Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant
「Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant」於資料集「Environmental Policy Monthly」由單位「行政院環境保護署」的楊先生所提供，聯繫電話是(02)23117722#2217,(02)23117722#2216，最近更新時間為：2022-01-15 01:13:03。 欄位編號的內容是570 ， 欄位標題的內容是Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant ， 欄位摘要的內容是In a recent explanation of his stance on construction of Taiwan's fourth nuclear power plant EPA Administrator Edgar Lin stated that previous policy decisions surrounding the plant were not made in an open manner, and that he therefore opposes the construction of the facility. Administrator Lin stated that he would respect the results of a current reevaluation of the facility no matter the outcome. The Administrator further emphasized that because the previous environmental impact assessment was biased, and due to the unresolved problem of radioactive waste treatment, the EPA is currently considering whether to require the planned facility to undergo another EIA.
Due to recent political disputes over the fate of Taiwan’s planned fourth nuclear power plant (hereafter referred to as “Plant 4”), the Legislative Yuan has been actively questioning administration officials on the topic. On May 25, EPA Administrator Edgar Lin visited the Legislative Yuan’s Health, Environment and Public Welfare Committee to report on the future direction of the EPA. During his report, Lin explained that his longstanding opposition to Plant 4 grew out of his opposition to what he perceived as a “dictatorship.” Due to the recent victory of opposition candidate Chen Shui-Bian as president, however, Lin argued that the dictatorship no longer exists, and that he thus no longer steadfastly opposes Plant 4.
Questions over the meaning of Lin’s statement prompted him to offer clarification the following day. He stated that by “dictatorship” he meant the decision-making processes regarding Plant 4. He pointed out that he opposed Plant 4 because the processes were neither open, fair, nor democratic, not because of an administrative dictatorship. If in the future, decisions regarding Plant 4 are made in an open and transparent manner, Lin will accept the results, whatever they may be. He remains very concerned, however, over the enormous decommissioning costs the plant will entail at the end of its life.
Lin also stated his opinion that Plant 4 should undergo another environmental impact assessment (EIA). He supported this suggestion with several claims. First, Lin considers the findings of the previous EIA to be biased. The job of an EIA review committee, he argued, is to review an environmental impact report, not issue an opinion. Second, waste from Taiwan’s other nuclear plants have still not been subject to final treatment and disposal. Plant 1 is currently storing more than 29,000 barrels of waste, while Plant 2 is temporarily storing on site over 32,000 barrels. The US and Europe no longer have the capacity to treat nuclear waste. In Taiwan, the problem of treatment is magnified by the island’s high population density and shortage of land. Moreover, economically advanced countries such as the UK and the US no longer build nuclear power plants due to factors such as waste treatment costs and safety concerns. Lin asked, in light of these trends, if it was not strange that Taiwan should be pursuing a fourth plant.
Lin also refuted the argument that Taiwan needs nuclear power to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. He pointed out that Taiwan's development policies still permit development of large industrial facilities, such as the Bing-Nan Industrial Complex and the Eighth Naptha Cracker, which if completed would be very large sources of CO2 emissions. Taiwan's industrial structure must be readjusted to resolve this contradiction.
Lin emphasized that Taiwan’s energy policy should follow a “small is beautiful” path that utilizes energy from multiple renewable sources. Constructing a fourth nuclear power plant would be a step back from the goal of energy source diversification and could have a serious impact on the island’s environment. Plant 4 would derail alternative energy projects, and built rashly without could entail even greater future costs. For these two reasons, Administrator Lin hopes to begin a new EIA for the facility. He repeatedly emphasized that any future EIA process must be open and transparent. ， 欄位全文的內容是In a recent explanation of his stance on construction of Taiwan's fourth nuclear power plant EPA Administrator Edgar Lin stated that previous policy decisions surrounding the plant were not made in an open manner, and that he therefore opposes the construction of the facility. Administrator Lin stated that he would respect the results of a current reevaluation of the facility no matter the outcome. The Administrator further emphasized that because the previous environmental impact assessment was biased, and due to the unresolved problem of radioactive waste treatment, the EPA is currently considering whether to require the planned facility to undergo another EIA.
Due to recent political disputes over the fate of Taiwan’s planned fourth nuclear power plant (hereafter referred to as “Plant 4”), the Legislative Yuan has been actively questioning administration officials on the topic. On May 25, EPA Administrator Edgar Lin visited the Legislative Yuan’s Health, Environment and Public Welfare Committee to report on the future direction of the EPA. During his report, Lin explained that his longstanding opposition to Plant 4 grew out of his opposition to what he perceived as a “dictatorship.” Due to the recent victory of opposition candidate Chen Shui-Bian as president, however, Lin argued that the dictatorship no longer exists, and that he thus no longer steadfastly opposes Plant 4.
Questions over the meaning of Lin’s statement prompted him to offer clarification the following day. He stated that by “dictatorship” he meant the decision-making processes regarding Plant 4. He pointed out that he opposed Plant 4 because the processes were neither open, fair, nor democratic, not because of an administrative dictatorship. If in the future, decisions regarding Plant 4 are made in an open and transparent manner, Lin will accept the results, whatever they may be. He remains very concerned, however, over the enormous decommissioning costs the plant will entail at the end of its life.
Lin also stated his opinion that Plant 4 should undergo another environmental impact assessment (EIA). He supported this suggestion with several claims. First, Lin considers the findings of the previous EIA to be biased. The job of an EIA review committee, he argued, is to review an environmental impact report, not issue an opinion. Second, waste from Taiwan’s other nuclear plants have still not been subject to final treatment and disposal. Plant 1 is currently storing more than 29,000 barrels of waste, while Plant 2 is temporarily storing on site over 32,000 barrels. The US and Europe no longer have the capacity to treat nuclear waste. In Taiwan, the problem of treatment is magnified by the island’s high population density and shortage of land. Moreover, economically advanced countries such as the UK and the US no longer build nuclear power plants due to factors such as waste treatment costs and safety concerns. Lin asked, in light of these trends, if it was not strange that Taiwan should be pursuing a fourth plant.
Lin also refuted the argument that Taiwan needs nuclear power to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. He pointed out that Taiwan's development policies still permit development of large industrial facilities, such as the Bing-Nan Industrial Complex and the Eighth Naptha Cracker, which if completed would be very large sources of CO2 emissions. Taiwan's industrial structure must be readjusted to resolve this contradiction.
Lin emphasized that Taiwan’s energy policy should follow a “small is beautiful” path that utilizes energy from multiple renewable sources. Constructing a fourth nuclear power plant would be a step back from the goal of energy source diversification and could have a serious impact on the island’s environment. Plant 4 would derail alternative energy projects, and built rashly without could entail even greater future costs. For these two reasons, Administrator Lin hopes to begin a new EIA for the facility. He repeatedly emphasized that any future EIA process must be open and transparent. ， 欄位年度的內容是2000 ， 欄位月份的內容是3 ， 欄位卷的內容是3 ， 欄位期的內容是13 ， 欄位順序的內容是1 ， 欄位倒序的內容是2 ， 欄位分類的內容是Climate Change ， 欄位標題2的內容是Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan s Fourth Nuclear Plant ， 欄位檔案位置的內容是print/V1/V3-13 。
編號
570
標題
Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant
摘要
In a recent explanation of his stance on construction of Taiwan's fourth nuclear power plant EPA Administrator Edgar Lin stated that previous policy decisions surrounding the plant were not made in an open manner, and that he therefore opposes the construction of the facility. Administrator Lin stated that he would respect the results of a current reevaluation of the facility no matter the outcome. The Administrator further emphasized that because the previous environmental impact assessment was biased, and due to the unresolved problem of radioactive waste treatment, the EPA is currently considering whether to require the planned facility to undergo another EIA. Due to recent political disputes over the fate of Taiwan’s planned fourth nuclear power plant (hereafter referred to as “Plant 4”), the Legislative Yuan has been actively questioning administration officials on the topic. On May 25, EPA Administrator Edgar Lin visited the Legislative Yuan’s Health, Environment and Public Welfare Committee to report on the future direction of the EPA. During his report, Lin explained that his longstanding opposition to Plant 4 grew out of his opposition to what he perceived as a “dictatorship.” Due to the recent victory of opposition candidate Chen Shui-Bian as president, however, Lin argued that the dictatorship no longer exists, and that he thus no longer steadfastly opposes Plant 4. Questions over the meaning of Lin’s statement prompted him to offer clarification the following day. He stated that by “dictatorship” he meant the decision-making processes regarding Plant 4. He pointed out that he opposed Plant 4 because the processes were neither open, fair, nor democratic, not because of an administrative dictatorship. If in the future, decisions regarding Plant 4 are made in an open and transparent manner, Lin will accept the results, whatever they may be. He remains very concerned, however, over the enormous decommissioning costs the plant will entail at the end of its life. Lin also stated his opinion that Plant 4 should undergo another environmental impact assessment (EIA). He supported this suggestion with several claims. First, Lin considers the findings of the previous EIA to be biased. The job of an EIA review committee, he argued, is to review an environmental impact report, not issue an opinion. Second, waste from Taiwan’s other nuclear plants have still not been subject to final treatment and disposal. Plant 1 is currently storing more than 29,000 barrels of waste, while Plant 2 is temporarily storing on site over 32,000 barrels. The US and Europe no longer have the capacity to treat nuclear waste. In Taiwan, the problem of treatment is magnified by the island’s high population density and shortage of land. Moreover, economically advanced countries such as the UK and the US no longer build nuclear power plants due to factors such as waste treatment costs and safety concerns. Lin asked, in light of these trends, if it was not strange that Taiwan should be pursuing a fourth plant. Lin also refuted the argument that Taiwan needs nuclear power to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. He pointed out that Taiwan's development policies still permit development of large industrial facilities, such as the Bing-Nan Industrial Complex and the Eighth Naptha Cracker, which if completed would be very large sources of CO2 emissions. Taiwan's industrial structure must be readjusted to resolve this contradiction. Lin emphasized that Taiwan’s energy policy should follow a “small is beautiful” path that utilizes energy from multiple renewable sources. Constructing a fourth nuclear power plant would be a step back from the goal of energy source diversification and could have a serious impact on the island’s environment. Plant 4 would derail alternative energy projects, and built rashly without could entail even greater future costs. For these two reasons, Administrator Lin hopes to begin a new EIA for the facility. He repeatedly emphasized that any future EIA process must be open and transparent.
全文
In a recent explanation of his stance on construction of Taiwan's fourth nuclear power plant EPA Administrator Edgar Lin stated that previous policy decisions surrounding the plant were not made in an open manner, and that he therefore opposes the construction of the facility. Administrator Lin stated that he would respect the results of a current reevaluation of the facility no matter the outcome. The Administrator further emphasized that because the previous environmental impact assessment was biased, and due to the unresolved problem of radioactive waste treatment, the EPA is currently considering whether to require the planned facility to undergo another EIA. Due to recent political disputes over the fate of Taiwan’s planned fourth nuclear power plant (hereafter referred to as “Plant 4”), the Legislative Yuan has been actively questioning administration officials on the topic. On May 25, EPA Administrator Edgar Lin visited the Legislative Yuan’s Health, Environment and Public Welfare Committee to report on the future direction of the EPA. During his report, Lin explained that his longstanding opposition to Plant 4 grew out of his opposition to what he perceived as a “dictatorship.” Due to the recent victory of opposition candidate Chen Shui-Bian as president, however, Lin argued that the dictatorship no longer exists, and that he thus no longer steadfastly opposes Plant 4. Questions over the meaning of Lin’s statement prompted him to offer clarification the following day. He stated that by “dictatorship” he meant the decision-making processes regarding Plant 4. He pointed out that he opposed Plant 4 because the processes were neither open, fair, nor democratic, not because of an administrative dictatorship. If in the future, decisions regarding Plant 4 are made in an open and transparent manner, Lin will accept the results, whatever they may be. He remains very concerned, however, over the enormous decommissioning costs the plant will entail at the end of its life. Lin also stated his opinion that Plant 4 should undergo another environmental impact assessment (EIA). He supported this suggestion with several claims. First, Lin considers the findings of the previous EIA to be biased. The job of an EIA review committee, he argued, is to review an environmental impact report, not issue an opinion. Second, waste from Taiwan’s other nuclear plants have still not been subject to final treatment and disposal. Plant 1 is currently storing more than 29,000 barrels of waste, while Plant 2 is temporarily storing on site over 32,000 barrels. The US and Europe no longer have the capacity to treat nuclear waste. In Taiwan, the problem of treatment is magnified by the island’s high population density and shortage of land. Moreover, economically advanced countries such as the UK and the US no longer build nuclear power plants due to factors such as waste treatment costs and safety concerns. Lin asked, in light of these trends, if it was not strange that Taiwan should be pursuing a fourth plant. Lin also refuted the argument that Taiwan needs nuclear power to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. He pointed out that Taiwan's development policies still permit development of large industrial facilities, such as the Bing-Nan Industrial Complex and the Eighth Naptha Cracker, which if completed would be very large sources of CO2 emissions. Taiwan's industrial structure must be readjusted to resolve this contradiction. Lin emphasized that Taiwan’s energy policy should follow a “small is beautiful” path that utilizes energy from multiple renewable sources. Constructing a fourth nuclear power plant would be a step back from the goal of energy source diversification and could have a serious impact on the island’s environment. Plant 4 would derail alternative energy projects, and built rashly without could entail even greater future costs. For these two reasons, Administrator Lin hopes to begin a new EIA for the facility. He repeatedly emphasized that any future EIA process must be open and transparent.
年度
2000
月份
3
卷
3
期
13
順序
1
倒序
2
分類
Climate Change
標題2
Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan s Fourth Nuclear Plant
檔案位置
print/V1/V3-13
「Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant」所屬的資料集：「Environmental Policy Monthly」的其他資料
編號：
352
標題：
Broader Fly Ash Disposal Regulations to Encourage Resource Recovery
摘要：
The EPA has agreed to extend the grace period permitted local authorities to improve disposal provis
全文：
The EPA has agreed to extend the grace period permitted local authorities to improve disposal provis
編號：
959
標題：
Regulations Drafted for Air Quality Simulation Models
摘要：
The EPA has completed its draft of regulations for air quality simulation models. These regulations
全文：
The EPA has completed its draft of regulations for air quality simulation models. These regulations
編號：
710
標題：
Draft Implementation Rules Announced for Soil & Groundwater Act
摘要：
The EPA has announced draft implementation rules for the Soil and Groundwater Pollution Remediation
全文：
The EPA has announced draft implementation rules for the Soil and Groundwater Pollution Remediation
編號：
755
標題：
NCSD Strengthens Socio-Economic Development
摘要：
The Executive Yuan initially approved addition of a national land development working group to stren
全文：
The Executive Yuan initially approved addition of a national land development working group to stren
編號：
147
標題：
Guidelines for Toxics Use Registration Formally Announced
摘要：
Toxic Substance The Toxic Chemical Substance Control Act amended last year designates three systems
全文：
Toxic Substance Management The Toxic Chemical Substance Control Act amended last year designates t
編號：
735
標題：
NT$1 PET Bottle Exchange
摘要：
In April of last year PET refund rates were changed to NT$0.5. Because the number of PET bottles dis
全文：
In April of last year PET refund rates were changed to NT$0.5. Because the number of PET bottles dis
編號：
632
標題：
Strong Future Market Predicted for Environmental Technologies
摘要：
While attending the Second Taiwan-Japan Environmental Technology Exchange Symposium Administrator Li
全文：
While attending the Second Taiwan-Japan Environmental Technology Exchange Symposium Administrator Li
編號：
177
標題：
EIA of Former RCA Site to Include Health Risk Assessment
摘要：
A list of individuals who have contracted cancer from the RCA soil pollution incident in Taoyuan Cou
全文：
A list of individuals who have contracted cancer from the RCA soil pollution incident in Taoyuan Cou
編號：
286
標題：
A look inside the EPA:The National Institute of Environmental Analysis
摘要：
According to the Environmental Protection Administration Organization Statutes the R.O.C. EPA’s Nati
全文：
According to the Environmental Protection Administration Organization Statutes the R.O.C. EPA’s Nati
編號：
731
標題：
Feature: In Celebration of Earth Day President Chen Rides Bicycle to Work
摘要：
To commemorate Earth Day President Chen Shui-Bian decided to ride a bicycle to work, accompanied by
全文：
To commemorate Earth Day President Chen Shui-Bian decided to ride a bicycle to work, accompanied by
編號：
738
標題：
Regulations for Soil Fund Fee Rates Drafted
摘要：
The EPA has released the draft Regulations Governing the Collection of Soil and Groundwater Pollutio
全文：
The EPA has released the draft Regulations Governing the Collection of Soil and Groundwater Pollutio
編號：
870
標題：
Permit Regulations for Waste Disposal Organizations Simplified
摘要：
The EPA has recently announced the Permit and Management Regulations for Public and Private Waste Cl
全文：
The EPA has recently announced the Permit and Management Regulations for Public and Private Waste Cl
編號：
3737
標題：
Central and Local Governments Settle on Short-, Mid-, and Long-Term Food Waste Plans Against Swine F
摘要：
Waste
Central and Local Governments Settle on Short-, Mid-, and Long-Term Food Waste Plans Against S
全文：
Central and Local Governments Settle on Short-, Mid-, and Long-Term Food Waste Plans Against Swine F
編號：
405
標題：
EPA Promotes Negotiations on Air Pollution Reduction with Four Northern Industries
摘要：
After years of providing assistance and implementing control measures to improve air quality in the
全文：
After years of providing assistance and implementing control measures to improve air quality in the
編號：
157
標題：
Amendments to Air Pollution Fee Regulations Announced
摘要：
Air Quality According to a draft amendment to the Regulations Governing the Collection of Air Poll
全文：
Air Quality According to a draft amendment to the Regulations Governing the Collection of Air Poll
編號：
897
標題：
Establishment of Four Environmental Industry Zones
摘要：
With the volume of Taiwan’s waste steadily increasing choosing the proper methods for waste recyclin
全文：
With the volume of Taiwan’s waste steadily increasing choosing the proper methods for waste recyclin
編號：
739
標題：
Scope of Vendors Required to Install Recycling Facilities Expanded
摘要：
Taiwan's Waste Disposal Act requires specified vendors to install recycling facilities within their
全文：
Taiwan's Waste Disposal Act requires specified vendors to install recycling facilities within their
編號：
476
標題：
Measures to Reduce Plastic Bag Use Underway
摘要：
The EPA has set sales targets of electric motorbikes (e-bikes) for various county and city governmen
全文：
The EPA has set sales targets of electric motorbikes (e-bikes) for various county and city governmen
編號：
798
標題：
Eight Measures for Improving EIA Reviews
摘要：
The lack of efficiency in conducting environmental impact assessment reviews has draw attention from
全文：
The lack of efficiency in conducting environmental impact assessment reviews has draw attention from
編號：
709
標題：
Cross-Agency General Industrial Waste Treatment Task Force Established
摘要：
Following last year’s major pollution incident in the Kaoping River industrial waste treatment probl
全文：
Following last year’s major pollution incident in the Kaoping River industrial waste treatment probl
編號：
704
標題：
Preliminary Soil Pollution Fund Management Framework Set
摘要：
The EPA's Draft Organizational Regulations of the Soil And Groundwater Pollution Remediation Fund Ma
全文：
The EPA's Draft Organizational Regulations of the Soil And Groundwater Pollution Remediation Fund Ma
編號：
32
標題：
EPA Subsidizes Gas Station Fume Recycling Equipment
摘要：
Air Quality As ozone pollution becomes a more serious concern the EPA has decided to subsidize the
全文：
Air Quality As ozone pollution becomes a more serious concern the EPA has decided to subsidize the
編號：
746
標題：
EPA Seeks Orators to Promote Environmental Education
摘要：
As part of its effort to support implementation of the Voluntary Service Law the EPA announced the c
全文：
As part of its effort to support implementation of the Voluntary Service Law the EPA announced the c
編號：
277
標題：
Recycling Improvement Measures for PET Bottles and Discarded Tires Confirmed
摘要：
The EPA is actively developing response measures to the PET Bottle Recycling Fund's red ink and the
全文：
The EPA is actively developing response measures to the PET Bottle Recycling Fund's red ink and the
編號：
494
標題：
First Privately Run LPG Station in Greater Taipei Opens
摘要：
The difficulty in setting up liquid petroleum gas (LPG) fill stations has created a bottleneck in ge
全文：
The difficulty in setting up liquid petroleum gas (LPG) fill stations has created a bottleneck in ge
編號：
492
標題：
Executive Yuan Approves Draft Amendments to Noise Act
摘要：
The ROC Executive Yuan recently approved amendments to the Noise Pollution Control Act. Revisions t
全文：
The ROC Executive Yuan recently approved amendments to the Noise Pollution Control Act. Revisions t
編號：
617
標題：
Administrator Lin Urges Local Governments to End Unreasonable Protests
摘要：
Public protests frequently scuttle plans to construct waste treatment facilities. This situation has
全文：
Public protests frequently scuttle plans to construct waste treatment facilities. This situation has
編號：
204
標題：
Amendment to Toxics Detection and Warning Guidelines Announced
摘要：
August 5 the EPA formally announced an amendment to Articles 4 and 5 of the Toxic Chemical Substance
全文：
August 5 the EPA formally announced an amendment to Articles 4 and 5 of the Toxic Chemical Substance
編號：
677
標題：
EPA Administrator Takes the Reins on Pollution in the Erhjen River
摘要：
The EPA is preparing heavy medicine to help fully implement cleanup of pollution on the Erhjen River
全文：
The EPA is preparing heavy medicine to help fully implement cleanup of pollution on the Erhjen River
編號：
267
標題：
Regulatory Guidelines Proposed for Sand and Gravel Extraction on Agricultural Land
摘要：
To assist the liberalization of gravel extraction policies the EPA has compiled current related regu
全文：
To assist the liberalization of gravel extraction policies the EPA has compiled current related regu
行政院環境保護署 的其他資料集
新化學物質簡易登錄表單
不定期更新更新,41蔡先生 | 02-23257399#55723 | 2023-08-09 01:04:23
行政院環境保護署營運中公有掩埋場掩埋場容量統計表
不定期更新更新,120彭先生 | 04-22521718#53510 | 2023-08-07 01:02:35
行政院環境保護署農業事業廢棄物再利用機構資料
每1年更新,139李小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2626 | 2023-07-27 00:59:35
行政院環境保護署公民營製造業、用水、電力及燃氣供應業污染防治支出
每1年更新,52顏先生 | 02-23117722#2109 | 2023-07-30 01:00:38
行政院環境保護署公文線上簽核比率表
不定期更新更新,46黃先生 | 02-2311-7722#2346 | 2022-01-14 01:20:47
行政院環境保護署
空氣污染防制區劃分結果
2年更新,154柏小姐 | 02-23712121#6106 | 2022-01-14 01:05:04
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_新北市_板橋站
每1時更新,125陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:58:18
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_苗栗縣_頭份站
每1時更新,215陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:58:03
行政院環境保護署環境教育活動數
每季更新更新,59李小姐 | 02-23117722#2724 | 2022-01-15 01:10:44
行政院環境保護署桃園市重要環保統計資料
每1月更新,99顏先生 | 02-23117722#2109 | 2023-08-07 01:00:19
行政院環境保護署
公害陳情案件分佈位置圖
不定期更新更新,42許小姐 | 04-22521718#58709 | 2022-01-15 01:16:11
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_苗栗縣_三義站
每小時更新更新,185謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:03:59
行政院環境保護署環境教育終身學習有效護照人數
每季更新更新,52李小姐 | 02-23117722#2724 | 2022-01-15 01:10:48
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_新北市_萬里站
每1時更新,131陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:58:21
行政院環境保護署溫室氣體年排放量
每1年更新,158甘先生 | (02)2311-7722#2771 | 2023-08-02 01:02:55
行政院環境保護署
環保專案摘要資料_資源循環
不定期更新更新,59陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-07-30 01:01:42
行政院環境保護署公告事業廢棄物清運機具資料
每月更新更新,234陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2682 | 2022-01-14 01:24:05
行政院環境保護署環保專案摘要資料_水質保護
不定期更新更新,153郭先生 | 02-2311-7722 EXT.2399 | 2022-01-15 01:13:33
行政院環境保護署EPQSummary_Other
不定期更新更新,75郭先生 | 02-2311-7722 EXT.2399 | 2022-01-15 01:14:18
行政院環境保護署再生粒料毒性特性溶出試驗結果
不定期更新更新,53許先生 | 02-2311-7722#2641 | 2022-01-14 01:18:39
行政院環境保護署
環保署官等年資統計資料
不定期更新更新,44黃小姐 | 02-23117722分機2132 | 2022-01-15 01:13:00
行政院環境保護署事業廢棄物共同清除、處理機構許可資料
不定期更新更新,162何先生 | 02-2311-7722#2653 | 2022-01-14 01:26:04
行政院環境保護署環保專案摘要資料
每月更新,109郭先生 | 02-2311-7722#2399 | 2022-01-15 01:13:31
行政院環境保護署環保署補、捐(獎)助團體及個人情形表
每3月更新,130蘇小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2155 | 2023-07-27 01:04:57
行政院環境保護署EPQSummary_WaterQualityProtection
不定期更新更新,151郭先生 | 02-2311-7722 EXT.2399 | 2022-01-15 01:13:47
行政院環境保護署
空氣品質小時值_新北市_三重站
每小時更新更新,240謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:04:40
行政院環境保護署機關綠色採購績效評核作業要點
不定期更新更新,46王先生 | 02-23117722#2921 | 2022-01-14 01:18:00
行政院環境保護署核能四廠環評監督委員會會議紀錄
不定期更新更新,42陳先生 | 04-2252-1718#51207 | 2023-08-09 01:04:33
行政院環境保護署紫外線即時監測資料
每1時更新,263陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:57:05
行政院環境保護署全國場址新增列管及解列統計表
不定期更新更新,128賴小姐 | 02-2383-2389#8102 | 2022-01-15 01:12:12
行政院環境保護署