of students who drink school water rises according to age, from 49% of high school students to only 23% of elementary students. Also, 67% of elementary students paid attention to the cleanliness of a water fountain before use, with more female than male students expressing concern with this point.
In the section pertaining to pollution, around 50% of both the public at large and college-level students felt that pig raising and factories were two serious sources of pollution to water resources and should be strictly prohibited. Second to these were trash dumps and the use of agricultural pesticides and fertilizers, with around 30% feeling that they should be prohibited. Additionally, 69% of high school and 55% of middle school students knew that "river pollution" means pollution to both the water and to the riverbed. Over 96% of students knew that dumping kitchen leftovers into drain pipes or ditches to increase the nutrients in lakes and rivers is wrong. 87% of high school students knew that septic tanks cannot go long periods of time without cleaning or else they lose effectiveness.
68% of college level students correctly identified the Green Mark, better than the general public's 50%. However, only 41% of college level students would give priority to purchasing a product with the Green Mark as opposed to 59% of the general public. Interestingly, public desire to purchase Green Mark products is higher than public recognition of the mark. Over 60% of the students and the general public were willing to apply for "environmental” credit cards (a fraction of the charge is donated to environmental activities) and over 70% were willing to participate in community environmental protection activities.
The EPA will continue to work to interpret the findings of the study and use them as a future administrative reference. ， 欄位全文的內容是The EPA recently finished a study on students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection. The study revealed that the public's level of knowledge about recycling fell with age and that although 70% of college-level students could recognize the EPA’s eco-label, the Green Mark, only 25% of students were willing to give priority to Green Mark products in their purchasing habits.
In order to better understand students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection and their recognition of and satisfaction with public awareness oriented policies, in 1998 the EPA commissioned Tung Wu University to organize a study on the environmental knowledge of students and the general public. The results of the study were recently released.
In the section dealing with air quality and noise pollution, the study points out that 37% of students and the public feel that there are unbearable levels of noise near their residence. For elementary, middle and high school students, 52%, 41% and 44%, respectively, felt the same. Of these, between 48% and 56% felt traffic to be the main cause.
As for resource recycling and trash disposal, 57% of the general public recognized the recycling symbol while close to 70% of college level, high school and middle school students could recognize the symbol. Also, 87% of elementary school students, the youngest group surveyed, recognized the symbol. When asked whether they knew of the government’s effort to promote recycling, the general public ranked the highest at 91% while 87% of others surveyed said they were aware. When asked what “resourcable trash” was, the higher age groups were better informed with 78% college level students and 73% of the general public aware.
When asked about environmental education 45-86% said they got information about basic environmental protection from the television and newspapers. Over 40% of the public and college level students and 60% of middle and high school students said they also obtained information about the environment from publicity items about environmental activities.
The study further revealed that although 76% of the public and 66% of college-level students drink tap water, those living further south tend to drink more mountain spring water. There was an overall discrepancy of 26 to 30 percentage points between the north and south. Close to 60% of those polled first boiled the water before drinking, while close to 30% first used a water purifier and then boiled the water. Only 6-10% drank water directly after putting it through a water purifier. In areas where tap water tends to be hard, 67% of the public and college level students thought it should be softened more.
In looking at the sources of drinking water for schools, the study showed that the proportion of students who drink school water rises according to age, from 49% of high school students to only 23% of elementary students. Also, 67% of elementary students paid attention to the cleanliness of a water fountain before use, with more female than male students expressing concern with this point.
In the section pertaining to pollution, around 50% of both the public at large and college-level students felt that pig raising and factories were two serious sources of pollution to water resources and should be strictly prohibited. Second to these were trash dumps and the use of agricultural pesticides and fertilizers, with around 30% feeling that they should be prohibited. Additionally, 69% of high school and 55% of middle school students knew that "river pollution" means pollution to both the water and to the riverbed. Over 96% of students knew that dumping kitchen leftovers into drain pipes or ditches to increase the nutrients in lakes and rivers is wrong. 87% of high school students knew that septic tanks cannot go long periods of time without cleaning or else they lose effectiveness.
68% of college level students correctly identified the Green Mark, better than the general public's 50%. However, only 41% of college level students would give priority to purchasing a product with the Green Mark as opposed to 59% of the general public. Interestingly, public desire to purchase Green Mark products is higher than public recognition of the mark. Over 60% of the students and the general public were willing to apply for "environmental” credit cards (a fraction of the charge is donated to environmental activities) and over 70% were willing to participate in community environmental protection activities.
The EPA will continue to work to interpret the findings of the study and use them as a future administrative reference. ， 欄位年度的內容是2000 ， 欄位月份的內容是3 ， 欄位卷的內容是3 ， 欄位期的內容是3 ， 欄位順序的內容是1 ， 欄位倒序的內容是2 ， 欄位分類的內容是General Policy ， 欄位標題2的內容是Study Released on Environmental Awareness in Taiwan ， 欄位檔案位置的內容是V3/V3-03 。
編號
414
標題
Study Released on Environmental Awareness in Taiwan
摘要
The EPA recently finished a study on students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection. The study revealed that the public's level of knowledge about recycling fell with age and that although 70% of college-level students could recognize the EPA’s eco-label, the Green Mark, only 25% of students were willing to give priority to Green Mark products in their purchasing habits. In order to better understand students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection and their recognition of and satisfaction with public awareness oriented policies, in 1998 the EPA commissioned Tung Wu University to organize a study on the environmental knowledge of students and the general public. The results of the study were recently released. In the section dealing with air quality and noise pollution, the study points out that 37% of students and the public feel that there are unbearable levels of noise near their residence. For elementary, middle and high school students, 52%, 41% and 44%, respectively, felt the same. Of these, between 48% and 56% felt traffic to be the main cause. As for resource recycling and trash disposal, 57% of the general public recognized the recycling symbol while close to 70% of college level, high school and middle school students could recognize the symbol. Also, 87% of elementary school students, the youngest group surveyed, recognized the symbol. When asked whether they knew of the government’s effort to promote recycling, the general public ranked the highest at 91% while 87% of others surveyed said they were aware. When asked what “resourcable trash” was, the higher age groups were better informed with 78% college level students and 73% of the general public aware. When asked about environmental education 45-86% said they got information about basic environmental protection from the television and newspapers. Over 40% of the public and college level students and 60% of middle and high school students said they also obtained information about the environment from publicity items about environmental activities. The study further revealed that although 76% of the public and 66% of college-level students drink tap water, those living further south tend to drink more mountain spring water. There was an overall discrepancy of 26 to 30 percentage points between the north and south. Close to 60% of those polled first boiled the water before drinking, while close to 30% first used a water purifier and then boiled the water. Only 6-10% drank water directly after putting it through a water purifier. In areas where tap water tends to be hard, 67% of the public and college level students thought it should be softened more. In looking at the sources of drinking water for schools, the study showed that the proportion of students who drink school water rises according to age, from 49% of high school students to only 23% of elementary students. Also, 67% of elementary students paid attention to the cleanliness of a water fountain before use, with more female than male students expressing concern with this point. In the section pertaining to pollution, around 50% of both the public at large and college-level students felt that pig raising and factories were two serious sources of pollution to water resources and should be strictly prohibited. Second to these were trash dumps and the use of agricultural pesticides and fertilizers, with around 30% feeling that they should be prohibited. Additionally, 69% of high school and 55% of middle school students knew that "river pollution" means pollution to both the water and to the riverbed. Over 96% of students knew that dumping kitchen leftovers into drain pipes or ditches to increase the nutrients in lakes and rivers is wrong. 87% of high school students knew that septic tanks cannot go long periods of time without cleaning or else they lose effectiveness. 68% of college level students correctly identified the Green Mark, better than the general public's 50%. However, only 41% of college level students would give priority to purchasing a product with the Green Mark as opposed to 59% of the general public. Interestingly, public desire to purchase Green Mark products is higher than public recognition of the mark. Over 60% of the students and the general public were willing to apply for "environmental” credit cards (a fraction of the charge is donated to environmental activities) and over 70% were willing to participate in community environmental protection activities. The EPA will continue to work to interpret the findings of the study and use them as a future administrative reference.
全文
The EPA recently finished a study on students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection. The study revealed that the public's level of knowledge about recycling fell with age and that although 70% of college-level students could recognize the EPA’s eco-label, the Green Mark, only 25% of students were willing to give priority to Green Mark products in their purchasing habits. In order to better understand students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection and their recognition of and satisfaction with public awareness oriented policies, in 1998 the EPA commissioned Tung Wu University to organize a study on the environmental knowledge of students and the general public. The results of the study were recently released. In the section dealing with air quality and noise pollution, the study points out that 37% of students and the public feel that there are unbearable levels of noise near their residence. For elementary, middle and high school students, 52%, 41% and 44%, respectively, felt the same. Of these, between 48% and 56% felt traffic to be the main cause. As for resource recycling and trash disposal, 57% of the general public recognized the recycling symbol while close to 70% of college level, high school and middle school students could recognize the symbol. Also, 87% of elementary school students, the youngest group surveyed, recognized the symbol. When asked whether they knew of the government’s effort to promote recycling, the general public ranked the highest at 91% while 87% of others surveyed said they were aware. When asked what “resourcable trash” was, the higher age groups were better informed with 78% college level students and 73% of the general public aware. When asked about environmental education 45-86% said they got information about basic environmental protection from the television and newspapers. Over 40% of the public and college level students and 60% of middle and high school students said they also obtained information about the environment from publicity items about environmental activities. The study further revealed that although 76% of the public and 66% of college-level students drink tap water, those living further south tend to drink more mountain spring water. There was an overall discrepancy of 26 to 30 percentage points between the north and south. Close to 60% of those polled first boiled the water before drinking, while close to 30% first used a water purifier and then boiled the water. Only 6-10% drank water directly after putting it through a water purifier. In areas where tap water tends to be hard, 67% of the public and college level students thought it should be softened more. In looking at the sources of drinking water for schools, the study showed that the proportion of students who drink school water rises according to age, from 49% of high school students to only 23% of elementary students. Also, 67% of elementary students paid attention to the cleanliness of a water fountain before use, with more female than male students expressing concern with this point. In the section pertaining to pollution, around 50% of both the public at large and college-level students felt that pig raising and factories were two serious sources of pollution to water resources and should be strictly prohibited. Second to these were trash dumps and the use of agricultural pesticides and fertilizers, with around 30% feeling that they should be prohibited. Additionally, 69% of high school and 55% of middle school students knew that "river pollution" means pollution to both the water and to the riverbed. Over 96% of students knew that dumping kitchen leftovers into drain pipes or ditches to increase the nutrients in lakes and rivers is wrong. 87% of high school students knew that septic tanks cannot go long periods of time without cleaning or else they lose effectiveness. 68% of college level students correctly identified the Green Mark, better than the general public's 50%. However, only 41% of college level students would give priority to purchasing a product with the Green Mark as opposed to 59% of the general public. Interestingly, public desire to purchase Green Mark products is higher than public recognition of the mark. Over 60% of the students and the general public were willing to apply for "environmental” credit cards (a fraction of the charge is donated to environmental activities) and over 70% were willing to participate in community environmental protection activities. The EPA will continue to work to interpret the findings of the study and use them as a future administrative reference.
年度
2000
月份
3
卷
3
期
3
順序
1
倒序
2
分類
General Policy
標題2
Study Released on Environmental Awareness in Taiwan
檔案位置
V3/V3-03
「Study Released on Environmental Awareness in TaiwanGeneral Policy」所屬的資料集：「MajorEnvironmentalPolicies」的其他資料
編號：
3828
標題：
Amendments to Waste Disposal Act Enforcement
摘要：
Rules Announced
全文：
The Waste Disposal Act Enforcement Rules were
recently amended to strengthen the management
of gener
編號：
3901
標題：
Co-firing Ratio and Composition Standards for Fuels Used by Stationary Pollution Sources Announced
摘要：
Air Co-firing Ratio and Composition Standards for Fuels Used by Stationary Pollution Sources Announ
全文：
The EPA also announced the Fuels Governed by the Co-firing Ratio and Composition Standards for Fuels
編號：
3685
標題：
Incentives Provided for Reporting Illegal Open-air Burning
摘要：
Air Quality
Incentives Provided for Reporting Illegal Open-air Burning
To improve air quality, the
全文：
Incentives Provided for Reporting Illegal Open-air Burning
To improve air quality, the EPA encourag
編號：
3970
標題：
EPA Works with Finland and Private Companies to Promote SRF
摘要：
To promote the use of solid recovered fuel (SRF), the EPA held the Turning Waste to Energy: Solid Re
全文：
The EPA indicates that waste-to-fuel policies help utilize high calorific value waste and reduce the
編號：
340
標題：
Mobile source air pollution fees to be collected from fuel suppliers
摘要：
Existing air pollution fee collection regulations have been revised so that air pollution fees for m
全文：
Existing air pollution fee collection regulations have been revised so that air pollution fees for m
編號：
4056
標題：
Operation Guidelines Announced to Promote Indoor Air Quality Voluntary Control Label
摘要：
The Operation Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality Voluntary Control Labels was announced on 2 July by
全文：
With 18 articles in total, the Guidelines specify the categories, applications, evaluations, and use
編號：
3562
標題：
Environmental Devotees Awarded on World Environment Day
摘要：
Environmental Education
Environmental Devotees Awarded on World Environment Day
5 June is World Envi
全文：
Environmental Devotees Awarded on World Environment Day
5 June is World Environment Day. On 5 June 2
編號：
3303
標題：
EPA Publishes Results of First Seabed Waste Survey
摘要：
Water EPA Publishes Results of First Seabed Waste Survey
全文：
EPA Publishes Results of First Seabed Waste Survey
Between March and May 2015 the EPA conducted mari
編號：
4098
標題：
Second Bioenergy Center to Begin Trial Operation in Taoyuan by End of 2021
摘要：
environmental inspection
Second Bioenergy Center to Begin Trial Operation in Taoyuan by End of 2021
全文：
According to the EPA, food waste is recycled domestically and is used to make pigswill (46%) or is c
編號：
1379
標題：
Newly Drafted Packaging Rules Announced
摘要：
Public opinion surveys reveal that the nation’s citizenry disapproves of over-packaged products and
全文：
Public opinion surveys reveal that the nation’s citizenry disapproves of over-packaged products and
編號：
388
標題：
Dioxin Emissions Standards to be Set for Small Incinerators
摘要：
Due to domestic concerns over incinerator dioxin emissions the EPA decided to set dioxin emissions s
全文：
Due to domestic concerns over incinerator dioxin emissions the EPA decided to set dioxin emissions s
編號：
3684
標題：
2018 Green Vehicles Announced
摘要：
Air Quality
2018 Green Vehicles Announced
Vehicle exhaust accounts for approximately one-third of PM
全文：
2018 Green Vehicles Announced
Vehicle exhaust accounts for approximately one-third of PM2.5 emission
編號：
60
標題：
Periodic Motorcycle Inspections Fully Implemented
摘要：
Air Quality Motorcycles are a major pollution source in urban areas. Although Taiwan has the world'
全文：
Air Quality Motorcycles are a major pollution source in urban areas. Although Taiwan has the world'
編號：
620
標題：
EPA Tightens Industrial Waste Requirements During EIA Review
摘要：
In the wake of the recent problems regarding solid waste management EPA Administrator Edgar Lin has
全文：
In the wake of the recent problems regarding solid waste management EPA Administrator Edgar Lin has
編號：
8
標題：
IDB Promotes Environmental Management Guidance
摘要：
Others Taiwan's primary Chinese-language source of in formation on IS014000 has been the IS014000 Up
全文：
Others Taiwan's primary Chinese-language source of in formation on IS014000 has been the IS014000 U
編號：
3637
標題：
Plastic-Free Ocean Promoted in Response to
International Trend
摘要：
waste
Plastic-Free Ocean Promoted in Response to
International Trend
Starting 1 January 2018, the EP
全文：
Plastic-Free Ocean Promoted in Response to
International Trend
Starting 1 January 2018, the EPA impl
編號：
378
標題：
Green Product Procurement Criteria Announced
摘要：
On June 26 regulations regarding the Government Procurement Act's provisions for priority purchasing
全文：
On June 26 regulations regarding the Government Procurement Act's provisions for priority purchasing
編號：
4210
標題：
Temporarily Stored Waste to Be Cleared by 2032
摘要：
To solve problems relating to industrial waste disposal, the EPA, the Ministry of Economic Affairs (
全文：
Temporarily Stored Waste to Be Cleared by 2032
To solve problems relating to industrial waste dispo
編號：
3900
標題：
EPA Cooperates with Tzu Chi to Promote Environmental Sustainability
摘要：
Environmental Education EPA Cooperates with Tzu Chi to Promote Environmental Sustainability
EPA Mini
全文：
It has been 33 years since the EPA was founded and 30 years since Tzu Chi started participating in e
編號：
3465
標題：
Amendments to Pest Control Operators Management Regulations Preannounced
摘要：
Amendments to Pest Control Operators Management Regulations Preannounced
全文：
Amendments to Pest Control Operators Management Regulations Preannounced
The EPA has preannounced dr
編號：
2038
標題：
Plastic Tape Manufacturers’ VOC Emissions to Be Regulated
摘要：
Air Quality
Plastic Tape Manufacturers’ VOC
全文：
Air Quality
Plastic Tape Manufacturers’ VOC
編號：
534
標題：
1999 Performance Evaluations of Local EPBs Completed
摘要：
On April 8th the EPA released performance evaluations of local environmental protection bureaus (EPB
全文：
On April 8th the EPA released performance evaluations of local environmental protection bureaus (EPB
編號：
450
標題：
Air Pollution Fee Tied to Gasoline Constituent Standards
摘要：
In the future the EPA will use a combination of economic incentives and command-and-control tactics
全文：
In the future the EPA will use a combination of economic incentives and command-and-control tactics
編號：
103
標題：
Standards for Fluorescent Light Eco-label Specifications Announced
摘要：
Eco-labeling On December 31 1998, the EPA announced the "Green Mark" specification standards for fl
全文：
Eco-labeling On December 31 1998, the EPA announced the "Green Mark" specification standards for fl
編號：
3482
標題：
New EIA Measures Announced for Implementation of Geology Act
摘要：
EIA
New EIA Measures Announced for Implementation of Geology Act
The Geology Act has now been in fo
全文：
New EIA Measures Announced for Implementation of Geology Act
The Geology Act has now been in force
編號：
3908
標題：
Regulations Governing Air Pollution Monitoring for Stationary Sources Amended
摘要：
Air Regulations Governing Air Pollution Monitoring for Stationary Sources Amended
To strengthen the
全文：
The main points of the amendments are as follows:
(1) The Stationary Sources of Air Pollution Requi
編號：
3868
標題：
Results of Food Safety Policies Examined to Enhance Control
摘要：
chemicals
Results of Food Safety Policies Examined to Enhance Control
On 10 December 2019, the Exe
全文：
The meeting was also attended by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, the Council of Agriculture, the
編號：
3400
標題：
EPA’s Environmental Incidents Specialist Teams Acquire ISO Certification
摘要：
General Policy
EPA’s Environmental Incidents Specialist Teams Acquire ISO Certification
全文：
EPA’s Environmental Incidents Specialist Teams Acquire ISO Certification
To standardize the preparat
編號：
4128
標題：
Enterprises With Excellent Recycling Performance Awarded for Improvements and Innovations in the Ind
摘要：
Enterprises With Excellent Recycling Performance Awarded for Improvements and Innovations in the Ind
全文：
The EPA has begun to acknowledge enterprises for their excellent performance in resource recycling s
編號：
2444
標題：
Wastewater Management Regulations under Revision to Improve Industrial Zone Effluent
摘要：
Water Quality
Wastewater Mana
全文：
Water Quality
Wastewater Mana
行政院環境保護署 的其他資料集
臺東縣水量水質自動監測連線傳輸監測紀錄值即時資料集
不定期更新更新,44程先生 | 02-2311-7722#2833 | 2023-08-09 01:04:06
行政院環境保護署環保署補、捐(獎)助地方政府情形表
每季更新更新,113蘇小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2155 | 2022-01-15 01:09:29
行政院環境保護署水庫水質監測資料
不定期更新更新,110郭先生 | 2311-7722#2399 | 2023-08-07 01:02:05
行政院環境保護署臺北市水量水質自動監測連線傳輸監測紀錄值即時資料集
不定期更新更新,46吳小姐 | 02-2383-2389#8303 | 2022-01-18 01:24:38
行政院環境保護署公告應回收項目之責任業者列管資料
每年更新更新,47廖小姐 | 02-2370-5888#3103 | 2022-01-14 01:26:07
行政院環境保護署
淡水河系水環境優化願景聯繫會報委員會議
不定期更新,47葉先生 | 02-2311-7722#2846 | 2022-01-15 01:12:48
行政院環境保護署環境影響評估開發案基本資料
每2月更新,158黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-06 01:04:25
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_桃園市_桃園站
每1時更新,121陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:58:09
行政院環境保護署公害陳情警示區域範圍圖
每6月更新,39許小姐 | 04-22521718#58709 | 2023-07-27 01:06:07
行政院環境保護署環境教育活動人時
每3月更新,77李小姐 | 02-23117722#2724 | 2023-08-07 01:01:27
行政院環境保護署
EPQSummary_InternationalIssues
不定期更新更新,90郭先生 | 02-2311-7722 EXT.2399 | 2022-01-15 01:14:16
行政院環境保護署行政院環境保護署環境教育設施場所認證展延申請書
不定期更新,61蘇小姐 | (03)4020789分機669 | 2022-01-15 01:11:08
行政院環境保護署噪音監測站資料
不定期更新更新,122王先生 | 02-23712121#6401 | 2022-01-14 01:18:45
行政院環境保護署使用中機動車輛噪音資料-汽油車
不定期更新更新,108林先生 | 02-23712121-6403 | 2022-01-14 01:18:53
行政院環境保護署台灣產品碳足跡資訊
每1月更新,133陳先生 | 02-23117722#2932 | 2023-07-30 01:02:46
行政院環境保護署
再生粒料毒性特性溶出試驗結果
不定期更新更新,47許先生 | 02-2311-7722#2641 | 2022-01-14 01:18:39
行政院環境保護署低關注聚合物事前審定表單
不定期更新更新,50蔡小姐 | 23257399#55723 | 2022-01-14 01:23:01
行政院環境保護署公告毒性化學物質及其毒性分類
不定期更新更新,37陳小姐 | 23257399#55337 | 2022-01-14 01:22:53
行政院環境保護署EPQSummary_RegionalEnvironmentalManagement
不定期更新更新,90陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-07-30 01:01:44
行政院環境保護署公民營廢棄物乙級清除機構許可資料
每月更新更新,109何先生 | 02-2311-7722#2653 | 2022-01-14 01:25:57
行政院環境保護署
空氣品質小時值_彰化縣_二林站
每1時更新,121陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:57:55
行政院環境保護署南投縣重要環保統計資料
每1月更新,160顏先生 | 02-23117722#2109 | 2023-08-07 01:00:08
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_新竹市_新竹站
每1時更新,115陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:58:04
行政院環境保護署貨品通關事前聲明確認作業指引簡報
不定期更新,51金先生 | 23257399＃55315 | 2022-01-14 01:22:22
行政院環境保護署細懸浮微粒資料（PM2.5）
每1時更新,95陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-08 00:58:48
行政院環境保護署
自來水水質抽驗檢驗結果
每1月更新,109顏先生 | 02-23117722#2109 | 2023-07-27 01:01:26
行政院環境保護署環評主管機關受理審查之因應對策
每2月更新,41黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-05 01:01:17
行政院環境保護署事業廢棄物共同清除、處理機構許可資料
不定期更新更新,151何先生 | 02-2311-7722#2653 | 2022-01-14 01:26:04
行政院環境保護署事業排放廢（污）水於土壤或地面水體所含有害健康物質之種類
不定期更新更新,40郭先生 | 02-2311-7722#2829 | 2023-08-09 01:04:16
行政院環境保護署縣市(桃園市)小時值-每小時
每小時更新更新,112謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:00:46
行政院環境保護署