Heavy Metal Classifications for Agricultural Soils to be Applied
「Heavy Metal Classifications for Agricultural Soils to be Applied」於資料集「Environmental Policy Monthly」由單位「行政院環境保護署」的楊先生所提供，聯繫電話是(02)23117722#2217,(02)23117722#2216，最近更新時間為：2022-01-15 01:13:03。 欄位編號的內容是425 ， 欄位標題的內容是Heavy Metal Classifications for Agricultural Soils to be Applied to Industrial Lands ， 欄位摘要的內容是Due to the frequency of incidents of industrial-use land pollution and illegal dumping in Taiwan the EPA has decided to expand the use of a table for classifying soil concentrations of heavy metals in agricultural land, to monitoring for industrial and other lands. The classifications will be used as the basis for future monitoring and remediation plans. Also, priority remediation values for agricultural land will be added to the original Class V standards.
In the past, when working with agricultural lands, the EPA set a table for concentrations of heavy metals in soil to divide monitoring results into five classifications. But, because of the recent number of incidents of industrial land pollution and illegal dumping, the EPA has decided to expand use of these classifications for the monitoring results of industrial and other land uses. The classifications will also be the basis for drawing up future soil monitoring and remediation plans.
According to the table, heavy metal-contaminated land is divided into five classes. Class I indicates that monitoring of the soil has revealed it to be deficient of copper, zinc, and other elements essential for agricultural lands. Class II land contains soil with a heavy metal content lower than environmental background values, while Class III land has soil with contaminant levels equivalent to environmental background values. The heavy metal concentrations in Class IV land are defined as being at observation levels, and a ranking of Class V means that land has been polluted by an exterior source of heavy metals, and should be listed as a key area for pollution controls. In addition, the EPA has decided to add to Class V a column for priority remediation values for agricultural land. Agricultural lands falling within this scope are assigned priority and will undergo remediation, depending on the environmental necessity and the willingness of local farmers.
The EPA explains that parcels of land categorized as Class I, II, or III do not have heavy metal soil pollution problems. County and city governments should put their main efforts into Class IV and V parcels. Although Class IV lands have exceeded environmental background values, this may be precipitated by geographical or environmental factors. According to plans, government efforts should center on identifying sources of external pollution, and if they exist strengthening pollution checks and controls. For land listed as Class V, county and city governments should perform regular monitoring of heavy metal concentrations in the soil, and determine priority for remediation accordingly. Monitoring results should also be sent to agricultural and health agencies for reference.
However, to avoid pollution to rice stocks, if cadmium or mercury values exceed 1mg/kg in land used to plant rice, the land must be listed as Class V and assigned priority for monitoring and remediation. If rice plantings tested do not conform with food product health standards (for cadmium and mercury), local EPBs must meet with relevant agencies to discuss which lands should be left fallow, and provide support for follow-up work efforts.
In June of this year the Executive Yuan approved a draft of the Soil Pollution Remediation Act which was then sent to the Legislative Yuan for review. Before passage of the act there are as of yet no procedures to follow for soil pollution control in Taiwan. For example, in the case of the pollution of industrial land, unless the identity of the polluter is clear, responsibility for remediation is extremely difficult to ascertain. Because the Soil Pollution Remediation Act has not yet passed, the classification table above is offered only as a reference for county and city governments. To cope with soil pollution problems for the time being, the EPA suggests county and city governments use the table to determine the polluted industrial lands and then determine the presence or absence of a pollution source. Governments should then request the removal of existing pollution sources according to the relevant laws for water, air and solid waste pollution, and should wait for further clarification of responsibility to begin soil remediation.
Addition of the priority remediation values for agricultural land is primarily intended to make county and city governments determine priority and begin remediation for those more seriously polluted sites. An EPA official stressed though that even if monitoring results do not fall within priority remediation values, remediation can still be undertaken. If the county or city government judges the site to be dangerous a remediation plan can be proposed and begun.
Table: Taiwan Land Classifications for Heavy Metal Concentrations in Soil
Pollutant
Class I
Class II
Class III
(Env. Background Levels)
Class IV
(Observation Levels)
Class V
Monitoring Levels
Priority Remediation Levels For Agricultural Lands
Arsenic
topsoil<4
bottom soil<4
4-9
4-15
10-60
16-60
>60
>60
>60
>60
Cadmium
<0.05
0.05-0.39
0.40-10
>10
>10
Chromium
<0.10
0.10-10
11-16
>16
>40
Copper
<1
1-11
12-20
21-100
>100
>200
Mercury
<0.10
0.10-0.39
0.40-20
>20
>20
Nickel
<2
2-10
11-100
>100
>200
Lead
<1
1-15
16-120
>120
>200
Zinc
<1.5
1.6-10
11-25
26-80
>80
>500
* Measurements in mg/kg ， 欄位全文的內容是Due to the frequency of incidents of industrial-use land pollution and illegal dumping in Taiwan the EPA has decided to expand the use of a table for classifying soil concentrations of heavy metals in agricultural land, to monitoring for industrial and other lands. The classifications will be used as the basis for future monitoring and remediation plans. Also, priority remediation values for agricultural land will be added to the original Class V standards.
In the past, when working with agricultural lands, the EPA set a table for concentrations of heavy metals in soil to divide monitoring results into five classifications. But, because of the recent number of incidents of industrial land pollution and illegal dumping, the EPA has decided to expand use of these classifications for the monitoring results of industrial and other land uses. The classifications will also be the basis for drawing up future soil monitoring and remediation plans.
According to the table, heavy metal-contaminated land is divided into five classes. Class I indicates that monitoring of the soil has revealed it to be deficient of copper, zinc, and other elements essential for agricultural lands. Class II land contains soil with a heavy metal content lower than environmental background values, while Class III land has soil with contaminant levels equivalent to environmental background values. The heavy metal concentrations in Class IV land are defined as being at observation levels, and a ranking of Class V means that land has been polluted by an exterior source of heavy metals, and should be listed as a key area for pollution controls. In addition, the EPA has decided to add to Class V a column for priority remediation values for agricultural land. Agricultural lands falling within this scope are assigned priority and will undergo remediation, depending on the environmental necessity and the willingness of local farmers.
The EPA explains that parcels of land categorized as Class I, II, or III do not have heavy metal soil pollution problems. County and city governments should put their main efforts into Class IV and V parcels. Although Class IV lands have exceeded environmental background values, this may be precipitated by geographical or environmental factors. According to plans, government efforts should center on identifying sources of external pollution, and if they exist strengthening pollution checks and controls. For land listed as Class V, county and city governments should perform regular monitoring of heavy metal concentrations in the soil, and determine priority for remediation accordingly. Monitoring results should also be sent to agricultural and health agencies for reference.
However, to avoid pollution to rice stocks, if cadmium or mercury values exceed 1mg/kg in land used to plant rice, the land must be listed as Class V and assigned priority for monitoring and remediation. If rice plantings tested do not conform with food product health standards (for cadmium and mercury), local EPBs must meet with relevant agencies to discuss which lands should be left fallow, and provide support for follow-up work efforts.
In June of this year the Executive Yuan approved a draft of the Soil Pollution Remediation Act which was then sent to the Legislative Yuan for review. Before passage of the act there are as of yet no procedures to follow for soil pollution control in Taiwan. For example, in the case of the pollution of industrial land, unless the identity of the polluter is clear, responsibility for remediation is extremely difficult to ascertain. Because the Soil Pollution Remediation Act has not yet passed, the classification table above is offered only as a reference for county and city governments. To cope with soil pollution problems for the time being, the EPA suggests county and city governments use the table to determine the polluted industrial lands and then determine the presence or absence of a pollution source. Governments should then request the removal of existing pollution sources according to the relevant laws for water, air and solid waste pollution, and should wait for further clarification of responsibility to begin soil remediation.
Addition of the priority remediation values for agricultural land is primarily intended to make county and city governments determine priority and begin remediation for those more seriously polluted sites. An EPA official stressed though that even if monitoring results do not fall within priority remediation values, remediation can still be undertaken. If the county or city government judges the site to be dangerous a remediation plan can be proposed and begun.
Table: Taiwan Land Classifications for Heavy Metal Concentrations in Soil
Pollutant
Class I
Class II
Class III
(Env. Background Levels)
Class IV
(Observation Levels)
Class V
Monitoring Levels
Priority Remediation Levels For Agricultural Lands
Arsenic
topsoil<4
bottom soil<4
4-9
4-15
10-60
16-60
>60
>60
>60
>60
Cadmium
<0.05
0.05-0.39
0.40-10
>10
>10
Chromium
<0.10
0.10-10
11-16
>16
>40
Copper
<1
1-11
12-20
21-100
>100
>200
Mercury
<0.10
0.10-0.39
0.40-20
>20
>20
Nickel
<2
2-10
11-100
>100
>200
Lead
<1
1-15
16-120
>120
>200
Zinc
<1.5
1.6-10
11-25
26-80
>80
>500
* Measurements in mg/kg ， 欄位年度的內容是2000 ， 欄位月份的內容是3 ， 欄位卷的內容是3 ， 欄位期的內容是4 ， 欄位順序的內容是1 ， 欄位倒序的內容是2 ， 欄位分類的內容是Soil and Groundwater ， 欄位標題2的內容是Heavy Metal Classifications for Agricultural Soils to be Applied to Industrial Lands ， 欄位檔案位置的內容是print/V3/V3-04 。
編號
425
標題
Heavy Metal Classifications for Agricultural Soils to be Applied to Industrial Lands
摘要
Due to the frequency of incidents of industrial-use land pollution and illegal dumping in Taiwan the EPA has decided to expand the use of a table for classifying soil concentrations of heavy metals in agricultural land, to monitoring for industrial and other lands. The classifications will be used as the basis for future monitoring and remediation plans. Also, priority remediation values for agricultural land will be added to the original Class V standards. In the past, when working with agricultural lands, the EPA set a table for concentrations of heavy metals in soil to divide monitoring results into five classifications. But, because of the recent number of incidents of industrial land pollution and illegal dumping, the EPA has decided to expand use of these classifications for the monitoring results of industrial and other land uses. The classifications will also be the basis for drawing up future soil monitoring and remediation plans. According to the table, heavy metal-contaminated land is divided into five classes. Class I indicates that monitoring of the soil has revealed it to be deficient of copper, zinc, and other elements essential for agricultural lands. Class II land contains soil with a heavy metal content lower than environmental background values, while Class III land has soil with contaminant levels equivalent to environmental background values. The heavy metal concentrations in Class IV land are defined as being at observation levels, and a ranking of Class V means that land has been polluted by an exterior source of heavy metals, and should be listed as a key area for pollution controls. In addition, the EPA has decided to add to Class V a column for priority remediation values for agricultural land. Agricultural lands falling within this scope are assigned priority and will undergo remediation, depending on the environmental necessity and the willingness of local farmers. The EPA explains that parcels of land categorized as Class I, II, or III do not have heavy metal soil pollution problems. County and city governments should put their main efforts into Class IV and V parcels. Although Class IV lands have exceeded environmental background values, this may be precipitated by geographical or environmental factors. According to plans, government efforts should center on identifying sources of external pollution, and if they exist strengthening pollution checks and controls. For land listed as Class V, county and city governments should perform regular monitoring of heavy metal concentrations in the soil, and determine priority for remediation accordingly. Monitoring results should also be sent to agricultural and health agencies for reference. However, to avoid pollution to rice stocks, if cadmium or mercury values exceed 1mg/kg in land used to plant rice, the land must be listed as Class V and assigned priority for monitoring and remediation. If rice plantings tested do not conform with food product health standards (for cadmium and mercury), local EPBs must meet with relevant agencies to discuss which lands should be left fallow, and provide support for follow-up work efforts. In June of this year the Executive Yuan approved a draft of the Soil Pollution Remediation Act which was then sent to the Legislative Yuan for review. Before passage of the act there are as of yet no procedures to follow for soil pollution control in Taiwan. For example, in the case of the pollution of industrial land, unless the identity of the polluter is clear, responsibility for remediation is extremely difficult to ascertain. Because the Soil Pollution Remediation Act has not yet passed, the classification table above is offered only as a reference for county and city governments. To cope with soil pollution problems for the time being, the EPA suggests county and city governments use the table to determine the polluted industrial lands and then determine the presence or absence of a pollution source. Governments should then request the removal of existing pollution sources according to the relevant laws for water, air and solid waste pollution, and should wait for further clarification of responsibility to begin soil remediation. Addition of the priority remediation values for agricultural land is primarily intended to make county and city governments determine priority and begin remediation for those more seriously polluted sites. An EPA official stressed though that even if monitoring results do not fall within priority remediation values, remediation can still be undertaken. If the county or city government judges the site to be dangerous a remediation plan can be proposed and begun. Table: Taiwan Land Classifications for Heavy Metal Concentrations in Soil Pollutant Class I Class II Class III (Env. Background Levels) Class IV (Observation Levels) Class V Monitoring Levels Priority Remediation Levels For Agricultural Lands Arsenic topsoil<4 bottom soil<4 4-9 4-15 10-60 16-60 >60 >60 >60 >60 Cadmium <0.05 0.05-0.39 0.40-10 >10 >10 Chromium <0.10 0.10-10 11-16 >16 >40 Copper <1 1-11 12-20 21-100 >100 >200 Mercury <0.10 0.10-0.39 0.40-20 >20 >20 Nickel <2 2-10 11-100 >100 >200 Lead <1 1-15 16-120 >120 >200 Zinc <1.5 1.6-10 11-25 26-80 >80 >500 * Measurements in mg/kg
全文
Due to the frequency of incidents of industrial-use land pollution and illegal dumping in Taiwan the EPA has decided to expand the use of a table for classifying soil concentrations of heavy metals in agricultural land, to monitoring for industrial and other lands. The classifications will be used as the basis for future monitoring and remediation plans. Also, priority remediation values for agricultural land will be added to the original Class V standards. In the past, when working with agricultural lands, the EPA set a table for concentrations of heavy metals in soil to divide monitoring results into five classifications. But, because of the recent number of incidents of industrial land pollution and illegal dumping, the EPA has decided to expand use of these classifications for the monitoring results of industrial and other land uses. The classifications will also be the basis for drawing up future soil monitoring and remediation plans. According to the table, heavy metal-contaminated land is divided into five classes. Class I indicates that monitoring of the soil has revealed it to be deficient of copper, zinc, and other elements essential for agricultural lands. Class II land contains soil with a heavy metal content lower than environmental background values, while Class III land has soil with contaminant levels equivalent to environmental background values. The heavy metal concentrations in Class IV land are defined as being at observation levels, and a ranking of Class V means that land has been polluted by an exterior source of heavy metals, and should be listed as a key area for pollution controls. In addition, the EPA has decided to add to Class V a column for priority remediation values for agricultural land. Agricultural lands falling within this scope are assigned priority and will undergo remediation, depending on the environmental necessity and the willingness of local farmers. The EPA explains that parcels of land categorized as Class I, II, or III do not have heavy metal soil pollution problems. County and city governments should put their main efforts into Class IV and V parcels. Although Class IV lands have exceeded environmental background values, this may be precipitated by geographical or environmental factors. According to plans, government efforts should center on identifying sources of external pollution, and if they exist strengthening pollution checks and controls. For land listed as Class V, county and city governments should perform regular monitoring of heavy metal concentrations in the soil, and determine priority for remediation accordingly. Monitoring results should also be sent to agricultural and health agencies for reference. However, to avoid pollution to rice stocks, if cadmium or mercury values exceed 1mg/kg in land used to plant rice, the land must be listed as Class V and assigned priority for monitoring and remediation. If rice plantings tested do not conform with food product health standards (for cadmium and mercury), local EPBs must meet with relevant agencies to discuss which lands should be left fallow, and provide support for follow-up work efforts. In June of this year the Executive Yuan approved a draft of the Soil Pollution Remediation Act which was then sent to the Legislative Yuan for review. Before passage of the act there are as of yet no procedures to follow for soil pollution control in Taiwan. For example, in the case of the pollution of industrial land, unless the identity of the polluter is clear, responsibility for remediation is extremely difficult to ascertain. Because the Soil Pollution Remediation Act has not yet passed, the classification table above is offered only as a reference for county and city governments. To cope with soil pollution problems for the time being, the EPA suggests county and city governments use the table to determine the polluted industrial lands and then determine the presence or absence of a pollution source. Governments should then request the removal of existing pollution sources according to the relevant laws for water, air and solid waste pollution, and should wait for further clarification of responsibility to begin soil remediation. Addition of the priority remediation values for agricultural land is primarily intended to make county and city governments determine priority and begin remediation for those more seriously polluted sites. An EPA official stressed though that even if monitoring results do not fall within priority remediation values, remediation can still be undertaken. If the county or city government judges the site to be dangerous a remediation plan can be proposed and begun. Table: Taiwan Land Classifications for Heavy Metal Concentrations in Soil Pollutant Class I Class II Class III (Env. Background Levels) Class IV (Observation Levels) Class V Monitoring Levels Priority Remediation Levels For Agricultural Lands Arsenic topsoil<4 bottom soil<4 4-9 4-15 10-60 16-60 >60 >60 >60 >60 Cadmium <0.05 0.05-0.39 0.40-10 >10 >10 Chromium <0.10 0.10-10 11-16 >16 >40 Copper <1 1-11 12-20 21-100 >100 >200 Mercury <0.10 0.10-0.39 0.40-20 >20 >20 Nickel <2 2-10 11-100 >100 >200 Lead <1 1-15 16-120 >120 >200 Zinc <1.5 1.6-10 11-25 26-80 >80 >500 * Measurements in mg/kg
年度
2000
月份
3
卷
3
期
4
順序
1
倒序
2
分類
Soil and Groundwater
標題2
Heavy Metal Classifications for Agricultural Soils to be Applied to Industrial Lands
檔案位置
print/V3/V3-04
「Heavy Metal Classifications for Agricultural Soils to be Applied」所屬的資料集：「Environmental Policy Monthly」的其他資料
編號：
670
標題：
Online Inspection Takes a Step Forward
摘要：
In response to the headaches in Taiwan created by industrial waste on December 19 the EPA's Industri
全文：
In response to the headaches in Taiwan created by industrial waste on December 19 the EPA's Industri
編號：
386
標題：
Review of Stationary Pollution Source Permits to be Handled at the County/City Level
摘要：
Due to the downsizing of the Taiwan Provincial Government (TPG) the EPA put the responsibility for r
全文：
Due to the downsizing of the Taiwan Provincial Government (TPG) the EPA put the responsibility for r
編號：
962
標題：
Taiwan to Continue Cutting Sulfur Levels in Industrial Fuel
摘要：
Aiming to improve air quality by reducing the concentration of sulfur in the air the EPA intends to
全文：
Aiming to improve air quality by reducing the concentration of sulfur in the air the EPA intends to
編號：
119
標題：
Resource Recycling and Reuse Act Draft Completed
摘要：
Recycling The EPA has once again modified a draft of the Resource Recycling and Reuse Act and will
全文：
Recycling The EPA has once again modified a draft of the Resource Recycling and Reuse Act and will
編號：
152
標題：
Regulations Governing Disease Prevention Businesses Formally Announced
摘要：
Environmental Sanitation On April 29 the EPA formally announced the Regulations Governing Disease
全文：
Environmental Sanitation On April 29 the EPA formally announced the Regulations Governing Disease
編號：
385
標題：
Pilot Total Quantity Control District to be Implemented in Central Taiwan
摘要：
The EPA recently selected the Central Taiwan Air Quality Region as the initial region for the demons
全文：
The EPA recently selected the Central Taiwan Air Quality Region as the initial region for the demons
編號：
817
標題：
Marine Pollution Control Act Enforcement Rules Announced
摘要：
The enactment of Taiwan’s first set of Marine Pollution Control Act Implementation Rules (海洋污染防治法施行細
全文：
The enactment of Taiwan’s first set of Marine Pollution Control Act Implementation Rules (海洋污染防治法施行細
編號：
204
標題：
Amendment to Toxics Detection and Warning Guidelines Announced
摘要：
August 5 the EPA formally announced an amendment to Articles 4 and 5 of the Toxic Chemical Substance
全文：
August 5 the EPA formally announced an amendment to Articles 4 and 5 of the Toxic Chemical Substance
編號：
891
標題：
Old Filling Station Groundwater Pollution Survey Results
摘要：
The survey found that 19 filling stations that have been operating for ten years or more have been l
全文：
The survey found that 19 filling stations that have been operating for ten years or more have been l
編號：
381
標題：
Green Product Procurement Criteria Announced
摘要：
On June 26 regulations regarding the Government Procurement Act's provisions for priority purchasing
全文：
On June 26 regulations regarding the Government Procurement Act's provisions for priority purchasing
編號：
619
標題：
Edgar Lin Stresses EPA Will Hold It's Ground in Inter-agency Discussions
摘要：
During a discussion with environmental groups EPA Administrator Edgar Lin stated that in the past th
全文：
During a discussion with environmental groups EPA Administrator Edgar Lin stated that in the past th
編號：
833
標題：
Special Demonstration Zone for Recycling to be Established
摘要：
The EPA as part of its efforts to further the development of a recycling-conscious society, has draw
全文：
The EPA as part of its efforts to further the development of a recycling-conscious society, has draw
編號：
328
標題：
Tap Water Receives Best Rating in 14 Years
摘要：
Tests this year returned the most positive prognosis on Taiwan's tap water supply of the past 14 yea
全文：
Tests this year returned the most positive prognosis on Taiwan's tap water supply of the past 14 yea
編號：
573
標題：
Environmental Protection Fundamentals Law Reviewed Administrator Proposes 12 New Policies
摘要：
On June 1st the Legislative Yuan began a review of the draft Environmental Protection Fundamentals L
全文：
On June 1st the Legislative Yuan began a review of the draft Environmental Protection Fundamentals L
編號：
590
標題：
EPA Promotes E-Government Effort
摘要：
On July 3 the EPA’s WWW home page was upgraded with the intent to more directly convey environmental
全文：
On July 3 the EPA’s WWW home page was upgraded with the intent to more directly convey environmental
編號：
742
標題：
Cleanup of MV Amorgos Oil Spill Accelerated
摘要：
Handling of the oil spill created by a Greek tanker the MV Amorgos, has captured the attention of Ta
全文：
Handling of the oil spill created by a Greek tanker the MV Amorgos, has captured the attention of Ta
編號：
849
標題：
Soil and Groundwater Monitoring and Control Standards Announced
摘要：
The EPA has announced four new monitoring and control standards for soil and groundwater pollution.
全文：
The EPA has announced four new monitoring and control standards for soil and groundwater pollution.
編號：
530
標題：
Management Guidelines for Vehicle Emissions Inspection Stations Promulgated
摘要：
As part of its efforts to implement large-scale remote sensing of vehicle emissions the EPA has aske
全文：
As part of its efforts to implement large-scale remote sensing of vehicle emissions the EPA has aske
編號：
920
標題：
Restrictions on Plastic Bags and Disposable Dishes Coming Soon
摘要：
The EPA is planning the introduction of restrictions on the use of plastic shopping bags and plastic
全文：
The EPA is planning the introduction of restrictions on the use of plastic shopping bags and plastic
編號：
841
標題：
Collection of Soil Pollution Cleanup Fees Initiated in November
摘要：
Regulations governing the collection of soil and groundwater cleanup fees namely the Regulations Gov
全文：
Regulations governing the collection of soil and groundwater cleanup fees namely the Regulations Gov
編號：
704
標題：
Preliminary Soil Pollution Fund Management Framework Set
摘要：
The EPA's Draft Organizational Regulations of the Soil And Groundwater Pollution Remediation Fund Ma
全文：
The EPA's Draft Organizational Regulations of the Soil And Groundwater Pollution Remediation Fund Ma
編號：
100
標題：
EPA Strengthens Communication with Foreign Business Community
摘要：
International Affairs At the invitation of the American Chamber of Commerce the Director General of
全文：
International Affairs At the invitation of the American Chamber of Commerce the Director General of
編號：
222
標題：
Amended Toxics Transportation Regulations Amended
摘要：
On August 19 in line with the system of regulating toxic chemical substances according to their clas
全文：
On August 19 in line with the system of regulating toxic chemical substances according to their clas
編號：
441
標題：
EPA Active In Earthquake Emergency Response
摘要：
Following the September 21 earthquake in Taiwan the EPA immediately established a 24-hour emergency
全文：
Following the September 21 earthquake in Taiwan the EPA immediately established a 24-hour emergency
編號：
377
標題：
EIA Initial Review Guidelines Announced
摘要：
The EPA recently announced guidelines for performing the EPA’s environmental impact assessment (EIA)
全文：
The EPA recently announced guidelines for performing the EPA’s environmental impact assessment (EIA)
編號：
1001
標題：
Economic Processing Zone Administration to Review Waste Disposal Plans
摘要：
To simplify industrial waste disposal plan review procedures on August 13 the EPA formally commissio
全文：
To simplify industrial waste disposal plan review procedures on August 13 the EPA formally commissio
編號：
788
標題：
NIR Monitoring Results for Base Stations Released
摘要：
On July 24 the EPA released the first set of monitoring data on levels of non-ionizing radiation gen
全文：
On July 24 the EPA released the first set of monitoring data on levels of non-ionizing radiation gen
編號：
459
標題：
EPA Plans Awards to Encourage Environmental Volunteers
摘要：
To encourage the public to take part in environmental volunteer work on October 26 the EPA invited r
全文：
To encourage the public to take part in environmental volunteer work on October 26 the EPA invited r
編號：
931
標題：
EPA-COA Reach Consensus on Agricultural Land Pollution Handling Principles
摘要：
The EPA and COA conducted a special responsibility coordination meeting in April in order to address
全文：
The EPA and COA conducted a special responsibility coordination meeting in April in order to address
編號：
797
標題：
EIA Review Committee Selected under New System
摘要：
The EPA announced its selection of the new specialist and academic members of the fourth EPA EIA Rev
全文：
The EPA announced its selection of the new specialist and academic members of the fourth EPA EIA Rev
行政院環境保護署 的其他資料集
空氣品質監測站基本資料
不定期更新更新,116陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-07 01:01:47
行政院環境保護署環境影響評估案件摘要資料
每2月更新,204黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-06 01:03:57
行政院環境保護署空氣品質監測月值
每1月更新,106陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-07 01:03:42
行政院環境保護署噪音陳情案件數(依年度)
不定期更新更新,47謝先生 | 02-23712121-6403 | 2023-07-27 01:03:47
行政院環境保護署歷年土壤調查_環保署土壤重金屬含量調查(319公頃)
不定期更新更新,96謝先生 | (02)23832389*8302 | 2022-01-14 01:20:19
行政院環境保護署
CO_8hr平均值(每日提供17筆)
每1日更新,122陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-08 00:58:47
行政院環境保護署環保專案摘要資料_區域環境管理
不定期更新更新,69陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-07-30 01:01:57
行政院環境保護署南科樹谷環境監測資料
不定期更新更新,37陳先生 | 04-22521718#51207 | 2022-01-14 01:22:03
行政院環境保護署空氣品質預報資料
30分鐘更新,94謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-15 01:00:10
行政院環境保護署各級環保單位歲出決算
每月更新更新,76謝小姐 | 02-23117722#2103 | 2022-01-14 01:21:35
行政院環境保護署
底泥品質檢測資料
每月更新更新,115張小姐 | 02-2383-2389 #8401 | 2022-01-14 01:20:32
行政院環境保護署環評監督委員會監督委員名單
2年更新,36陳先生 | 04-2252-1718#51207 | 2022-01-15 01:13:16
行政院環境保護署建檔公廁明細-臺東縣
不定期更新更新,140賴先生 | 04-2252-1718#53686 | 2023-07-27 01:01:54
行政院環境保護署環境教育活動數
每季更新更新,50李小姐 | 02-23117722#2724 | 2022-01-15 01:10:44
行政院環境保護署空氣品質監測即時影像資料(發布)
每10分更新,29陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-09 01:05:51
行政院環境保護署
公害陳情警示區域範圍圖
每6月更新,36許小姐 | 04-22521718#58709 | 2023-07-27 01:06:07
行政院環境保護署環境音量監測不合格時段數
每月更新更新,159謝小姐 | 02-23117722#2103 | 2022-01-14 01:20:55
行政院環境保護署苗栗縣重要環保統計資料
每1月更新,122顏先生 | 02-23117722#2109 | 2023-08-07 01:00:15
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_桃園市_大園站
每1時更新,110陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:58:08
行政院環境保護署臺東縣水量水質自動監測連線傳輸監測紀錄值即時資料集
不定期更新更新,42程先生 | 02-2311-7722#2833 | 2023-08-09 01:04:06
行政院環境保護署
總碳氫化合物(THC)監測小時值(每小時提供)
每小時更新更新,83謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:05:09
行政院環境保護署酸雨成份分析值
每6月更新,138許小姐 | 02-23117722#6113 | 2023-07-28 18:51:41
行政院環境保護署道路交通音量監測結果統計(依時段分)
每季更新更新,95林先生 | 02-23712121#6403 | 2022-01-14 01:18:42
行政院環境保護署環保專案摘要資料_環境資訊系統
不定期更新更新,86郭先生 | 02-2311-7722 EXT.2399 | 2022-01-15 01:13:42
行政院環境保護署鹿林山測站小時值資料
每1時更新,109陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:57:25
行政院環境保護署
機動車輛測定機構許可資料
每1月更新,50楊先生 | (03)491-5818轉2103 | 2023-07-27 01:01:43
行政院環境保護署EPQSummary_RegionalEnvironmentalManagement
不定期更新更新,87陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-07-30 01:01:44
行政院環境保護署EPQSummary_Other
不定期更新更新,61郭先生 | 02-2311-7722 EXT.2399 | 2022-01-15 01:14:18
行政院環境保護署環境影響說明書審查結論
每2月更新,59黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-05 00:59:41
行政院環境保護署交通空氣品質監測站基本資料
不定期更新更新,55謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:05:52
行政院環境保護署