Interim Effluent Standards Expirewater2000
「Interim Effluent Standards Expirewater2000」於資料集「Environmental Policy Monthly」由單位「行政院環境保護署」的楊先生所提供，聯繫電話是(02)23117722#2217,(02)23117722#2216，最近更新時間為：2022-01-15 01:13:03。 欄位編號的內容是475 ， 欄位標題的內容是Interim Effluent Standards Expire ， 欄位摘要的內容是After the 1998 interim effluent standards expire industries using the interim standards will need to prepare for a slightly modified draft of the 1998 Effluent Standards to take effect. In the draft proposed by the EPA, to encourage recycling in the paper industry, different COD limits will be set according to wastepaper recycling rates. Also, due to the use of different testing methods the standard for true-color value will be adjusted to 550. After completing a public hearing, the EPA presented the draft standards to the Executive Yuan for approval.
The reasonability of effluent standards has once again become a topic of contention. Effluent standards were first set in 1991 in Taiwan, and tightened successively in 1993 and 1998. However, before implementation of the 1998 standards, the EPA received a constant stream of industry feedback, asking it to loosen pollutant limits set in standards they claimed were too tough.
In the face of scientific evidence and documentation presented for the industry case, on December 24, 1997 the EPA made a well intentioned gesture by creating interim standards for seven large industries; chemicals, paper, pulp, petrochemicals, livestock, leather, and printing and dyeing. Industries were required to come up with improvement plans, and after submitting the plans would be subject to the interim standards for two years.
However, after two years, as the interim standards were set to expire, the reasonability of the 1998 effluent standards has once again been brought to the table. The seven large industries have one-by-one presented studies showing that the 1998 standards are too tough, and asking that the interim standards be maintained as the new 2000 standards.
Because COD (chemical oxygen demand) and SS (suspended solids) are the main items toughened in the 1998 standards, most industry suggestions were directed at maintaining the interim restrictions for these two standards. Industry representatives noted that due to low sewerage hookup rates in Taiwan, it is impossible to jointly treat industrial and residential wastewater. In this situation, there is no way to adjust the mixture of COD and BOD levels to optimum proportions, lowering the effectiveness of organic wastewater treatment.
In addition, industry representatives also pointed out that traditional secondary bio-treatment methods are insufficient to further lower COD discharges, so chemical treatment methods must be used. After the use of large quantities of chemical additives, operating costs and quantities of waste sludge will both increase, as well as the bio-toxicity of wastewater discharges.
To come up with a set of reasonable, workable effluent standards, the EPA called numerous meeting between experts and academics; industrial groups; the Industrial Development Bureau (IDB) and the Council of Agriculture, to discuss the standards in light of the current status of industry improvements, technological feasibility and environmental impact. A total of nine different meetings resulted in changes to the draft standards that ensure effluent management will be more reasonable and practicable. Changes include:
1. Due to a change in the testing method for true-color value, the control standard for true-color value should be 550. Thus, the control standard for all target industries was changed to 550 and the proscribed testing method will remain the current method in use.
2.
Due to a major switch to wastepaper as a raw material by the paper industry in order to comply with recycling policies, the current shape of the paper industry and the character of it's effluent stream have changed completely. For this reason, paper companies where wastepaper makes up over 60% of raw materials used are allowed a COD limit of 180mg/L. For companies where wastepaper consists of below 60% of raw materials, the COD limit will be 160mg/L, and companies that do not use wastepaper will have to comply with the COD 100mg/L standard.
The EPA emphasized that in 1988 and 1987, 2,000 companies made use of the interim standards and signed pledges to continue improvements to pollution prevention. In total pig raising was decreased by almost 280,000 head and around 2.2 billion NTD were invested in order to meet the 1998 effluent standards. Moreover, statistics compiled from onsite audits by local EPBs revealed that compliance with COD standards averages around 81% among industry groups (see graph), with the additional 19% able to meet interim standards. To totally readjust effluent standard values only for the sake of this 19% of problem industries would be a step in the wrong direction and be a violation of the EPA's mandate to protect water quality. Accordingly, the effluent standard values will not be changed again during the current phase.
Over the next half year, the EPA will check to see if industries have made any of the pollution prevention improvements suggested over the course of their meetings. Some methods suggested include the separation of solid and liquid wastes from pig-rearing, removal of high salt and chlorine liquid wastes in the dying materials and leather industry, or the removal of dying materials and treatment additives from wastewater in the dying industry. If these changes are reflected in the solid waste online reporting system or by audit numbers, or it can be shown that companies are properly using wastewater treatment facilities but are still stuck at the edge of the control standards due to technology bottlenecks, the EPA will deal with new them on a case-by-case basis. After onsite verification by special personnel, the possibility of opening a subcategory standard can be assessed and discussed. ， 欄位全文的內容是After the 1998 interim effluent standards expire industries using the interim standards will need to prepare for a slightly modified draft of the 1998 Effluent Standards to take effect. In the draft proposed by the EPA, to encourage recycling in the paper industry, different COD limits will be set according to wastepaper recycling rates. Also, due to the use of different testing methods the standard for true-color value will be adjusted to 550. After completing a public hearing, the EPA presented the draft standards to the Executive Yuan for approval.
The reasonability of effluent standards has once again become a topic of contention. Effluent standards were first set in 1991 in Taiwan, and tightened successively in 1993 and 1998. However, before implementation of the 1998 standards, the EPA received a constant stream of industry feedback, asking it to loosen pollutant limits set in standards they claimed were too tough.
In the face of scientific evidence and documentation presented for the industry case, on December 24, 1997 the EPA made a well intentioned gesture by creating interim standards for seven large industries; chemicals, paper, pulp, petrochemicals, livestock, leather, and printing and dyeing. Industries were required to come up with improvement plans, and after submitting the plans would be subject to the interim standards for two years.
However, after two years, as the interim standards were set to expire, the reasonability of the 1998 effluent standards has once again been brought to the table. The seven large industries have one-by-one presented studies showing that the 1998 standards are too tough, and asking that the interim standards be maintained as the new 2000 standards.
Because COD (chemical oxygen demand) and SS (suspended solids) are the main items toughened in the 1998 standards, most industry suggestions were directed at maintaining the interim restrictions for these two standards. Industry representatives noted that due to low sewerage hookup rates in Taiwan, it is impossible to jointly treat industrial and residential wastewater. In this situation, there is no way to adjust the mixture of COD and BOD levels to optimum proportions, lowering the effectiveness of organic wastewater treatment.
In addition, industry representatives also pointed out that traditional secondary bio-treatment methods are insufficient to further lower COD discharges, so chemical treatment methods must be used. After the use of large quantities of chemical additives, operating costs and quantities of waste sludge will both increase, as well as the bio-toxicity of wastewater discharges.
To come up with a set of reasonable, workable effluent standards, the EPA called numerous meeting between experts and academics; industrial groups; the Industrial Development Bureau (IDB) and the Council of Agriculture, to discuss the standards in light of the current status of industry improvements, technological feasibility and environmental impact. A total of nine different meetings resulted in changes to the draft standards that ensure effluent management will be more reasonable and practicable. Changes include:
1. Due to a change in the testing method for true-color value, the control standard for true-color value should be 550. Thus, the control standard for all target industries was changed to 550 and the proscribed testing method will remain the current method in use.
2.
Due to a major switch to wastepaper as a raw material by the paper industry in order to comply with recycling policies, the current shape of the paper industry and the character of it's effluent stream have changed completely. For this reason, paper companies where wastepaper makes up over 60% of raw materials used are allowed a COD limit of 180mg/L. For companies where wastepaper consists of below 60% of raw materials, the COD limit will be 160mg/L, and companies that do not use wastepaper will have to comply with the COD 100mg/L standard.
The EPA emphasized that in 1988 and 1987, 2,000 companies made use of the interim standards and signed pledges to continue improvements to pollution prevention. In total pig raising was decreased by almost 280,000 head and around 2.2 billion NTD were invested in order to meet the 1998 effluent standards. Moreover, statistics compiled from onsite audits by local EPBs revealed that compliance with COD standards averages around 81% among industry groups (see graph), with the additional 19% able to meet interim standards. To totally readjust effluent standard values only for the sake of this 19% of problem industries would be a step in the wrong direction and be a violation of the EPA's mandate to protect water quality. Accordingly, the effluent standard values will not be changed again during the current phase.
Over the next half year, the EPA will check to see if industries have made any of the pollution prevention improvements suggested over the course of their meetings. Some methods suggested include the separation of solid and liquid wastes from pig-rearing, removal of high salt and chlorine liquid wastes in the dying materials and leather industry, or the removal of dying materials and treatment additives from wastewater in the dying industry. If these changes are reflected in the solid waste online reporting system or by audit numbers, or it can be shown that companies are properly using wastewater treatment facilities but are still stuck at the edge of the control standards due to technology bottlenecks, the EPA will deal with new them on a case-by-case basis. After onsite verification by special personnel, the possibility of opening a subcategory standard can be assessed and discussed. ， 欄位年度的內容是2000 ， 欄位月份的內容是3 ， 欄位卷的內容是3 ， 欄位期的內容是7 ， 欄位順序的內容是1 ， 欄位倒序的內容是2 ， 欄位分類的內容是water ， 欄位標題2的內容是Interim Effluent Standards Expire ， 欄位檔案位置的內容是print/V3/V3-07 。
編號
475
標題
Interim Effluent Standards Expire
摘要
After the 1998 interim effluent standards expire industries using the interim standards will need to prepare for a slightly modified draft of the 1998 Effluent Standards to take effect. In the draft proposed by the EPA, to encourage recycling in the paper industry, different COD limits will be set according to wastepaper recycling rates. Also, due to the use of different testing methods the standard for true-color value will be adjusted to 550. After completing a public hearing, the EPA presented the draft standards to the Executive Yuan for approval. The reasonability of effluent standards has once again become a topic of contention. Effluent standards were first set in 1991 in Taiwan, and tightened successively in 1993 and 1998. However, before implementation of the 1998 standards, the EPA received a constant stream of industry feedback, asking it to loosen pollutant limits set in standards they claimed were too tough. In the face of scientific evidence and documentation presented for the industry case, on December 24, 1997 the EPA made a well intentioned gesture by creating interim standards for seven large industries; chemicals, paper, pulp, petrochemicals, livestock, leather, and printing and dyeing. Industries were required to come up with improvement plans, and after submitting the plans would be subject to the interim standards for two years. However, after two years, as the interim standards were set to expire, the reasonability of the 1998 effluent standards has once again been brought to the table. The seven large industries have one-by-one presented studies showing that the 1998 standards are too tough, and asking that the interim standards be maintained as the new 2000 standards. Because COD (chemical oxygen demand) and SS (suspended solids) are the main items toughened in the 1998 standards, most industry suggestions were directed at maintaining the interim restrictions for these two standards. Industry representatives noted that due to low sewerage hookup rates in Taiwan, it is impossible to jointly treat industrial and residential wastewater. In this situation, there is no way to adjust the mixture of COD and BOD levels to optimum proportions, lowering the effectiveness of organic wastewater treatment. In addition, industry representatives also pointed out that traditional secondary bio-treatment methods are insufficient to further lower COD discharges, so chemical treatment methods must be used. After the use of large quantities of chemical additives, operating costs and quantities of waste sludge will both increase, as well as the bio-toxicity of wastewater discharges. To come up with a set of reasonable, workable effluent standards, the EPA called numerous meeting between experts and academics; industrial groups; the Industrial Development Bureau (IDB) and the Council of Agriculture, to discuss the standards in light of the current status of industry improvements, technological feasibility and environmental impact. A total of nine different meetings resulted in changes to the draft standards that ensure effluent management will be more reasonable and practicable. Changes include: 1. Due to a change in the testing method for true-color value, the control standard for true-color value should be 550. Thus, the control standard for all target industries was changed to 550 and the proscribed testing method will remain the current method in use. 2. Due to a major switch to wastepaper as a raw material by the paper industry in order to comply with recycling policies, the current shape of the paper industry and the character of it's effluent stream have changed completely. For this reason, paper companies where wastepaper makes up over 60% of raw materials used are allowed a COD limit of 180mg/L. For companies where wastepaper consists of below 60% of raw materials, the COD limit will be 160mg/L, and companies that do not use wastepaper will have to comply with the COD 100mg/L standard. The EPA emphasized that in 1988 and 1987, 2,000 companies made use of the interim standards and signed pledges to continue improvements to pollution prevention. In total pig raising was decreased by almost 280,000 head and around 2.2 billion NTD were invested in order to meet the 1998 effluent standards. Moreover, statistics compiled from onsite audits by local EPBs revealed that compliance with COD standards averages around 81% among industry groups (see graph), with the additional 19% able to meet interim standards. To totally readjust effluent standard values only for the sake of this 19% of problem industries would be a step in the wrong direction and be a violation of the EPA's mandate to protect water quality. Accordingly, the effluent standard values will not be changed again during the current phase. Over the next half year, the EPA will check to see if industries have made any of the pollution prevention improvements suggested over the course of their meetings. Some methods suggested include the separation of solid and liquid wastes from pig-rearing, removal of high salt and chlorine liquid wastes in the dying materials and leather industry, or the removal of dying materials and treatment additives from wastewater in the dying industry. If these changes are reflected in the solid waste online reporting system or by audit numbers, or it can be shown that companies are properly using wastewater treatment facilities but are still stuck at the edge of the control standards due to technology bottlenecks, the EPA will deal with new them on a case-by-case basis. After onsite verification by special personnel, the possibility of opening a subcategory standard can be assessed and discussed.
全文
After the 1998 interim effluent standards expire industries using the interim standards will need to prepare for a slightly modified draft of the 1998 Effluent Standards to take effect. In the draft proposed by the EPA, to encourage recycling in the paper industry, different COD limits will be set according to wastepaper recycling rates. Also, due to the use of different testing methods the standard for true-color value will be adjusted to 550. After completing a public hearing, the EPA presented the draft standards to the Executive Yuan for approval. The reasonability of effluent standards has once again become a topic of contention. Effluent standards were first set in 1991 in Taiwan, and tightened successively in 1993 and 1998. However, before implementation of the 1998 standards, the EPA received a constant stream of industry feedback, asking it to loosen pollutant limits set in standards they claimed were too tough. In the face of scientific evidence and documentation presented for the industry case, on December 24, 1997 the EPA made a well intentioned gesture by creating interim standards for seven large industries; chemicals, paper, pulp, petrochemicals, livestock, leather, and printing and dyeing. Industries were required to come up with improvement plans, and after submitting the plans would be subject to the interim standards for two years. However, after two years, as the interim standards were set to expire, the reasonability of the 1998 effluent standards has once again been brought to the table. The seven large industries have one-by-one presented studies showing that the 1998 standards are too tough, and asking that the interim standards be maintained as the new 2000 standards. Because COD (chemical oxygen demand) and SS (suspended solids) are the main items toughened in the 1998 standards, most industry suggestions were directed at maintaining the interim restrictions for these two standards. Industry representatives noted that due to low sewerage hookup rates in Taiwan, it is impossible to jointly treat industrial and residential wastewater. In this situation, there is no way to adjust the mixture of COD and BOD levels to optimum proportions, lowering the effectiveness of organic wastewater treatment. In addition, industry representatives also pointed out that traditional secondary bio-treatment methods are insufficient to further lower COD discharges, so chemical treatment methods must be used. After the use of large quantities of chemical additives, operating costs and quantities of waste sludge will both increase, as well as the bio-toxicity of wastewater discharges. To come up with a set of reasonable, workable effluent standards, the EPA called numerous meeting between experts and academics; industrial groups; the Industrial Development Bureau (IDB) and the Council of Agriculture, to discuss the standards in light of the current status of industry improvements, technological feasibility and environmental impact. A total of nine different meetings resulted in changes to the draft standards that ensure effluent management will be more reasonable and practicable. Changes include: 1. Due to a change in the testing method for true-color value, the control standard for true-color value should be 550. Thus, the control standard for all target industries was changed to 550 and the proscribed testing method will remain the current method in use. 2. Due to a major switch to wastepaper as a raw material by the paper industry in order to comply with recycling policies, the current shape of the paper industry and the character of it's effluent stream have changed completely. For this reason, paper companies where wastepaper makes up over 60% of raw materials used are allowed a COD limit of 180mg/L. For companies where wastepaper consists of below 60% of raw materials, the COD limit will be 160mg/L, and companies that do not use wastepaper will have to comply with the COD 100mg/L standard. The EPA emphasized that in 1988 and 1987, 2,000 companies made use of the interim standards and signed pledges to continue improvements to pollution prevention. In total pig raising was decreased by almost 280,000 head and around 2.2 billion NTD were invested in order to meet the 1998 effluent standards. Moreover, statistics compiled from onsite audits by local EPBs revealed that compliance with COD standards averages around 81% among industry groups (see graph), with the additional 19% able to meet interim standards. To totally readjust effluent standard values only for the sake of this 19% of problem industries would be a step in the wrong direction and be a violation of the EPA's mandate to protect water quality. Accordingly, the effluent standard values will not be changed again during the current phase. Over the next half year, the EPA will check to see if industries have made any of the pollution prevention improvements suggested over the course of their meetings. Some methods suggested include the separation of solid and liquid wastes from pig-rearing, removal of high salt and chlorine liquid wastes in the dying materials and leather industry, or the removal of dying materials and treatment additives from wastewater in the dying industry. If these changes are reflected in the solid waste online reporting system or by audit numbers, or it can be shown that companies are properly using wastewater treatment facilities but are still stuck at the edge of the control standards due to technology bottlenecks, the EPA will deal with new them on a case-by-case basis. After onsite verification by special personnel, the possibility of opening a subcategory standard can be assessed and discussed.
年度
2000
月份
3
卷
3
期
7
順序
1
倒序
2
分類
water
標題2
Interim Effluent Standards Expire
檔案位置
print/V3/V3-07
「Interim Effluent Standards Expirewater2000」所屬的資料集：「Environmental Policy Monthly」的其他資料
編號：
957
標題：
Public Most Satisfied with Government Environmental Action
摘要：
The most recent public opinion survey results announced by the Executive Yuan on May 17, reveal that
全文：
The most recent public opinion survey results announced by the Executive Yuan on May 17, reveal that
編號：
856
標題：
Awards Promote Office Environmentalism
摘要：
The EPA presented excellence awards to 25 companies that have aggressively promoted environmental pr
全文：
The EPA presented excellence awards to 25 companies that have aggressively promoted environmental pr
編號：
538
標題：
Audits of Container Reporting to be Beefed Up
摘要：
To fortify the recycling system for waste containers the EPA has been assisting container enterprise
全文：
To fortify the recycling system for waste containers the EPA has been assisting container enterprise
編號：
917
標題：
Overview of Environmental Agent Management
摘要：
Environmental agents are an all-pervasive part of our society. To avoid harm to the environment and
全文：
Environmental agents are an all-pervasive part of our society. To avoid harm to the environment and
編號：
989
標題：
Marine Pollution Response Exercise Held in Kaohsiung Harbor
摘要：
The EPA conducted the 2002 Severe Marine Pollution Response Exercise near the floating oil offloadin
全文：
The EPA conducted the 2002 Severe Marine Pollution Response Exercise near the floating oil offloadin
編號：
360
標題：
Establishment of Greenhouse Gas Control Act to be Studied
摘要：
The EPA contracted research on laws to control green house gas emissions. Research results argue tha
全文：
The EPA contracted research on laws to control green house gas emissions. Research results argue tha
編號：
412
標題：
PET Bottle Industry Listed as Target of Next Wave of Recycling Audits
摘要：
Starting in August the EPA targeted the container industry to station inspectors at their factories
全文：
Starting in August the EPA targeted the container industry to station inspectors at their factories
編號：
21
標題：
Taiwan to Hold Meeting on APEC Marine Modeling Process
摘要：
Others The APEC Committee on Marine Modeling Processes convened its first meeting in Taipei on Augu
全文：
Others The APEC Committee on Marine Modeling Processes convened its first meeting in Taipei on Augu
編號：
973
標題：
International Conference on Environmental Health Risk Assessment and Management
摘要：
To encourage the international sharing of environmental health risk assessment and management techni
全文：
To encourage the international sharing of environmental health risk assessment and management techni
編號：
4
標題：
EPA Proposes to List Five New Toxic Chemicals
摘要：
Toxic Substance Five new substances will be added to Taiwan's list of regulated toxic chemicals. In
全文：
Toxic Substance Management Five new substances will be added to Taiwan's list of regulated toxic ch
編號：
182
標題：
Feature Article The History and Performance of the R.O.C.'s EIA System
摘要：
Prior to the Environmental Impact Assessment Act becoming law in December 1994, a range of environme
全文：
Prior to the Environmental Impact Assessment Act becoming law in December 1994, a range of environme
編號：
565
標題：
River Basin and Area Management Plan Submitted to EY for Approval
摘要：
The EPA recently completed draft measures to manage and control potentially polluting activities wit
全文：
The EPA recently completed draft measures to manage and control potentially polluting activities wit
編號：
313
標題：
CD-ROM of Environmental GIS Data Published
摘要：
The EPA issued the first in the set of "Public Databases on Environment Geographic Information Syste
全文：
The EPA issued the first in the set of "Public Databases on Environment Geographic Information Syste
編號：
493
標題：
Feature Article: Toxic Chemical Management: Past Achievements and Future Policy
摘要：
The EPA has already listed 199 types of toxic chemicals to guard against the many dangers posed by t
全文：
The EPA has already listed 199 types of toxic chemicals to guard against the many dangers posed by t
編號：
125
標題：
Controls on IC Industry Air Emissions to be Tightened
摘要：
Air Quality The Union Chemical Laboratories (UCL) of the Industrial Technology Research Institute (
全文：
Air Quality The Union Chemical Laboratories (UCL) of the Industrial Technology Research Institute (
編號：
345
標題：
ROC-Canada Environmental Cooperation Projects Confirmed
摘要：
The 4th Steering Committee of the ROC-Canada Memorandum of Understanding on Environmental Cooperatio
全文：
The 4th Steering Committee of the ROC-Canada Memorandum of Understanding on Environmental Cooperatio
編號：
533
標題：
Seven Star Green Building Label Awarded to NIEA Building
摘要：
Taiwan Ministry of the Interior has established a program to distinguish buildings that make use of
全文：
Taiwan Ministry of the Interior has established a program to distinguish buildings that make use of
編號：
391
標題：
Dioxin Emissions Standards to be Set for Small Incinerators
摘要：
Due to domestic concerns over incinerator dioxin emissions the EPA decided to set dioxin emissions s
全文：
Due to domestic concerns over incinerator dioxin emissions the EPA decided to set dioxin emissions s
編號：
797
標題：
EIA Review Committee Selected under New System
摘要：
The EPA announced its selection of the new specialist and academic members of the fourth EPA EIA Rev
全文：
The EPA announced its selection of the new specialist and academic members of the fourth EPA EIA Rev
編號：
3730
標題：
Air Quality Red Alert Days Halved Ahead of Schedule
摘要：
Air
Air Quality Red Alert Days Halved Ahead of Schedule
With the joint effort between central and l
全文：
Air Quality Red Alert Days Halved Ahead of Schedule
With the joint effort between central and local
編號：
296
標題：
Semiconductor Industry Air Emissions Standards Announced
摘要：
On January 6 1999, air pollution emission standards for the semiconductor industry were announced by
全文：
On January 6 1999, air pollution emission standards for the semiconductor industry were announced by
編號：
877
標題：
VOC Reduction Incentives for Stationary Sources Expanded
摘要：
Volatile organic compounds (VOC) in addition to the notorious sulfur oxides and nitrogen oxides, are
全文：
Volatile organic compounds (VOC) in addition to the notorious sulfur oxides and nitrogen oxides, are
編號：
852
標題：
Tracking Industrial Waste Flows in Real-time Using GPS
摘要：
The EPA plans to start using global positioning system (GPS) technology next year to perform the rea
全文：
The EPA plans to start using global positioning system (GPS) technology next year to perform the rea
編號：
939
標題：
Post-WTO Seminar for the Environmental Services Industry
摘要：
The EPA Council of Economic Planning and Development, and Board of Foreign Trade jointly conducted a
全文：
The EPA Council of Economic Planning and Development, and Board of Foreign Trade jointly conducted a
編號：
233
標題：
Industrial Waste Controls to be Significantly Tightened
摘要：
A draft amendment to the Waste Disposal Act added the principles of “waste life-span liability” and
全文：
A draft amendment to the Waste Disposal Act added the principles of “waste life-span liability” and
編號：
755
標題：
NCSD Strengthens Socio-Economic Development
摘要：
The Executive Yuan initially approved addition of a national land development working group to stren
全文：
The Executive Yuan initially approved addition of a national land development working group to stren
編號：
977
標題：
Poll Shows Air Pollution is Public’s Greatest Environmental Concern
摘要：
A recent EPA poll shows that the public considers air pollution Taiwan’s most severe environmental p
全文：
A recent EPA poll shows that the public considers air pollution Taiwan’s most severe environmental p
編號：
592
標題：
EPA To Set Recycling Guidelines for Fast Food Industry
摘要：
The pollution problems arising from fast food consumption are receiving greater attention. Because f
全文：
The pollution problems arising from fast food consumption are receiving greater attention. Because f
編號：
384
標題：
National Council for Sustainable Development Elevated and Reorganized
摘要：
Reorganization of the National Council for Sustainable Development (NCSD) was recently completed. In
全文：
Reorganization of the National Council for Sustainable Development (NCSD) was recently completed. In
編號：
87
標題：
Regulations Concerning Public Nuisance Prevention Agreements to be Amended
摘要：
Supervision Evaluation & Dispute Resolution On November 5 amendments to the Public Dispute Settleme
全文：
Supervision Evaluation & Dispute Resolution On November 5 amendments to the Public Dispute Settleme
行政院環境保護署 的其他資料集
空氣品質小時值_澎湖縣_馬公站
每小時更新更新,196謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:04:49
行政院環境保護署環保署補、捐(獎)助地方政府情形表
每季更新更新,123蘇小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2155 | 2022-01-15 01:09:29
行政院環境保護署再生粒料毒性特性溶出試驗結果
不定期更新更新,53許先生 | 02-2311-7722#2641 | 2022-01-14 01:18:39
行政院環境保護署公害糾紛處理法
不定期更新更新,51陳小姐 | (02)2311-7722分機2932 | 2023-07-30 01:02:09
行政院環境保護署綠色商店基本資料
每季更新更新,104邱小姐 | 02-23117722#2924 | 2022-01-15 01:16:43
行政院環境保護署
應回收廢棄物(廢鉛蓄電池類)回收量資料
每年更新更新,44廖小姐 | 02-2370-5888#3103 | 2022-01-14 01:24:36
行政院環境保護署公民營廢棄物清除機構數
每1年更新,110顏先生 | 02-23117722#2109 | 2023-07-27 01:00:41
行政院環境保護署行政院環境保護署環境保護人員訓練所單位決算
每1年更新,53江先生 | 03-4020789 #583 | 2023-08-09 01:05:48
行政院環境保護署環保署各類人員預算員額數
每年更新更新,58張小姐 | 02-23117722分機2122 | 2022-01-15 01:13:02
行政院環境保護署環評主管機關受理審查之環境影響調查報告
每2月更新,90黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-05 01:01:16
行政院環境保護署
接受民間捐款鼓勵檢舉重大污染案件專案執行要點
不更新更新,52許小姐 | 04-22521718#58709 | 2022-01-14 01:18:01
行政院環境保護署嘉義市重要環保統計資料
每1月更新,217顏先生 | 02-23117722#2109 | 2023-08-07 00:59:58
行政院環境保護署行政院環境保護署年度施政計畫
不定期更新更新,38賀先生 | 02-23117722轉2981 | 2023-07-27 01:03:02
行政院環境保護署因應對策專案小組初審會議紀錄
不定期更新更新,50劉先生 | 02-23117722#2743 | 2022-01-15 01:12:39
行政院環境保護署縣市(直轄市)小時值-每小時
每小時更新更新,156謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:00:23
行政院環境保護署
應回收廢棄物處理業者(廢乾電池類)最大處理量資料
每年更新更新,49廖小姐 | 02-2370-5888#3103 | 2022-01-14 01:24:03
行政院環境保護署公害糾紛裁決委員會委員名單
不定期更新更新,43謝先生 | 02-2311-7722#2962 | 2022-01-15 01:12:55
行政院環境保護署生物源網格空氣污染排放量(TWD97)
不定期更新更新,173柏小姐 | 02-23712121#6106 | 2022-01-14 01:05:47
行政院環境保護署推薦機關(薦舉)環境教育人員認證申請書
不定期更新更新,40盧小姐 | (03)4020789分機606 | 2023-08-09 01:05:27
行政院環境保護署焚化廠營運年報
每1年更新,116莊先生 | 04-22521718#53523 | 2023-08-07 01:02:34
行政院環境保護署
空氣品質小時值_新北市_土城站
每1時更新,375陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:58:19
行政院環境保護署水肥清運處理狀況
每1月更新,147余小姐 | 04-22521718#53508 | 2023-08-07 01:02:10
行政院環境保護署水庫水質監測點基本資料
不定期更新更新,157郭先生 | 2311-7722#2399 | 2023-08-07 00:59:33
行政院環境保護署持久性有機污染物斯德哥爾摩公約國家實施計畫成果報告
每年更新更新,43劉小姐 | 23257399#55531 | 2022-01-15 01:10:06
行政院環境保護署已公告之飲用水水源水質保護區一覽表
不定期更新更新,71黃先生 | 02-23117722#2881 | 2022-01-15 01:10:25
行政院環境保護署
固定污染源戴奧辛、重金屬（鉛、鎘、汞）及氯化氫排放檢測資料
每季更新更新,279江先生 | 02-23117722#6201 | 2022-01-15 01:12:33
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_臺中市_西屯站
每1時更新,284陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:57:57
行政院環境保護署污水經處理後注入地下水體水質標準
不定期更新更新,34劉小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2824 | 2022-01-14 01:23:27
行政院環境保護署室內空品公告場所
不定期更新更新,127謝先生 | 02-23117722#6410 | 2022-01-14 01:04:13
行政院環境保護署公害陳情年度統計分析報告
每3月更新,48許小姐 | 04-22521718#58709 | 2023-08-09 01:04:44
行政院環境保護署