Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant
「Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant」於資料集「Environmental Policy Monthly」由單位「行政院環境保護署」的楊先生所提供，聯繫電話是(02)23117722#2217,(02)23117722#2216，最近更新時間為：2022-01-15 01:13:03。 欄位編號的內容是570 ， 欄位標題的內容是Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant ， 欄位摘要的內容是In a recent explanation of his stance on construction of Taiwan's fourth nuclear power plant EPA Administrator Edgar Lin stated that previous policy decisions surrounding the plant were not made in an open manner, and that he therefore opposes the construction of the facility. Administrator Lin stated that he would respect the results of a current reevaluation of the facility no matter the outcome. The Administrator further emphasized that because the previous environmental impact assessment was biased, and due to the unresolved problem of radioactive waste treatment, the EPA is currently considering whether to require the planned facility to undergo another EIA.
Due to recent political disputes over the fate of Taiwan’s planned fourth nuclear power plant (hereafter referred to as “Plant 4”), the Legislative Yuan has been actively questioning administration officials on the topic. On May 25, EPA Administrator Edgar Lin visited the Legislative Yuan’s Health, Environment and Public Welfare Committee to report on the future direction of the EPA. During his report, Lin explained that his longstanding opposition to Plant 4 grew out of his opposition to what he perceived as a “dictatorship.” Due to the recent victory of opposition candidate Chen Shui-Bian as president, however, Lin argued that the dictatorship no longer exists, and that he thus no longer steadfastly opposes Plant 4.
Questions over the meaning of Lin’s statement prompted him to offer clarification the following day. He stated that by “dictatorship” he meant the decision-making processes regarding Plant 4. He pointed out that he opposed Plant 4 because the processes were neither open, fair, nor democratic, not because of an administrative dictatorship. If in the future, decisions regarding Plant 4 are made in an open and transparent manner, Lin will accept the results, whatever they may be. He remains very concerned, however, over the enormous decommissioning costs the plant will entail at the end of its life.
Lin also stated his opinion that Plant 4 should undergo another environmental impact assessment (EIA). He supported this suggestion with several claims. First, Lin considers the findings of the previous EIA to be biased. The job of an EIA review committee, he argued, is to review an environmental impact report, not issue an opinion. Second, waste from Taiwan’s other nuclear plants have still not been subject to final treatment and disposal. Plant 1 is currently storing more than 29,000 barrels of waste, while Plant 2 is temporarily storing on site over 32,000 barrels. The US and Europe no longer have the capacity to treat nuclear waste. In Taiwan, the problem of treatment is magnified by the island’s high population density and shortage of land. Moreover, economically advanced countries such as the UK and the US no longer build nuclear power plants due to factors such as waste treatment costs and safety concerns. Lin asked, in light of these trends, if it was not strange that Taiwan should be pursuing a fourth plant.
Lin also refuted the argument that Taiwan needs nuclear power to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. He pointed out that Taiwan's development policies still permit development of large industrial facilities, such as the Bing-Nan Industrial Complex and the Eighth Naptha Cracker, which if completed would be very large sources of CO2 emissions. Taiwan's industrial structure must be readjusted to resolve this contradiction.
Lin emphasized that Taiwan’s energy policy should follow a “small is beautiful” path that utilizes energy from multiple renewable sources. Constructing a fourth nuclear power plant would be a step back from the goal of energy source diversification and could have a serious impact on the island’s environment. Plant 4 would derail alternative energy projects, and built rashly without could entail even greater future costs. For these two reasons, Administrator Lin hopes to begin a new EIA for the facility. He repeatedly emphasized that any future EIA process must be open and transparent. ， 欄位全文的內容是In a recent explanation of his stance on construction of Taiwan's fourth nuclear power plant EPA Administrator Edgar Lin stated that previous policy decisions surrounding the plant were not made in an open manner, and that he therefore opposes the construction of the facility. Administrator Lin stated that he would respect the results of a current reevaluation of the facility no matter the outcome. The Administrator further emphasized that because the previous environmental impact assessment was biased, and due to the unresolved problem of radioactive waste treatment, the EPA is currently considering whether to require the planned facility to undergo another EIA.
Due to recent political disputes over the fate of Taiwan’s planned fourth nuclear power plant (hereafter referred to as “Plant 4”), the Legislative Yuan has been actively questioning administration officials on the topic. On May 25, EPA Administrator Edgar Lin visited the Legislative Yuan’s Health, Environment and Public Welfare Committee to report on the future direction of the EPA. During his report, Lin explained that his longstanding opposition to Plant 4 grew out of his opposition to what he perceived as a “dictatorship.” Due to the recent victory of opposition candidate Chen Shui-Bian as president, however, Lin argued that the dictatorship no longer exists, and that he thus no longer steadfastly opposes Plant 4.
Questions over the meaning of Lin’s statement prompted him to offer clarification the following day. He stated that by “dictatorship” he meant the decision-making processes regarding Plant 4. He pointed out that he opposed Plant 4 because the processes were neither open, fair, nor democratic, not because of an administrative dictatorship. If in the future, decisions regarding Plant 4 are made in an open and transparent manner, Lin will accept the results, whatever they may be. He remains very concerned, however, over the enormous decommissioning costs the plant will entail at the end of its life.
Lin also stated his opinion that Plant 4 should undergo another environmental impact assessment (EIA). He supported this suggestion with several claims. First, Lin considers the findings of the previous EIA to be biased. The job of an EIA review committee, he argued, is to review an environmental impact report, not issue an opinion. Second, waste from Taiwan’s other nuclear plants have still not been subject to final treatment and disposal. Plant 1 is currently storing more than 29,000 barrels of waste, while Plant 2 is temporarily storing on site over 32,000 barrels. The US and Europe no longer have the capacity to treat nuclear waste. In Taiwan, the problem of treatment is magnified by the island’s high population density and shortage of land. Moreover, economically advanced countries such as the UK and the US no longer build nuclear power plants due to factors such as waste treatment costs and safety concerns. Lin asked, in light of these trends, if it was not strange that Taiwan should be pursuing a fourth plant.
Lin also refuted the argument that Taiwan needs nuclear power to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. He pointed out that Taiwan's development policies still permit development of large industrial facilities, such as the Bing-Nan Industrial Complex and the Eighth Naptha Cracker, which if completed would be very large sources of CO2 emissions. Taiwan's industrial structure must be readjusted to resolve this contradiction.
Lin emphasized that Taiwan’s energy policy should follow a “small is beautiful” path that utilizes energy from multiple renewable sources. Constructing a fourth nuclear power plant would be a step back from the goal of energy source diversification and could have a serious impact on the island’s environment. Plant 4 would derail alternative energy projects, and built rashly without could entail even greater future costs. For these two reasons, Administrator Lin hopes to begin a new EIA for the facility. He repeatedly emphasized that any future EIA process must be open and transparent. ， 欄位年度的內容是2000 ， 欄位月份的內容是3 ， 欄位卷的內容是3 ， 欄位期的內容是13 ， 欄位順序的內容是1 ， 欄位倒序的內容是2 ， 欄位分類的內容是Climate Change ， 欄位標題2的內容是Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan s Fourth Nuclear Plant ， 欄位檔案位置的內容是print/V1/V3-13 。
編號
570
標題
Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant
摘要
In a recent explanation of his stance on construction of Taiwan's fourth nuclear power plant EPA Administrator Edgar Lin stated that previous policy decisions surrounding the plant were not made in an open manner, and that he therefore opposes the construction of the facility. Administrator Lin stated that he would respect the results of a current reevaluation of the facility no matter the outcome. The Administrator further emphasized that because the previous environmental impact assessment was biased, and due to the unresolved problem of radioactive waste treatment, the EPA is currently considering whether to require the planned facility to undergo another EIA. Due to recent political disputes over the fate of Taiwan’s planned fourth nuclear power plant (hereafter referred to as “Plant 4”), the Legislative Yuan has been actively questioning administration officials on the topic. On May 25, EPA Administrator Edgar Lin visited the Legislative Yuan’s Health, Environment and Public Welfare Committee to report on the future direction of the EPA. During his report, Lin explained that his longstanding opposition to Plant 4 grew out of his opposition to what he perceived as a “dictatorship.” Due to the recent victory of opposition candidate Chen Shui-Bian as president, however, Lin argued that the dictatorship no longer exists, and that he thus no longer steadfastly opposes Plant 4. Questions over the meaning of Lin’s statement prompted him to offer clarification the following day. He stated that by “dictatorship” he meant the decision-making processes regarding Plant 4. He pointed out that he opposed Plant 4 because the processes were neither open, fair, nor democratic, not because of an administrative dictatorship. If in the future, decisions regarding Plant 4 are made in an open and transparent manner, Lin will accept the results, whatever they may be. He remains very concerned, however, over the enormous decommissioning costs the plant will entail at the end of its life. Lin also stated his opinion that Plant 4 should undergo another environmental impact assessment (EIA). He supported this suggestion with several claims. First, Lin considers the findings of the previous EIA to be biased. The job of an EIA review committee, he argued, is to review an environmental impact report, not issue an opinion. Second, waste from Taiwan’s other nuclear plants have still not been subject to final treatment and disposal. Plant 1 is currently storing more than 29,000 barrels of waste, while Plant 2 is temporarily storing on site over 32,000 barrels. The US and Europe no longer have the capacity to treat nuclear waste. In Taiwan, the problem of treatment is magnified by the island’s high population density and shortage of land. Moreover, economically advanced countries such as the UK and the US no longer build nuclear power plants due to factors such as waste treatment costs and safety concerns. Lin asked, in light of these trends, if it was not strange that Taiwan should be pursuing a fourth plant. Lin also refuted the argument that Taiwan needs nuclear power to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. He pointed out that Taiwan's development policies still permit development of large industrial facilities, such as the Bing-Nan Industrial Complex and the Eighth Naptha Cracker, which if completed would be very large sources of CO2 emissions. Taiwan's industrial structure must be readjusted to resolve this contradiction. Lin emphasized that Taiwan’s energy policy should follow a “small is beautiful” path that utilizes energy from multiple renewable sources. Constructing a fourth nuclear power plant would be a step back from the goal of energy source diversification and could have a serious impact on the island’s environment. Plant 4 would derail alternative energy projects, and built rashly without could entail even greater future costs. For these two reasons, Administrator Lin hopes to begin a new EIA for the facility. He repeatedly emphasized that any future EIA process must be open and transparent.
全文
In a recent explanation of his stance on construction of Taiwan's fourth nuclear power plant EPA Administrator Edgar Lin stated that previous policy decisions surrounding the plant were not made in an open manner, and that he therefore opposes the construction of the facility. Administrator Lin stated that he would respect the results of a current reevaluation of the facility no matter the outcome. The Administrator further emphasized that because the previous environmental impact assessment was biased, and due to the unresolved problem of radioactive waste treatment, the EPA is currently considering whether to require the planned facility to undergo another EIA. Due to recent political disputes over the fate of Taiwan’s planned fourth nuclear power plant (hereafter referred to as “Plant 4”), the Legislative Yuan has been actively questioning administration officials on the topic. On May 25, EPA Administrator Edgar Lin visited the Legislative Yuan’s Health, Environment and Public Welfare Committee to report on the future direction of the EPA. During his report, Lin explained that his longstanding opposition to Plant 4 grew out of his opposition to what he perceived as a “dictatorship.” Due to the recent victory of opposition candidate Chen Shui-Bian as president, however, Lin argued that the dictatorship no longer exists, and that he thus no longer steadfastly opposes Plant 4. Questions over the meaning of Lin’s statement prompted him to offer clarification the following day. He stated that by “dictatorship” he meant the decision-making processes regarding Plant 4. He pointed out that he opposed Plant 4 because the processes were neither open, fair, nor democratic, not because of an administrative dictatorship. If in the future, decisions regarding Plant 4 are made in an open and transparent manner, Lin will accept the results, whatever they may be. He remains very concerned, however, over the enormous decommissioning costs the plant will entail at the end of its life. Lin also stated his opinion that Plant 4 should undergo another environmental impact assessment (EIA). He supported this suggestion with several claims. First, Lin considers the findings of the previous EIA to be biased. The job of an EIA review committee, he argued, is to review an environmental impact report, not issue an opinion. Second, waste from Taiwan’s other nuclear plants have still not been subject to final treatment and disposal. Plant 1 is currently storing more than 29,000 barrels of waste, while Plant 2 is temporarily storing on site over 32,000 barrels. The US and Europe no longer have the capacity to treat nuclear waste. In Taiwan, the problem of treatment is magnified by the island’s high population density and shortage of land. Moreover, economically advanced countries such as the UK and the US no longer build nuclear power plants due to factors such as waste treatment costs and safety concerns. Lin asked, in light of these trends, if it was not strange that Taiwan should be pursuing a fourth plant. Lin also refuted the argument that Taiwan needs nuclear power to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. He pointed out that Taiwan's development policies still permit development of large industrial facilities, such as the Bing-Nan Industrial Complex and the Eighth Naptha Cracker, which if completed would be very large sources of CO2 emissions. Taiwan's industrial structure must be readjusted to resolve this contradiction. Lin emphasized that Taiwan’s energy policy should follow a “small is beautiful” path that utilizes energy from multiple renewable sources. Constructing a fourth nuclear power plant would be a step back from the goal of energy source diversification and could have a serious impact on the island’s environment. Plant 4 would derail alternative energy projects, and built rashly without could entail even greater future costs. For these two reasons, Administrator Lin hopes to begin a new EIA for the facility. He repeatedly emphasized that any future EIA process must be open and transparent.
年度
2000
月份
3
卷
3
期
13
順序
1
倒序
2
分類
Climate Change
標題2
Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan s Fourth Nuclear Plant
檔案位置
print/V1/V3-13
「Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant」所屬的資料集：「Environmental Policy Monthly」的其他資料
編號：
349
標題：
Toxic Chemical Accident Dispersion Model Put On-line
摘要：
After two years of collaboration with the US the ROC EPA announced on April 23 that toxic disaster d
全文：
After two years of collaboration with the US the ROC EPA announced on April 23 that toxic disaster d
編號：
23
標題：
VOCs from PU Synthetic Leather Industry to Be Controlled
摘要：
Air Quality Taiwan is the world's leading polyurethane (PU) synthetic leather producer controlling
全文：
Air Quality Taiwan is the world's leading polyurethane (PU) synthetic leather producer controlling
編號：
285
標題：
Watercourse Area Refuse Dumpsite Remediation Plan Finally Nailed Down
摘要：
The Watercourse Area Refuse Dumpsite Remediation Plan drafted by the EPA, has been approved by the E
全文：
The Watercourse Area Refuse Dumpsite Remediation Plan drafted by the EPA, has been approved by the E
編號：
149
標題：
Method of Calculating Construction Project Air Pollution Fee Rates to be Amended
摘要：
Air Quality Since construction project air pollution fee rates were first levied in July last year
全文：
Air Quality Since construction project air pollution fee rates were first levied in July last year
編號：
335
標題：
EPA Developing Plans for Large-Scale Groundwater Survey
摘要：
The EPA is pressing for the development of plans to conduct a large-scale subsurface survey to asses
全文：
The EPA is pressing for the development of plans to conduct a large-scale subsurface survey to asses
編號：
505
標題：
EPA Designates National Cleanliness Week
摘要：
As a means of greeting the new year the EPA has especially designated the week proceeding Chinese Ne
全文：
As a means of greeting the new year the EPA has especially designated the week proceeding Chinese Ne
編號：
42
標題：
EPA Announces Recycling Fees for Containers and General Articles
摘要：
Recycling To encourage recycling the legislature revised the Waste Disposal Act in March of this ye
全文：
Recycling To encourage recycling the legislature revised the Waste Disposal Act in March of this ye
編號：
940
標題：
Preliminary Soil and Groundwater Pollution Survey Results
摘要：
With regulations related to the Soil and Groundwater Pollution Remediation Act nearing completion th
全文：
With regulations related to the Soil and Groundwater Pollution Remediation Act nearing completion th
編號：
761
標題：
Construction Site Runoff Water Placed Under Regulation
摘要：
The EPA will begin introducing a series of regulations aimed at enterprises that are frequently the
全文：
The EPA will begin introducing a series of regulations aimed at enterprises that are frequently the
編號：
785
標題：
Feature Article: Regulatory Framework for SGPRA Nearing Completion
摘要：
Because there was previously no legal basis for soil and groundwater pollution remediation work cont
全文：
Because there was previously no legal basis for soil and groundwater pollution remediation work cont
編號：
851
標題：
Thirteen Measures to Improve Urban Air Quality
摘要：
The EPA has formulated thirteen measures that specifically address the special problems of urban air
全文：
The EPA has formulated thirteen measures that specifically address the special problems of urban air
編號：
104
標題：
Structure of Marine Pollution Control Act to be Drafted
摘要：
Water Quality Marine resource welfare and protection from pollution is becoming increasingly import
全文：
Water Quality Marine resource welfare and protection from pollution is becoming increasingly import
編號：
612
標題：
Industrial Pollution Leading Cause of Public Complaints in 1999
摘要：
The EPA has released the 1999 White Paper on Public Nuisance Complaints. The White Paper shows that
全文：
The EPA has released the 1999 White Paper on Public Nuisance Complaints. The White Paper shows that
編號：
925
標題：
Diesel Auto Exhaust Inspection Certificate Regulations Revised
摘要：
As a member of the WTO Taiwan must allow the import of small diesel vehicles by 2003. The EPA has th
全文：
As a member of the WTO Taiwan must allow the import of small diesel vehicles by 2003. The EPA has th
編號：
517
標題：
1999 Air Quality Analysis Complete
摘要：
The results of air quality monitoring from 1999 are now available. Although the percentage of poor
全文：
The results of air quality monitoring from 1999 are now available. Although the percentage of poor
編號：
365
標題：
Further Large-scale Amendments Proposed for Waste Disposal Act
摘要：
The EPA recently completed drafting further amendments to Taiwan’s Waste Disposal Act. Originally pl
全文：
The EPA recently completed drafting further amendments to Taiwan’s Waste Disposal Act. Originally pl
編號：
952
標題：
EPA Drafts Mid-/Long-term Gasoline and Diesel Control Standards
摘要：
The EPA is currently drafting Mid-/Long-term Gasoline and Diesel Control Standards (中長程汽柴油管制標準) and
全文：
The EPA is currently drafting Mid-/Long-term Gasoline and Diesel Control Standards (中長程汽柴油管制標準) and
編號：
43
標題：
EPA Readies Regulations for Second Stage Air Pollution Control Fee Collection
摘要：
Air Quality Beginning July 1 1998, fees for air emissions from fixed pollution sources will be coll
全文：
Air Quality Beginning July 1 1998, fees for air emissions from fixed pollution sources will be coll
編號：
996
標題：
Revised Waste Disposal Act Enforcement Rules Drafted
摘要：
In conjunction with the revision of the Waste Disposal Act the EPA has revised the Waste Disposal Ac
全文：
In conjunction with the revision of the Waste Disposal Act the EPA has revised the Waste Disposal Ac
編號：
577
標題：
EPA Plans to Accelerate Phase-out of Older Vehicles
摘要：
With 15 million cars and motorcycles on the road Taiwan has the highest vehicle density in the world
全文：
With 15 million cars and motorcycles on the road Taiwan has the highest vehicle density in the world
編號：
175
標題：
Articles in the Public Dispute Settlement Act Enforcement Rules to be Amended
摘要：
Draft amendments to articles in the enforcement guidelines portion of the Act have already been read
全文：
Draft amendments to articles in the enforcement guidelines portion of the Act have already been read
編號：
41
標題：
EPA Amends Definitions and Types of Businesses Regulated by Water Pollution Control Act
摘要：
Water Quality The EPA has announced amendments to the definition and classification of businesses r
全文：
Water Quality The EPA has announced amendments to the definition and classification of businesses r
編號：
319
標題：
EPA to Integrate Factory Pollution Prevention Evaluation and Assistance
摘要：
1998 factory pollution control evaluation efforts by the EPA focused on round 2 and 3 factories i.e.
全文：
1998 factory pollution control evaluation efforts by the EPA focused on round 2 and 3 factories i.e.
編號：
852
標題：
Tracking Industrial Waste Flows in Real-time Using GPS
摘要：
The EPA plans to start using global positioning system (GPS) technology next year to perform the rea
全文：
The EPA plans to start using global positioning system (GPS) technology next year to perform the rea
編號：
965
標題：
Administrator Hau and Pai Ping-ping Team up to Promote Environmental Bags
摘要：
To promote the government's restrictions on the use of disposable plastic shopping bags and dishes t
全文：
To promote the government's restrictions on the use of disposable plastic shopping bags and dishes t
編號：
3280
標題：
Water Pollution Control Fees to Be Collected from 1 May 2015
摘要：
Water Water Pollution Control Fees to Be Collected from 1 May 2015
全文：
Water Pollution Control Fees to Be Collected from 1 May 2015
On 31 March 2015 the EPA announced revi
編號：
649
標題：
Traditional Industries Earn Environmental Awards
摘要：
Results of the 9th annual Green Business Awards were announced on October 3 by the EPA. The awards
全文：
Results of the 9th annual Green Business Awards were announced on October 3 by the EPA. The awards
編號：
864
標題：
Golf Course Development to Remain Frozen
摘要：
The 90th conference of the EPA EIA Review Committee passed the Criteria for the Review of Environmen
全文：
The 90th conference of the EPA EIA Review Committee passed the Criteria for the Review of Environmen
編號：
401
標題：
Compilation of Agenda 21 Kicks Into High Gear
摘要：
In order to keep abreast of global trends and articulate an Agenda 21 strategy the EPA has finished
全文：
In order to keep abreast of global trends and articulate an Agenda 21 strategy the EPA has finished
編號：
578
標題：
EPA Promotes Compensated Removal of Hog Farms to Restore Water Source Regions
摘要：
After repeated consultation with agricultural agencies the EPA announced that it will soon begin com
全文：
After repeated consultation with agricultural agencies the EPA announced that it will soon begin com
行政院環境保護署 的其他資料集
歷年毒性化學物質環境流布調查成果手冊
每年更新更新,37陳小姐 | 23257399#55337 | 2022-01-14 01:22:52
行政院環境保護署水庫水質監測資料
不定期更新更新,130郭先生 | 2311-7722#2399 | 2023-08-07 01:02:05
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_高雄市_林園站
每1時更新,130陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:57:41
行政院環境保護署建檔公廁明細-臺東縣
不定期更新更新,173賴先生 | 04-2252-1718#53686 | 2023-07-27 01:01:54
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_臺南市_臺南站
每1時更新,113陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:57:45
行政院環境保護署
臺北港物流倉儲區環境監測結果
不定期更新更新,92許先生 | 02-2311-7722#2641 | 2022-01-15 01:12:24
行政院環境保護署移動污染源空氣污染防制費收費統計
每1月更新,132周小姐 | 02-2311-7722#6304 | 2023-07-28 11:35:52
行政院環境保護署自來水水質抽驗檢驗結果
每1月更新,115顏先生 | 02-23117722#2109 | 2023-07-27 01:01:26
行政院環境保護署縣市(嘉義縣)小時值-每小時
每小時更新更新,95謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:01:00
行政院環境保護署環評監督委員會監督委員名單
2年更新,41陳先生 | 04-2252-1718#51207 | 2022-01-15 01:13:16
行政院環境保護署
縣市(澎湖縣)小時值-每小時
每小時更新更新,81謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:01:03
行政院環境保護署資源回收業(站、點)資料
不定期更新,131范小姐 | 02-23117722#2622 | 2022-01-14 01:26:05
行政院環境保護署執行機關一般廢棄物處理量
每1月更新,188顏先生 | 02-23117722#2109 | 2023-07-27 01:01:19
行政院環境保護署細懸浮微粒資料（PM2.5）
每1時更新,99陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-08 00:58:48
行政院環境保護署縣市(嘉義市)小時值-每小時
每小時更新更新,167謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:00:59
行政院環境保護署
環評主管機關受理審查之變更內容對照表
每2月更新,212黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-06 01:04:30
行政院環境保護署河川水質季監測資料
每3月更新,169郭先生 | 2311-7722#2399 | 2023-08-07 01:02:03
行政院環境保護署環保署環境影響評估審查委員會委員名單
每2年更新,88黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-05 01:00:47
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_桃園市_平鎮站
每小時更新更新,205謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:03:51
行政院環境保護署環境空氣戴奧辛監測資料
每6月更新,129戴先生 | 02-2371-2121#6210 | 2023-08-07 01:03:23
行政院環境保護署
新化學物質資料保護申請表單
不定期更新更新,54蔡先生 | 02-23257399#55723 | 2023-08-09 01:04:24
行政院環境保護署縣市(高雄市)小時值-每小時
每小時更新更新,156謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:01:08
行政院環境保護署大甲媽祖遶境即時空品監測成果(E-motor)
不定期更新更新,222陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2341 | 2022-01-14 01:02:39
行政院環境保護署包裝及盛裝飲用水水源水質抽驗結果
每季更新更新,122黃先生 | 02-23117722#2881 | 2022-01-15 01:10:25
行政院環境保護署土壤污染物監測及管制標準
不定期更新更新,71王先生 | 02-23832389#8307 | 2022-01-14 01:20:21
行政院環境保護署
固定污染源CEMS廢氣燃燒塔一小時監測紀錄值
每1時更新,277洪小姐 | 02-23117722#6221 | 2023-08-02 00:57:07
行政院環境保護署環保專責（技術）人員合格證書申請表
不定期更新更新,46魏小姐 | 03-402-0789#605 | 2022-01-15 01:10:45
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_嘉義市_嘉義站
每1時更新,115陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:57:48
行政院環境保護署EPQSummary_RegionalEnvironmentalManagement
不定期更新更新,98陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-07-30 01:01:44
行政院環境保護署菸酒事業廢棄物再利用機構資料
每1年更新,76李小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2626 | 2023-07-27 00:59:33
行政院環境保護署