Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant
「Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant」於資料集「Environmental Policy Monthly」由單位「行政院環境保護署」的楊先生所提供，聯繫電話是(02)23117722#2217,(02)23117722#2216，最近更新時間為：2022-01-15 01:13:03。 欄位編號的內容是570 ， 欄位標題的內容是Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant ， 欄位摘要的內容是In a recent explanation of his stance on construction of Taiwan's fourth nuclear power plant EPA Administrator Edgar Lin stated that previous policy decisions surrounding the plant were not made in an open manner, and that he therefore opposes the construction of the facility. Administrator Lin stated that he would respect the results of a current reevaluation of the facility no matter the outcome. The Administrator further emphasized that because the previous environmental impact assessment was biased, and due to the unresolved problem of radioactive waste treatment, the EPA is currently considering whether to require the planned facility to undergo another EIA.
Due to recent political disputes over the fate of Taiwan’s planned fourth nuclear power plant (hereafter referred to as “Plant 4”), the Legislative Yuan has been actively questioning administration officials on the topic. On May 25, EPA Administrator Edgar Lin visited the Legislative Yuan’s Health, Environment and Public Welfare Committee to report on the future direction of the EPA. During his report, Lin explained that his longstanding opposition to Plant 4 grew out of his opposition to what he perceived as a “dictatorship.” Due to the recent victory of opposition candidate Chen Shui-Bian as president, however, Lin argued that the dictatorship no longer exists, and that he thus no longer steadfastly opposes Plant 4.
Questions over the meaning of Lin’s statement prompted him to offer clarification the following day. He stated that by “dictatorship” he meant the decision-making processes regarding Plant 4. He pointed out that he opposed Plant 4 because the processes were neither open, fair, nor democratic, not because of an administrative dictatorship. If in the future, decisions regarding Plant 4 are made in an open and transparent manner, Lin will accept the results, whatever they may be. He remains very concerned, however, over the enormous decommissioning costs the plant will entail at the end of its life.
Lin also stated his opinion that Plant 4 should undergo another environmental impact assessment (EIA). He supported this suggestion with several claims. First, Lin considers the findings of the previous EIA to be biased. The job of an EIA review committee, he argued, is to review an environmental impact report, not issue an opinion. Second, waste from Taiwan’s other nuclear plants have still not been subject to final treatment and disposal. Plant 1 is currently storing more than 29,000 barrels of waste, while Plant 2 is temporarily storing on site over 32,000 barrels. The US and Europe no longer have the capacity to treat nuclear waste. In Taiwan, the problem of treatment is magnified by the island’s high population density and shortage of land. Moreover, economically advanced countries such as the UK and the US no longer build nuclear power plants due to factors such as waste treatment costs and safety concerns. Lin asked, in light of these trends, if it was not strange that Taiwan should be pursuing a fourth plant.
Lin also refuted the argument that Taiwan needs nuclear power to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. He pointed out that Taiwan's development policies still permit development of large industrial facilities, such as the Bing-Nan Industrial Complex and the Eighth Naptha Cracker, which if completed would be very large sources of CO2 emissions. Taiwan's industrial structure must be readjusted to resolve this contradiction.
Lin emphasized that Taiwan’s energy policy should follow a “small is beautiful” path that utilizes energy from multiple renewable sources. Constructing a fourth nuclear power plant would be a step back from the goal of energy source diversification and could have a serious impact on the island’s environment. Plant 4 would derail alternative energy projects, and built rashly without could entail even greater future costs. For these two reasons, Administrator Lin hopes to begin a new EIA for the facility. He repeatedly emphasized that any future EIA process must be open and transparent. ， 欄位全文的內容是In a recent explanation of his stance on construction of Taiwan's fourth nuclear power plant EPA Administrator Edgar Lin stated that previous policy decisions surrounding the plant were not made in an open manner, and that he therefore opposes the construction of the facility. Administrator Lin stated that he would respect the results of a current reevaluation of the facility no matter the outcome. The Administrator further emphasized that because the previous environmental impact assessment was biased, and due to the unresolved problem of radioactive waste treatment, the EPA is currently considering whether to require the planned facility to undergo another EIA.
Due to recent political disputes over the fate of Taiwan’s planned fourth nuclear power plant (hereafter referred to as “Plant 4”), the Legislative Yuan has been actively questioning administration officials on the topic. On May 25, EPA Administrator Edgar Lin visited the Legislative Yuan’s Health, Environment and Public Welfare Committee to report on the future direction of the EPA. During his report, Lin explained that his longstanding opposition to Plant 4 grew out of his opposition to what he perceived as a “dictatorship.” Due to the recent victory of opposition candidate Chen Shui-Bian as president, however, Lin argued that the dictatorship no longer exists, and that he thus no longer steadfastly opposes Plant 4.
Questions over the meaning of Lin’s statement prompted him to offer clarification the following day. He stated that by “dictatorship” he meant the decision-making processes regarding Plant 4. He pointed out that he opposed Plant 4 because the processes were neither open, fair, nor democratic, not because of an administrative dictatorship. If in the future, decisions regarding Plant 4 are made in an open and transparent manner, Lin will accept the results, whatever they may be. He remains very concerned, however, over the enormous decommissioning costs the plant will entail at the end of its life.
Lin also stated his opinion that Plant 4 should undergo another environmental impact assessment (EIA). He supported this suggestion with several claims. First, Lin considers the findings of the previous EIA to be biased. The job of an EIA review committee, he argued, is to review an environmental impact report, not issue an opinion. Second, waste from Taiwan’s other nuclear plants have still not been subject to final treatment and disposal. Plant 1 is currently storing more than 29,000 barrels of waste, while Plant 2 is temporarily storing on site over 32,000 barrels. The US and Europe no longer have the capacity to treat nuclear waste. In Taiwan, the problem of treatment is magnified by the island’s high population density and shortage of land. Moreover, economically advanced countries such as the UK and the US no longer build nuclear power plants due to factors such as waste treatment costs and safety concerns. Lin asked, in light of these trends, if it was not strange that Taiwan should be pursuing a fourth plant.
Lin also refuted the argument that Taiwan needs nuclear power to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. He pointed out that Taiwan's development policies still permit development of large industrial facilities, such as the Bing-Nan Industrial Complex and the Eighth Naptha Cracker, which if completed would be very large sources of CO2 emissions. Taiwan's industrial structure must be readjusted to resolve this contradiction.
Lin emphasized that Taiwan’s energy policy should follow a “small is beautiful” path that utilizes energy from multiple renewable sources. Constructing a fourth nuclear power plant would be a step back from the goal of energy source diversification and could have a serious impact on the island’s environment. Plant 4 would derail alternative energy projects, and built rashly without could entail even greater future costs. For these two reasons, Administrator Lin hopes to begin a new EIA for the facility. He repeatedly emphasized that any future EIA process must be open and transparent. ， 欄位年度的內容是2000 ， 欄位月份的內容是3 ， 欄位卷的內容是3 ， 欄位期的內容是13 ， 欄位順序的內容是1 ， 欄位倒序的內容是2 ， 欄位分類的內容是Climate Change ， 欄位標題2的內容是Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan s Fourth Nuclear Plant ， 欄位檔案位置的內容是print/V1/V3-13 。
編號
570
標題
Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant
摘要
In a recent explanation of his stance on construction of Taiwan's fourth nuclear power plant EPA Administrator Edgar Lin stated that previous policy decisions surrounding the plant were not made in an open manner, and that he therefore opposes the construction of the facility. Administrator Lin stated that he would respect the results of a current reevaluation of the facility no matter the outcome. The Administrator further emphasized that because the previous environmental impact assessment was biased, and due to the unresolved problem of radioactive waste treatment, the EPA is currently considering whether to require the planned facility to undergo another EIA. Due to recent political disputes over the fate of Taiwan’s planned fourth nuclear power plant (hereafter referred to as “Plant 4”), the Legislative Yuan has been actively questioning administration officials on the topic. On May 25, EPA Administrator Edgar Lin visited the Legislative Yuan’s Health, Environment and Public Welfare Committee to report on the future direction of the EPA. During his report, Lin explained that his longstanding opposition to Plant 4 grew out of his opposition to what he perceived as a “dictatorship.” Due to the recent victory of opposition candidate Chen Shui-Bian as president, however, Lin argued that the dictatorship no longer exists, and that he thus no longer steadfastly opposes Plant 4. Questions over the meaning of Lin’s statement prompted him to offer clarification the following day. He stated that by “dictatorship” he meant the decision-making processes regarding Plant 4. He pointed out that he opposed Plant 4 because the processes were neither open, fair, nor democratic, not because of an administrative dictatorship. If in the future, decisions regarding Plant 4 are made in an open and transparent manner, Lin will accept the results, whatever they may be. He remains very concerned, however, over the enormous decommissioning costs the plant will entail at the end of its life. Lin also stated his opinion that Plant 4 should undergo another environmental impact assessment (EIA). He supported this suggestion with several claims. First, Lin considers the findings of the previous EIA to be biased. The job of an EIA review committee, he argued, is to review an environmental impact report, not issue an opinion. Second, waste from Taiwan’s other nuclear plants have still not been subject to final treatment and disposal. Plant 1 is currently storing more than 29,000 barrels of waste, while Plant 2 is temporarily storing on site over 32,000 barrels. The US and Europe no longer have the capacity to treat nuclear waste. In Taiwan, the problem of treatment is magnified by the island’s high population density and shortage of land. Moreover, economically advanced countries such as the UK and the US no longer build nuclear power plants due to factors such as waste treatment costs and safety concerns. Lin asked, in light of these trends, if it was not strange that Taiwan should be pursuing a fourth plant. Lin also refuted the argument that Taiwan needs nuclear power to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. He pointed out that Taiwan's development policies still permit development of large industrial facilities, such as the Bing-Nan Industrial Complex and the Eighth Naptha Cracker, which if completed would be very large sources of CO2 emissions. Taiwan's industrial structure must be readjusted to resolve this contradiction. Lin emphasized that Taiwan’s energy policy should follow a “small is beautiful” path that utilizes energy from multiple renewable sources. Constructing a fourth nuclear power plant would be a step back from the goal of energy source diversification and could have a serious impact on the island’s environment. Plant 4 would derail alternative energy projects, and built rashly without could entail even greater future costs. For these two reasons, Administrator Lin hopes to begin a new EIA for the facility. He repeatedly emphasized that any future EIA process must be open and transparent.
全文
In a recent explanation of his stance on construction of Taiwan's fourth nuclear power plant EPA Administrator Edgar Lin stated that previous policy decisions surrounding the plant were not made in an open manner, and that he therefore opposes the construction of the facility. Administrator Lin stated that he would respect the results of a current reevaluation of the facility no matter the outcome. The Administrator further emphasized that because the previous environmental impact assessment was biased, and due to the unresolved problem of radioactive waste treatment, the EPA is currently considering whether to require the planned facility to undergo another EIA. Due to recent political disputes over the fate of Taiwan’s planned fourth nuclear power plant (hereafter referred to as “Plant 4”), the Legislative Yuan has been actively questioning administration officials on the topic. On May 25, EPA Administrator Edgar Lin visited the Legislative Yuan’s Health, Environment and Public Welfare Committee to report on the future direction of the EPA. During his report, Lin explained that his longstanding opposition to Plant 4 grew out of his opposition to what he perceived as a “dictatorship.” Due to the recent victory of opposition candidate Chen Shui-Bian as president, however, Lin argued that the dictatorship no longer exists, and that he thus no longer steadfastly opposes Plant 4. Questions over the meaning of Lin’s statement prompted him to offer clarification the following day. He stated that by “dictatorship” he meant the decision-making processes regarding Plant 4. He pointed out that he opposed Plant 4 because the processes were neither open, fair, nor democratic, not because of an administrative dictatorship. If in the future, decisions regarding Plant 4 are made in an open and transparent manner, Lin will accept the results, whatever they may be. He remains very concerned, however, over the enormous decommissioning costs the plant will entail at the end of its life. Lin also stated his opinion that Plant 4 should undergo another environmental impact assessment (EIA). He supported this suggestion with several claims. First, Lin considers the findings of the previous EIA to be biased. The job of an EIA review committee, he argued, is to review an environmental impact report, not issue an opinion. Second, waste from Taiwan’s other nuclear plants have still not been subject to final treatment and disposal. Plant 1 is currently storing more than 29,000 barrels of waste, while Plant 2 is temporarily storing on site over 32,000 barrels. The US and Europe no longer have the capacity to treat nuclear waste. In Taiwan, the problem of treatment is magnified by the island’s high population density and shortage of land. Moreover, economically advanced countries such as the UK and the US no longer build nuclear power plants due to factors such as waste treatment costs and safety concerns. Lin asked, in light of these trends, if it was not strange that Taiwan should be pursuing a fourth plant. Lin also refuted the argument that Taiwan needs nuclear power to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. He pointed out that Taiwan's development policies still permit development of large industrial facilities, such as the Bing-Nan Industrial Complex and the Eighth Naptha Cracker, which if completed would be very large sources of CO2 emissions. Taiwan's industrial structure must be readjusted to resolve this contradiction. Lin emphasized that Taiwan’s energy policy should follow a “small is beautiful” path that utilizes energy from multiple renewable sources. Constructing a fourth nuclear power plant would be a step back from the goal of energy source diversification and could have a serious impact on the island’s environment. Plant 4 would derail alternative energy projects, and built rashly without could entail even greater future costs. For these two reasons, Administrator Lin hopes to begin a new EIA for the facility. He repeatedly emphasized that any future EIA process must be open and transparent.
年度
2000
月份
3
卷
3
期
13
順序
1
倒序
2
分類
Climate Change
標題2
Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan s Fourth Nuclear Plant
檔案位置
print/V1/V3-13
「Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant」所屬的資料集：「Environmental Policy Monthly」的其他資料
編號：
611
標題：
FPC to Begin Treatment of Mercury-tainted Sludge
摘要：
Following the return of mercury-tainted sludge to Formosa Plactic’s Jenwu facility FPC has begun pre
全文：
Following the return of mercury-tainted sludge to Formosa Plactic’s Jenwu facility FPC has begun pre
編號：
735
標題：
NT$1 PET Bottle Exchange
摘要：
In April of last year PET refund rates were changed to NT$0.5. Because the number of PET bottles dis
全文：
In April of last year PET refund rates were changed to NT$0.5. Because the number of PET bottles dis
編號：
47
標題：
Premier Orders Quick Resolution to Garbage Disposal Problems
摘要：
Waste Management Shortly after taking office Premier Vincent Siew, paid a visit to the EPA on Septe
全文：
Waste Management Shortly after taking office Premier Vincent Siew, paid a visit to the EPA on Septe
編號：
239
標題：
A look inside the EPA: Bureau of Environmental Sanitation and Toxic Chemicals Control
摘要：
According to the Environmental Protection Administration Organization Statutes the EPA's Bureau of E
全文：
According to the Environmental Protection Administration Organization Statutes the EPA's Bureau of E
編號：
9
標題：
Launch of Fuel Improvement Plan Accelerated
摘要：
Air Quality The problem of air pollution due to car and motorcycle emissions is drawing increased a
全文：
Air Quality The problem of air pollution due to car and motorcycle emissions is drawing increased a
編號：
59
標題：
Non-Point Source River Pollution to Come Under Control
摘要：
Water Quality The focus of river water quality protection has traditionally been on point source po
全文：
Water Quality The focus of river water quality protection has traditionally been on point source po
編號：
750
標題：
Explosion Leads to First Activation of Toxic Chemical Disaster Response System
摘要：
The explosion of a boiler and the resulting fire at the Fukuo Company in Hsinchu County led the EPA
全文：
The explosion of a boiler and the resulting fire at the Fukuo Company in Hsinchu County led the EPA
編號：
479
標題：
Post-Disaster Emergency Construction Projects Exempted from Air Pollution Fee
摘要：
On December 15 the EPA modified the Regulations Governing the Collection of Air Pollution Control Fe
全文：
On December 15 the EPA modified the Regulations Governing the Collection of Air Pollution Control Fe
編號：
358
標題：
EPA Promotes Integrated Climate Change Research
摘要：
The EPA recently sponsored a conference to examine potential climate change impacts on Taiwan and st
全文：
The EPA recently sponsored a conference to examine potential climate change impacts on Taiwan and st
編號：
309
標題：
Initial Draft of Air Act Enforcement Rules Completed
摘要：
The EPA recently completed a thorough review and modification of the Air Pollution Control Act Enfor
全文：
The EPA recently completed a thorough review and modification of the Air Pollution Control Act Enfor
編號：
614
標題：
Prosecutor Seeks Life Sentences in Kaoping River Pollution Incident
摘要：
On August 15 the Kaohsiung Prosecutor’s Office completed its investigation of the recent solvent con
全文：
On August 15 the Kaohsiung Prosecutor’s Office completed its investigation of the recent solvent con
編號：
131
標題：
Government Policy EIA Performance Criteria Announced
摘要：
Environmental Impact Assessment On March 11 the Criteria for Performing Government Policy EIAs was
全文：
Environmental Impact Assessment On March 11 the Criteria for Performing Government Policy EIAs was
編號：
465
標題：
Legislative Yuan Requests Formation of Environmental Police Bureau Speeded Up
摘要：
The Environmental Police Force was established in July of this year. Due to its effectiveness to dat
全文：
The Environmental Police Force was established in July of this year. Due to its effectiveness to dat
編號：
690
標題：
Recycling and Conservation Stepped Up in EPA Offices
摘要：
The EPA Taiwan’s highest environmental protection authority, in promoting domestic environmental pro
全文：
The EPA Taiwan’s highest environmental protection authority, in promoting domestic environmental pro
編號：
717
標題：
On Eve of Departure Edgar Lin Urges EPA to Stick to Environmental Ideals
摘要：
On the eve of his departure from the EPA former Administrator Edgar Lin expressed his appreciation f
全文：
On the eve of his departure from the EPA former Administrator Edgar Lin expressed his appreciation f
編號：
963
標題：
2001 Outstanding Recycling Promotion Awards Ceremony
摘要：
The EPA held a ceremony on June 18 to commend government agencies that have contributed to the promo
全文：
The EPA held a ceremony on June 18 to commend government agencies that have contributed to the promo
編號：
704
標題：
Preliminary Soil Pollution Fund Management Framework Set
摘要：
The EPA's Draft Organizational Regulations of the Soil And Groundwater Pollution Remediation Fund Ma
全文：
The EPA's Draft Organizational Regulations of the Soil And Groundwater Pollution Remediation Fund Ma
編號：
635
標題：
2001 Proposed Environmental Budget Tops NT$9.6 Billion
摘要：
NT$9.6 billion was set aside for environmental protection in the 2001 central government budget. Co
全文：
NT$9.6 billion was set aside for environmental protection in the 2001 central government budget. Co
編號：
282
標題：
The Executive Yuan Approves Amendments to Waste Disposal Fee Regulations
摘要：
To solve the previous dispute between the central government and Taipei City regarding garbage fees
全文：
To solve the previous dispute between the central government and Taipei City regarding garbage fees
編號：
421
標題：
Environmental Database for Disputes Prone Areas Under Construction
摘要：
The EPA will continue to push the construction of an environmental database for dispute prone areas.
全文：
The EPA will continue to push the construction of an environmental database for dispute prone areas.
編號：
27
標題：
Dioxin Emission Standards for Large-scale Incinerators Promulgated
摘要：
Air Quality To resolve public concerns regarding dioxin emissions from large-scale incinerators the
全文：
Air Quality To resolve public concerns regarding dioxin emissions from large-scale incinerators the
編號：
227
標題：
EPA Boosts Efforts to Phase Out Older High Polluting Motor Vehicles
摘要：
Although second-stage emission standards have been in place for years many cars and motorcycles on t
全文：
Although second-stage emission standards have been in place for years many cars and motorcycles on t
編號：
571
標題：
Administrator Lin Urges Consumer Habit Change
摘要：
In preparation for World Environment Day the EPA announced the results of a WWF 1998 report. The rep
全文：
In preparation for World Environment Day the EPA announced the results of a WWF 1998 report. The rep
編號：
530
標題：
Management Guidelines for Vehicle Emissions Inspection Stations Promulgated
摘要：
As part of its efforts to implement large-scale remote sensing of vehicle emissions the EPA has aske
全文：
As part of its efforts to implement large-scale remote sensing of vehicle emissions the EPA has aske
編號：
567
標題：
Taiwan's Agenda 21 Document Set
摘要：
Sustainable Development Taiwan's Agenda 21 Document Set In the spirit of the United Nations Agenda 2
全文：
In the spirit of the United Nations Agenda 21 the Executive Yuan recently passed a draft of Taiwan's
編號：
341
標題：
Industrial Waste Final Disposal Sites to be Moved Forward on a Case-by-Case Basis
摘要：
Existing final disposal sites for industrial waste in Taiwan have a total capacity of only about 1.0
全文：
Existing final disposal sites for industrial waste in Taiwan have a total capacity of only about 1.0
編號：
534
標題：
Taipei City to Implement Per-Bag Trash Collection Fee Beginning in July
摘要：
Director of Taipei City's Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Dr. Stephen Shen, announced o
全文：
Director of Taipei City's Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Dr. Stephen Shen, announced o
編號：
169
標題：
Soil Pollution Control Act Readied
摘要：
A great deal of importance has recently been placed on groundwater and soil pollution problems. In r
全文：
A great deal of importance has recently been placed on groundwater and soil pollution problems. In r
編號：
166
標題：
Motor Vehicle Recall and Repair Guidelines to be Announced
摘要：
Article 25 of the Air Pollution Control Act stipulates that motor vehicles in use that do not meet e
全文：
Article 25 of the Air Pollution Control Act stipulates that motor vehicles in use that do not meet e
編號：
457
標題：
EPA Appeals to Vehicle Owners to Voluntarily Participate in Exhaust Testing
摘要：
If due to design or manufacturing flaws, vehicles do not comply with air emissions standards, manufa
全文：
If due to design or manufacturing flaws, vehicles do not comply with air emissions standards, manufa
行政院環境保護署 的其他資料集
符合噪音管制標準車輛-進口機車
不定期更新更新,186林先生 | 02-23712121-6403 | 2022-01-14 01:18:59
行政院環境保護署監測車、河川揚塵監測站基本資料
每1日更新,85陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-03 01:02:48
行政院環境保護署核能四廠環評監督委員會會議紀錄
不定期更新更新,48陳先生 | 04-2252-1718#51207 | 2023-08-09 01:04:33
行政院環境保護署化學物質資料及登錄申請表
不定期更新更新,45金先生 | 23257399#55315 | 2022-01-15 01:13:24
行政院環境保護署光化測站(橋頭)小時值資料
不定期更新更新,195陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-07 01:03:34
行政院環境保護署
焚化爐煙囪位置圖
不定期更新更新,66張小姐 | 02-23712121#5907 | 2023-07-27 01:06:06
行政院環境保護署綠色商店基本資料
每季更新更新,132邱小姐 | 02-23117722#2924 | 2022-01-15 01:16:43
行政院環境保護署環境音量監測結果統計(依管制區分)
不定期更新更新,167章小姐 | 02-23712121#6407 | 2023-08-03 01:04:06
行政院環境保護署廢棄物質最終處置資訊網會議資料
每月更新更新,47許先生 | 02-2311-7722#2641 | 2022-01-14 01:24:13
行政院環境保護署行政院環境保護署毒物及化學物質局法定預算
每年更新更新,38魏小姐 | 02-23257399#55432 | 2022-01-15 01:09:49
行政院環境保護署
空氣品質小時值_高雄市_林園站
每1時更新,139陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:57:41
行政院環境保護署環保署裁罰處分
每季更新更新,131張先生 | 02-2311-7722#2716 | 2022-01-15 01:10:12
行政院環境保護署重點事業廢棄物-生物醫療廢棄物之處理方式
每月更新更新,181陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2682 | 2022-01-14 01:24:07
行政院環境保護署行政院環境保護署環境保護人員訓練所單位決算
每1年更新,59江先生 | 03-4020789 #583 | 2023-08-09 01:05:48
行政院環境保護署符合噪音管制標準車輛-進口柴油引擎車
不定期更新更新,179林先生 | 02-23712121-6403 | 2022-01-14 01:18:58
行政院環境保護署
連江縣水量水質自動監測連線傳輸監測紀錄值即時資料集
不定期更新更新,71程先生 | 02-2311-7722#2833 | 2023-08-09 01:04:05
行政院環境保護署違規公司與產品消息資料
每1月更新,102盧小姐 | 02-23117722#2943 | 2023-07-27 01:03:54
行政院環境保護署歷年土壤調查_環保署土壤重金屬含量調查(319公頃)
不定期更新更新,118謝先生 | (02)23832389*8302 | 2022-01-14 01:20:19
行政院環境保護署建檔公廁明細-臺中市
不定期更新更新,154賴先生 | 04-2252-1718#53686 | 2023-07-27 01:01:56
行政院環境保護署光化測站(臺西)小時值資料
每1月更新,167陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-07 01:03:36
行政院環境保護署
工業區污水處理廠分布位置地理圖資
不定期更新更新,50簡小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2831 | 2023-07-27 01:06:00
行政院環境保護署環評會議公告
每2月更新,171黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-05 01:01:22
行政院環境保護署縣市(新竹市)小時值-每小時
每小時更新更新,201謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:00:48
行政院環境保護署歷年土壤調查環保署農地調查計畫桃園地區污染調查計畫
不定期更新更新,161謝先生 | (02)23832389*8302 | 2022-01-14 01:20:27
行政院環境保護署建檔公廁明細-高雄市
不定期更新更新,284賴先生 | 04-2252-1718#53686 | 2023-07-27 01:02:04
行政院環境保護署
車機型號妥善率報表
每月更新更新,131林先生 | 02-2325-7399#55232 | 2022-01-14 01:18:34
行政院環境保護署建檔公廁明細-南投縣
不定期更新更新,148賴先生 | 04-2252-1718#53686 | 2023-07-27 01:02:06
行政院環境保護署各年度環境檢測標準方法研訂資訊表
每1年更新,59楊先生 | (03)491-5818轉2103 | 2023-08-09 01:04:47
行政院環境保護署環境影響評估開發案基本資料
每2月更新,174黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-06 01:04:25
行政院環境保護署行政院環境保護署年度施政計畫
不定期更新更新,43賀先生 | 02-23117722轉2981 | 2023-07-27 01:03:02
行政院環境保護署