Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant
「Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant」於資料集「Environmental Policy Monthly」由單位「行政院環境保護署」的楊先生所提供，聯繫電話是(02)23117722#2217,(02)23117722#2216，最近更新時間為：2022-01-15 01:13:03。 欄位編號的內容是570 ， 欄位標題的內容是Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant ， 欄位摘要的內容是In a recent explanation of his stance on construction of Taiwan's fourth nuclear power plant EPA Administrator Edgar Lin stated that previous policy decisions surrounding the plant were not made in an open manner, and that he therefore opposes the construction of the facility. Administrator Lin stated that he would respect the results of a current reevaluation of the facility no matter the outcome. The Administrator further emphasized that because the previous environmental impact assessment was biased, and due to the unresolved problem of radioactive waste treatment, the EPA is currently considering whether to require the planned facility to undergo another EIA.
Due to recent political disputes over the fate of Taiwan’s planned fourth nuclear power plant (hereafter referred to as “Plant 4”), the Legislative Yuan has been actively questioning administration officials on the topic. On May 25, EPA Administrator Edgar Lin visited the Legislative Yuan’s Health, Environment and Public Welfare Committee to report on the future direction of the EPA. During his report, Lin explained that his longstanding opposition to Plant 4 grew out of his opposition to what he perceived as a “dictatorship.” Due to the recent victory of opposition candidate Chen Shui-Bian as president, however, Lin argued that the dictatorship no longer exists, and that he thus no longer steadfastly opposes Plant 4.
Questions over the meaning of Lin’s statement prompted him to offer clarification the following day. He stated that by “dictatorship” he meant the decision-making processes regarding Plant 4. He pointed out that he opposed Plant 4 because the processes were neither open, fair, nor democratic, not because of an administrative dictatorship. If in the future, decisions regarding Plant 4 are made in an open and transparent manner, Lin will accept the results, whatever they may be. He remains very concerned, however, over the enormous decommissioning costs the plant will entail at the end of its life.
Lin also stated his opinion that Plant 4 should undergo another environmental impact assessment (EIA). He supported this suggestion with several claims. First, Lin considers the findings of the previous EIA to be biased. The job of an EIA review committee, he argued, is to review an environmental impact report, not issue an opinion. Second, waste from Taiwan’s other nuclear plants have still not been subject to final treatment and disposal. Plant 1 is currently storing more than 29,000 barrels of waste, while Plant 2 is temporarily storing on site over 32,000 barrels. The US and Europe no longer have the capacity to treat nuclear waste. In Taiwan, the problem of treatment is magnified by the island’s high population density and shortage of land. Moreover, economically advanced countries such as the UK and the US no longer build nuclear power plants due to factors such as waste treatment costs and safety concerns. Lin asked, in light of these trends, if it was not strange that Taiwan should be pursuing a fourth plant.
Lin also refuted the argument that Taiwan needs nuclear power to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. He pointed out that Taiwan's development policies still permit development of large industrial facilities, such as the Bing-Nan Industrial Complex and the Eighth Naptha Cracker, which if completed would be very large sources of CO2 emissions. Taiwan's industrial structure must be readjusted to resolve this contradiction.
Lin emphasized that Taiwan’s energy policy should follow a “small is beautiful” path that utilizes energy from multiple renewable sources. Constructing a fourth nuclear power plant would be a step back from the goal of energy source diversification and could have a serious impact on the island’s environment. Plant 4 would derail alternative energy projects, and built rashly without could entail even greater future costs. For these two reasons, Administrator Lin hopes to begin a new EIA for the facility. He repeatedly emphasized that any future EIA process must be open and transparent. ， 欄位全文的內容是In a recent explanation of his stance on construction of Taiwan's fourth nuclear power plant EPA Administrator Edgar Lin stated that previous policy decisions surrounding the plant were not made in an open manner, and that he therefore opposes the construction of the facility. Administrator Lin stated that he would respect the results of a current reevaluation of the facility no matter the outcome. The Administrator further emphasized that because the previous environmental impact assessment was biased, and due to the unresolved problem of radioactive waste treatment, the EPA is currently considering whether to require the planned facility to undergo another EIA.
Due to recent political disputes over the fate of Taiwan’s planned fourth nuclear power plant (hereafter referred to as “Plant 4”), the Legislative Yuan has been actively questioning administration officials on the topic. On May 25, EPA Administrator Edgar Lin visited the Legislative Yuan’s Health, Environment and Public Welfare Committee to report on the future direction of the EPA. During his report, Lin explained that his longstanding opposition to Plant 4 grew out of his opposition to what he perceived as a “dictatorship.” Due to the recent victory of opposition candidate Chen Shui-Bian as president, however, Lin argued that the dictatorship no longer exists, and that he thus no longer steadfastly opposes Plant 4.
Questions over the meaning of Lin’s statement prompted him to offer clarification the following day. He stated that by “dictatorship” he meant the decision-making processes regarding Plant 4. He pointed out that he opposed Plant 4 because the processes were neither open, fair, nor democratic, not because of an administrative dictatorship. If in the future, decisions regarding Plant 4 are made in an open and transparent manner, Lin will accept the results, whatever they may be. He remains very concerned, however, over the enormous decommissioning costs the plant will entail at the end of its life.
Lin also stated his opinion that Plant 4 should undergo another environmental impact assessment (EIA). He supported this suggestion with several claims. First, Lin considers the findings of the previous EIA to be biased. The job of an EIA review committee, he argued, is to review an environmental impact report, not issue an opinion. Second, waste from Taiwan’s other nuclear plants have still not been subject to final treatment and disposal. Plant 1 is currently storing more than 29,000 barrels of waste, while Plant 2 is temporarily storing on site over 32,000 barrels. The US and Europe no longer have the capacity to treat nuclear waste. In Taiwan, the problem of treatment is magnified by the island’s high population density and shortage of land. Moreover, economically advanced countries such as the UK and the US no longer build nuclear power plants due to factors such as waste treatment costs and safety concerns. Lin asked, in light of these trends, if it was not strange that Taiwan should be pursuing a fourth plant.
Lin also refuted the argument that Taiwan needs nuclear power to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. He pointed out that Taiwan's development policies still permit development of large industrial facilities, such as the Bing-Nan Industrial Complex and the Eighth Naptha Cracker, which if completed would be very large sources of CO2 emissions. Taiwan's industrial structure must be readjusted to resolve this contradiction.
Lin emphasized that Taiwan’s energy policy should follow a “small is beautiful” path that utilizes energy from multiple renewable sources. Constructing a fourth nuclear power plant would be a step back from the goal of energy source diversification and could have a serious impact on the island’s environment. Plant 4 would derail alternative energy projects, and built rashly without could entail even greater future costs. For these two reasons, Administrator Lin hopes to begin a new EIA for the facility. He repeatedly emphasized that any future EIA process must be open and transparent. ， 欄位年度的內容是2000 ， 欄位月份的內容是3 ， 欄位卷的內容是3 ， 欄位期的內容是13 ， 欄位順序的內容是1 ， 欄位倒序的內容是2 ， 欄位分類的內容是Climate Change ， 欄位標題2的內容是Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan s Fourth Nuclear Plant ， 欄位檔案位置的內容是print/V1/V3-13 。
編號
570
標題
Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant
摘要
In a recent explanation of his stance on construction of Taiwan's fourth nuclear power plant EPA Administrator Edgar Lin stated that previous policy decisions surrounding the plant were not made in an open manner, and that he therefore opposes the construction of the facility. Administrator Lin stated that he would respect the results of a current reevaluation of the facility no matter the outcome. The Administrator further emphasized that because the previous environmental impact assessment was biased, and due to the unresolved problem of radioactive waste treatment, the EPA is currently considering whether to require the planned facility to undergo another EIA. Due to recent political disputes over the fate of Taiwan’s planned fourth nuclear power plant (hereafter referred to as “Plant 4”), the Legislative Yuan has been actively questioning administration officials on the topic. On May 25, EPA Administrator Edgar Lin visited the Legislative Yuan’s Health, Environment and Public Welfare Committee to report on the future direction of the EPA. During his report, Lin explained that his longstanding opposition to Plant 4 grew out of his opposition to what he perceived as a “dictatorship.” Due to the recent victory of opposition candidate Chen Shui-Bian as president, however, Lin argued that the dictatorship no longer exists, and that he thus no longer steadfastly opposes Plant 4. Questions over the meaning of Lin’s statement prompted him to offer clarification the following day. He stated that by “dictatorship” he meant the decision-making processes regarding Plant 4. He pointed out that he opposed Plant 4 because the processes were neither open, fair, nor democratic, not because of an administrative dictatorship. If in the future, decisions regarding Plant 4 are made in an open and transparent manner, Lin will accept the results, whatever they may be. He remains very concerned, however, over the enormous decommissioning costs the plant will entail at the end of its life. Lin also stated his opinion that Plant 4 should undergo another environmental impact assessment (EIA). He supported this suggestion with several claims. First, Lin considers the findings of the previous EIA to be biased. The job of an EIA review committee, he argued, is to review an environmental impact report, not issue an opinion. Second, waste from Taiwan’s other nuclear plants have still not been subject to final treatment and disposal. Plant 1 is currently storing more than 29,000 barrels of waste, while Plant 2 is temporarily storing on site over 32,000 barrels. The US and Europe no longer have the capacity to treat nuclear waste. In Taiwan, the problem of treatment is magnified by the island’s high population density and shortage of land. Moreover, economically advanced countries such as the UK and the US no longer build nuclear power plants due to factors such as waste treatment costs and safety concerns. Lin asked, in light of these trends, if it was not strange that Taiwan should be pursuing a fourth plant. Lin also refuted the argument that Taiwan needs nuclear power to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. He pointed out that Taiwan's development policies still permit development of large industrial facilities, such as the Bing-Nan Industrial Complex and the Eighth Naptha Cracker, which if completed would be very large sources of CO2 emissions. Taiwan's industrial structure must be readjusted to resolve this contradiction. Lin emphasized that Taiwan’s energy policy should follow a “small is beautiful” path that utilizes energy from multiple renewable sources. Constructing a fourth nuclear power plant would be a step back from the goal of energy source diversification and could have a serious impact on the island’s environment. Plant 4 would derail alternative energy projects, and built rashly without could entail even greater future costs. For these two reasons, Administrator Lin hopes to begin a new EIA for the facility. He repeatedly emphasized that any future EIA process must be open and transparent.
全文
In a recent explanation of his stance on construction of Taiwan's fourth nuclear power plant EPA Administrator Edgar Lin stated that previous policy decisions surrounding the plant were not made in an open manner, and that he therefore opposes the construction of the facility. Administrator Lin stated that he would respect the results of a current reevaluation of the facility no matter the outcome. The Administrator further emphasized that because the previous environmental impact assessment was biased, and due to the unresolved problem of radioactive waste treatment, the EPA is currently considering whether to require the planned facility to undergo another EIA. Due to recent political disputes over the fate of Taiwan’s planned fourth nuclear power plant (hereafter referred to as “Plant 4”), the Legislative Yuan has been actively questioning administration officials on the topic. On May 25, EPA Administrator Edgar Lin visited the Legislative Yuan’s Health, Environment and Public Welfare Committee to report on the future direction of the EPA. During his report, Lin explained that his longstanding opposition to Plant 4 grew out of his opposition to what he perceived as a “dictatorship.” Due to the recent victory of opposition candidate Chen Shui-Bian as president, however, Lin argued that the dictatorship no longer exists, and that he thus no longer steadfastly opposes Plant 4. Questions over the meaning of Lin’s statement prompted him to offer clarification the following day. He stated that by “dictatorship” he meant the decision-making processes regarding Plant 4. He pointed out that he opposed Plant 4 because the processes were neither open, fair, nor democratic, not because of an administrative dictatorship. If in the future, decisions regarding Plant 4 are made in an open and transparent manner, Lin will accept the results, whatever they may be. He remains very concerned, however, over the enormous decommissioning costs the plant will entail at the end of its life. Lin also stated his opinion that Plant 4 should undergo another environmental impact assessment (EIA). He supported this suggestion with several claims. First, Lin considers the findings of the previous EIA to be biased. The job of an EIA review committee, he argued, is to review an environmental impact report, not issue an opinion. Second, waste from Taiwan’s other nuclear plants have still not been subject to final treatment and disposal. Plant 1 is currently storing more than 29,000 barrels of waste, while Plant 2 is temporarily storing on site over 32,000 barrels. The US and Europe no longer have the capacity to treat nuclear waste. In Taiwan, the problem of treatment is magnified by the island’s high population density and shortage of land. Moreover, economically advanced countries such as the UK and the US no longer build nuclear power plants due to factors such as waste treatment costs and safety concerns. Lin asked, in light of these trends, if it was not strange that Taiwan should be pursuing a fourth plant. Lin also refuted the argument that Taiwan needs nuclear power to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. He pointed out that Taiwan's development policies still permit development of large industrial facilities, such as the Bing-Nan Industrial Complex and the Eighth Naptha Cracker, which if completed would be very large sources of CO2 emissions. Taiwan's industrial structure must be readjusted to resolve this contradiction. Lin emphasized that Taiwan’s energy policy should follow a “small is beautiful” path that utilizes energy from multiple renewable sources. Constructing a fourth nuclear power plant would be a step back from the goal of energy source diversification and could have a serious impact on the island’s environment. Plant 4 would derail alternative energy projects, and built rashly without could entail even greater future costs. For these two reasons, Administrator Lin hopes to begin a new EIA for the facility. He repeatedly emphasized that any future EIA process must be open and transparent.
年度
2000
月份
3
卷
3
期
13
順序
1
倒序
2
分類
Climate Change
標題2
Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan s Fourth Nuclear Plant
檔案位置
print/V1/V3-13
「Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant」所屬的資料集：「Environmental Policy Monthly」的其他資料
編號：
596
標題：
President Chen Emphasizes the Importance of Sustainable Development
摘要：
During a recent visit with foreign guests President Chen Shui-Bian emphasized the importance of sust
全文：
During a recent visit with foreign guests President Chen Shui-Bian emphasized the importance of sust
編號：
76
標題：
Toxic Chemicals Control Act Substantially Amended
摘要：
Toxic Substance On November 19 the Toxic Chemicals Control Act was amended and promulgated by presi
全文：
Toxic Substance Management On November 19 the Toxic Chemicals Control Act was amended and promulgat
編號：
288
標題：
EPA Considers Adopting Energy Star Plan in Taiwan
摘要：
With environmental technology cooperation and interchange between Taiwan and the U.S. regarding the
全文：
With environmental technology cooperation and interchange between Taiwan and the U.S. regarding the
編號：
3268
標題：
EPA Marks Five Years of Promoting Energy Saving and Carbon Reduction Label
摘要：
climate change EPA Marks Five Years of Promoting Energy Saving and Carbon Reduction Label
全文：
EPA Marks Five Years of Promoting Energy Saving and Carbon Reduction Label
To recognize local govern
編號：
855
標題：
Awards for Public Participation in Environmental Protection
摘要：
The EPA held the awards ceremony for the Tenth National Model Environmental Communities and the 2001
全文：
The EPA held the awards ceremony for the Tenth National Model Environmental Communities and the 2001
編號：
400
標題：
Administrator Tsai Instructs the Central Taiwan Division of the EPA to Plan for Regional Environment
摘要：
When the Taiwan Provincial Government was downsized in July the EPA originally planned to establish
全文：
When the Taiwan Provincial Government was downsized in July the EPA originally planned to establish
編號：
327
標題：
Semiconductor Industry Expenditures on Air Pollution Control Expected to Hit NT$1.2 Billion
摘要：
By July 2000 all current semiconductor production operations must meet emission standards as stipula
全文：
By July 2000 all current semiconductor production operations must meet emission standards as stipula
編號：
912
標題：
Formosa Plastics Completes Treatment of Mercury Sludge
摘要：
Formosa Plastics Corp. has finally completed the treatment of this waste which has drawn so much int
全文：
Formosa Plastics Corp. has finally completed the treatment of this waste which has drawn so much int
編號：
296
標題：
Semiconductor Industry Air Emissions Standards Announced
摘要：
On January 6 1999, air pollution emission standards for the semiconductor industry were announced by
全文：
On January 6 1999, air pollution emission standards for the semiconductor industry were announced by
編號：
452
標題：
Administrator Tsai Reports to LY on EPA Achievements and Future Efforts
摘要：
EPA Administrator Tsai Hsung-hsiung, recently presented a report to the Legislative Yuan explaining
全文：
EPA Administrator Tsai Hsung-hsiung, recently presented a report to the Legislative Yuan explaining
編號：
508
標題：
International Experts Discuss CDM in Taiwan
摘要：
The EPA held an international conference to explore policies to help Taiwan in greenhouse gas reduct
全文：
The EPA held an international conference to explore policies to help Taiwan in greenhouse gas reduct
編號：
857
標題：
Dioxin Control Standards for Electric Arc Furnaces Announced
摘要：
To step up control of dioxin pollution (see EPM Vol. IV Issue 5), the EPA formally announced the Ste
全文：
To step up control of dioxin pollution (see EPM Vol. IV Issue 5), the EPA formally announced the Ste
編號：
244
標題：
EPA Modifies Approach to Water Pollution Assistance Plan
摘要：
The Industrial Water Pollution Diagnosis and Assistance Plan continues to move forward with plans fo
全文：
The Industrial Water Pollution Diagnosis and Assistance Plan continues to move forward with plans fo
編號：
853
標題：
Water Quality Management and Soil and Groundwater Remediation Framework
摘要：
To improve the environmental quality of rivers and waterways the ocean, lakes, reservoirs, soil and
全文：
To improve the environmental quality of rivers and waterways the ocean, lakes, reservoirs, soil and
編號：
869
標題：
Old Motorbike Replacement Subsidies Aim to Reduce Air Pollution
摘要：
The EPA as part of its efforts to reduce air pollution, announced the most up-to-date Old Motorbike
全文：
The EPA as part of its efforts to reduce air pollution, announced the most up-to-date Old Motorbike
編號：
255
標題：
A look inside the EPA: The Bureau of Performance Evaluation and Dispute Settlement
摘要：
According to the Environmental Protection Administration Organization Statutes the EPA’s Bureau of P
全文：
According to the Environmental Protection Administration Organization Statutes the EPA’s Bureau of P
編號：
898
標題：
Green Mark – The New Trend in Green Consumerism
摘要：
This is the most pivotal year for green consumerism since the government began promoting the concept
全文：
This is the most pivotal year for green consumerism since the government began promoting the concept
編號：
647
標題：
Preparation for Collection of Water Pollution Fee Begins
摘要：
In 2002 the EPA will begin collecting water pollution fees from industrial generators. The EPA has b
全文：
In 2002 the EPA will begin collecting water pollution fees from industrial generators. The EPA has b
編號：
990
標題：
New Vehicle Noise Inspections to Accept EU Certification
摘要：
The EPA announced on July 1 that when vehicles made in the EU apply for noise inspection certificati
全文：
The EPA announced on July 1 that when vehicles made in the EU apply for noise inspection certificati
編號：
928
標題：
Environmental Education Volunteer Corps Created
摘要：
Administrator Hau presided over the presentation of certificates to 59 volunteers at the founding of
全文：
Administrator Hau presided over the presentation of certificates to 59 volunteers at the founding of
編號：
623
標題：
EPA Tightens Industrial Waste Requirements During EIA Review
摘要：
In the wake of the recent problems regarding solid waste management EPA Administrator Edgar Lin has
全文：
In the wake of the recent problems regarding solid waste management EPA Administrator Edgar Lin has
編號：
3470
標題：
Dengue Fever Vector Control in Taiwan
摘要：
Environmental Sanitation Dengue Fever V ector Control in Taiwan
In 2015, an outbreak of dengue fe
全文：
Dengue Fever Vector Control in Taiwan
In 2015, an outbreak of dengue fever in Tainan turned into
編號：
14
標題：
EPA Announces General Container Recycling Label
摘要：
Recycling The EPA has publicly announced the official design of the recycling label to be displayed
全文：
Recycling The EPA has publicly announced the official design of the recycling label to be displayed
編號：
418
標題：
Technical Assistance for Industrial Wastewater Shows Results
摘要：
Since 1998 the EPA has promoted a plan to diagnose assist and inspect industrial water pollution. Ov
全文：
Since 1998 the EPA has promoted a plan to diagnose assist and inspect industrial water pollution. Ov
編號：
762
標題：
Control Framework for Marine Pollution Submitted to Executive Yuan
摘要：
Besides laying out plans for future marine monitoring systems the Draft Marine Pollution Control Act
全文：
Besides laying out plans for future marine monitoring systems the Draft Marine Pollution Control Act
編號：
42
標題：
EPA Announces Recycling Fees for Containers and General Articles
摘要：
Recycling To encourage recycling the legislature revised the Waste Disposal Act in March of this ye
全文：
Recycling To encourage recycling the legislature revised the Waste Disposal Act in March of this ye
編號：
373
標題：
Diesel Fuel with more than 0.05% Sulfur Content Banned
摘要：
On June 28 1999 the EPA announced the reclassification of diesel fuel with more than 0.05% sulfur co
全文：
On June 28 1999 the EPA announced the reclassification of diesel fuel with more than 0.05% sulfur co
編號：
254
標題：
Water Act to Be Significantly Revised
摘要：
The EPA is working on a major revision to the Water Pollution Control Act. In terms of controls curr
全文：
The EPA is working on a major revision to the Water Pollution Control Act. In terms of controls curr
編號：
305
標題：
EPA Drafts Rules for Green Product Procurement
摘要：
The EPA has drafted the Regulations Governing the Criteria and Implementation of Priority Purchasing
全文：
The EPA has drafted the Regulations Governing the Criteria and Implementation of Priority Purchasing
編號：
3135
標題：
American Institute in Taiwan Praises Taiwan
摘要：
International Cooperation American Institute in Taiwan Praises Taiwan
全文：
International cooperation American Institute in Taiwan Praises Taiwan’s Contribution to Protect the
行政院環境保護署 的其他資料集
大甲媽祖遶境即時空品監測成果(E-motor)
不定期更新更新,214陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2341 | 2022-01-14 01:02:39
行政院環境保護署固定污染源CEMS監測數據紀錄值資料集(6分鐘紀錄值)
每小時更新更新,190陳小姐 | 02-23117722分機6216 | 2022-01-14 01:02:55
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_新北市_永和站
每1時更新,176陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:57:27
行政院環境保護署應回收廢棄物(廢機動車輛類)回收量資料
每年更新更新,38廖小姐 | 02-2370-5888#3103 | 2022-01-14 01:24:35
行政院環境保護署執行機關資源回收設施統計資料
每年更新更新,56廖小姐 | 02-2370-5888#3103 | 2022-01-14 01:26:22
行政院環境保護署
彰濱工業區環境監測資料
每3月更新,51陳先生 | 04-22521718#51207 | 2023-08-09 01:05:05
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_南投縣_南投站
每1時更新,254陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:57:54
行政院環境保護署廠商獲頒產品數統計(第一類)
每1月更新,101盧小姐 | 02-23117722#2943 | 2023-08-02 01:02:54
行政院環境保護署嘉義市重要環保統計資料
每1月更新,217顏先生 | 02-23117722#2109 | 2023-08-07 00:59:58
行政院環境保護署日空氣品質指標(AQI)
每日更新更新,147謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:05:38
行政院環境保護署
二仁溪污染整治小組及再生願景聯繫會報
不定期更新,31黃先生 | 02-2311-7722#2508 | 2022-01-15 01:12:47
行政院環境保護署環境教育人員認證展延研習30小時課程規劃參考表
不定期更新,37蘇小姐 | (03)4020789分機669 | 2022-01-15 01:11:11
行政院環境保護署環境影響評估報告書修正審查結論
每2月更新,45黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-05 00:59:54
行政院環境保護署重要河川污染情形
每月更新更新,163謝小姐 | 02-23117722#2103 | 2022-01-14 01:21:02
行政院環境保護署環保署裁罰處分
每季更新更新,106張先生 | 02-2311-7722#2716 | 2022-01-15 01:10:12
行政院環境保護署
空氣品質小時值_屏東縣_屏東站
每1時更新,97陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:57:36
行政院環境保護署列管公共污水下水道名單
不定期更新更新,35羅先生 | 02-2311-7722#2831 | 2023-08-09 01:04:19
行政院環境保護署中科后里環境監測資料
不定期更新更新,51陳先生 | 04-22521718#51207 | 2023-08-09 01:05:06
行政院環境保護署推薦機關(薦舉)環境教育人員認證申請書
不定期更新更新,40盧小姐 | (03)4020789分機606 | 2023-08-09 01:05:27
行政院環境保護署縣市(連江縣)小時值-每小時
每小時更新更新,83謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-15 01:02:40
行政院環境保護署
工業區污水處理廠分布位置地理圖資
不定期更新更新,45簡小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2831 | 2023-07-27 01:06:00
行政院環境保護署菸酒事業廢棄物再利用機構資料
每1年更新,76李小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2626 | 2023-07-27 00:59:33
行政院環境保護署公民營製造業、用水、電力及燃氣供應業污染防治支出
每1年更新,52顏先生 | 02-23117722#2109 | 2023-07-30 01:00:38
行政院環境保護署環境保護工程之興建類別環境影響說明書
每2月更新,118黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-05 01:01:10
行政院環境保護署道路之開發類別環境影響評估報告書
每2月更新,47黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-06 01:04:17
行政院環境保護署
環境科技論壇論文集
每1年更新,41賀先生 | 23117722#2981 | 2023-08-06 01:06:11
行政院環境保護署空氣品質監測小時值(一般污染物,每日更新)
每日更新更新,253謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:01:07
行政院環境保護署行政院環境保護署環境檢驗所單位決算
每年更新更新,38洪小姐 | 03-4915818#3001 | 2022-01-15 01:09:40
行政院環境保護署建檔公廁明細-屏東縣
不定期更新更新,193賴先生 | 04-2252-1718#53686 | 2023-07-27 01:02:06
行政院環境保護署環境空氣戴奧辛監測資料
每6月更新,129戴先生 | 02-2371-2121#6210 | 2023-08-07 01:03:23
行政院環境保護署