Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant
「Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant」於資料集「Environmental Policy Monthly」由單位「行政院環境保護署」的楊先生所提供，聯繫電話是(02)23117722#2217,(02)23117722#2216，最近更新時間為：2022-01-15 01:13:03。 欄位編號的內容是570 ， 欄位標題的內容是Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant ， 欄位摘要的內容是In a recent explanation of his stance on construction of Taiwan's fourth nuclear power plant EPA Administrator Edgar Lin stated that previous policy decisions surrounding the plant were not made in an open manner, and that he therefore opposes the construction of the facility. Administrator Lin stated that he would respect the results of a current reevaluation of the facility no matter the outcome. The Administrator further emphasized that because the previous environmental impact assessment was biased, and due to the unresolved problem of radioactive waste treatment, the EPA is currently considering whether to require the planned facility to undergo another EIA.
Due to recent political disputes over the fate of Taiwan’s planned fourth nuclear power plant (hereafter referred to as “Plant 4”), the Legislative Yuan has been actively questioning administration officials on the topic. On May 25, EPA Administrator Edgar Lin visited the Legislative Yuan’s Health, Environment and Public Welfare Committee to report on the future direction of the EPA. During his report, Lin explained that his longstanding opposition to Plant 4 grew out of his opposition to what he perceived as a “dictatorship.” Due to the recent victory of opposition candidate Chen Shui-Bian as president, however, Lin argued that the dictatorship no longer exists, and that he thus no longer steadfastly opposes Plant 4.
Questions over the meaning of Lin’s statement prompted him to offer clarification the following day. He stated that by “dictatorship” he meant the decision-making processes regarding Plant 4. He pointed out that he opposed Plant 4 because the processes were neither open, fair, nor democratic, not because of an administrative dictatorship. If in the future, decisions regarding Plant 4 are made in an open and transparent manner, Lin will accept the results, whatever they may be. He remains very concerned, however, over the enormous decommissioning costs the plant will entail at the end of its life.
Lin also stated his opinion that Plant 4 should undergo another environmental impact assessment (EIA). He supported this suggestion with several claims. First, Lin considers the findings of the previous EIA to be biased. The job of an EIA review committee, he argued, is to review an environmental impact report, not issue an opinion. Second, waste from Taiwan’s other nuclear plants have still not been subject to final treatment and disposal. Plant 1 is currently storing more than 29,000 barrels of waste, while Plant 2 is temporarily storing on site over 32,000 barrels. The US and Europe no longer have the capacity to treat nuclear waste. In Taiwan, the problem of treatment is magnified by the island’s high population density and shortage of land. Moreover, economically advanced countries such as the UK and the US no longer build nuclear power plants due to factors such as waste treatment costs and safety concerns. Lin asked, in light of these trends, if it was not strange that Taiwan should be pursuing a fourth plant.
Lin also refuted the argument that Taiwan needs nuclear power to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. He pointed out that Taiwan's development policies still permit development of large industrial facilities, such as the Bing-Nan Industrial Complex and the Eighth Naptha Cracker, which if completed would be very large sources of CO2 emissions. Taiwan's industrial structure must be readjusted to resolve this contradiction.
Lin emphasized that Taiwan’s energy policy should follow a “small is beautiful” path that utilizes energy from multiple renewable sources. Constructing a fourth nuclear power plant would be a step back from the goal of energy source diversification and could have a serious impact on the island’s environment. Plant 4 would derail alternative energy projects, and built rashly without could entail even greater future costs. For these two reasons, Administrator Lin hopes to begin a new EIA for the facility. He repeatedly emphasized that any future EIA process must be open and transparent. ， 欄位全文的內容是In a recent explanation of his stance on construction of Taiwan's fourth nuclear power plant EPA Administrator Edgar Lin stated that previous policy decisions surrounding the plant were not made in an open manner, and that he therefore opposes the construction of the facility. Administrator Lin stated that he would respect the results of a current reevaluation of the facility no matter the outcome. The Administrator further emphasized that because the previous environmental impact assessment was biased, and due to the unresolved problem of radioactive waste treatment, the EPA is currently considering whether to require the planned facility to undergo another EIA.
Due to recent political disputes over the fate of Taiwan’s planned fourth nuclear power plant (hereafter referred to as “Plant 4”), the Legislative Yuan has been actively questioning administration officials on the topic. On May 25, EPA Administrator Edgar Lin visited the Legislative Yuan’s Health, Environment and Public Welfare Committee to report on the future direction of the EPA. During his report, Lin explained that his longstanding opposition to Plant 4 grew out of his opposition to what he perceived as a “dictatorship.” Due to the recent victory of opposition candidate Chen Shui-Bian as president, however, Lin argued that the dictatorship no longer exists, and that he thus no longer steadfastly opposes Plant 4.
Questions over the meaning of Lin’s statement prompted him to offer clarification the following day. He stated that by “dictatorship” he meant the decision-making processes regarding Plant 4. He pointed out that he opposed Plant 4 because the processes were neither open, fair, nor democratic, not because of an administrative dictatorship. If in the future, decisions regarding Plant 4 are made in an open and transparent manner, Lin will accept the results, whatever they may be. He remains very concerned, however, over the enormous decommissioning costs the plant will entail at the end of its life.
Lin also stated his opinion that Plant 4 should undergo another environmental impact assessment (EIA). He supported this suggestion with several claims. First, Lin considers the findings of the previous EIA to be biased. The job of an EIA review committee, he argued, is to review an environmental impact report, not issue an opinion. Second, waste from Taiwan’s other nuclear plants have still not been subject to final treatment and disposal. Plant 1 is currently storing more than 29,000 barrels of waste, while Plant 2 is temporarily storing on site over 32,000 barrels. The US and Europe no longer have the capacity to treat nuclear waste. In Taiwan, the problem of treatment is magnified by the island’s high population density and shortage of land. Moreover, economically advanced countries such as the UK and the US no longer build nuclear power plants due to factors such as waste treatment costs and safety concerns. Lin asked, in light of these trends, if it was not strange that Taiwan should be pursuing a fourth plant.
Lin also refuted the argument that Taiwan needs nuclear power to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. He pointed out that Taiwan's development policies still permit development of large industrial facilities, such as the Bing-Nan Industrial Complex and the Eighth Naptha Cracker, which if completed would be very large sources of CO2 emissions. Taiwan's industrial structure must be readjusted to resolve this contradiction.
Lin emphasized that Taiwan’s energy policy should follow a “small is beautiful” path that utilizes energy from multiple renewable sources. Constructing a fourth nuclear power plant would be a step back from the goal of energy source diversification and could have a serious impact on the island’s environment. Plant 4 would derail alternative energy projects, and built rashly without could entail even greater future costs. For these two reasons, Administrator Lin hopes to begin a new EIA for the facility. He repeatedly emphasized that any future EIA process must be open and transparent. ， 欄位年度的內容是2000 ， 欄位月份的內容是3 ， 欄位卷的內容是3 ， 欄位期的內容是13 ， 欄位順序的內容是1 ， 欄位倒序的內容是2 ， 欄位分類的內容是Climate Change ， 欄位標題2的內容是Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan s Fourth Nuclear Plant ， 欄位檔案位置的內容是print/V1/V3-13 。
編號
570
標題
Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant
摘要
In a recent explanation of his stance on construction of Taiwan's fourth nuclear power plant EPA Administrator Edgar Lin stated that previous policy decisions surrounding the plant were not made in an open manner, and that he therefore opposes the construction of the facility. Administrator Lin stated that he would respect the results of a current reevaluation of the facility no matter the outcome. The Administrator further emphasized that because the previous environmental impact assessment was biased, and due to the unresolved problem of radioactive waste treatment, the EPA is currently considering whether to require the planned facility to undergo another EIA. Due to recent political disputes over the fate of Taiwan’s planned fourth nuclear power plant (hereafter referred to as “Plant 4”), the Legislative Yuan has been actively questioning administration officials on the topic. On May 25, EPA Administrator Edgar Lin visited the Legislative Yuan’s Health, Environment and Public Welfare Committee to report on the future direction of the EPA. During his report, Lin explained that his longstanding opposition to Plant 4 grew out of his opposition to what he perceived as a “dictatorship.” Due to the recent victory of opposition candidate Chen Shui-Bian as president, however, Lin argued that the dictatorship no longer exists, and that he thus no longer steadfastly opposes Plant 4. Questions over the meaning of Lin’s statement prompted him to offer clarification the following day. He stated that by “dictatorship” he meant the decision-making processes regarding Plant 4. He pointed out that he opposed Plant 4 because the processes were neither open, fair, nor democratic, not because of an administrative dictatorship. If in the future, decisions regarding Plant 4 are made in an open and transparent manner, Lin will accept the results, whatever they may be. He remains very concerned, however, over the enormous decommissioning costs the plant will entail at the end of its life. Lin also stated his opinion that Plant 4 should undergo another environmental impact assessment (EIA). He supported this suggestion with several claims. First, Lin considers the findings of the previous EIA to be biased. The job of an EIA review committee, he argued, is to review an environmental impact report, not issue an opinion. Second, waste from Taiwan’s other nuclear plants have still not been subject to final treatment and disposal. Plant 1 is currently storing more than 29,000 barrels of waste, while Plant 2 is temporarily storing on site over 32,000 barrels. The US and Europe no longer have the capacity to treat nuclear waste. In Taiwan, the problem of treatment is magnified by the island’s high population density and shortage of land. Moreover, economically advanced countries such as the UK and the US no longer build nuclear power plants due to factors such as waste treatment costs and safety concerns. Lin asked, in light of these trends, if it was not strange that Taiwan should be pursuing a fourth plant. Lin also refuted the argument that Taiwan needs nuclear power to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. He pointed out that Taiwan's development policies still permit development of large industrial facilities, such as the Bing-Nan Industrial Complex and the Eighth Naptha Cracker, which if completed would be very large sources of CO2 emissions. Taiwan's industrial structure must be readjusted to resolve this contradiction. Lin emphasized that Taiwan’s energy policy should follow a “small is beautiful” path that utilizes energy from multiple renewable sources. Constructing a fourth nuclear power plant would be a step back from the goal of energy source diversification and could have a serious impact on the island’s environment. Plant 4 would derail alternative energy projects, and built rashly without could entail even greater future costs. For these two reasons, Administrator Lin hopes to begin a new EIA for the facility. He repeatedly emphasized that any future EIA process must be open and transparent.
全文
In a recent explanation of his stance on construction of Taiwan's fourth nuclear power plant EPA Administrator Edgar Lin stated that previous policy decisions surrounding the plant were not made in an open manner, and that he therefore opposes the construction of the facility. Administrator Lin stated that he would respect the results of a current reevaluation of the facility no matter the outcome. The Administrator further emphasized that because the previous environmental impact assessment was biased, and due to the unresolved problem of radioactive waste treatment, the EPA is currently considering whether to require the planned facility to undergo another EIA. Due to recent political disputes over the fate of Taiwan’s planned fourth nuclear power plant (hereafter referred to as “Plant 4”), the Legislative Yuan has been actively questioning administration officials on the topic. On May 25, EPA Administrator Edgar Lin visited the Legislative Yuan’s Health, Environment and Public Welfare Committee to report on the future direction of the EPA. During his report, Lin explained that his longstanding opposition to Plant 4 grew out of his opposition to what he perceived as a “dictatorship.” Due to the recent victory of opposition candidate Chen Shui-Bian as president, however, Lin argued that the dictatorship no longer exists, and that he thus no longer steadfastly opposes Plant 4. Questions over the meaning of Lin’s statement prompted him to offer clarification the following day. He stated that by “dictatorship” he meant the decision-making processes regarding Plant 4. He pointed out that he opposed Plant 4 because the processes were neither open, fair, nor democratic, not because of an administrative dictatorship. If in the future, decisions regarding Plant 4 are made in an open and transparent manner, Lin will accept the results, whatever they may be. He remains very concerned, however, over the enormous decommissioning costs the plant will entail at the end of its life. Lin also stated his opinion that Plant 4 should undergo another environmental impact assessment (EIA). He supported this suggestion with several claims. First, Lin considers the findings of the previous EIA to be biased. The job of an EIA review committee, he argued, is to review an environmental impact report, not issue an opinion. Second, waste from Taiwan’s other nuclear plants have still not been subject to final treatment and disposal. Plant 1 is currently storing more than 29,000 barrels of waste, while Plant 2 is temporarily storing on site over 32,000 barrels. The US and Europe no longer have the capacity to treat nuclear waste. In Taiwan, the problem of treatment is magnified by the island’s high population density and shortage of land. Moreover, economically advanced countries such as the UK and the US no longer build nuclear power plants due to factors such as waste treatment costs and safety concerns. Lin asked, in light of these trends, if it was not strange that Taiwan should be pursuing a fourth plant. Lin also refuted the argument that Taiwan needs nuclear power to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. He pointed out that Taiwan's development policies still permit development of large industrial facilities, such as the Bing-Nan Industrial Complex and the Eighth Naptha Cracker, which if completed would be very large sources of CO2 emissions. Taiwan's industrial structure must be readjusted to resolve this contradiction. Lin emphasized that Taiwan’s energy policy should follow a “small is beautiful” path that utilizes energy from multiple renewable sources. Constructing a fourth nuclear power plant would be a step back from the goal of energy source diversification and could have a serious impact on the island’s environment. Plant 4 would derail alternative energy projects, and built rashly without could entail even greater future costs. For these two reasons, Administrator Lin hopes to begin a new EIA for the facility. He repeatedly emphasized that any future EIA process must be open and transparent.
年度
2000
月份
3
卷
3
期
13
順序
1
倒序
2
分類
Climate Change
標題2
Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan s Fourth Nuclear Plant
檔案位置
print/V1/V3-13
「Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant」所屬的資料集：「Environmental Policy Monthly」的其他資料
編號：
538
標題：
Audits of Container Reporting to be Beefed Up
摘要：
To fortify the recycling system for waste containers the EPA has been assisting container enterprise
全文：
To fortify the recycling system for waste containers the EPA has been assisting container enterprise
編號：
996
標題：
Revised Waste Disposal Act Enforcement Rules Drafted
摘要：
In conjunction with the revision of the Waste Disposal Act the EPA has revised the Waste Disposal Ac
全文：
In conjunction with the revision of the Waste Disposal Act the EPA has revised the Waste Disposal Ac
編號：
961
標題：
Revised Air Pollution Control Act Simplifies Permit Procedures
摘要：
The revised Air Pollution Control Act passed by the Legislative Yuan on May 21, authorizes the EPA t
全文：
The revised Air Pollution Control Act passed by the Legislative Yuan on May 21, authorizes the EPA t
編號：
314
標題：
EIA Requirements for Petroleum Storage Tanks Revised
摘要：
On 4 February the EPA issued a public announcement regarding revision and relaxation of EIA requirem
全文：
On 4 February the EPA issued a public announcement regarding revision and relaxation of EIA requirem
編號：
905
標題：
Standardization of Soil Pollution Analysis Methods
摘要：
The EPA has been gradually completing soil pollution standards and methods to be used in standardize
全文：
The EPA has been gradually completing soil pollution standards and methods to be used in standardize
編號：
185
標題：
R.O.C. and Canada Initiate Mutual Recognition of Eco-label Schemes
摘要：
Following Canada's lead the EPA's Eco-label Review Committee recently passed jointly developed draft
全文：
Following Canada's lead the EPA's Eco-label Review Committee recently passed jointly developed draft
編號：
762
標題：
Control Framework for Marine Pollution Submitted to Executive Yuan
摘要：
Besides laying out plans for future marine monitoring systems the Draft Marine Pollution Control Act
全文：
Besides laying out plans for future marine monitoring systems the Draft Marine Pollution Control Act
編號：
709
標題：
Cross-Agency General Industrial Waste Treatment Task Force Established
摘要：
Following last year’s major pollution incident in the Kaoping River industrial waste treatment probl
全文：
Following last year’s major pollution incident in the Kaoping River industrial waste treatment probl
編號：
221
標題：
A Look Inside the EPA: The Bureau of Solid Waste Management
摘要：
According to the Environmental Protection Administration Organization Statutes the EPA’s Bureau of S
全文：
According to the Environmental Protection Administration Organization Statutes the EPA’s Bureau of S
編號：
354
標題：
Dry-cell Batteries to be Comprehensively Recycled
摘要：
The plan to comprehensively recycle dry-cell batteries was recently completed and announced on May 4
全文：
The plan to comprehensively recycle dry-cell batteries was recently completed and announced on May 4
編號：
454
標題：
Consensus Reached on EIA Criteria for Industrial Parks
摘要：
The EPA has drafted criteria to increase the transparency and consistency of EIA reviews in industri
全文：
The EPA has drafted criteria to increase the transparency and consistency of EIA reviews in industri
編號：
76
標題：
Toxic Chemicals Control Act Substantially Amended
摘要：
Toxic Substance On November 19 the Toxic Chemicals Control Act was amended and promulgated by presi
全文：
Toxic Substance Management On November 19 the Toxic Chemicals Control Act was amended and promulgat
編號：
844
標題：
EPA Cracks down on Illegal Export of Hazardous Waste
摘要：
The northern division of the EPA Inspection Team working in conjunction with the Criminal Investigat
全文：
The northern division of the EPA Inspection Team working in conjunction with the Criminal Investigat
編號：
881
標題：
Administrator: We will Never Allow a Repeat of Amorgos Incident
摘要：
Underscoring his resolve that no oil spill similar to last year’s Amorgos incident shall happen agai
全文：
Underscoring his resolve that no oil spill similar to last year’s Amorgos incident shall happen agai
編號：
846
標題：
Jane Goodall Promotes “Root and Sprout” Program in Taiwan
摘要：
Prominent chimpanzee researcher and environmentalist Dr. Jane Goodall arrived in Taiwan for her sixt
全文：
Prominent chimpanzee researcher and environmentalist Dr. Jane Goodall arrived in Taiwan for her sixt
編號：
298
標題：
630 Sites Exempted from Air Permitting Requirements
摘要：
The EPA recently announced the liberalization of air pollution permitting requirements for some site
全文：
The EPA recently announced the liberalization of air pollution permitting requirements for some site
編號：
27
標題：
Dioxin Emission Standards for Large-scale Incinerators Promulgated
摘要：
Air Quality To resolve public concerns regarding dioxin emissions from large-scale incinerators the
全文：
Air Quality To resolve public concerns regarding dioxin emissions from large-scale incinerators the
編號：
825
標題：
EPA Holds Oil Pollution Emergency Response Exercise
摘要：
The 2001 “Large-scale Marine Oil Pollution Emergency Response Exercise” was held on October 23rd in
全文：
The 2001 “Large-scale Marine Oil Pollution Emergency Response Exercise” was held on October 23rd in
編號：
379
標題：
EPA Study Reveals Heavy Metal Content of Incinerator Air Emissions is Minute
摘要：
In a six-month air pollution study begun in December 1998 the EPA focused on the heavy metal content
全文：
In a six-month air pollution study begun in December 1998 the EPA focused on the heavy metal content
編號：
565
標題：
River Basin and Area Management Plan Submitted to EY for Approval
摘要：
The EPA recently completed draft measures to manage and control potentially polluting activities wit
全文：
The EPA recently completed draft measures to manage and control potentially polluting activities wit
編號：
839
標題：
Assessment of Illegal Dumping Sites to be Completed this Year
摘要：
The EPA recently announced its progress in hazard assessment of 170 controlled illegal dumping sites
全文：
The EPA recently announced its progress in hazard assessment of 170 controlled illegal dumping sites
編號：
942
標題：
Republic of Clean: Administrator Hau's Earth Day Vision
摘要：
Administrator Hau announced on Earth Day that the first stage of the EPA's "Plastic Shopping Bag and
全文：
Administrator Hau announced on Earth Day that the first stage of the EPA's "Plastic Shopping Bag and
編號：
474
標題：
EPA Urges Local Govts to Get Electric Bikes on the Road
摘要：
In the last few years the EPA has decided to promote electric motorbikes (e-bikes) as an important w
全文：
In the last few years the EPA has decided to promote electric motorbikes (e-bikes) as an important w
編號：
889
標題：
New Policies for a New Year
摘要：
The EPM presents an overview of some of the major policies being pursued within the EPA this year in
全文：
The EPM presents an overview of some of the major policies being pursued within the EPA this year in
編號：
228
標題：
EPA Formulating Procedural Rules for EIA Review
摘要：
To ensure that Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) reviews are reasonable and fair the EPA is draf
全文：
To ensure that Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) reviews are reasonable and fair the EPA is draf
編號：
831
標題：
Soil and Groundwater Pollution Remediation Act Enforcement Rules Announced
摘要：
The Soil and Groundwater Pollution Remediation Act Enforcement Rules (土壤及地下水污染整治法施行細則) were promulga
全文：
The Soil and Groundwater Pollution Remediation Act Enforcement Rules (土壤及地下水污染整治法施行細則) were promulga
編號：
792
標題：
TQC System Planned for Kaohsiung-Pingtung Air Pollution
摘要：
Which area of Taiwan has the worst air quality? The answer is the Kaohsiung-Pingtung air quality dis
全文：
Which area of Taiwan has the worst air quality? The answer is the Kaohsiung-Pingtung air quality dis
編號：
97
標題：
EIA Required for Development of Media Park
摘要：
Environmental Impact Assessment On January 3 1998, the EPA publicly announced that a proposed Media
全文：
Environmental Impact Assessment On January 3 1998, the EPA publicly announced that a proposed Media
編號：
250
標題：
New Plan to Encourage Retirement of Older Motorcycles Readied
摘要：
The EPA recently finalized the compensation details of a new scheme to encourage the retirement of o
全文：
The EPA recently finalized the compensation details of a new scheme to encourage the retirement of o
編號：
219
標題：
LY Inquiries to the EPA Focus on Narrower Range of Issues
摘要：
It was found that during the 5th session of the Legislative Yuan (LY) inquiries addressed to the EPA
全文：
It was found that during the 5th session of the Legislative Yuan (LY) inquiries addressed to the EPA
行政院環境保護署 的其他資料集
行政院環境保護署事業廢棄物再利用機構資料
每年更新更新,66李小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2633 | 2022-01-14 01:26:21
行政院環境保護署環境教育課程開辦統計資料
每1月更新,43李小姐 | 02-23117722#2724 | 2023-07-30 01:04:33
行政院環境保護署BTEX監測小時值（每日更新）
不定期更新更新,92陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-07 01:03:41
行政院環境保護署南科樹谷環境監測資料
不定期更新更新,37陳先生 | 04-22521718#51207 | 2022-01-14 01:22:03
行政院環境保護署應回收廢棄物處理業者(廢乾電池類)最大處理量資料
每年更新更新,43廖小姐 | 02-2370-5888#3103 | 2022-01-14 01:24:03
行政院環境保護署
空氣品質小時值_苗栗縣_三義站
每小時更新更新,118謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:03:59
行政院環境保護署環評主管機關受理審查之因應對策
每2月更新,39黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-05 01:01:17
行政院環境保護署環保標章認證實驗室資料
每1月更新,42黃先生 | 02-23117722#2932 | 2023-07-27 01:01:44
行政院環境保護署機車定檢站位置圖
不定期更新更新,47呂小姐 | 02-2371-2121#6308 | 2022-01-15 01:16:25
行政院環境保護署環境教育及訓練電子報
不定期更新更新,30葉小姐 | 03-4020789#607 | 2022-01-15 01:13:29
行政院環境保護署
公害糾紛處理法施行細則
不定期更新更新,41潘先生 | (02)2311-7722分機2931 | 2022-01-15 01:13:21
行政院環境保護署0800資源回收免費專線-查詢事業廢棄物統計
每年更新更新,46莊先生 | 02-23705888#3108 | 2022-01-14 01:24:31
行政院環境保護署空氣污染排放量推估結果
不定期更新更新,106柏小姐 | 02-23712121#6106 | 2022-01-14 01:04:24
行政院環境保護署公害糾紛裁決委員會委員名單
不定期更新更新,35謝先生 | 02-2311-7722#2962 | 2022-01-15 01:12:55
行政院環境保護署空氣污染罰鍰次數
每年更新更新,135謝小姐 | 02-23117722#2103 | 2022-01-14 01:22:39
行政院環境保護署
廢棄物稽查次數
每1年更新,134顏先生 | 02-23117722#2109 | 2023-07-27 01:00:46
行政院環境保護署花蓮縣重要環保統計資料
每1月更新,124顏先生 | 02-23117722#2109 | 2023-08-07 01:00:00
行政院環境保護署縣市(新竹縣)小時值-每小時
每1時更新,105陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:58:53
行政院環境保護署審核事業或污水下水道系統放流水水質濃度限值處理原則
不定期更新,42簡小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2818 | 2022-01-15 01:13:05
行政院環境保護署特殊性工業區人工操作監測值資料檔
每1年更新,99劉小姐 | 02-2311-7722#6111 | 2023-07-27 01:04:59
行政院環境保護署
本署核准成立之環境保護財團法人名單
不定期更新更新,69黃小姐 | (02)2311-7722#2714 | 2023-08-07 01:01:13
行政院環境保護署0800資源回收免費專線-查詢非業務範圍統計
每年更新更新,40莊先生 | 02-23705888#3108 | 2022-01-14 01:24:30
行政院環境保護署高雄市水量水質自動監測連線傳輸監測紀錄值即時資料集
不定期更新更新,33程先生 | 02-2311-7722#2833 | 2023-08-09 01:04:09
行政院環境保護署區域性地下水水質測站位置圖
不定期更新更新,52陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-07 01:04:32
行政院環境保護署縣市(南投縣)小時值-每小時
每1時更新,180陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:58:49
行政院環境保護署
環境影響調查報告書專案小組審查會議紀錄
每2月更新,64黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-06 01:02:15
行政院環境保護署各工廠空氣污染物排放資料
每季更新更新,118黃先生 | 02-23712121#6210 | 2022-01-15 01:12:09
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_高雄市_左營站
每1時更新,99陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:57:39
行政院環境保護署毒性化學物質禁止運作事項資料
不定期更新更新,42許先生 | 02-23257399#55328 | 2023-07-30 00:59:58
行政院環境保護署二仁溪污染整治小組及再生願景聯繫會報
不定期更新,26黃先生 | 02-2311-7722#2508 | 2022-01-15 01:12:47
行政院環境保護署