Interim Effluent Standards Expirewater2000
「Interim Effluent Standards Expirewater2000」於資料集「Environmental Policy Monthly」由單位「行政院環境保護署」的楊先生所提供，聯繫電話是(02)23117722#2217,(02)23117722#2216，最近更新時間為：2022-01-15 01:13:03。 欄位編號的內容是475 ， 欄位標題的內容是Interim Effluent Standards Expire ， 欄位摘要的內容是After the 1998 interim effluent standards expire industries using the interim standards will need to prepare for a slightly modified draft of the 1998 Effluent Standards to take effect. In the draft proposed by the EPA, to encourage recycling in the paper industry, different COD limits will be set according to wastepaper recycling rates. Also, due to the use of different testing methods the standard for true-color value will be adjusted to 550. After completing a public hearing, the EPA presented the draft standards to the Executive Yuan for approval.
The reasonability of effluent standards has once again become a topic of contention. Effluent standards were first set in 1991 in Taiwan, and tightened successively in 1993 and 1998. However, before implementation of the 1998 standards, the EPA received a constant stream of industry feedback, asking it to loosen pollutant limits set in standards they claimed were too tough.
In the face of scientific evidence and documentation presented for the industry case, on December 24, 1997 the EPA made a well intentioned gesture by creating interim standards for seven large industries; chemicals, paper, pulp, petrochemicals, livestock, leather, and printing and dyeing. Industries were required to come up with improvement plans, and after submitting the plans would be subject to the interim standards for two years.
However, after two years, as the interim standards were set to expire, the reasonability of the 1998 effluent standards has once again been brought to the table. The seven large industries have one-by-one presented studies showing that the 1998 standards are too tough, and asking that the interim standards be maintained as the new 2000 standards.
Because COD (chemical oxygen demand) and SS (suspended solids) are the main items toughened in the 1998 standards, most industry suggestions were directed at maintaining the interim restrictions for these two standards. Industry representatives noted that due to low sewerage hookup rates in Taiwan, it is impossible to jointly treat industrial and residential wastewater. In this situation, there is no way to adjust the mixture of COD and BOD levels to optimum proportions, lowering the effectiveness of organic wastewater treatment.
In addition, industry representatives also pointed out that traditional secondary bio-treatment methods are insufficient to further lower COD discharges, so chemical treatment methods must be used. After the use of large quantities of chemical additives, operating costs and quantities of waste sludge will both increase, as well as the bio-toxicity of wastewater discharges.
To come up with a set of reasonable, workable effluent standards, the EPA called numerous meeting between experts and academics; industrial groups; the Industrial Development Bureau (IDB) and the Council of Agriculture, to discuss the standards in light of the current status of industry improvements, technological feasibility and environmental impact. A total of nine different meetings resulted in changes to the draft standards that ensure effluent management will be more reasonable and practicable. Changes include:
1. Due to a change in the testing method for true-color value, the control standard for true-color value should be 550. Thus, the control standard for all target industries was changed to 550 and the proscribed testing method will remain the current method in use.
2.
Due to a major switch to wastepaper as a raw material by the paper industry in order to comply with recycling policies, the current shape of the paper industry and the character of it's effluent stream have changed completely. For this reason, paper companies where wastepaper makes up over 60% of raw materials used are allowed a COD limit of 180mg/L. For companies where wastepaper consists of below 60% of raw materials, the COD limit will be 160mg/L, and companies that do not use wastepaper will have to comply with the COD 100mg/L standard.
The EPA emphasized that in 1988 and 1987, 2,000 companies made use of the interim standards and signed pledges to continue improvements to pollution prevention. In total pig raising was decreased by almost 280,000 head and around 2.2 billion NTD were invested in order to meet the 1998 effluent standards. Moreover, statistics compiled from onsite audits by local EPBs revealed that compliance with COD standards averages around 81% among industry groups (see graph), with the additional 19% able to meet interim standards. To totally readjust effluent standard values only for the sake of this 19% of problem industries would be a step in the wrong direction and be a violation of the EPA's mandate to protect water quality. Accordingly, the effluent standard values will not be changed again during the current phase.
Over the next half year, the EPA will check to see if industries have made any of the pollution prevention improvements suggested over the course of their meetings. Some methods suggested include the separation of solid and liquid wastes from pig-rearing, removal of high salt and chlorine liquid wastes in the dying materials and leather industry, or the removal of dying materials and treatment additives from wastewater in the dying industry. If these changes are reflected in the solid waste online reporting system or by audit numbers, or it can be shown that companies are properly using wastewater treatment facilities but are still stuck at the edge of the control standards due to technology bottlenecks, the EPA will deal with new them on a case-by-case basis. After onsite verification by special personnel, the possibility of opening a subcategory standard can be assessed and discussed. ， 欄位全文的內容是After the 1998 interim effluent standards expire industries using the interim standards will need to prepare for a slightly modified draft of the 1998 Effluent Standards to take effect. In the draft proposed by the EPA, to encourage recycling in the paper industry, different COD limits will be set according to wastepaper recycling rates. Also, due to the use of different testing methods the standard for true-color value will be adjusted to 550. After completing a public hearing, the EPA presented the draft standards to the Executive Yuan for approval.
The reasonability of effluent standards has once again become a topic of contention. Effluent standards were first set in 1991 in Taiwan, and tightened successively in 1993 and 1998. However, before implementation of the 1998 standards, the EPA received a constant stream of industry feedback, asking it to loosen pollutant limits set in standards they claimed were too tough.
In the face of scientific evidence and documentation presented for the industry case, on December 24, 1997 the EPA made a well intentioned gesture by creating interim standards for seven large industries; chemicals, paper, pulp, petrochemicals, livestock, leather, and printing and dyeing. Industries were required to come up with improvement plans, and after submitting the plans would be subject to the interim standards for two years.
However, after two years, as the interim standards were set to expire, the reasonability of the 1998 effluent standards has once again been brought to the table. The seven large industries have one-by-one presented studies showing that the 1998 standards are too tough, and asking that the interim standards be maintained as the new 2000 standards.
Because COD (chemical oxygen demand) and SS (suspended solids) are the main items toughened in the 1998 standards, most industry suggestions were directed at maintaining the interim restrictions for these two standards. Industry representatives noted that due to low sewerage hookup rates in Taiwan, it is impossible to jointly treat industrial and residential wastewater. In this situation, there is no way to adjust the mixture of COD and BOD levels to optimum proportions, lowering the effectiveness of organic wastewater treatment.
In addition, industry representatives also pointed out that traditional secondary bio-treatment methods are insufficient to further lower COD discharges, so chemical treatment methods must be used. After the use of large quantities of chemical additives, operating costs and quantities of waste sludge will both increase, as well as the bio-toxicity of wastewater discharges.
To come up with a set of reasonable, workable effluent standards, the EPA called numerous meeting between experts and academics; industrial groups; the Industrial Development Bureau (IDB) and the Council of Agriculture, to discuss the standards in light of the current status of industry improvements, technological feasibility and environmental impact. A total of nine different meetings resulted in changes to the draft standards that ensure effluent management will be more reasonable and practicable. Changes include:
1. Due to a change in the testing method for true-color value, the control standard for true-color value should be 550. Thus, the control standard for all target industries was changed to 550 and the proscribed testing method will remain the current method in use.
2.
Due to a major switch to wastepaper as a raw material by the paper industry in order to comply with recycling policies, the current shape of the paper industry and the character of it's effluent stream have changed completely. For this reason, paper companies where wastepaper makes up over 60% of raw materials used are allowed a COD limit of 180mg/L. For companies where wastepaper consists of below 60% of raw materials, the COD limit will be 160mg/L, and companies that do not use wastepaper will have to comply with the COD 100mg/L standard.
The EPA emphasized that in 1988 and 1987, 2,000 companies made use of the interim standards and signed pledges to continue improvements to pollution prevention. In total pig raising was decreased by almost 280,000 head and around 2.2 billion NTD were invested in order to meet the 1998 effluent standards. Moreover, statistics compiled from onsite audits by local EPBs revealed that compliance with COD standards averages around 81% among industry groups (see graph), with the additional 19% able to meet interim standards. To totally readjust effluent standard values only for the sake of this 19% of problem industries would be a step in the wrong direction and be a violation of the EPA's mandate to protect water quality. Accordingly, the effluent standard values will not be changed again during the current phase.
Over the next half year, the EPA will check to see if industries have made any of the pollution prevention improvements suggested over the course of their meetings. Some methods suggested include the separation of solid and liquid wastes from pig-rearing, removal of high salt and chlorine liquid wastes in the dying materials and leather industry, or the removal of dying materials and treatment additives from wastewater in the dying industry. If these changes are reflected in the solid waste online reporting system or by audit numbers, or it can be shown that companies are properly using wastewater treatment facilities but are still stuck at the edge of the control standards due to technology bottlenecks, the EPA will deal with new them on a case-by-case basis. After onsite verification by special personnel, the possibility of opening a subcategory standard can be assessed and discussed. ， 欄位年度的內容是2000 ， 欄位月份的內容是3 ， 欄位卷的內容是3 ， 欄位期的內容是7 ， 欄位順序的內容是1 ， 欄位倒序的內容是2 ， 欄位分類的內容是water ， 欄位標題2的內容是Interim Effluent Standards Expire ， 欄位檔案位置的內容是print/V3/V3-07 。
編號
475
標題
Interim Effluent Standards Expire
摘要
After the 1998 interim effluent standards expire industries using the interim standards will need to prepare for a slightly modified draft of the 1998 Effluent Standards to take effect. In the draft proposed by the EPA, to encourage recycling in the paper industry, different COD limits will be set according to wastepaper recycling rates. Also, due to the use of different testing methods the standard for true-color value will be adjusted to 550. After completing a public hearing, the EPA presented the draft standards to the Executive Yuan for approval. The reasonability of effluent standards has once again become a topic of contention. Effluent standards were first set in 1991 in Taiwan, and tightened successively in 1993 and 1998. However, before implementation of the 1998 standards, the EPA received a constant stream of industry feedback, asking it to loosen pollutant limits set in standards they claimed were too tough. In the face of scientific evidence and documentation presented for the industry case, on December 24, 1997 the EPA made a well intentioned gesture by creating interim standards for seven large industries; chemicals, paper, pulp, petrochemicals, livestock, leather, and printing and dyeing. Industries were required to come up with improvement plans, and after submitting the plans would be subject to the interim standards for two years. However, after two years, as the interim standards were set to expire, the reasonability of the 1998 effluent standards has once again been brought to the table. The seven large industries have one-by-one presented studies showing that the 1998 standards are too tough, and asking that the interim standards be maintained as the new 2000 standards. Because COD (chemical oxygen demand) and SS (suspended solids) are the main items toughened in the 1998 standards, most industry suggestions were directed at maintaining the interim restrictions for these two standards. Industry representatives noted that due to low sewerage hookup rates in Taiwan, it is impossible to jointly treat industrial and residential wastewater. In this situation, there is no way to adjust the mixture of COD and BOD levels to optimum proportions, lowering the effectiveness of organic wastewater treatment. In addition, industry representatives also pointed out that traditional secondary bio-treatment methods are insufficient to further lower COD discharges, so chemical treatment methods must be used. After the use of large quantities of chemical additives, operating costs and quantities of waste sludge will both increase, as well as the bio-toxicity of wastewater discharges. To come up with a set of reasonable, workable effluent standards, the EPA called numerous meeting between experts and academics; industrial groups; the Industrial Development Bureau (IDB) and the Council of Agriculture, to discuss the standards in light of the current status of industry improvements, technological feasibility and environmental impact. A total of nine different meetings resulted in changes to the draft standards that ensure effluent management will be more reasonable and practicable. Changes include: 1. Due to a change in the testing method for true-color value, the control standard for true-color value should be 550. Thus, the control standard for all target industries was changed to 550 and the proscribed testing method will remain the current method in use. 2. Due to a major switch to wastepaper as a raw material by the paper industry in order to comply with recycling policies, the current shape of the paper industry and the character of it's effluent stream have changed completely. For this reason, paper companies where wastepaper makes up over 60% of raw materials used are allowed a COD limit of 180mg/L. For companies where wastepaper consists of below 60% of raw materials, the COD limit will be 160mg/L, and companies that do not use wastepaper will have to comply with the COD 100mg/L standard. The EPA emphasized that in 1988 and 1987, 2,000 companies made use of the interim standards and signed pledges to continue improvements to pollution prevention. In total pig raising was decreased by almost 280,000 head and around 2.2 billion NTD were invested in order to meet the 1998 effluent standards. Moreover, statistics compiled from onsite audits by local EPBs revealed that compliance with COD standards averages around 81% among industry groups (see graph), with the additional 19% able to meet interim standards. To totally readjust effluent standard values only for the sake of this 19% of problem industries would be a step in the wrong direction and be a violation of the EPA's mandate to protect water quality. Accordingly, the effluent standard values will not be changed again during the current phase. Over the next half year, the EPA will check to see if industries have made any of the pollution prevention improvements suggested over the course of their meetings. Some methods suggested include the separation of solid and liquid wastes from pig-rearing, removal of high salt and chlorine liquid wastes in the dying materials and leather industry, or the removal of dying materials and treatment additives from wastewater in the dying industry. If these changes are reflected in the solid waste online reporting system or by audit numbers, or it can be shown that companies are properly using wastewater treatment facilities but are still stuck at the edge of the control standards due to technology bottlenecks, the EPA will deal with new them on a case-by-case basis. After onsite verification by special personnel, the possibility of opening a subcategory standard can be assessed and discussed.
全文
After the 1998 interim effluent standards expire industries using the interim standards will need to prepare for a slightly modified draft of the 1998 Effluent Standards to take effect. In the draft proposed by the EPA, to encourage recycling in the paper industry, different COD limits will be set according to wastepaper recycling rates. Also, due to the use of different testing methods the standard for true-color value will be adjusted to 550. After completing a public hearing, the EPA presented the draft standards to the Executive Yuan for approval. The reasonability of effluent standards has once again become a topic of contention. Effluent standards were first set in 1991 in Taiwan, and tightened successively in 1993 and 1998. However, before implementation of the 1998 standards, the EPA received a constant stream of industry feedback, asking it to loosen pollutant limits set in standards they claimed were too tough. In the face of scientific evidence and documentation presented for the industry case, on December 24, 1997 the EPA made a well intentioned gesture by creating interim standards for seven large industries; chemicals, paper, pulp, petrochemicals, livestock, leather, and printing and dyeing. Industries were required to come up with improvement plans, and after submitting the plans would be subject to the interim standards for two years. However, after two years, as the interim standards were set to expire, the reasonability of the 1998 effluent standards has once again been brought to the table. The seven large industries have one-by-one presented studies showing that the 1998 standards are too tough, and asking that the interim standards be maintained as the new 2000 standards. Because COD (chemical oxygen demand) and SS (suspended solids) are the main items toughened in the 1998 standards, most industry suggestions were directed at maintaining the interim restrictions for these two standards. Industry representatives noted that due to low sewerage hookup rates in Taiwan, it is impossible to jointly treat industrial and residential wastewater. In this situation, there is no way to adjust the mixture of COD and BOD levels to optimum proportions, lowering the effectiveness of organic wastewater treatment. In addition, industry representatives also pointed out that traditional secondary bio-treatment methods are insufficient to further lower COD discharges, so chemical treatment methods must be used. After the use of large quantities of chemical additives, operating costs and quantities of waste sludge will both increase, as well as the bio-toxicity of wastewater discharges. To come up with a set of reasonable, workable effluent standards, the EPA called numerous meeting between experts and academics; industrial groups; the Industrial Development Bureau (IDB) and the Council of Agriculture, to discuss the standards in light of the current status of industry improvements, technological feasibility and environmental impact. A total of nine different meetings resulted in changes to the draft standards that ensure effluent management will be more reasonable and practicable. Changes include: 1. Due to a change in the testing method for true-color value, the control standard for true-color value should be 550. Thus, the control standard for all target industries was changed to 550 and the proscribed testing method will remain the current method in use. 2. Due to a major switch to wastepaper as a raw material by the paper industry in order to comply with recycling policies, the current shape of the paper industry and the character of it's effluent stream have changed completely. For this reason, paper companies where wastepaper makes up over 60% of raw materials used are allowed a COD limit of 180mg/L. For companies where wastepaper consists of below 60% of raw materials, the COD limit will be 160mg/L, and companies that do not use wastepaper will have to comply with the COD 100mg/L standard. The EPA emphasized that in 1988 and 1987, 2,000 companies made use of the interim standards and signed pledges to continue improvements to pollution prevention. In total pig raising was decreased by almost 280,000 head and around 2.2 billion NTD were invested in order to meet the 1998 effluent standards. Moreover, statistics compiled from onsite audits by local EPBs revealed that compliance with COD standards averages around 81% among industry groups (see graph), with the additional 19% able to meet interim standards. To totally readjust effluent standard values only for the sake of this 19% of problem industries would be a step in the wrong direction and be a violation of the EPA's mandate to protect water quality. Accordingly, the effluent standard values will not be changed again during the current phase. Over the next half year, the EPA will check to see if industries have made any of the pollution prevention improvements suggested over the course of their meetings. Some methods suggested include the separation of solid and liquid wastes from pig-rearing, removal of high salt and chlorine liquid wastes in the dying materials and leather industry, or the removal of dying materials and treatment additives from wastewater in the dying industry. If these changes are reflected in the solid waste online reporting system or by audit numbers, or it can be shown that companies are properly using wastewater treatment facilities but are still stuck at the edge of the control standards due to technology bottlenecks, the EPA will deal with new them on a case-by-case basis. After onsite verification by special personnel, the possibility of opening a subcategory standard can be assessed and discussed.
年度
2000
月份
3
卷
3
期
7
順序
1
倒序
2
分類
water
標題2
Interim Effluent Standards Expire
檔案位置
print/V3/V3-07
「Interim Effluent Standards Expirewater2000」所屬的資料集：「Environmental Policy Monthly」的其他資料
編號：
980
標題：
Workshop for the 2002 Air Quality Improvement and Protection Plan
摘要：
To encourage the sharing of experience between local bureaus of environmental protection the EPA hel
全文：
To encourage the sharing of experience between local bureaus of environmental protection the EPA hel
編號：
458
標題：
EPA Moves Forward On Comprehensive Battery Recycling
摘要：
After a long deliberation on how to lower heavy metal content in batteries and encourage their recyc
全文：
After a long deliberation on how to lower heavy metal content in batteries and encourage their recyc
編號：
976
標題：
New Warning Pictograms for Environmental Sanitation Agents
摘要：
The EPA implemented its new regulations for the labeling of environmental sanitation agents on July
全文：
The EPA implemented its new regulations for the labeling of environmental sanitation agents on July
編號：
518
標題：
Assistance Program for Waste Clearance and Treatment Organizations Underway
摘要：
Encouraging the establishment of solid waste clearance and treatment firms has been a key administra
全文：
Encouraging the establishment of solid waste clearance and treatment firms has been a key administra
編號：
344
標題：
NOx Emission Standards to be Significantly Tightened
摘要：
The EPA plans to tighten up the currently loose nitrogen oxide (NOx) emission standards and set limi
全文：
The EPA plans to tighten up the currently loose nitrogen oxide (NOx) emission standards and set limi
編號：
894
標題：
Encouraging Citizens to Keep Watch over the Aquatic Environment
摘要：
To promote “River and Waterway Pollution Cleanup Year” and encourage citizens to participate in envi
全文：
To promote “River and Waterway Pollution Cleanup Year” and encourage citizens to participate in envi
編號：
44
標題：
Executive Yuan Passes Amendments to Air Pollution Act
摘要：
Air Quality The Air Pollution Control Act was last revised in February 1992, more than five years a
全文：
Air Quality The Air Pollution Control Act was last revised in February 1992, more than five years a
編號：
3128
標題：
Deputy Minister Yeh Visits Taoyuan Enterprises with Outstanding Environmental Performances
摘要：
Control & Evaluation Deputy Minister Yeh Visits Taoyuan Enterprises with Outstanding Environmental P
全文：
Control & Evaluation Deputy Minister Yeh Visits Taoyuan Enterprises with Outstanding Environmental P
編號：
702
標題：
Feature Article: Sustainable Development of Green Silicon Island Main Theme of Premier Chang's Admi
摘要：
Executive Yuan Premier Chang Chun-hsiung's administrative report of June 20 contained the heading "T
全文：
Executive Yuan Premier Chang Chun-hsiung's administrative report of June 20 contained the heading "T
編號：
300
標題：
Collection Rate of Quantity-based Air Pollution Fee Hits 90%
摘要：
Nearly 5000 firms have already paid the FY1999 first quarter (quantity-based) air pollution fee, and
全文：
Nearly 5000 firms have already paid the FY1999 first quarter (quantity-based) air pollution fee, and
編號：
812
標題：
EPA Promotes Bring Your Own Shopping Bags
摘要：
The EPA will launch a “Spare the Environment—Bring Your Own Shopping Bag” activity with President Ch
全文：
The EPA will launch a “Spare the Environment—Bring Your Own Shopping Bag” activity with President Ch
編號：
70
標題：
EPA Assists Companies to Achieve ISO 14000 Certification
摘要：
Others To encourage companies to voluntarily comply with environmental protection laws and to conti
全文：
Others To encourage companies to voluntarily comply with environmental protection laws and to conti
編號：
3566
標題：
Premier Lin Visits Toxic and Chemical Substances Bureau
摘要：
Toxic Substance
Premier Lin Visits Toxic and Chemical Substances Bureau
On 2 June 2017, Premier Lin
全文：
Premier Lin Visits Toxic and Chemical Substances Bureau
On 2 June 2017, Premier Lin Chuan inspected
編號：
322
標題：
Incinerator EIA Requirements Set According to Treatment Volume
摘要：
Environmental impact assessment (EIA) requirements for existing municipal and general industrial was
全文：
Environmental impact assessment (EIA) requirements for existing municipal and general industrial was
編號：
691
標題：
Regulations Governing Joint Disposal Organizations for Educational Institutions Announced
摘要：
To promote a joint disposal system for waste generated by educational organizations the EPA and Mini
全文：
To promote a joint disposal system for waste generated by educational organizations the EPA and Mini
編號：
327
標題：
Semiconductor Industry Expenditures on Air Pollution Control Expected to Hit NT$1.2 Billion
摘要：
By July 2000 all current semiconductor production operations must meet emission standards as stipula
全文：
By July 2000 all current semiconductor production operations must meet emission standards as stipula
編號：
672
標題：
Incentive Offered to Encourage Replacement of Older Buses and Trucks
摘要：
The EPA plans to use a large incentive to help accelerate the process of replacing large diesel pass
全文：
The EPA plans to use a large incentive to help accelerate the process of replacing large diesel pass
編號：
3736
標題：
Air Pollution Control Act Revised for Source to End-of- Pipe Controls
摘要：
Air
Air Pollution Control Act Revised for Source to End-of- Pipe Controls
Revisions of the Air Poll
全文：
Air Pollution Control Act Revised for Source to End-of- Pipe Controls
Revisions of the Air Pollutio
編號：
73
標題：
Modifications Made to Reward Incentives for Motor Vehicle Recycling
摘要：
Recycling The EPA has formally announced that beginning November 1 manufacturers and importers of m
全文：
Recycling The EPA has formally announced that beginning November 1 manufacturers and importers of m
編號：
287
標題：
Draft of Environmental Fundamental Act Passed by EY
摘要：
On December 27 1998, the R.O.C. Executive Yuan (EY) passed a draft of the Environmental Fundamental
全文：
On December 27 1998, the R.O.C. Executive Yuan (EY) passed a draft of the Environmental Fundamental
編號：
915
標題：
Marine Pollution Control Capabilities Upgraded
摘要：
The EPA gained abundant practical experience in the aftermath of the Amorgos oil spill and it has ap
全文：
The EPA gained abundant practical experience in the aftermath of the Amorgos oil spill and it has ap
編號：
416
標題：
Report Released on Investigation of Acid Rain in Taiwan
摘要：
The results of an investigation into acid rain in the Taiwan region were recently released. Accordin
全文：
The results of an investigation into acid rain in the Taiwan region were recently released. Accordin
編號：
622
標題：
EPA Presents Annual Awards for Excellence in Office Environmental Protection
摘要：
Results of the 2000 "Excellence in Office Environmental Protection" competition were recently releas
全文：
Results of the 2000 "Excellence in Office Environmental Protection" competition were recently releas
編號：
338
標題：
Feature Article The Results and Status of Taiwan’s Incinerator Promotion Efforts
摘要：
To further the construction of incinerators in Taiwan the EPA approved the Taiwan Area Refuse Resour
全文：
To further the construction of incinerators in Taiwan the EPA approved the Taiwan Area Refuse Resour
編號：
709
標題：
Cross-Agency General Industrial Waste Treatment Task Force Established
摘要：
Following last year’s major pollution incident in the Kaoping River industrial waste treatment probl
全文：
Following last year’s major pollution incident in the Kaoping River industrial waste treatment probl
編號：
830
標題：
“Re-enactment” of Noise Added to Noise Control Measures
摘要：
Satisfaction with the response to noise complaints has always been very low. The main reason for thi
全文：
Satisfaction with the response to noise complaints has always been very low. The main reason for thi
編號：
749
標題：
EPA's Inspection Team Gains Legal Foothold
摘要：
On May 21 the Legislative Yuan finished initial review of amendments to the EPA Organic Statutes. I
全文：
On May 21 the Legislative Yuan finished initial review of amendments to the EPA Organic Statutes. I
編號：
882
標題：
Ban on Water Polluting Behavior Announced
摘要：
In accordance with Article 28-5 of the Water Pollution Control Act (水污染防治法) the EPA announced on Jan
全文：
In accordance with Article 28-5 of the Water Pollution Control Act (水污染防治法) the EPA announced on Jan
編號：
991
標題：
Number of Firms Required to Report Waste Flow Online Increased
摘要：
To strengthen source management of industrial waste and better track waste flow the EPA announced th
全文：
To strengthen source management of industrial waste and better track waste flow the EPA announced th
編號：
110
標題：
Drinking Water Management Enforcement Rules Announced
摘要：
Water Quality The Enforcement Rules for Drinking Water Management Provisions were announced on Febr
全文：
Water Quality The Enforcement Rules for Drinking Water Management Provisions were announced on Febr
行政院環境保護署 的其他資料集
環評主管機關受理審查環境現況差異分析及對策檢討報告
每2月更新,55黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-06 01:04:29
行政院環境保護署基隆市水量水質自動監測連線傳輸監測紀錄值即時資料集
不定期更新更新,43許先生 | 02-2311-7722#2831 | 2022-01-18 01:24:38
行政院環境保護署環保標章規格標準
每季更新更新,84陳先生 | 02-23117722#2936 | 2022-01-14 01:16:50
行政院環境保護署縣市(新北市)小時值-每小時
每小時更新更新,145謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:00:40
行政院環境保護署環保標章認證實驗室資料
每1月更新,46黃先生 | 02-23117722#2932 | 2023-07-27 01:01:44
行政院環境保護署
開發單位公開說明會訊息公聽會訊息
每2月更新,138黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-06 01:04:33
行政院環境保護署環境影響評估案件概況
每1年更新,173顏先生 | 02-23117722#2109 | 2023-07-30 01:00:47
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_彰化縣_線西站
每1時更新,105陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:57:55
行政院環境保護署特殊性工業區人工操作監測值資料檔
每1年更新,105劉小姐 | 02-2311-7722#6111 | 2023-07-27 01:04:59
行政院環境保護署垃圾回收清除車輛數
每月更新更新,90謝小姐 | 02-23117722#2103 | 2022-01-14 01:22:32
行政院環境保護署
公民營廢棄物乙級清除機構許可資料
每月更新更新,131何先生 | 02-2311-7722#2653 | 2022-01-14 01:25:57
行政院環境保護署行動監測車
每小時更新更新,143謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:00:21
行政院環境保護署重點事業廢棄物-爐碴之產出及清理流向
每月更新更新,94陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2682 | 2022-01-14 01:24:19
行政院環境保護署新化學物質少量登錄表單
不定期更新更新,55蔡先生 | 02-23257399#55723 | 2023-08-09 01:04:24
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_屏東縣_潮州站
每小時更新更新,138謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:04:31
行政院環境保護署
監測車、河川揚塵監測站基本資料
每1日更新,78陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-03 01:02:48
行政院環境保護署包裝及盛裝飲用水水源水質抽驗結果
每季更新更新,122黃先生 | 02-23117722#2881 | 2022-01-15 01:10:25
行政院環境保護署環境教育及訓練電子報
不定期更新更新,39葉小姐 | 03-4020789#607 | 2022-01-15 01:13:29
行政院環境保護署不良日數月報表
每1月更新,231陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-07 01:03:28
行政院環境保護署建檔公廁明細-連江縣
不定期更新更新,111賴先生 | 04-2252-1718#53686 | 2023-07-27 01:02:02
行政院環境保護署
機車新車審驗資料
每月更新更新,124邱小姐 | 02-23712121#6309 | 2022-01-14 01:18:31
行政院環境保護署貨品通關事前聲明確認作業指引簡報
不定期更新,54金先生 | 23257399＃55315 | 2022-01-14 01:22:22
行政院環境保護署符合噪音管制標準車輛-國產柴油引擎車
不定期更新更新,222林先生 | 02-23712121-6403 | 2022-01-14 01:18:57
行政院環境保護署新北市水量水質自動監測連線傳輸監測紀錄值即時資料集
不定期更新更新,43許先生 | 02-2311-7722#2831 | 2022-01-18 01:24:39
行政院環境保護署固定污染源戴奧辛、重金屬（鉛、鎘、汞）及氯化氫排放檢測資料
每季更新更新,279江先生 | 02-23117722#6201 | 2022-01-15 01:12:33
行政院環境保護署
噪音陳情管道
不定期更新更新,44王先生 | 02-23712121#6401 | 2022-01-14 01:18:43
行政院環境保護署低關注聚合物事前審定表單
不定期更新更新,53蔡小姐 | 23257399#55723 | 2022-01-14 01:23:01
行政院環境保護署應回收廢棄物處理業者(廢容器類)最大處理量資料
每1年更新,46廖小姐 | 02-2370-5888#3103 | 2023-08-03 00:59:54
行政院環境保護署汽車新車審驗資料
每月更新更新,175王先生 | 02-23712121#6306 | 2022-01-14 01:18:29
行政院環境保護署光化測站(朴子)小時值資料
每月更新更新,215謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:05:29
行政院環境保護署