Regulatory Guidelines Proposed for Sand and Gravel Extraction on
「Regulatory Guidelines Proposed for Sand and Gravel Extraction on」於資料集「Environmental Policy Monthly」由單位「行政院環境保護署」的楊先生所提供，聯繫電話是(02)23117722#2217,(02)23117722#2216，最近更新時間為：2022-01-15 01:13:03。 欄位編號的內容是267 ， 欄位標題的內容是Regulatory Guidelines Proposed for Sand and Gravel Extraction on Agricultural Land ， 欄位摘要的內容是To assist the liberalization of gravel extraction policies the EPA has compiled current related regulations and drawn up the draft Guidelines for Reviewing Sand and Gravel Extraction on Secondary Agricultural Land that clearly lists no-extraction zones. The regulatory scope also addresses groundwater conservation, gravel removal, extraction site rehabilitation and reuse, and environmental welfare and compensation.
Steady depletion of gravel in Taiwan’s river environments has driven up the price of gravel and put pressure on many public works projects. As a result, accelerating the development of sand and gravel extraction on agricultural land has become one of the government’s most pressing policy development issues. ， 欄位全文的內容是To assist the liberalization of gravel extraction policies the EPA has compiled current related regulations and drawn up the draft Guidelines for Reviewing Sand and Gravel Extraction on Secondary Agricultural Land that clearly lists no-extraction zones. The regulatory scope also addresses groundwater conservation, gravel removal, extraction site rehabilitation and reuse, and environmental welfare and compensation.
Steady depletion of gravel in Taiwan’s river environments has driven up the price of gravel and put pressure on many public works projects. As a result, accelerating the development of sand and gravel extraction on agricultural land has become one of the government’s most pressing policy development issues.
Plans call for the Executive Yuan’s Council of Agriculture to release 389,000 hectares of secondary agricultural land for permitted gravel extraction. To ensure that the ecology of the land is not damaged, the Executive Yuan instructed the EPA to quickly delineate agricultural land areas unsuitable for gravel extraction activities and submit a report to the Executive Yuan for approval.
To accomodate existing Executive Yuan policies and to protect the environment, the EPA recently accelerated drafting of the Guidelines for Reviewing Sand and Gravel Extraction on Secondary Agricultural Land. In preparation for the draft, the EPA compiled current regulations related to gravel extraction and promulgated by a range of government agencies. In consideration of the experiences of other nations, the regulatory scope addresses gravel extraction locale, scale, potential environmental damage and response measures. It also addresses land development compensation, extraction site rehabilitation and land reuse methods.
On October 20, the EPA invited representatives from related agencies at all levels to discuss the draft. The following is a list of the types of areas that will be designated “no-extraction zones.”
1.Extraction prohibited areas clearly stated in related laws: The EPA and Council of Agriculture compiled current laws and regulations related to gravel extraction restrictions and submitted it to the Executive Yuan for approval. Tables and diagrams will later be used to clearly show no-extraction areas in the released agricultural land.
2.Agricultural land in city plans: Focuses on agricultural land in city plans that function as areas for future expansion but which are often located close to areas with high human density and therefore not allowed to be developed.
3.Coastal land stretching 500 meters inland: Focuses mainly on preventing damage to the coastline. The definition of coastline areas takes into consideration the MOI Construction & Planning Administration’s draft Coastal Act. As coastal area sand and gravel extraction will focus on outer islands, there should be no conflict between the no-extraction principle for the coastline on Taiwan proper and future coastal sand and gravel extraction policies.
Reservoir water catchement areas, areas adjacent to communities and public facilities and areas within 150 meters of principal roadways originally to be listed for no-extraction regulations were added to category 1 as they were already provided for in construction and planning related regulations and the Tap Water Act.
In terms of extraction restrictions within the scope of groundwater resource conservation, representatives had different views on how the laws are interpreted. For this reason, a resolution was reached whereby the Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) Water Resource Bureau will delineate clear groundwater conservation zones. If the latter cannot provide related information, the EPA and Council of Agriculture might do so through formal announcement.
Chapters 2 and 3 of the draft address flatland and mountain slope sand and gravel extraction methods, scale and soil/water conservation measures. Environmental groups expressed concern over the problem of groundwater conservation. In flatland areas, sand and gravel extraction is restricted to a depth above the water table during rainy seasons but that cannot exceed a maximum depth of 15 meters. In mountain slope areas, gravel extraction depth limits are based on the results of exploratory drill holes whereby the horizontal distance extending from the extraction area land surface cannot exceed 30% of its vertical depth.
Chapters 4 and 5 address operational processes involving the crushing and panning of rock/soil and the stacking and transporting of waste soil, sludge and rock/soil. It also sets the regulatory scope for the much criticized transporting of waste soil, sludge and rock/soil from extraction sites.
Chapter 6 addresses extraction site rehabilitation and land reuse methods. Chapter 7 addresses extraction site environmental conservation and compensation. There have been cases of agricultural land owners selling extraction rights and then using the resulting pit as an illegal landfill. To prevent such incidents, the draft stipulates that later use of flatland extraction sites as landfills should be avoided. Otherwise, waterproof soil barriers and an above and below ground drainage system must be installed.
If plans call for the extraction site to be filled in and reused a second time, the refilling earthwork should be carried out with the objective of reusing the land. Substances acceptable for use as fill material are in general clearly specified in the draft.
Before the extraction site can be filled in and reused a second time, soil/water conservation and all environmental protection measures must be completed and the relevant competent authority must inspect and approve the site as qualified. Similar to what has been done in Germany, all rights over extraction sites are lost to local governments if any preexisting silt pond or reservoir, flood control reservoir or extraction shaft is used directly as a pond.
Given the immense size of the draft, discussions during the meeting could not be concluded. EPA Bureau of Comprehensive Planning Director General Shi-Piao Ni who chaired the meeting that day said that to accelerate progress, the EPA and Council of Agriculture would submit a “negative” list of agricultural land no-extraction zones to the Executive Yuan for approval.
Director General Ni said that the EPA will also propose to the Taiwan Provincial Government’s Bureau of Mining that a “positive” list of sand and gravel deposits and sites suitable for extraction be generated from survey results over the years and submitted to the Executive Yuan. The positive and negative lists are both important and are a top priority for execution by the EPA. The remaining items in the Guidelines for Reviewing Sand and Gravel Extraction on Secondary Agricultural Land will be completed by the EPA and related agencies in the near future.
To accommodate existing Executive Yuan policies and to protect the environment, the EPA recently accelerated drafting of the Guidelines for Reviewing Sand and Gravel Extraction on Secondary Agricultural Land. In preparation for the draft, the EPA compiled current regulations related to gravel extraction and promulgated by a range of government agencies. In consideration of the experiences of other nations, the regulatory scope addresses gravel extraction locale, scale, potential environmental damage and response measures. It also addresses land development compensation, extraction site rehabilitation and land reuse methods.
On October 20, the EPA invited representatives from related agencies at all levels to discuss the draft. The following is a list of the types of areas that will be designated “no-extraction zones.”
1.Extraction prohibited areas clearly stated in related laws: The EPA and Council of Agriculture compiled current laws and regulations related to gravel extraction restrictions and submitted it to the Executive Yuan for approval. Tables and diagrams will later be used to clearly show no-extraction areas in the released agricultural land.
2.Agricultural land in city plans: Focuses on agricultural land in city plans that function as areas for future expansion but which are often located close to areas with high human density and therefore not allowed to be developed.
3.Coastal land stretching 500 meters inland: Focuses mainly on preventing damage to the coastline. The definition of coastline areas takes into consideration the MOI Construction & Planning Administration’s draft Coastal Act. As coastal area sand and gravel extraction will focus on outer islands, there should be no conflict between the no-extraction principle for the coastline on Taiwan proper and future coastal sand and gravel extraction policies.
Reservoir water catchement areas, areas adjacent to communities and public facilities and areas within 150 meters of principal roadways originally to be listed for no-extraction regulations were added to category 1 as they were already provided for in construction and planning related regulations and the Tap Water Act.
In terms of extraction restrictions within the scope of groundwater resource conservation, representatives had different views on how the laws are interpreted. For this reason, a resolution was reached whereby the Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) Water Resource Bureau will delineate clear groundwater conservation zones. If the latter cannot provide related information, the EPA and Council of Agriculture might do so through formal announcement.
Chapters 2 and 3 of the draft address flatland and mountain slope sand and gravel extraction methods, scale and soil/water conservation measures. Environmental groups expressed concern over the problem of groundwater conservation. In flatland areas, sand and gravel extraction is restricted to a depth above the water table during rainy seasons but that cannot exceed a maximum depth of 15 meters. In mountain slope areas, gravel extraction depth limits are based on the results of exploratory drill holes whereby the horizontal distance extending from the extraction area land surface cannot exceed 30% of its vertical depth.
Chapters 4 and 5 address operational processes involving the crushing and panning of rock/soil and the stacking and transporting of waste soil, sludge and rock/soil. It also sets the regulatory scope for the much criticized transporting of waste soil, sludge and rock/soil from extraction sites.
Chapter 6 addresses extraction site rehabilitation and land reuse methods. Chapter 7 addresses extraction site environmental conservation and compensation. There have been cases of agricultural land owners selling extraction rights and then using the resulting pit as an illegal landfill. To prevent such incidents, the draft stipulates that later use of flatland extraction sites as landfills should be avoided. Otherwise, waterproof soil barriers and an above and below ground drainage system must be installed.
If plans call for the extraction site to be filled in and reused a second time, the refilling earthwork should be carried out with the objective of reusing the land. Substances acceptable for use as fill material are in general clearly specified in the draft.
Before the extraction site can be filled in and reused a second time, soil/water conservation and all environmental protection measures must be completed and the relevant competent authority must inspect and approve the site as qualified. Similar to what has been done in Germany, all rights over extraction sites are lost to local governments if any preexisting silt pond or reservoir, flood control reservoir or extraction shaft is used directly as a pond.
Given the immense size of the draft, discussions during the meeting could not be concluded. EPA Bureau of Comprehensive Planning Director General Shi-Piao Ni who chaired the meeting that day said that to accelerate progress, the EPA and Council of Agriculture would submit a “negative” list of agricultural land no-extraction zones to the Executive Yuan for approval.
Director General Ni said that the EPA will also propose to the Taiwan Provincial Government’s Bureau of Mining that a “positive” list of sand and gravel deposits and sites suitable for extraction be generated from survey results over the years and submitted to the Executive Yuan. The positive and negative lists are both important and are a top priority for execution by the EPA. The remaining items in the Guidelines for Reviewing Sand and Gravel Extraction on Secondary Agricultural Land will be completed by the EPA and related agencies in the near future. ， 欄位年度的內容是1999 ， 欄位月份的內容是2 ， 欄位卷的內容是2 ， 欄位期的內容是6 ， 欄位順序的內容是1 ， 欄位倒序的內容是2 ， 欄位分類的內容是Soil and Groundwater ， 欄位標題2的內容是Regulatory Guidelines Proposed for Sand and Gravel Extraction on Agricultural Land ， 欄位檔案位置的內容是print/V2/V2-06 。
編號
267
標題
Regulatory Guidelines Proposed for Sand and Gravel Extraction on Agricultural Land
摘要
To assist the liberalization of gravel extraction policies the EPA has compiled current related regulations and drawn up the draft Guidelines for Reviewing Sand and Gravel Extraction on Secondary Agricultural Land that clearly lists no-extraction zones. The regulatory scope also addresses groundwater conservation, gravel removal, extraction site rehabilitation and reuse, and environmental welfare and compensation. Steady depletion of gravel in Taiwan’s river environments has driven up the price of gravel and put pressure on many public works projects. As a result, accelerating the development of sand and gravel extraction on agricultural land has become one of the government’s most pressing policy development issues.
全文
To assist the liberalization of gravel extraction policies the EPA has compiled current related regulations and drawn up the draft Guidelines for Reviewing Sand and Gravel Extraction on Secondary Agricultural Land that clearly lists no-extraction zones. The regulatory scope also addresses groundwater conservation, gravel removal, extraction site rehabilitation and reuse, and environmental welfare and compensation. Steady depletion of gravel in Taiwan’s river environments has driven up the price of gravel and put pressure on many public works projects. As a result, accelerating the development of sand and gravel extraction on agricultural land has become one of the government’s most pressing policy development issues. Plans call for the Executive Yuan’s Council of Agriculture to release 389,000 hectares of secondary agricultural land for permitted gravel extraction. To ensure that the ecology of the land is not damaged, the Executive Yuan instructed the EPA to quickly delineate agricultural land areas unsuitable for gravel extraction activities and submit a report to the Executive Yuan for approval. To accomodate existing Executive Yuan policies and to protect the environment, the EPA recently accelerated drafting of the Guidelines for Reviewing Sand and Gravel Extraction on Secondary Agricultural Land. In preparation for the draft, the EPA compiled current regulations related to gravel extraction and promulgated by a range of government agencies. In consideration of the experiences of other nations, the regulatory scope addresses gravel extraction locale, scale, potential environmental damage and response measures. It also addresses land development compensation, extraction site rehabilitation and land reuse methods. On October 20, the EPA invited representatives from related agencies at all levels to discuss the draft. The following is a list of the types of areas that will be designated “no-extraction zones.” 1.Extraction prohibited areas clearly stated in related laws: The EPA and Council of Agriculture compiled current laws and regulations related to gravel extraction restrictions and submitted it to the Executive Yuan for approval. Tables and diagrams will later be used to clearly show no-extraction areas in the released agricultural land. 2.Agricultural land in city plans: Focuses on agricultural land in city plans that function as areas for future expansion but which are often located close to areas with high human density and therefore not allowed to be developed. 3.Coastal land stretching 500 meters inland: Focuses mainly on preventing damage to the coastline. The definition of coastline areas takes into consideration the MOI Construction & Planning Administration’s draft Coastal Act. As coastal area sand and gravel extraction will focus on outer islands, there should be no conflict between the no-extraction principle for the coastline on Taiwan proper and future coastal sand and gravel extraction policies. Reservoir water catchement areas, areas adjacent to communities and public facilities and areas within 150 meters of principal roadways originally to be listed for no-extraction regulations were added to category 1 as they were already provided for in construction and planning related regulations and the Tap Water Act. In terms of extraction restrictions within the scope of groundwater resource conservation, representatives had different views on how the laws are interpreted. For this reason, a resolution was reached whereby the Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) Water Resource Bureau will delineate clear groundwater conservation zones. If the latter cannot provide related information, the EPA and Council of Agriculture might do so through formal announcement. Chapters 2 and 3 of the draft address flatland and mountain slope sand and gravel extraction methods, scale and soil/water conservation measures. Environmental groups expressed concern over the problem of groundwater conservation. In flatland areas, sand and gravel extraction is restricted to a depth above the water table during rainy seasons but that cannot exceed a maximum depth of 15 meters. In mountain slope areas, gravel extraction depth limits are based on the results of exploratory drill holes whereby the horizontal distance extending from the extraction area land surface cannot exceed 30% of its vertical depth. Chapters 4 and 5 address operational processes involving the crushing and panning of rock/soil and the stacking and transporting of waste soil, sludge and rock/soil. It also sets the regulatory scope for the much criticized transporting of waste soil, sludge and rock/soil from extraction sites. Chapter 6 addresses extraction site rehabilitation and land reuse methods. Chapter 7 addresses extraction site environmental conservation and compensation. There have been cases of agricultural land owners selling extraction rights and then using the resulting pit as an illegal landfill. To prevent such incidents, the draft stipulates that later use of flatland extraction sites as landfills should be avoided. Otherwise, waterproof soil barriers and an above and below ground drainage system must be installed. If plans call for the extraction site to be filled in and reused a second time, the refilling earthwork should be carried out with the objective of reusing the land. Substances acceptable for use as fill material are in general clearly specified in the draft. Before the extraction site can be filled in and reused a second time, soil/water conservation and all environmental protection measures must be completed and the relevant competent authority must inspect and approve the site as qualified. Similar to what has been done in Germany, all rights over extraction sites are lost to local governments if any preexisting silt pond or reservoir, flood control reservoir or extraction shaft is used directly as a pond. Given the immense size of the draft, discussions during the meeting could not be concluded. EPA Bureau of Comprehensive Planning Director General Shi-Piao Ni who chaired the meeting that day said that to accelerate progress, the EPA and Council of Agriculture would submit a “negative” list of agricultural land no-extraction zones to the Executive Yuan for approval. Director General Ni said that the EPA will also propose to the Taiwan Provincial Government’s Bureau of Mining that a “positive” list of sand and gravel deposits and sites suitable for extraction be generated from survey results over the years and submitted to the Executive Yuan. The positive and negative lists are both important and are a top priority for execution by the EPA. The remaining items in the Guidelines for Reviewing Sand and Gravel Extraction on Secondary Agricultural Land will be completed by the EPA and related agencies in the near future. To accommodate existing Executive Yuan policies and to protect the environment, the EPA recently accelerated drafting of the Guidelines for Reviewing Sand and Gravel Extraction on Secondary Agricultural Land. In preparation for the draft, the EPA compiled current regulations related to gravel extraction and promulgated by a range of government agencies. In consideration of the experiences of other nations, the regulatory scope addresses gravel extraction locale, scale, potential environmental damage and response measures. It also addresses land development compensation, extraction site rehabilitation and land reuse methods. On October 20, the EPA invited representatives from related agencies at all levels to discuss the draft. The following is a list of the types of areas that will be designated “no-extraction zones.” 1.Extraction prohibited areas clearly stated in related laws: The EPA and Council of Agriculture compiled current laws and regulations related to gravel extraction restrictions and submitted it to the Executive Yuan for approval. Tables and diagrams will later be used to clearly show no-extraction areas in the released agricultural land. 2.Agricultural land in city plans: Focuses on agricultural land in city plans that function as areas for future expansion but which are often located close to areas with high human density and therefore not allowed to be developed. 3.Coastal land stretching 500 meters inland: Focuses mainly on preventing damage to the coastline. The definition of coastline areas takes into consideration the MOI Construction & Planning Administration’s draft Coastal Act. As coastal area sand and gravel extraction will focus on outer islands, there should be no conflict between the no-extraction principle for the coastline on Taiwan proper and future coastal sand and gravel extraction policies. Reservoir water catchement areas, areas adjacent to communities and public facilities and areas within 150 meters of principal roadways originally to be listed for no-extraction regulations were added to category 1 as they were already provided for in construction and planning related regulations and the Tap Water Act. In terms of extraction restrictions within the scope of groundwater resource conservation, representatives had different views on how the laws are interpreted. For this reason, a resolution was reached whereby the Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) Water Resource Bureau will delineate clear groundwater conservation zones. If the latter cannot provide related information, the EPA and Council of Agriculture might do so through formal announcement. Chapters 2 and 3 of the draft address flatland and mountain slope sand and gravel extraction methods, scale and soil/water conservation measures. Environmental groups expressed concern over the problem of groundwater conservation. In flatland areas, sand and gravel extraction is restricted to a depth above the water table during rainy seasons but that cannot exceed a maximum depth of 15 meters. In mountain slope areas, gravel extraction depth limits are based on the results of exploratory drill holes whereby the horizontal distance extending from the extraction area land surface cannot exceed 30% of its vertical depth. Chapters 4 and 5 address operational processes involving the crushing and panning of rock/soil and the stacking and transporting of waste soil, sludge and rock/soil. It also sets the regulatory scope for the much criticized transporting of waste soil, sludge and rock/soil from extraction sites. Chapter 6 addresses extraction site rehabilitation and land reuse methods. Chapter 7 addresses extraction site environmental conservation and compensation. There have been cases of agricultural land owners selling extraction rights and then using the resulting pit as an illegal landfill. To prevent such incidents, the draft stipulates that later use of flatland extraction sites as landfills should be avoided. Otherwise, waterproof soil barriers and an above and below ground drainage system must be installed. If plans call for the extraction site to be filled in and reused a second time, the refilling earthwork should be carried out with the objective of reusing the land. Substances acceptable for use as fill material are in general clearly specified in the draft. Before the extraction site can be filled in and reused a second time, soil/water conservation and all environmental protection measures must be completed and the relevant competent authority must inspect and approve the site as qualified. Similar to what has been done in Germany, all rights over extraction sites are lost to local governments if any preexisting silt pond or reservoir, flood control reservoir or extraction shaft is used directly as a pond. Given the immense size of the draft, discussions during the meeting could not be concluded. EPA Bureau of Comprehensive Planning Director General Shi-Piao Ni who chaired the meeting that day said that to accelerate progress, the EPA and Council of Agriculture would submit a “negative” list of agricultural land no-extraction zones to the Executive Yuan for approval. Director General Ni said that the EPA will also propose to the Taiwan Provincial Government’s Bureau of Mining that a “positive” list of sand and gravel deposits and sites suitable for extraction be generated from survey results over the years and submitted to the Executive Yuan. The positive and negative lists are both important and are a top priority for execution by the EPA. The remaining items in the Guidelines for Reviewing Sand and Gravel Extraction on Secondary Agricultural Land will be completed by the EPA and related agencies in the near future.
年度
1999
月份
2
卷
2
期
6
順序
1
倒序
2
分類
Soil and Groundwater
標題2
Regulatory Guidelines Proposed for Sand and Gravel Extraction on Agricultural Land
檔案位置
print/V2/V2-06
「Regulatory Guidelines Proposed for Sand and Gravel Extraction on」所屬的資料集：「Environmental Policy Monthly」的其他資料
編號：
503
標題：
Environmental Police Make Strong Showing
摘要：
On July 1 1999, the EPA established the Environmental Protection Police Force as a means of strength
全文：
On July 1 1999, the EPA established the Environmental Protection Police Force as a means of strength
編號：
643
標題：
Feature: Executive Yuan Calls for Halt to Construction of the 4th Nuclear Power Plant
摘要：
The Executive Yuan has officially called for a halt to construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plan
全文：
The Executive Yuan has officially called for a halt to construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plan
編號：
903
標題：
Resolving Waste Problems in the Pachang River
摘要：
The EPA has decided to spend NT$290 million to thoroughly clean up the more than 700000m3 of humus s
全文：
The EPA has decided to spend NT$290 million to thoroughly clean up the more than 700000m3 of humus s
編號：
616
標題：
Young Professors Give Suggestions on Environmental Protection
摘要：
On September 7 the EPA held a discussion forum for young professors to aid in the formulation of env
全文：
On September 7 the EPA held a discussion forum for young professors to aid in the formulation of env
編號：
181
標題：
EPA to Announce Third Round of General Industrial Waste Items for Reuse
摘要：
To broaden the recycling and reuse of general industrial waste the EPA has prepared a draft of the t
全文：
To broaden the recycling and reuse of general industrial waste the EPA has prepared a draft of the t
編號：
462
標題：
EPA's Electronic Library Comes Online
摘要：
General policy In support of environmental protection technology research and development the EPA re
全文：
In support of environmental protection technology research and development the EPA recently establis
編號：
428
標題：
Medium and Long Term Plans for Waste Disposal Facilities in the Works
摘要：
The EPA is drafting the Medium and Long Term Plans for the Construction of Public Waste Disposal Fac
全文：
The EPA is drafting the Medium and Long Term Plans for the Construction of Public Waste Disposal Fac
編號：
201
標題：
Taiwan Makes Contributions During “Year of the Ocean”
摘要：
In June 1998, Taiwan was appointed “lead shepherd” of the APEC Marine Resource Conservation (MRC) Wo
全文：
In June 1998, Taiwan was appointed “lead shepherd” of the APEC Marine Resource Conservation (MRC) Wo
編號：
149
標題：
Method of Calculating Construction Project Air Pollution Fee Rates to be Amended
摘要：
Air Quality Since construction project air pollution fee rates were first levied in July last year
全文：
Air Quality Since construction project air pollution fee rates were first levied in July last year
編號：
752
標題：
First Policy EIA Review Completed – Golf Course Development
摘要：
On April 30 the EIA Review Committee passed Taiwan's first ever government policy EIA review directe
全文：
On April 30 the EIA Review Committee passed Taiwan's first ever government policy EIA review directe
編號：
971
標題：
Fuel Injection Engine Scooters to Cut Air Pollution
摘要：
The five major Taiwanese motorbike manufactures have coordinated with EPA policy by developing new 1
全文：
The five major Taiwanese motorbike manufactures have coordinated with EPA policy by developing new 1
編號：
777
標題：
Transparent Selection Process for Members of EIA Review Committee Introduced
摘要：
The announcement of the Guidelines for the Selection of Specialists and Scholars as Members of the E
全文：
The announcement of the Guidelines for the Selection of Specialists and Scholars as Members of the E
編號：
1001
標題：
Economic Processing Zone Administration to Review Waste Disposal Plans
摘要：
To simplify industrial waste disposal plan review procedures on August 13 the EPA formally commissio
全文：
To simplify industrial waste disposal plan review procedures on August 13 the EPA formally commissio
編號：
904
標題：
Small Alcohol Producers Exempt from Air Permits
摘要：
The EPA announced in a policy revision on February 4 that only alcohol producers with an annual outp
全文：
The EPA announced in a policy revision on February 4 that only alcohol producers with an annual outp
編號：
529
標題：
Home Appliance Recycling Fee to be Raised
摘要：
Due to increases in the cost of recycling and processing unwanted home appliances the EPA recently d
全文：
Due to increases in the cost of recycling and processing unwanted home appliances the EPA recently d
編號：
704
標題：
Preliminary Soil Pollution Fund Management Framework Set
摘要：
The EPA's Draft Organizational Regulations of the Soil And Groundwater Pollution Remediation Fund Ma
全文：
The EPA's Draft Organizational Regulations of the Soil And Groundwater Pollution Remediation Fund Ma
編號：
947
標題：
Administrator Hau Presides at Inaugural Ceremony for Putzu River Constructed Wetlands Project
摘要：
Administrator Hau personally presided at a ceremony held on May 21 to inaugurate use of the Putzu Ri
全文：
Administrator Hau personally presided at a ceremony held on May 21 to inaugurate use of the Putzu Ri
編號：
344
標題：
NOx Emission Standards to be Significantly Tightened
摘要：
The EPA plans to tighten up the currently loose nitrogen oxide (NOx) emission standards and set limi
全文：
The EPA plans to tighten up the currently loose nitrogen oxide (NOx) emission standards and set limi
編號：
598
標題：
Recycling Industry Contributes NT$35 Billion Annually In Value Added
摘要：
Everyone knows that recycling helps the environment but it is less well known that recycling directl
全文：
Everyone knows that recycling helps the environment but it is less well known that recycling directl
編號：
172
標題：
1999 Waste Electric Appliance Recycling Fee Rates Formally Announced
摘要：
On June 15 1998, a meeting of the Electronic Appliance Resource Recycling Fund Management Committee
全文：
On June 15 1998, a meeting of the Electronic Appliance Resource Recycling Fund Management Committee
編號：
506
標題：
Executive Yuan Passes Initial Review of Draft Marine Pollution Act
摘要：
The Executive Yuan has finished initial review of the draft Marine Pollution Control Act. According
全文：
The Executive Yuan has finished initial review of the draft Marine Pollution Control Act. According
編號：
173
標題：
A Look Inside the EPA The Comprehensive Planning Bureau
摘要：
According to the series of regulations establishing the EPA's organizational structure the EPA's Com
全文：
According to the series of regulations establishing the EPA's organizational structure the EPA's Com
編號：
488
標題：
Drinking Water Protection Zones Now Viewable Online
摘要：
Drinking water statutes require the delineation of protection zones for sources of drinking water.
全文：
Drinking water statutes require the delineation of protection zones for sources of drinking water.
編號：
744
標題：
Dioxin Retrofitting at Neihu Incinerator
摘要：
On May 10 Taipei City's Neihu Incinerator Plant held a meeting to show off the results of their rece
全文：
On May 10 Taipei City's Neihu Incinerator Plant held a meeting to show off the results of their rece
編號：
219
標題：
LY Inquiries to the EPA Focus on Narrower Range of Issues
摘要：
It was found that during the 5th session of the Legislative Yuan (LY) inquiries addressed to the EPA
全文：
It was found that during the 5th session of the Legislative Yuan (LY) inquiries addressed to the EPA
編號：
3270
標題：
Additional Air Quality Monitoring Stations Required for PM2.5 in Special Industrial Parks
摘要：
Air Additional Air Quality Monitoring Stations Required for PM2.5 in Special Industrial Parks
To str
全文：
Additional Air Quality Monitoring Stations Required for PM2.5 in Special Industrial Parks
To strengt
編號：
209
標題：
Electric Motorcycles Listed for Priority Purchase by Government
摘要：
The EPA recently completed a draft of the Comprehensive Government Agency Purchasing Electric Motorc
全文：
The EPA recently completed a draft of the Comprehensive Government Agency Purchasing Electric Motorc
編號：
800
標題：
EPA Appeals for Dengue Fever Prevention
摘要：
According to an EPA survey there had been a total of 33 cases of Dengue fever reported in Taiwan thi
全文：
According to an EPA survey there had been a total of 33 cases of Dengue fever reported in Taiwan thi
編號：
499
標題：
Stricter Emergency Response Regulations Proposed for Toxics Shipments
摘要：
Two accidents involving the shipment of toxic chemical substances last year have forced the EPA to p
全文：
Two accidents involving the shipment of toxic chemical substances last year have forced the EPA to p
編號：
753
標題：
Gas Station Subsidy Extended 1 Year
摘要：
The EPA continues to promote control of gas station volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions. To s
全文：
The EPA continues to promote control of gas station volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions. To s
行政院環境保護署 的其他資料集
經過山坡地之環境影響說明書件
每2月更新,229黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-05 01:01:01
行政院環境保護署土壤污染物監測及管制標準
不定期更新更新,71王先生 | 02-23832389#8307 | 2022-01-14 01:20:21
行政院環境保護署應回收廢棄物處理業者(廢乾電池類)最大處理量資料
每年更新更新,49廖小姐 | 02-2370-5888#3103 | 2022-01-14 01:24:03
行政院環境保護署光化測站(臺西)小時值資料
每1月更新,131陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-07 01:03:36
行政院環境保護署環保署環境影響評估審查委員會委員名單
每2年更新,88黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-05 01:00:47
行政院環境保護署
環境影響評估案件摘要資料
每2月更新,227黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-06 01:03:57
行政院環境保護署焚化廠飛灰穩定化檢測資料
每月更新更新,116吳先生 | 04-22521718#53526 | 2022-01-15 01:15:34
行政院環境保護署經過海岸保護區之環境影響評估報告書件
每2月更新,57黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-06 01:04:05
行政院環境保護署公告應回收項目之責任業者列管家數統計
每1年更新,40廖小姐 | 02-2370-5888#3103 | 2023-07-27 00:59:42
行政院環境保護署菸酒事業廢棄物再利用機構資料
每1年更新,76李小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2626 | 2023-07-27 00:59:33
行政院環境保護署
垃圾回收清除車輛數
每月更新更新,88謝小姐 | 02-23117722#2103 | 2022-01-14 01:22:32
行政院環境保護署共通性事業廢棄物再利用機構資料
每年更新更新,172李小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2633 | 2022-01-14 01:24:44
行政院環境保護署國家溫室氣體排放清冊報告
每年更新更新,56張先生 | 02-23117722#2796 | 2022-01-15 01:15:49
行政院環境保護署柴油新車審驗資料-合格證明
不定期更新更新,40李小姐 | 02-2311-7722#6311 | 2023-08-09 01:04:48
行政院環境保護署各工廠空氣污染物排放資料
每季更新更新,141黃先生 | 02-23712121#6210 | 2022-01-15 01:12:09
行政院環境保護署
環評監督辦理流程
不定期更新更新,67陳先生 | 04-2252-1718#51207 | 2022-01-15 01:13:27
行政院環境保護署核能一廠用過核燃料中期貯存計畫環境監測資料
不定期更新更新,56陳先生 | 04-22521718#51207 | 2022-01-14 01:21:59
行政院環境保護署環評主管機關受理審查之環境影響調查報告
每2月更新,89黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-05 01:01:16
行政院環境保護署公文歸檔案件統計表
不定期更新更新,35黃先生 | 02-2311-7722#2346 | 2022-01-14 01:20:45
行政院環境保護署EPQSummary_EnvironmentalImpactAssessment
不定期更新更新,132陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-07-30 01:01:43
行政院環境保護署
環境影響評估案件概況
每1年更新,172顏先生 | 02-23117722#2109 | 2023-07-30 01:00:47
行政院環境保護署河川巡守路線地理圖資
不定期更新更新,54謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2836 | 2023-08-09 01:04:56
行政院環境保護署光化測站(忠明)小時值資料
不定期更新更新,134陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-07 01:03:29
行政院環境保護署行政院環境保護署環境檢驗所法定預算
每1年更新,66莊小姐 | 03-4915818#3003 | 2023-08-09 01:05:46
行政院環境保護署登錄證明文件繳費通知單
不定期更新更新,40沈小姐 | 02-23491031 | 2022-01-14 01:22:59
行政院環境保護署
列管事業污染源裁處資料
每1月更新,116陳小姐 | 04-2252-1718#51310 | 2023-08-07 01:02:41
行政院環境保護署焚化廠營運月報
每月更新更新,179吳先生 | 04-22521718#53526 | 2022-01-15 01:15:25
行政院環境保護署環境教育課程開辦統計資料
每1月更新,48李小姐 | 02-23117722#2724 | 2023-07-30 01:04:33
行政院環境保護署環保專案摘要資料_其他
不定期更新更新,158陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-07-30 01:01:54
行政院環境保護署全國年度例行性計畫成果統計表 （摘要）
不定期更新更新,108楊小姐 | 02-2383-2389#8106 | 2022-01-14 01:22:08
行政院環境保護署