Interim Effluent Standards Expirewater2000
「Interim Effluent Standards Expirewater2000」於資料集「Environmental Policy Monthly」由單位「行政院環境保護署」的楊先生所提供，聯繫電話是(02)23117722#2217,(02)23117722#2216，最近更新時間為：2022-01-15 01:13:03。 欄位編號的內容是475 ， 欄位標題的內容是Interim Effluent Standards Expire ， 欄位摘要的內容是After the 1998 interim effluent standards expire industries using the interim standards will need to prepare for a slightly modified draft of the 1998 Effluent Standards to take effect. In the draft proposed by the EPA, to encourage recycling in the paper industry, different COD limits will be set according to wastepaper recycling rates. Also, due to the use of different testing methods the standard for true-color value will be adjusted to 550. After completing a public hearing, the EPA presented the draft standards to the Executive Yuan for approval.
The reasonability of effluent standards has once again become a topic of contention. Effluent standards were first set in 1991 in Taiwan, and tightened successively in 1993 and 1998. However, before implementation of the 1998 standards, the EPA received a constant stream of industry feedback, asking it to loosen pollutant limits set in standards they claimed were too tough.
In the face of scientific evidence and documentation presented for the industry case, on December 24, 1997 the EPA made a well intentioned gesture by creating interim standards for seven large industries; chemicals, paper, pulp, petrochemicals, livestock, leather, and printing and dyeing. Industries were required to come up with improvement plans, and after submitting the plans would be subject to the interim standards for two years.
However, after two years, as the interim standards were set to expire, the reasonability of the 1998 effluent standards has once again been brought to the table. The seven large industries have one-by-one presented studies showing that the 1998 standards are too tough, and asking that the interim standards be maintained as the new 2000 standards.
Because COD (chemical oxygen demand) and SS (suspended solids) are the main items toughened in the 1998 standards, most industry suggestions were directed at maintaining the interim restrictions for these two standards. Industry representatives noted that due to low sewerage hookup rates in Taiwan, it is impossible to jointly treat industrial and residential wastewater. In this situation, there is no way to adjust the mixture of COD and BOD levels to optimum proportions, lowering the effectiveness of organic wastewater treatment.
In addition, industry representatives also pointed out that traditional secondary bio-treatment methods are insufficient to further lower COD discharges, so chemical treatment methods must be used. After the use of large quantities of chemical additives, operating costs and quantities of waste sludge will both increase, as well as the bio-toxicity of wastewater discharges.
To come up with a set of reasonable, workable effluent standards, the EPA called numerous meeting between experts and academics; industrial groups; the Industrial Development Bureau (IDB) and the Council of Agriculture, to discuss the standards in light of the current status of industry improvements, technological feasibility and environmental impact. A total of nine different meetings resulted in changes to the draft standards that ensure effluent management will be more reasonable and practicable. Changes include:
1. Due to a change in the testing method for true-color value, the control standard for true-color value should be 550. Thus, the control standard for all target industries was changed to 550 and the proscribed testing method will remain the current method in use.
2.
Due to a major switch to wastepaper as a raw material by the paper industry in order to comply with recycling policies, the current shape of the paper industry and the character of it's effluent stream have changed completely. For this reason, paper companies where wastepaper makes up over 60% of raw materials used are allowed a COD limit of 180mg/L. For companies where wastepaper consists of below 60% of raw materials, the COD limit will be 160mg/L, and companies that do not use wastepaper will have to comply with the COD 100mg/L standard.
The EPA emphasized that in 1988 and 1987, 2,000 companies made use of the interim standards and signed pledges to continue improvements to pollution prevention. In total pig raising was decreased by almost 280,000 head and around 2.2 billion NTD were invested in order to meet the 1998 effluent standards. Moreover, statistics compiled from onsite audits by local EPBs revealed that compliance with COD standards averages around 81% among industry groups (see graph), with the additional 19% able to meet interim standards. To totally readjust effluent standard values only for the sake of this 19% of problem industries would be a step in the wrong direction and be a violation of the EPA's mandate to protect water quality. Accordingly, the effluent standard values will not be changed again during the current phase.
Over the next half year, the EPA will check to see if industries have made any of the pollution prevention improvements suggested over the course of their meetings. Some methods suggested include the separation of solid and liquid wastes from pig-rearing, removal of high salt and chlorine liquid wastes in the dying materials and leather industry, or the removal of dying materials and treatment additives from wastewater in the dying industry. If these changes are reflected in the solid waste online reporting system or by audit numbers, or it can be shown that companies are properly using wastewater treatment facilities but are still stuck at the edge of the control standards due to technology bottlenecks, the EPA will deal with new them on a case-by-case basis. After onsite verification by special personnel, the possibility of opening a subcategory standard can be assessed and discussed. ， 欄位全文的內容是After the 1998 interim effluent standards expire industries using the interim standards will need to prepare for a slightly modified draft of the 1998 Effluent Standards to take effect. In the draft proposed by the EPA, to encourage recycling in the paper industry, different COD limits will be set according to wastepaper recycling rates. Also, due to the use of different testing methods the standard for true-color value will be adjusted to 550. After completing a public hearing, the EPA presented the draft standards to the Executive Yuan for approval.
The reasonability of effluent standards has once again become a topic of contention. Effluent standards were first set in 1991 in Taiwan, and tightened successively in 1993 and 1998. However, before implementation of the 1998 standards, the EPA received a constant stream of industry feedback, asking it to loosen pollutant limits set in standards they claimed were too tough.
In the face of scientific evidence and documentation presented for the industry case, on December 24, 1997 the EPA made a well intentioned gesture by creating interim standards for seven large industries; chemicals, paper, pulp, petrochemicals, livestock, leather, and printing and dyeing. Industries were required to come up with improvement plans, and after submitting the plans would be subject to the interim standards for two years.
However, after two years, as the interim standards were set to expire, the reasonability of the 1998 effluent standards has once again been brought to the table. The seven large industries have one-by-one presented studies showing that the 1998 standards are too tough, and asking that the interim standards be maintained as the new 2000 standards.
Because COD (chemical oxygen demand) and SS (suspended solids) are the main items toughened in the 1998 standards, most industry suggestions were directed at maintaining the interim restrictions for these two standards. Industry representatives noted that due to low sewerage hookup rates in Taiwan, it is impossible to jointly treat industrial and residential wastewater. In this situation, there is no way to adjust the mixture of COD and BOD levels to optimum proportions, lowering the effectiveness of organic wastewater treatment.
In addition, industry representatives also pointed out that traditional secondary bio-treatment methods are insufficient to further lower COD discharges, so chemical treatment methods must be used. After the use of large quantities of chemical additives, operating costs and quantities of waste sludge will both increase, as well as the bio-toxicity of wastewater discharges.
To come up with a set of reasonable, workable effluent standards, the EPA called numerous meeting between experts and academics; industrial groups; the Industrial Development Bureau (IDB) and the Council of Agriculture, to discuss the standards in light of the current status of industry improvements, technological feasibility and environmental impact. A total of nine different meetings resulted in changes to the draft standards that ensure effluent management will be more reasonable and practicable. Changes include:
1. Due to a change in the testing method for true-color value, the control standard for true-color value should be 550. Thus, the control standard for all target industries was changed to 550 and the proscribed testing method will remain the current method in use.
2.
Due to a major switch to wastepaper as a raw material by the paper industry in order to comply with recycling policies, the current shape of the paper industry and the character of it's effluent stream have changed completely. For this reason, paper companies where wastepaper makes up over 60% of raw materials used are allowed a COD limit of 180mg/L. For companies where wastepaper consists of below 60% of raw materials, the COD limit will be 160mg/L, and companies that do not use wastepaper will have to comply with the COD 100mg/L standard.
The EPA emphasized that in 1988 and 1987, 2,000 companies made use of the interim standards and signed pledges to continue improvements to pollution prevention. In total pig raising was decreased by almost 280,000 head and around 2.2 billion NTD were invested in order to meet the 1998 effluent standards. Moreover, statistics compiled from onsite audits by local EPBs revealed that compliance with COD standards averages around 81% among industry groups (see graph), with the additional 19% able to meet interim standards. To totally readjust effluent standard values only for the sake of this 19% of problem industries would be a step in the wrong direction and be a violation of the EPA's mandate to protect water quality. Accordingly, the effluent standard values will not be changed again during the current phase.
Over the next half year, the EPA will check to see if industries have made any of the pollution prevention improvements suggested over the course of their meetings. Some methods suggested include the separation of solid and liquid wastes from pig-rearing, removal of high salt and chlorine liquid wastes in the dying materials and leather industry, or the removal of dying materials and treatment additives from wastewater in the dying industry. If these changes are reflected in the solid waste online reporting system or by audit numbers, or it can be shown that companies are properly using wastewater treatment facilities but are still stuck at the edge of the control standards due to technology bottlenecks, the EPA will deal with new them on a case-by-case basis. After onsite verification by special personnel, the possibility of opening a subcategory standard can be assessed and discussed. ， 欄位年度的內容是2000 ， 欄位月份的內容是3 ， 欄位卷的內容是3 ， 欄位期的內容是7 ， 欄位順序的內容是1 ， 欄位倒序的內容是2 ， 欄位分類的內容是water ， 欄位標題2的內容是Interim Effluent Standards Expire ， 欄位檔案位置的內容是print/V3/V3-07 。
編號
475
標題
Interim Effluent Standards Expire
摘要
After the 1998 interim effluent standards expire industries using the interim standards will need to prepare for a slightly modified draft of the 1998 Effluent Standards to take effect. In the draft proposed by the EPA, to encourage recycling in the paper industry, different COD limits will be set according to wastepaper recycling rates. Also, due to the use of different testing methods the standard for true-color value will be adjusted to 550. After completing a public hearing, the EPA presented the draft standards to the Executive Yuan for approval. The reasonability of effluent standards has once again become a topic of contention. Effluent standards were first set in 1991 in Taiwan, and tightened successively in 1993 and 1998. However, before implementation of the 1998 standards, the EPA received a constant stream of industry feedback, asking it to loosen pollutant limits set in standards they claimed were too tough. In the face of scientific evidence and documentation presented for the industry case, on December 24, 1997 the EPA made a well intentioned gesture by creating interim standards for seven large industries; chemicals, paper, pulp, petrochemicals, livestock, leather, and printing and dyeing. Industries were required to come up with improvement plans, and after submitting the plans would be subject to the interim standards for two years. However, after two years, as the interim standards were set to expire, the reasonability of the 1998 effluent standards has once again been brought to the table. The seven large industries have one-by-one presented studies showing that the 1998 standards are too tough, and asking that the interim standards be maintained as the new 2000 standards. Because COD (chemical oxygen demand) and SS (suspended solids) are the main items toughened in the 1998 standards, most industry suggestions were directed at maintaining the interim restrictions for these two standards. Industry representatives noted that due to low sewerage hookup rates in Taiwan, it is impossible to jointly treat industrial and residential wastewater. In this situation, there is no way to adjust the mixture of COD and BOD levels to optimum proportions, lowering the effectiveness of organic wastewater treatment. In addition, industry representatives also pointed out that traditional secondary bio-treatment methods are insufficient to further lower COD discharges, so chemical treatment methods must be used. After the use of large quantities of chemical additives, operating costs and quantities of waste sludge will both increase, as well as the bio-toxicity of wastewater discharges. To come up with a set of reasonable, workable effluent standards, the EPA called numerous meeting between experts and academics; industrial groups; the Industrial Development Bureau (IDB) and the Council of Agriculture, to discuss the standards in light of the current status of industry improvements, technological feasibility and environmental impact. A total of nine different meetings resulted in changes to the draft standards that ensure effluent management will be more reasonable and practicable. Changes include: 1. Due to a change in the testing method for true-color value, the control standard for true-color value should be 550. Thus, the control standard for all target industries was changed to 550 and the proscribed testing method will remain the current method in use. 2. Due to a major switch to wastepaper as a raw material by the paper industry in order to comply with recycling policies, the current shape of the paper industry and the character of it's effluent stream have changed completely. For this reason, paper companies where wastepaper makes up over 60% of raw materials used are allowed a COD limit of 180mg/L. For companies where wastepaper consists of below 60% of raw materials, the COD limit will be 160mg/L, and companies that do not use wastepaper will have to comply with the COD 100mg/L standard. The EPA emphasized that in 1988 and 1987, 2,000 companies made use of the interim standards and signed pledges to continue improvements to pollution prevention. In total pig raising was decreased by almost 280,000 head and around 2.2 billion NTD were invested in order to meet the 1998 effluent standards. Moreover, statistics compiled from onsite audits by local EPBs revealed that compliance with COD standards averages around 81% among industry groups (see graph), with the additional 19% able to meet interim standards. To totally readjust effluent standard values only for the sake of this 19% of problem industries would be a step in the wrong direction and be a violation of the EPA's mandate to protect water quality. Accordingly, the effluent standard values will not be changed again during the current phase. Over the next half year, the EPA will check to see if industries have made any of the pollution prevention improvements suggested over the course of their meetings. Some methods suggested include the separation of solid and liquid wastes from pig-rearing, removal of high salt and chlorine liquid wastes in the dying materials and leather industry, or the removal of dying materials and treatment additives from wastewater in the dying industry. If these changes are reflected in the solid waste online reporting system or by audit numbers, or it can be shown that companies are properly using wastewater treatment facilities but are still stuck at the edge of the control standards due to technology bottlenecks, the EPA will deal with new them on a case-by-case basis. After onsite verification by special personnel, the possibility of opening a subcategory standard can be assessed and discussed.
全文
After the 1998 interim effluent standards expire industries using the interim standards will need to prepare for a slightly modified draft of the 1998 Effluent Standards to take effect. In the draft proposed by the EPA, to encourage recycling in the paper industry, different COD limits will be set according to wastepaper recycling rates. Also, due to the use of different testing methods the standard for true-color value will be adjusted to 550. After completing a public hearing, the EPA presented the draft standards to the Executive Yuan for approval. The reasonability of effluent standards has once again become a topic of contention. Effluent standards were first set in 1991 in Taiwan, and tightened successively in 1993 and 1998. However, before implementation of the 1998 standards, the EPA received a constant stream of industry feedback, asking it to loosen pollutant limits set in standards they claimed were too tough. In the face of scientific evidence and documentation presented for the industry case, on December 24, 1997 the EPA made a well intentioned gesture by creating interim standards for seven large industries; chemicals, paper, pulp, petrochemicals, livestock, leather, and printing and dyeing. Industries were required to come up with improvement plans, and after submitting the plans would be subject to the interim standards for two years. However, after two years, as the interim standards were set to expire, the reasonability of the 1998 effluent standards has once again been brought to the table. The seven large industries have one-by-one presented studies showing that the 1998 standards are too tough, and asking that the interim standards be maintained as the new 2000 standards. Because COD (chemical oxygen demand) and SS (suspended solids) are the main items toughened in the 1998 standards, most industry suggestions were directed at maintaining the interim restrictions for these two standards. Industry representatives noted that due to low sewerage hookup rates in Taiwan, it is impossible to jointly treat industrial and residential wastewater. In this situation, there is no way to adjust the mixture of COD and BOD levels to optimum proportions, lowering the effectiveness of organic wastewater treatment. In addition, industry representatives also pointed out that traditional secondary bio-treatment methods are insufficient to further lower COD discharges, so chemical treatment methods must be used. After the use of large quantities of chemical additives, operating costs and quantities of waste sludge will both increase, as well as the bio-toxicity of wastewater discharges. To come up with a set of reasonable, workable effluent standards, the EPA called numerous meeting between experts and academics; industrial groups; the Industrial Development Bureau (IDB) and the Council of Agriculture, to discuss the standards in light of the current status of industry improvements, technological feasibility and environmental impact. A total of nine different meetings resulted in changes to the draft standards that ensure effluent management will be more reasonable and practicable. Changes include: 1. Due to a change in the testing method for true-color value, the control standard for true-color value should be 550. Thus, the control standard for all target industries was changed to 550 and the proscribed testing method will remain the current method in use. 2. Due to a major switch to wastepaper as a raw material by the paper industry in order to comply with recycling policies, the current shape of the paper industry and the character of it's effluent stream have changed completely. For this reason, paper companies where wastepaper makes up over 60% of raw materials used are allowed a COD limit of 180mg/L. For companies where wastepaper consists of below 60% of raw materials, the COD limit will be 160mg/L, and companies that do not use wastepaper will have to comply with the COD 100mg/L standard. The EPA emphasized that in 1988 and 1987, 2,000 companies made use of the interim standards and signed pledges to continue improvements to pollution prevention. In total pig raising was decreased by almost 280,000 head and around 2.2 billion NTD were invested in order to meet the 1998 effluent standards. Moreover, statistics compiled from onsite audits by local EPBs revealed that compliance with COD standards averages around 81% among industry groups (see graph), with the additional 19% able to meet interim standards. To totally readjust effluent standard values only for the sake of this 19% of problem industries would be a step in the wrong direction and be a violation of the EPA's mandate to protect water quality. Accordingly, the effluent standard values will not be changed again during the current phase. Over the next half year, the EPA will check to see if industries have made any of the pollution prevention improvements suggested over the course of their meetings. Some methods suggested include the separation of solid and liquid wastes from pig-rearing, removal of high salt and chlorine liquid wastes in the dying materials and leather industry, or the removal of dying materials and treatment additives from wastewater in the dying industry. If these changes are reflected in the solid waste online reporting system or by audit numbers, or it can be shown that companies are properly using wastewater treatment facilities but are still stuck at the edge of the control standards due to technology bottlenecks, the EPA will deal with new them on a case-by-case basis. After onsite verification by special personnel, the possibility of opening a subcategory standard can be assessed and discussed.
年度
2000
月份
3
卷
3
期
7
順序
1
倒序
2
分類
water
標題2
Interim Effluent Standards Expire
檔案位置
print/V3/V3-07
「Interim Effluent Standards Expirewater2000」所屬的資料集：「Environmental Policy Monthly」的其他資料
編號：
469
標題：
Review Guidelines Set for Tier 2 Eco-Products
摘要：
The EPA has finished the Guidelines for the Review of Tier 2 Eco-Products. According to the guidelin
全文：
The EPA has finished the Guidelines for the Review of Tier 2 Eco-Products. According to the guidelin
編號：
183
標題：
General Industrial Waste Exchange Operational Review Guidelines Readied
摘要：
A new EPA regulation will bring industrial waste exchange centers into the legal system eleven years
全文：
A new EPA regulation will bring industrial waste exchange centers into the legal system eleven years
編號：
319
標題：
EPA to Integrate Factory Pollution Prevention Evaluation and Assistance
摘要：
1998 factory pollution control evaluation efforts by the EPA focused on round 2 and 3 factories i.e.
全文：
1998 factory pollution control evaluation efforts by the EPA focused on round 2 and 3 factories i.e.
編號：
773
標題：
Free Subscriptions to EPA e-News Offered Online
摘要：
Those who have been keeping and eye on the EPA will surely have noticed that there is a new addition
全文：
Those who have been keeping and eye on the EPA will surely have noticed that there is a new addition
編號：
628
標題：
National Industrial Waste Management Plan Reported to Executive Yuan
摘要：
After calling together relevant industrial agencies the EPA has completed a draft of the National In
全文：
After calling together relevant industrial agencies the EPA has completed a draft of the National In
編號：
649
標題：
Traditional Industries Earn Environmental Awards
摘要：
Results of the 9th annual Green Business Awards were announced on October 3 by the EPA. The awards
全文：
Results of the 9th annual Green Business Awards were announced on October 3 by the EPA. The awards
編號：
126
標題：
Discarded Tires and Waste Lubricants to be Used as Fuel
摘要：
Recycling On March 2 1998, the EPA announced discarded tire and waste lubricant “resource factories
全文：
Recycling On March 2 1998, the EPA announced discarded tire and waste lubricant “resource factories
編號：
997
標題：
Subsidies for Filling Station Vapor Recovery Equipment Reintroduced
摘要：
The EPA is once again offering subsidies for the installation of vapor recovery equipment on filling
全文：
The EPA is once again offering subsidies for the installation of vapor recovery equipment on filling
編號：
155
標題：
Water Pollution Control Act Enforcement Rules to be Amended
摘要：
Water Quality In line with the central government's policy of streamlining regulations the EPA's B
全文：
Water Quality In line with the central government's policy of streamlining regulations the EPA's B
編號：
364
標題：
First Round of Intensive Inspections of Hazardous Waste Complete
摘要：
To deal with continued illegal dumping of hazardous industrial waste the EPA in March began its firs
全文：
To deal with continued illegal dumping of hazardous industrial waste the EPA in March began its firs
編號：
147
標題：
Guidelines for Toxics Use Registration Formally Announced
摘要：
Toxic Substance The Toxic Chemical Substance Control Act amended last year designates three systems
全文：
Toxic Substance Management The Toxic Chemical Substance Control Act amended last year designates t
編號：
867
標題：
Marine Environment Classification and Quality Standards Announced
摘要：
The EPA promulgated the Marine Environment Classification and Quality Standards on December 26 2001.
全文：
The EPA promulgated the Marine Environment Classification and Quality Standards on December 26 2001.
編號：
51
標題：
Bottled Water Sources to be Investigated
摘要：
Water Quality The EPA has announced the Working Guidelines for the Application of an Inspection Cer
全文：
Water Quality The EPA has announced the Working Guidelines for the Application of an Inspection Cer
編號：
577
標題：
EPA Plans to Accelerate Phase-out of Older Vehicles
摘要：
With 15 million cars and motorcycles on the road Taiwan has the highest vehicle density in the world
全文：
With 15 million cars and motorcycles on the road Taiwan has the highest vehicle density in the world
編號：
386
標題：
Review of Stationary Pollution Source Permits to be Handled at the County/City Level
摘要：
Due to the downsizing of the Taiwan Provincial Government (TPG) the EPA put the responsibility for r
全文：
Due to the downsizing of the Taiwan Provincial Government (TPG) the EPA put the responsibility for r
編號：
363
標題：
Feature Article Taiwan's Recycling System Moves Forward
摘要：
In the past ten years Taiwan’s average annual growth rate of municipal waste has reached nearly 6%.
全文：
In the past ten years Taiwan’s average annual growth rate of municipal waste has reached nearly 6%.
編號：
219
標題：
LY Inquiries to the EPA Focus on Narrower Range of Issues
摘要：
It was found that during the 5th session of the Legislative Yuan (LY) inquiries addressed to the EPA
全文：
It was found that during the 5th session of the Legislative Yuan (LY) inquiries addressed to the EPA
編號：
3128
標題：
Deputy Minister Yeh Visits Taoyuan Enterprises with Outstanding Environmental Performances
摘要：
Control & Evaluation Deputy Minister Yeh Visits Taoyuan Enterprises with Outstanding Environmental P
全文：
Control & Evaluation Deputy Minister Yeh Visits Taoyuan Enterprises with Outstanding Environmental P
編號：
534
標題：
Taipei City to Implement Per-Bag Trash Collection Fee Beginning in July
摘要：
Director of Taipei City's Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Dr. Stephen Shen, announced o
全文：
Director of Taipei City's Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Dr. Stephen Shen, announced o
編號：
353
標題：
Control of Waste Electroplating Solutions to Proceed in Two Stages
摘要：
The illegal disposal of waste electroplating solutions and sludge is a serious problem in Taiwan. Th
全文：
The illegal disposal of waste electroplating solutions and sludge is a serious problem in Taiwan. Th
編號：
305
標題：
EPA Drafts Rules for Green Product Procurement
摘要：
The EPA has drafted the Regulations Governing the Criteria and Implementation of Priority Purchasing
全文：
The EPA has drafted the Regulations Governing the Criteria and Implementation of Priority Purchasing
編號：
40
標題：
Effluent Standards to be Substantially Amended
摘要：
Water Quality The EPA has recently made several significant amendments to Taiwan’s Effluent Standar
全文：
Water Quality The EPA has recently made several significant amendments to Taiwan’s Effluent Standar
編號：
1001
標題：
Economic Processing Zone Administration to Review Waste Disposal Plans
摘要：
To simplify industrial waste disposal plan review procedures on August 13 the EPA formally commissio
全文：
To simplify industrial waste disposal plan review procedures on August 13 the EPA formally commissio
編號：
303
標題：
Dry Cleaning Solvent Recovery Rate to be Set at 85%
摘要：
The Air Pollution Control and Emission Standards for the Dry Cleaning Industry require dry cleaning
全文：
The Air Pollution Control and Emission Standards for the Dry Cleaning Industry require dry cleaning
編號：
141
標題：
Environmental Protection Market Enjoys Steady Growth
摘要：
Others To better understand the changes taking place among environmental protection related busines
全文：
Others To better understand the changes taking place among environmental protection related busines
編號：
999
標題：
World-Class Auto Testing Center Formally Begins Operations
摘要：
Built in the Changpin Industrial Park near Changhua by the Automobile Research and Testing Center (A
全文：
Built in the Changpin Industrial Park near Changhua by the Automobile Research and Testing Center (A
編號：
321
標題：
Incinerator Construction Moves Forward
摘要：
The EPA is vigorously pursuing the construction of new waste incineration facilities as the best met
全文：
The EPA is vigorously pursuing the construction of new waste incineration facilities as the best met
編號：
205
標題：
Controls on General Waste Recyclers to be Relaxed
摘要：
On August 5 the EPA formally announced an amendment to a portion of articles in the Public and Priva
全文：
On August 5 the EPA formally announced an amendment to a portion of articles in the Public and Priva
編號：
188
標題：
Taiwan Heads up APEC Marine Resource Conservation Working Group
摘要：
EPA Water Quality Protection Bureau Director General Gwo-dong Roam lead a delegation from Taiwan to
全文：
EPA Water Quality Protection Bureau Director General Gwo-dong Roam lead a delegation from Taiwan to
編號：
76
標題：
Toxic Chemicals Control Act Substantially Amended
摘要：
Toxic Substance On November 19 the Toxic Chemicals Control Act was amended and promulgated by presi
全文：
Toxic Substance Management On November 19 the Toxic Chemicals Control Act was amended and promulgat
行政院環境保護署 的其他資料集
公民營廢棄物甲級處理機構許可資料
每月更新更新,106何先生 | 02-2311-7722#2653 | 2022-01-14 01:25:59
行政院環境保護署日累積雨量(每月更新)
每1月更新,141陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-03 01:05:26
行政院環境保護署公害糾紛處理法施行細則
不定期更新更新,47潘先生 | (02)2311-7722分機2931 | 2022-01-15 01:13:21
行政院環境保護署APEC Ocean and Fisheries Working Group (OFWG)
不定期更新更新,81陳小姐 | (02)23117722#2753 | 2023-08-02 01:03:43
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_雲林縣_臺西站
每1時更新,212陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:57:49
行政院環境保護署
土壤污染管制區範圍圖
不定期更新更新,38賴小姐 | 02-2383-2389#8102 | 2022-01-15 01:16:35
行政院環境保護署區域性地下水水質監測井基本資料
不定期更新更新,129謝小姐 | 02-23117722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:23:17
行政院環境保護署大眾捷運系統之開發類別環境影響評估報告書
每2月更新,40黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-05 01:01:06
行政院環境保護署縣市(非直轄市)小時值-每小時
每小時更新更新,194謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:00:27
行政院環境保護署0800資源回收免費專線-一般件問題查詢廢機動車輛統計
每年更新更新,42莊先生 | 02-23705888#3108 | 2022-01-14 01:24:24
行政院環境保護署
道路交通音量監測結果統計(依管制區分)
每季更新更新,156林先生 | 02-23712121#6403 | 2022-01-14 01:18:41
行政院環境保護署空氣品質區範圍圖
不定期更新更新,41簡先生 | 02-23712121#6103 | 2023-07-27 01:06:02
行政院環境保護署毒性化學物質釋放量公開資訊
不定期更新更新,116李小姐 | (02)23257399#55318 | 2023-07-27 01:00:19
行政院環境保護署列管工業區下水道名單
不定期更新更新,42許先生 | 02-2311-7722#2831 | 2022-01-14 01:23:05
行政院環境保護署歷年毒性化學物質環境流布調查成果手冊
每年更新更新,37陳小姐 | 23257399#55337 | 2022-01-14 01:22:52
行政院環境保護署
0800資源回收免費專線-查詢廢輪胎、鉛蓄電池統計
每年更新更新,58莊先生 | 02-23705888#3108 | 2022-01-14 01:24:27
行政院環境保護署符合噪音管制標準車輛-國產汽油引擎車
不定期更新更新,319章小姐 | 02-23712121#6406 | 2023-07-28 11:37:57
行政院環境保護署光化測站(林園)小時值資料
不定期更新更新,156陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-07 01:03:28
行政院環境保護署歷年土壤調查_環保署土壤重金屬含量調查(25公頃)
不定期更新更新,116謝小姐 | (02)23832389*8302 | 2022-01-14 01:20:17
行政院環境保護署環保署補、捐(獎)助地方政府情形表
每季更新更新,123蘇小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2155 | 2022-01-15 01:09:29
行政院環境保護署
地方環保局環保實收罰鍰
每月更新更新,168謝小姐 | 02-23117722#2103 | 2022-01-14 01:21:32
行政院環境保護署廢棄物質最終處置資訊網會議資料
每月更新更新,40許先生 | 02-2311-7722#2641 | 2022-01-14 01:24:13
行政院環境保護署光化測站基本資料
不定期更新更新,53謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:05:01
行政院環境保護署環境影響評估報告書環境敏感區位調查表
每2月更新,158黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-05 01:00:55
行政院環境保護署應回收廢棄物(廢輪胎類)回收量資料
每年更新更新,52廖小姐 | 02-2370-5888#3103 | 2022-01-14 01:24:37
行政院環境保護署
環保專案摘要資料_其他
不定期更新更新,160陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-07-30 01:01:54
行政院環境保護署管制事業、下水道系統下水道查核、處分資料資訊平台
不定期更新更新,42陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2827 | 2023-08-09 01:04:16
行政院環境保護署化學物質資料及登錄申請表
不定期更新更新,37金先生 | 23257399#55315 | 2022-01-15 01:13:24
行政院環境保護署環境教育人員認證得採計之專業領域課程(ODS)
不定期更新更新,43盧小姐 | (03)4020789分機606 | 2023-08-09 01:05:24
行政院環境保護署預鑄式建築物污水處理設施審定登記認可設施一覽表
不定期更新更新,52洪先生 | 02-23117722分機2833 | 2023-08-09 01:04:31
行政院環境保護署