Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant
「Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant」於資料集「Environmental Policy Monthly」由單位「行政院環境保護署」的楊先生所提供，聯繫電話是(02)23117722#2217,(02)23117722#2216，最近更新時間為：2022-01-15 01:13:03。 欄位編號的內容是570 ， 欄位標題的內容是Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant ， 欄位摘要的內容是In a recent explanation of his stance on construction of Taiwan's fourth nuclear power plant EPA Administrator Edgar Lin stated that previous policy decisions surrounding the plant were not made in an open manner, and that he therefore opposes the construction of the facility. Administrator Lin stated that he would respect the results of a current reevaluation of the facility no matter the outcome. The Administrator further emphasized that because the previous environmental impact assessment was biased, and due to the unresolved problem of radioactive waste treatment, the EPA is currently considering whether to require the planned facility to undergo another EIA.
Due to recent political disputes over the fate of Taiwan’s planned fourth nuclear power plant (hereafter referred to as “Plant 4”), the Legislative Yuan has been actively questioning administration officials on the topic. On May 25, EPA Administrator Edgar Lin visited the Legislative Yuan’s Health, Environment and Public Welfare Committee to report on the future direction of the EPA. During his report, Lin explained that his longstanding opposition to Plant 4 grew out of his opposition to what he perceived as a “dictatorship.” Due to the recent victory of opposition candidate Chen Shui-Bian as president, however, Lin argued that the dictatorship no longer exists, and that he thus no longer steadfastly opposes Plant 4.
Questions over the meaning of Lin’s statement prompted him to offer clarification the following day. He stated that by “dictatorship” he meant the decision-making processes regarding Plant 4. He pointed out that he opposed Plant 4 because the processes were neither open, fair, nor democratic, not because of an administrative dictatorship. If in the future, decisions regarding Plant 4 are made in an open and transparent manner, Lin will accept the results, whatever they may be. He remains very concerned, however, over the enormous decommissioning costs the plant will entail at the end of its life.
Lin also stated his opinion that Plant 4 should undergo another environmental impact assessment (EIA). He supported this suggestion with several claims. First, Lin considers the findings of the previous EIA to be biased. The job of an EIA review committee, he argued, is to review an environmental impact report, not issue an opinion. Second, waste from Taiwan’s other nuclear plants have still not been subject to final treatment and disposal. Plant 1 is currently storing more than 29,000 barrels of waste, while Plant 2 is temporarily storing on site over 32,000 barrels. The US and Europe no longer have the capacity to treat nuclear waste. In Taiwan, the problem of treatment is magnified by the island’s high population density and shortage of land. Moreover, economically advanced countries such as the UK and the US no longer build nuclear power plants due to factors such as waste treatment costs and safety concerns. Lin asked, in light of these trends, if it was not strange that Taiwan should be pursuing a fourth plant.
Lin also refuted the argument that Taiwan needs nuclear power to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. He pointed out that Taiwan's development policies still permit development of large industrial facilities, such as the Bing-Nan Industrial Complex and the Eighth Naptha Cracker, which if completed would be very large sources of CO2 emissions. Taiwan's industrial structure must be readjusted to resolve this contradiction.
Lin emphasized that Taiwan’s energy policy should follow a “small is beautiful” path that utilizes energy from multiple renewable sources. Constructing a fourth nuclear power plant would be a step back from the goal of energy source diversification and could have a serious impact on the island’s environment. Plant 4 would derail alternative energy projects, and built rashly without could entail even greater future costs. For these two reasons, Administrator Lin hopes to begin a new EIA for the facility. He repeatedly emphasized that any future EIA process must be open and transparent. ， 欄位全文的內容是In a recent explanation of his stance on construction of Taiwan's fourth nuclear power plant EPA Administrator Edgar Lin stated that previous policy decisions surrounding the plant were not made in an open manner, and that he therefore opposes the construction of the facility. Administrator Lin stated that he would respect the results of a current reevaluation of the facility no matter the outcome. The Administrator further emphasized that because the previous environmental impact assessment was biased, and due to the unresolved problem of radioactive waste treatment, the EPA is currently considering whether to require the planned facility to undergo another EIA.
Due to recent political disputes over the fate of Taiwan’s planned fourth nuclear power plant (hereafter referred to as “Plant 4”), the Legislative Yuan has been actively questioning administration officials on the topic. On May 25, EPA Administrator Edgar Lin visited the Legislative Yuan’s Health, Environment and Public Welfare Committee to report on the future direction of the EPA. During his report, Lin explained that his longstanding opposition to Plant 4 grew out of his opposition to what he perceived as a “dictatorship.” Due to the recent victory of opposition candidate Chen Shui-Bian as president, however, Lin argued that the dictatorship no longer exists, and that he thus no longer steadfastly opposes Plant 4.
Questions over the meaning of Lin’s statement prompted him to offer clarification the following day. He stated that by “dictatorship” he meant the decision-making processes regarding Plant 4. He pointed out that he opposed Plant 4 because the processes were neither open, fair, nor democratic, not because of an administrative dictatorship. If in the future, decisions regarding Plant 4 are made in an open and transparent manner, Lin will accept the results, whatever they may be. He remains very concerned, however, over the enormous decommissioning costs the plant will entail at the end of its life.
Lin also stated his opinion that Plant 4 should undergo another environmental impact assessment (EIA). He supported this suggestion with several claims. First, Lin considers the findings of the previous EIA to be biased. The job of an EIA review committee, he argued, is to review an environmental impact report, not issue an opinion. Second, waste from Taiwan’s other nuclear plants have still not been subject to final treatment and disposal. Plant 1 is currently storing more than 29,000 barrels of waste, while Plant 2 is temporarily storing on site over 32,000 barrels. The US and Europe no longer have the capacity to treat nuclear waste. In Taiwan, the problem of treatment is magnified by the island’s high population density and shortage of land. Moreover, economically advanced countries such as the UK and the US no longer build nuclear power plants due to factors such as waste treatment costs and safety concerns. Lin asked, in light of these trends, if it was not strange that Taiwan should be pursuing a fourth plant.
Lin also refuted the argument that Taiwan needs nuclear power to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. He pointed out that Taiwan's development policies still permit development of large industrial facilities, such as the Bing-Nan Industrial Complex and the Eighth Naptha Cracker, which if completed would be very large sources of CO2 emissions. Taiwan's industrial structure must be readjusted to resolve this contradiction.
Lin emphasized that Taiwan’s energy policy should follow a “small is beautiful” path that utilizes energy from multiple renewable sources. Constructing a fourth nuclear power plant would be a step back from the goal of energy source diversification and could have a serious impact on the island’s environment. Plant 4 would derail alternative energy projects, and built rashly without could entail even greater future costs. For these two reasons, Administrator Lin hopes to begin a new EIA for the facility. He repeatedly emphasized that any future EIA process must be open and transparent. ， 欄位年度的內容是2000 ， 欄位月份的內容是3 ， 欄位卷的內容是3 ， 欄位期的內容是13 ， 欄位順序的內容是1 ， 欄位倒序的內容是2 ， 欄位分類的內容是Climate Change ， 欄位標題2的內容是Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan s Fourth Nuclear Plant ， 欄位檔案位置的內容是print/V1/V3-13 。
編號
570
標題
Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant
摘要
In a recent explanation of his stance on construction of Taiwan's fourth nuclear power plant EPA Administrator Edgar Lin stated that previous policy decisions surrounding the plant were not made in an open manner, and that he therefore opposes the construction of the facility. Administrator Lin stated that he would respect the results of a current reevaluation of the facility no matter the outcome. The Administrator further emphasized that because the previous environmental impact assessment was biased, and due to the unresolved problem of radioactive waste treatment, the EPA is currently considering whether to require the planned facility to undergo another EIA. Due to recent political disputes over the fate of Taiwan’s planned fourth nuclear power plant (hereafter referred to as “Plant 4”), the Legislative Yuan has been actively questioning administration officials on the topic. On May 25, EPA Administrator Edgar Lin visited the Legislative Yuan’s Health, Environment and Public Welfare Committee to report on the future direction of the EPA. During his report, Lin explained that his longstanding opposition to Plant 4 grew out of his opposition to what he perceived as a “dictatorship.” Due to the recent victory of opposition candidate Chen Shui-Bian as president, however, Lin argued that the dictatorship no longer exists, and that he thus no longer steadfastly opposes Plant 4. Questions over the meaning of Lin’s statement prompted him to offer clarification the following day. He stated that by “dictatorship” he meant the decision-making processes regarding Plant 4. He pointed out that he opposed Plant 4 because the processes were neither open, fair, nor democratic, not because of an administrative dictatorship. If in the future, decisions regarding Plant 4 are made in an open and transparent manner, Lin will accept the results, whatever they may be. He remains very concerned, however, over the enormous decommissioning costs the plant will entail at the end of its life. Lin also stated his opinion that Plant 4 should undergo another environmental impact assessment (EIA). He supported this suggestion with several claims. First, Lin considers the findings of the previous EIA to be biased. The job of an EIA review committee, he argued, is to review an environmental impact report, not issue an opinion. Second, waste from Taiwan’s other nuclear plants have still not been subject to final treatment and disposal. Plant 1 is currently storing more than 29,000 barrels of waste, while Plant 2 is temporarily storing on site over 32,000 barrels. The US and Europe no longer have the capacity to treat nuclear waste. In Taiwan, the problem of treatment is magnified by the island’s high population density and shortage of land. Moreover, economically advanced countries such as the UK and the US no longer build nuclear power plants due to factors such as waste treatment costs and safety concerns. Lin asked, in light of these trends, if it was not strange that Taiwan should be pursuing a fourth plant. Lin also refuted the argument that Taiwan needs nuclear power to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. He pointed out that Taiwan's development policies still permit development of large industrial facilities, such as the Bing-Nan Industrial Complex and the Eighth Naptha Cracker, which if completed would be very large sources of CO2 emissions. Taiwan's industrial structure must be readjusted to resolve this contradiction. Lin emphasized that Taiwan’s energy policy should follow a “small is beautiful” path that utilizes energy from multiple renewable sources. Constructing a fourth nuclear power plant would be a step back from the goal of energy source diversification and could have a serious impact on the island’s environment. Plant 4 would derail alternative energy projects, and built rashly without could entail even greater future costs. For these two reasons, Administrator Lin hopes to begin a new EIA for the facility. He repeatedly emphasized that any future EIA process must be open and transparent.
全文
In a recent explanation of his stance on construction of Taiwan's fourth nuclear power plant EPA Administrator Edgar Lin stated that previous policy decisions surrounding the plant were not made in an open manner, and that he therefore opposes the construction of the facility. Administrator Lin stated that he would respect the results of a current reevaluation of the facility no matter the outcome. The Administrator further emphasized that because the previous environmental impact assessment was biased, and due to the unresolved problem of radioactive waste treatment, the EPA is currently considering whether to require the planned facility to undergo another EIA. Due to recent political disputes over the fate of Taiwan’s planned fourth nuclear power plant (hereafter referred to as “Plant 4”), the Legislative Yuan has been actively questioning administration officials on the topic. On May 25, EPA Administrator Edgar Lin visited the Legislative Yuan’s Health, Environment and Public Welfare Committee to report on the future direction of the EPA. During his report, Lin explained that his longstanding opposition to Plant 4 grew out of his opposition to what he perceived as a “dictatorship.” Due to the recent victory of opposition candidate Chen Shui-Bian as president, however, Lin argued that the dictatorship no longer exists, and that he thus no longer steadfastly opposes Plant 4. Questions over the meaning of Lin’s statement prompted him to offer clarification the following day. He stated that by “dictatorship” he meant the decision-making processes regarding Plant 4. He pointed out that he opposed Plant 4 because the processes were neither open, fair, nor democratic, not because of an administrative dictatorship. If in the future, decisions regarding Plant 4 are made in an open and transparent manner, Lin will accept the results, whatever they may be. He remains very concerned, however, over the enormous decommissioning costs the plant will entail at the end of its life. Lin also stated his opinion that Plant 4 should undergo another environmental impact assessment (EIA). He supported this suggestion with several claims. First, Lin considers the findings of the previous EIA to be biased. The job of an EIA review committee, he argued, is to review an environmental impact report, not issue an opinion. Second, waste from Taiwan’s other nuclear plants have still not been subject to final treatment and disposal. Plant 1 is currently storing more than 29,000 barrels of waste, while Plant 2 is temporarily storing on site over 32,000 barrels. The US and Europe no longer have the capacity to treat nuclear waste. In Taiwan, the problem of treatment is magnified by the island’s high population density and shortage of land. Moreover, economically advanced countries such as the UK and the US no longer build nuclear power plants due to factors such as waste treatment costs and safety concerns. Lin asked, in light of these trends, if it was not strange that Taiwan should be pursuing a fourth plant. Lin also refuted the argument that Taiwan needs nuclear power to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. He pointed out that Taiwan's development policies still permit development of large industrial facilities, such as the Bing-Nan Industrial Complex and the Eighth Naptha Cracker, which if completed would be very large sources of CO2 emissions. Taiwan's industrial structure must be readjusted to resolve this contradiction. Lin emphasized that Taiwan’s energy policy should follow a “small is beautiful” path that utilizes energy from multiple renewable sources. Constructing a fourth nuclear power plant would be a step back from the goal of energy source diversification and could have a serious impact on the island’s environment. Plant 4 would derail alternative energy projects, and built rashly without could entail even greater future costs. For these two reasons, Administrator Lin hopes to begin a new EIA for the facility. He repeatedly emphasized that any future EIA process must be open and transparent.
年度
2000
月份
3
卷
3
期
13
順序
1
倒序
2
分類
Climate Change
標題2
Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan s Fourth Nuclear Plant
檔案位置
print/V1/V3-13
「Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant」所屬的資料集：「Environmental Policy Monthly」的其他資料
編號：
247
標題：
Feature Article Nationwide Coastal Cleanup Plan Successfully Kicked-off
摘要：
With the implementation of a two-day weekend every other week it is now more important than ever tha
全文：
With the implementation of a two-day weekend every other week it is now more important than ever tha
編號：
357
標題：
EPA Issues Contingency Measures in Response to the Jih-You Medical Waste Case
摘要：
To punish Taiwan’s largest medical waste treatment organization Jih-You, the EPA considered pulling
全文：
To punish Taiwan’s largest medical waste treatment organization Jih-You, the EPA considered pulling
編號：
98
標題：
Enforcement Rules for Environmental Agents Control Act Submitted to Executive Yuan
摘要：
Toxic Substancet On January 9 1998, a draft version of the Environmental Agents Control Act Enforce
全文：
Toxic Substance Management On January 9 1998, a draft version of the Environmental Agents Control A
編號：
968
標題：
EPA and DOH Hold Inter-ministerial Coordination Meeting
摘要：
The EPA and Department of Health (DOH) held an inter-ministerial coordination meeting on June 7. Thi
全文：
The EPA and Department of Health (DOH) held an inter-ministerial coordination meeting on June 7. Thi
編號：
737
標題：
Recycling of Fluorescent Light Tubes to Begin in 2002
摘要：
For the last several years large volumes of waste fluorescent light tubes have been disposed of in l
全文：
For the last several years large volumes of waste fluorescent light tubes have been disposed of in l
編號：
64
標題：
Vinyl Chloride and Four Other Chemicals Listed as Toxic Substances
摘要：
Toxic Substance Five more chemicals have been added to Taiwan's list of toxic substances. On October
全文：
Toxic Substance Management Five more chemicals have been added to Taiwan's list of toxic substances
編號：
58
標題：
New List of Industries Required to Obtain Air Pollution Control Permits Announced
摘要：
Air Quality The EPA has announced the 7th round of industries with stationary pollution sources whi
全文：
Air Quality The EPA has announced the 7th round of industries with stationary pollution sources whi
編號：
491
標題：
EPA Studies Control Policies for Environmental Hormones
摘要：
Due to outside concerns over the danger of environmental hormones the EPA has announced that of 70 s
全文：
Due to outside concerns over the danger of environmental hormones the EPA has announced that of 70 s
編號：
253
標題：
Roadway Greening Plan Underway
摘要：
On October 9 the EPA’s Environmental Roadway Greening Plan was approved by the Executive Yuan. Over
全文：
On October 9 the EPA’s Environmental Roadway Greening Plan was approved by the Executive Yuan. Over
編號：
360
標題：
Establishment of Greenhouse Gas Control Act to be Studied
摘要：
The EPA contracted research on laws to control green house gas emissions. Research results argue tha
全文：
The EPA contracted research on laws to control green house gas emissions. Research results argue tha
編號：
585
標題：
Consensus Reached on Adjustment to Computer Recycling Fee Rates
摘要：
The current recycling rate for computers is below that originally anticipated when the computer recy
全文：
The current recycling rate for computers is below that originally anticipated when the computer recy
編號：
961
標題：
Revised Air Pollution Control Act Simplifies Permit Procedures
摘要：
The revised Air Pollution Control Act passed by the Legislative Yuan on May 21, authorizes the EPA t
全文：
The revised Air Pollution Control Act passed by the Legislative Yuan on May 21, authorizes the EPA t
編號：
492
標題：
Executive Yuan Approves Draft Amendments to Noise Act
摘要：
The ROC Executive Yuan recently approved amendments to the Noise Pollution Control Act. Revisions t
全文：
The ROC Executive Yuan recently approved amendments to the Noise Pollution Control Act. Revisions t
編號：
603
標題：
Environmental Protection Plans to Reflect Local Character
摘要：
The National Environmental Protection Plan (NEPP) calls for formulation of local environmental prote
全文：
The National Environmental Protection Plan (NEPP) calls for formulation of local environmental prote
編號：
352
標題：
Broader Fly Ash Disposal Regulations to Encourage Resource Recovery
摘要：
The EPA has agreed to extend the grace period permitted local authorities to improve disposal provis
全文：
The EPA has agreed to extend the grace period permitted local authorities to improve disposal provis
編號：
79
標題：
Amendment to Air Pollution Control Act Includes Addition of Civil Suit Clause
摘要：
Air Pollution Committee of the Legislative Yuan. Passage of the clause into law
全文：
Air Pollution On December 17 a draft amendment to the Air Pollution Control Act that includes the a
編號：
390
標題：
Air Pollution Fees to be Used for Street Cleaning
摘要：
Dust particles raised from city streets known as fugitive dust, is a serious problem. To improve cit
全文：
Dust particles raised from city streets known as fugitive dust, is a serious problem. To improve cit
編號：
662
標題：
Repeat Violators of Park Wastewater Regulations Face Shut Down
摘要：
To punish companies that violate wastewater statutes industry park management will often cut off the
全文：
To punish companies that violate wastewater statutes industry park management will often cut off the
編號：
810
標題：
Dyeing Industry Effluent Standards Put in Line with EDAC Resolutions
摘要：
The EPA together with the dyeing industry and the MOEA has signed a memorandum adjusting dyeing indu
全文：
The EPA together with the dyeing industry and the MOEA has signed a memorandum adjusting dyeing indu
編號：
726
標題：
Dioxin Standard for Steel Smelting Furnaces to be Announced in July
摘要：
To ensure public health the EPA has carried out continuing studies of the dioxin emissions from diff
全文：
To ensure public health the EPA has carried out continuing studies of the dioxin emissions from diff
編號：
977
標題：
Poll Shows Air Pollution is Public’s Greatest Environmental Concern
摘要：
A recent EPA poll shows that the public considers air pollution Taiwan’s most severe environmental p
全文：
A recent EPA poll shows that the public considers air pollution Taiwan’s most severe environmental p
編號：
834
標題：
Three-stage Phase-out of Plastic Bags to Kick off in May 2002
摘要：
Taiwanese consumers use over 10 billion plastic bags every year. These bags being non-biodegradable,
全文：
Taiwanese consumers use over 10 billion plastic bags every year. These bags being non-biodegradable,
編號：
313
標題：
CD-ROM of Environmental GIS Data Published
摘要：
The EPA issued the first in the set of "Public Databases on Environment Geographic Information Syste
全文：
The EPA issued the first in the set of "Public Databases on Environment Geographic Information Syste
編號：
474
標題：
EPA Urges Local Govts to Get Electric Bikes on the Road
摘要：
In the last few years the EPA has decided to promote electric motorbikes (e-bikes) as an important w
全文：
In the last few years the EPA has decided to promote electric motorbikes (e-bikes) as an important w
編號：
19
標題：
New Recycling System Nears Completion
摘要：
Recycling The EPA in accordance with recent amendments to the Waste Disposal Act, has been actively
全文：
Recycling The EPA in accordance with recent amendments to the Waste Disposal Act, has been actively
編號：
36
標題：
Taiwan Responds to Climate Change Convention
摘要：
Climate Change To address the problem of global warming in 1992 world leaders signed the UN Framewo
全文：
Climate Change To address the problem of global warming in 1992 world leaders signed the UN Framewo
編號：
299
標題：
A look inside the EPA: The National Institute of Environmental Training
摘要：
According to the Environmental Protection Administration Organization Statutes the responsibilities
全文：
According to the Environmental Protection Administration Organization Statutes the responsibilities
編號：
992
標題：
Panamanian Oil Tanker Adrift in the Seas off Taitung
摘要：
The Panamanian-registered oil tanker Orpheus Asia carrying a full load of 250,000 tons of crude oil,
全文：
The Panamanian-registered oil tanker Orpheus Asia carrying a full load of 250,000 tons of crude oil,
編號：
742
標題：
Cleanup of MV Amorgos Oil Spill Accelerated
摘要：
Handling of the oil spill created by a Greek tanker the MV Amorgos, has captured the attention of Ta
全文：
Handling of the oil spill created by a Greek tanker the MV Amorgos, has captured the attention of Ta
編號：
881
標題：
Administrator: We will Never Allow a Repeat of Amorgos Incident
摘要：
Underscoring his resolve that no oil spill similar to last year’s Amorgos incident shall happen agai
全文：
Underscoring his resolve that no oil spill similar to last year’s Amorgos incident shall happen agai
行政院環境保護署 的其他資料集
歷年土壤調查_環保署土壤重金屬含量調查(1公頃)
不定期更新更新,139謝小姐 | (02)23832389*8302 | 2022-01-14 01:20:18
行政院環境保護署核能一廠、二廠相關計畫環評監督委員會會議紀錄
不定期更新更新,34陳先生 | 04-22521718#51207 | 2023-08-09 01:05:12
行政院環境保護署各公告類別事業廢棄物自行處理申報量統計
每月更新更新,154陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2682 | 2022-01-14 01:25:33
行政院環境保護署行政院環境保護署政府資料開放行動計畫
不定期更新更新,58魏小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2311 | 2023-07-27 01:02:30
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_臺北市_松山站
每1時更新,136陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:58:11
行政院環境保護署
空氣品質小時值_苗栗縣_三義站
每小時更新更新,211謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:03:59
行政院環境保護署臺中雲林農地作物含重金屬鎘污染成因調查及查證計畫
不更新更新,50吳小姐 | 02-2383-2389#8303 | 2022-01-15 01:12:21
行政院環境保護署臺南市重要環保統計資料
每月更新更新,155謝小姐 | 02-23117722#2103 | 2022-01-14 01:20:38
行政院環境保護署應回收廢棄物處理業者(廢機動車輛類)最大處理量資料
每1年更新,64廖小姐 | 02-2370-5888#3103 | 2023-08-03 00:59:54
行政院環境保護署中油三輕環境監測資料
每季更新更新,61陳先生 | 04-22521718#51207 | 2022-01-15 01:14:21
行政院環境保護署
歷年土壤調查_環保署土壤重金屬含量調查(25公頃)
不定期更新更新,119謝小姐 | (02)23832389*8302 | 2022-01-14 01:20:17
行政院環境保護署區域性地下水水質監測資料
每3月更新,151郭先生 | 2311-7722#2399 | 2023-08-07 01:02:05
行政院環境保護署EPQSummary_InternationalIssues
不定期更新更新,124郭先生 | 02-2311-7722 EXT.2399 | 2022-01-15 01:14:16
行政院環境保護署審核事業或污水下水道系統放流水水質濃度限值處理原則
不定期更新,47簡小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2818 | 2022-01-15 01:13:05
行政院環境保護署連江縣水量水質自動監測連線傳輸監測紀錄值即時資料集
不定期更新更新,63程先生 | 02-2311-7722#2833 | 2023-08-09 01:04:05
行政院環境保護署
縣市(屏東縣)小時值-每小時
每1時更新,106陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:58:39
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_新北市_新莊站
每小時更新更新,127謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:03:24
行政院環境保護署空氣品質監測月值
每1月更新,114陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-07 01:03:42
行政院環境保護署重點事業廢棄物-一般污泥之產出及清理流向
每月更新更新,161陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2682 | 2022-01-14 01:24:16
行政院環境保護署應回收廢棄物受補貼機構（回收業）
每年更新更新,146廖小姐 | 02-2370-5888#3103 | 2022-01-14 01:23:57
行政院環境保護署
應回收廢棄物受補貼機構（處理業）
每1年更新,161廖小姐 | 02-2370-5888#3103 | 2023-07-27 01:00:04
行政院環境保護署交通空氣品質監測站基本資料
不定期更新更新,60謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:05:52
行政院環境保護署EPQSummary_EnvironmentalImpactAssessment
不定期更新更新,140陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-07-30 01:01:43
行政院環境保護署特殊性工業區品保品管後監測值資料檔(一般空氣污染物)
每年更新更新,150丁小姐 | 02-2371-2121#6101 | 2022-01-15 01:06:51
行政院環境保護署我國重要環保統計資料
每月更新更新,171謝小姐 | 02-23117722#2103 | 2022-01-14 01:20:33
行政院環境保護署
管制事業、下水道系統下水道查核、處分資料資訊平台
不定期更新更新,42陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2827 | 2023-08-09 01:04:16
行政院環境保護署噪音罰鍰次數
每年更新更新,66謝小姐 | 02-23117722#2103 | 2022-01-14 01:22:42
行政院環境保護署符合噪音管制標準車輛-進口柴油引擎車
不定期更新更新,171林先生 | 02-23712121-6403 | 2022-01-14 01:18:58
行政院環境保護署低關注聚合物事前審定表單
不定期更新更新,53蔡小姐 | 23257399#55723 | 2022-01-14 01:23:01
行政院環境保護署環境影響說明書審查結論
每2月更新,67黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-05 00:59:41
行政院環境保護署