Study Released on Environmental Awareness in TaiwanGeneral Policy
「Study Released on Environmental Awareness in TaiwanGeneral Policy」於資料集「Environmental Policy Monthly」由單位「行政院環境保護署」的楊先生所提供，聯繫電話是(02)23117722#2217,(02)23117722#2216，最近更新時間為：2022-01-15 01:13:03。 欄位編號的內容是417 ， 欄位標題的內容是Study Released on Environmental Awareness in Taiwan ， 欄位摘要的內容是The EPA recently finished a study on students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection. The study revealed that the public's level of knowledge about recycling fell with age and that although 70% of college-level students could recognize the EPA’s eco-label, the Green Mark, only 25% of students were willing to give priority to Green Mark products in their purchasing habits.
In order to better understand students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection and their recognition of and satisfaction with public awareness oriented policies, in 1998 the EPA commissioned Tung Wu University to organize a study on the environmental knowledge of students and the general public. The results of the study were recently released.
In the section dealing with air quality and noise pollution, the study points out that 37% of students and the public feel that there are unbearable levels of noise near their residence. For elementary, middle and high school students, 52%, 41% and 44%, respectively, felt the same. Of these, between 48% and 56% felt traffic to be the main cause.
As for resource recycling and trash disposal, 57% of the general public recognized the recycling symbol while close to 70% of college level, high school and middle school students could recognize the symbol. Also, 87% of elementary school students, the youngest group surveyed, recognized the symbol. When asked whether they knew of the government’s effort to promote recycling, the general public ranked the highest at 91% while 87% of others surveyed said they were aware. When asked what “resourcable trash” was, the higher age groups were better informed with 78% college level students and 73% of the general public aware.
When asked about environmental education 45-86% said they got information about basic environmental protection from the television and newspapers. Over 40% of the public and college level students and 60% of middle and high school students said they also obtained information about the environment from publicity items about environmental activities.
The study further revealed that although 76% of the public and 66% of college-level students drink tap water, those living further south tend to drink more mountain spring water. There was an overall discrepancy of 26 to 30 percentage points between the north and south. Close to 60% of those polled first boiled the water before drinking, while close to 30% first used a water purifier and then boiled the water. Only 6-10% drank water directly after putting it through a water purifier. In areas where tap water tends to be hard, 67% of the public and college level students thought it should be softened more.
In looking at the sources of drinking water for schools, the study showed that the proportion of students who drink school water rises according to age, from 49% of high school students to only 23% of elementary students. Also, 67% of elementary students paid attention to the cleanliness of a water fountain before use, with more female than male students expressing concern with this point.
In the section pertaining to pollution, around 50% of both the public at large and college-level students felt that pig raising and factories were two serious sources of pollution to water resources and should be strictly prohibited. Second to these were trash dumps and the use of agricultural pesticides and fertilizers, with around 30% feeling that they should be prohibited. Additionally, 69% of high school and 55% of middle school students knew that "river pollution" means pollution to both the water and to the riverbed. Over 96% of students knew that dumping kitchen leftovers into drain pipes or ditches to increase the nutrients in lakes and rivers is wrong. 87% of high school students knew that septic tanks cannot go long periods of time without cleaning or else they lose effectiveness.
68% of college level students correctly identified the Green Mark, better than the general public's 50%. However, only 41% of college level students would give priority to purchasing a product with the Green Mark as opposed to 59% of the general public. Interestingly, public desire to purchase Green Mark products is higher than public recognition of the mark. Over 60% of the students and the general public were willing to apply for "environmental” credit cards (a fraction of the charge is donated to environmental activities) and over 70% were willing to participate in community environmental protection activities.
The EPA will continue to work to interpret the findings of the study and use them as a future administrative reference. ， 欄位全文的內容是The EPA recently finished a study on students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection. The study revealed that the public's level of knowledge about recycling fell with age and that although 70% of college-level students could recognize the EPA’s eco-label, the Green Mark, only 25% of students were willing to give priority to Green Mark products in their purchasing habits.
In order to better understand students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection and their recognition of and satisfaction with public awareness oriented policies, in 1998 the EPA commissioned Tung Wu University to organize a study on the environmental knowledge of students and the general public. The results of the study were recently released.
In the section dealing with air quality and noise pollution, the study points out that 37% of students and the public feel that there are unbearable levels of noise near their residence. For elementary, middle and high school students, 52%, 41% and 44%, respectively, felt the same. Of these, between 48% and 56% felt traffic to be the main cause.
As for resource recycling and trash disposal, 57% of the general public recognized the recycling symbol while close to 70% of college level, high school and middle school students could recognize the symbol. Also, 87% of elementary school students, the youngest group surveyed, recognized the symbol. When asked whether they knew of the government’s effort to promote recycling, the general public ranked the highest at 91% while 87% of others surveyed said they were aware. When asked what “resourcable trash” was, the higher age groups were better informed with 78% college level students and 73% of the general public aware.
When asked about environmental education 45-86% said they got information about basic environmental protection from the television and newspapers. Over 40% of the public and college level students and 60% of middle and high school students said they also obtained information about the environment from publicity items about environmental activities.
The study further revealed that although 76% of the public and 66% of college-level students drink tap water, those living further south tend to drink more mountain spring water. There was an overall discrepancy of 26 to 30 percentage points between the north and south. Close to 60% of those polled first boiled the water before drinking, while close to 30% first used a water purifier and then boiled the water. Only 6-10% drank water directly after putting it through a water purifier. In areas where tap water tends to be hard, 67% of the public and college level students thought it should be softened more.
In looking at the sources of drinking water for schools, the study showed that the proportion of students who drink school water rises according to age, from 49% of high school students to only 23% of elementary students. Also, 67% of elementary students paid attention to the cleanliness of a water fountain before use, with more female than male students expressing concern with this point.
In the section pertaining to pollution, around 50% of both the public at large and college-level students felt that pig raising and factories were two serious sources of pollution to water resources and should be strictly prohibited. Second to these were trash dumps and the use of agricultural pesticides and fertilizers, with around 30% feeling that they should be prohibited. Additionally, 69% of high school and 55% of middle school students knew that "river pollution" means pollution to both the water and to the riverbed. Over 96% of students knew that dumping kitchen leftovers into drain pipes or ditches to increase the nutrients in lakes and rivers is wrong. 87% of high school students knew that septic tanks cannot go long periods of time without cleaning or else they lose effectiveness.
68% of college level students correctly identified the Green Mark, better than the general public's 50%. However, only 41% of college level students would give priority to purchasing a product with the Green Mark as opposed to 59% of the general public. Interestingly, public desire to purchase Green Mark products is higher than public recognition of the mark. Over 60% of the students and the general public were willing to apply for "environmental” credit cards (a fraction of the charge is donated to environmental activities) and over 70% were willing to participate in community environmental protection activities.
The EPA will continue to work to interpret the findings of the study and use them as a future administrative reference. ， 欄位年度的內容是2000 ， 欄位月份的內容是3 ， 欄位卷的內容是3 ， 欄位期的內容是3 ， 欄位順序的內容是1 ， 欄位倒序的內容是2 ， 欄位分類的內容是General Policy ， 欄位標題2的內容是Study Released on Environmental Awareness in Taiwan ， 欄位檔案位置的內容是print/V3/V3-03 。
編號
417
標題
Study Released on Environmental Awareness in Taiwan
摘要
The EPA recently finished a study on students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection. The study revealed that the public's level of knowledge about recycling fell with age and that although 70% of college-level students could recognize the EPA’s eco-label, the Green Mark, only 25% of students were willing to give priority to Green Mark products in their purchasing habits. In order to better understand students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection and their recognition of and satisfaction with public awareness oriented policies, in 1998 the EPA commissioned Tung Wu University to organize a study on the environmental knowledge of students and the general public. The results of the study were recently released. In the section dealing with air quality and noise pollution, the study points out that 37% of students and the public feel that there are unbearable levels of noise near their residence. For elementary, middle and high school students, 52%, 41% and 44%, respectively, felt the same. Of these, between 48% and 56% felt traffic to be the main cause. As for resource recycling and trash disposal, 57% of the general public recognized the recycling symbol while close to 70% of college level, high school and middle school students could recognize the symbol. Also, 87% of elementary school students, the youngest group surveyed, recognized the symbol. When asked whether they knew of the government’s effort to promote recycling, the general public ranked the highest at 91% while 87% of others surveyed said they were aware. When asked what “resourcable trash” was, the higher age groups were better informed with 78% college level students and 73% of the general public aware. When asked about environmental education 45-86% said they got information about basic environmental protection from the television and newspapers. Over 40% of the public and college level students and 60% of middle and high school students said they also obtained information about the environment from publicity items about environmental activities. The study further revealed that although 76% of the public and 66% of college-level students drink tap water, those living further south tend to drink more mountain spring water. There was an overall discrepancy of 26 to 30 percentage points between the north and south. Close to 60% of those polled first boiled the water before drinking, while close to 30% first used a water purifier and then boiled the water. Only 6-10% drank water directly after putting it through a water purifier. In areas where tap water tends to be hard, 67% of the public and college level students thought it should be softened more. In looking at the sources of drinking water for schools, the study showed that the proportion of students who drink school water rises according to age, from 49% of high school students to only 23% of elementary students. Also, 67% of elementary students paid attention to the cleanliness of a water fountain before use, with more female than male students expressing concern with this point. In the section pertaining to pollution, around 50% of both the public at large and college-level students felt that pig raising and factories were two serious sources of pollution to water resources and should be strictly prohibited. Second to these were trash dumps and the use of agricultural pesticides and fertilizers, with around 30% feeling that they should be prohibited. Additionally, 69% of high school and 55% of middle school students knew that "river pollution" means pollution to both the water and to the riverbed. Over 96% of students knew that dumping kitchen leftovers into drain pipes or ditches to increase the nutrients in lakes and rivers is wrong. 87% of high school students knew that septic tanks cannot go long periods of time without cleaning or else they lose effectiveness. 68% of college level students correctly identified the Green Mark, better than the general public's 50%. However, only 41% of college level students would give priority to purchasing a product with the Green Mark as opposed to 59% of the general public. Interestingly, public desire to purchase Green Mark products is higher than public recognition of the mark. Over 60% of the students and the general public were willing to apply for "environmental” credit cards (a fraction of the charge is donated to environmental activities) and over 70% were willing to participate in community environmental protection activities. The EPA will continue to work to interpret the findings of the study and use them as a future administrative reference.
全文
The EPA recently finished a study on students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection. The study revealed that the public's level of knowledge about recycling fell with age and that although 70% of college-level students could recognize the EPA’s eco-label, the Green Mark, only 25% of students were willing to give priority to Green Mark products in their purchasing habits. In order to better understand students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection and their recognition of and satisfaction with public awareness oriented policies, in 1998 the EPA commissioned Tung Wu University to organize a study on the environmental knowledge of students and the general public. The results of the study were recently released. In the section dealing with air quality and noise pollution, the study points out that 37% of students and the public feel that there are unbearable levels of noise near their residence. For elementary, middle and high school students, 52%, 41% and 44%, respectively, felt the same. Of these, between 48% and 56% felt traffic to be the main cause. As for resource recycling and trash disposal, 57% of the general public recognized the recycling symbol while close to 70% of college level, high school and middle school students could recognize the symbol. Also, 87% of elementary school students, the youngest group surveyed, recognized the symbol. When asked whether they knew of the government’s effort to promote recycling, the general public ranked the highest at 91% while 87% of others surveyed said they were aware. When asked what “resourcable trash” was, the higher age groups were better informed with 78% college level students and 73% of the general public aware. When asked about environmental education 45-86% said they got information about basic environmental protection from the television and newspapers. Over 40% of the public and college level students and 60% of middle and high school students said they also obtained information about the environment from publicity items about environmental activities. The study further revealed that although 76% of the public and 66% of college-level students drink tap water, those living further south tend to drink more mountain spring water. There was an overall discrepancy of 26 to 30 percentage points between the north and south. Close to 60% of those polled first boiled the water before drinking, while close to 30% first used a water purifier and then boiled the water. Only 6-10% drank water directly after putting it through a water purifier. In areas where tap water tends to be hard, 67% of the public and college level students thought it should be softened more. In looking at the sources of drinking water for schools, the study showed that the proportion of students who drink school water rises according to age, from 49% of high school students to only 23% of elementary students. Also, 67% of elementary students paid attention to the cleanliness of a water fountain before use, with more female than male students expressing concern with this point. In the section pertaining to pollution, around 50% of both the public at large and college-level students felt that pig raising and factories were two serious sources of pollution to water resources and should be strictly prohibited. Second to these were trash dumps and the use of agricultural pesticides and fertilizers, with around 30% feeling that they should be prohibited. Additionally, 69% of high school and 55% of middle school students knew that "river pollution" means pollution to both the water and to the riverbed. Over 96% of students knew that dumping kitchen leftovers into drain pipes or ditches to increase the nutrients in lakes and rivers is wrong. 87% of high school students knew that septic tanks cannot go long periods of time without cleaning or else they lose effectiveness. 68% of college level students correctly identified the Green Mark, better than the general public's 50%. However, only 41% of college level students would give priority to purchasing a product with the Green Mark as opposed to 59% of the general public. Interestingly, public desire to purchase Green Mark products is higher than public recognition of the mark. Over 60% of the students and the general public were willing to apply for "environmental” credit cards (a fraction of the charge is donated to environmental activities) and over 70% were willing to participate in community environmental protection activities. The EPA will continue to work to interpret the findings of the study and use them as a future administrative reference.
年度
2000
月份
3
卷
3
期
3
順序
1
倒序
2
分類
General Policy
標題2
Study Released on Environmental Awareness in Taiwan
檔案位置
print/V3/V3-03
「Study Released on Environmental Awareness in TaiwanGeneral Policy」所屬的資料集：「Environmental Policy Monthly」的其他資料
編號：
653
標題：
Energy Star for Buildings to Promote Commercial Energy Savings
摘要：
For many years Taiwan’s energy strategy has not been sufficiently diversified and has not incorporat
全文：
For many years Taiwan’s energy strategy has not been sufficiently diversified and has not incorporat
編號：
409
標題：
Incentives for Reporting Violations of the Waste Disposal Act Proposed
摘要：
The new Waste Disposal Act includes regulations providing rewards for persons who report violators o
全文：
The new Waste Disposal Act includes regulations providing rewards for persons who report violators o
編號：
917
標題：
Overview of Environmental Agent Management
摘要：
Environmental agents are an all-pervasive part of our society. To avoid harm to the environment and
全文：
Environmental agents are an all-pervasive part of our society. To avoid harm to the environment and
編號：
150
標題：
New Facilities in Industrial Parks to be Exempt from EIA Requirements
摘要：
Environmental Impact Assessment In line with the ROC Government’s policy of easing regulations the
全文：
Environmental Impact Assessment In line with the ROC Government’s policy of easing regulations the
編號：
626
標題：
Green Architecture Criteria Included in EIA Requirements for Housing Projects
摘要：
The EPA recently amended regulations governing the EIA review process for housing projects. Changes
全文：
The EPA recently amended regulations governing the EIA review process for housing projects. Changes
編號：
761
標題：
Construction Site Runoff Water Placed Under Regulation
摘要：
The EPA will begin introducing a series of regulations aimed at enterprises that are frequently the
全文：
The EPA will begin introducing a series of regulations aimed at enterprises that are frequently the
編號：
381
標題：
Green Product Procurement Criteria Announced
摘要：
On June 26 regulations regarding the Government Procurement Act's provisions for priority purchasing
全文：
On June 26 regulations regarding the Government Procurement Act's provisions for priority purchasing
編號：
47
標題：
Premier Orders Quick Resolution to Garbage Disposal Problems
摘要：
Waste Management Shortly after taking office Premier Vincent Siew, paid a visit to the EPA on Septe
全文：
Waste Management Shortly after taking office Premier Vincent Siew, paid a visit to the EPA on Septe
編號：
573
標題：
Environmental Protection Fundamentals Law Reviewed Administrator Proposes 12 New Policies
摘要：
On June 1st the Legislative Yuan began a review of the draft Environmental Protection Fundamentals L
全文：
On June 1st the Legislative Yuan began a review of the draft Environmental Protection Fundamentals L
編號：
791
標題：
Testing of Waters at Recreational Beaches
摘要：
With the arrival of hot summer weather many people enjoy participating in various water sports and g
全文：
With the arrival of hot summer weather many people enjoy participating in various water sports and g
編號：
692
標題：
Reorganization of the EPA Website
摘要：
The recent reorganization of the EPA website incorporates flash technology to enhance dynamic perfor
全文：
The recent reorganization of the EPA website incorporates flash technology to enhance dynamic perfor
編號：
3128
標題：
Deputy Minister Yeh Visits Taoyuan Enterprises with Outstanding Environmental Performances
摘要：
Control & Evaluation Deputy Minister Yeh Visits Taoyuan Enterprises with Outstanding Environmental P
全文：
Control & Evaluation Deputy Minister Yeh Visits Taoyuan Enterprises with Outstanding Environmental P
編號：
490
標題：
EPA Phases Out Leaded Gas Vehicles
摘要：
In light of the prohibition on the sale of leaded gasoline in Taiwan in October of 1999 the China Pe
全文：
In light of the prohibition on the sale of leaded gasoline in Taiwan in October of 1999 the China Pe
編號：
179
標題：
EPA Actively Promotes Remote Sensing of Car Emissions
摘要：
Remote emissions sensing has been in place for three years with some 2.1 million cars having been ch
全文：
Remote emissions sensing has been in place for three years with some 2.1 million cars having been ch
編號：
91
標題：
1998 General Containers Recycling Fee Rates Formally Announced
摘要：
Recycling The 1998 recycling fee rates for general containers examined and approved by the Fee Revi
全文：
Recycling The 1998 recycling fee rates for general containers examined and approved by the Fee Revi
編號：
906
標題：
Taiwan’s Air Quality Shows Yearly Improvement
摘要：
The EPA’s recently announced 2001 air quality monitoring results indicate that Taiwan’s air is gradu
全文：
The EPA’s recently announced 2001 air quality monitoring results indicate that Taiwan’s air is gradu
編號：
1000
標題：
2002 World Summit Response Strategy Conference Held
摘要：
To jointly draft response strategies for the main issues discussed at the UN World Summit recently h
全文：
To jointly draft response strategies for the main issues discussed at the UN World Summit recently h
編號：
902
標題：
Remote Sensing Nets “Squid Cars”
摘要：
The EPA has conducted a total of 6.7 million vehicle emissions inspections using remote emissions se
全文：
The EPA has conducted a total of 6.7 million vehicle emissions inspections using remote emissions se
編號：
100
標題：
EPA Strengthens Communication with Foreign Business Community
摘要：
International Affairs At the invitation of the American Chamber of Commerce the Director General of
全文：
International Affairs At the invitation of the American Chamber of Commerce the Director General of
編號：
225
標題：
Central Area Air Quality Improvement Plan Implemented
摘要：
On August 25 the Central Area Air Quality Improvement Plan was formally implemented. The Plan calls
全文：
On August 25 the Central Area Air Quality Improvement Plan was formally implemented. The Plan calls
編號：
339
標題：
Guidelines for Applying to Handle and Use Bituminous Coal and Petroleum Coke to be Announced
摘要：
The EPA has completed the draft guideline for obtaining handling and use permits for bituminous coal
全文：
The EPA has completed the draft guideline for obtaining handling and use permits for bituminous coal
編號：
258
標題：
EPA Announces Consolidation of General Waste Recycling Categories
摘要：
On October 23 an amendment to the Guidelines for the Selection of General Waste Recycling and Dispos
全文：
On October 23 an amendment to the Guidelines for the Selection of General Waste Recycling and Dispos
編號：
208
標題：
EIA Air Quality Modeling Requirements Announced
摘要：
According to Article 49 of the Development Activity EIA Work Procedures the EPA set the scope of mod
全文：
According to Article 49 of the Development Activity EIA Work Procedures the EPA set the scope of mod
編號：
44
標題：
Executive Yuan Passes Amendments to Air Pollution Act
摘要：
Air Quality The Air Pollution Control Act was last revised in February 1992, more than five years a
全文：
Air Quality The Air Pollution Control Act was last revised in February 1992, more than five years a
編號：
866
標題：
Hog Raising Prohibition in Major Watersheds Yielding Results
摘要：
To improve the quality of Taiwan’s drinking water the EPA and various levels of government have work
全文：
To improve the quality of Taiwan’s drinking water the EPA and various levels of government have work
編號：
570
標題：
Administrator Lin Explains His Stance on Taiwan’s Fourth Nuclear Plant
摘要：
In a recent explanation of his stance on construction of Taiwan's fourth nuclear power plant EPA Adm
全文：
In a recent explanation of his stance on construction of Taiwan's fourth nuclear power plant EPA Adm
編號：
898
標題：
Green Mark – The New Trend in Green Consumerism
摘要：
This is the most pivotal year for green consumerism since the government began promoting the concept
全文：
This is the most pivotal year for green consumerism since the government began promoting the concept
編號：
620
標題：
Feature Article: EPA Calls for Reducing Gas Consumption by Government Vehicles
摘要：
To help reduce motor vehicle pollution the EPA recently proposed a plan to lower gasoline consumptio
全文：
To help reduce motor vehicle pollution the EPA recently proposed a plan to lower gasoline consumptio
編號：
588
標題：
Edgar Lin Urges Greater Interaction Between Environmental Agencies
摘要：
EPA Administrator Edgar Lin recently called his first joint meeting of environmental agencies. At t
全文：
EPA Administrator Edgar Lin recently called his first joint meeting of environmental agencies. At t
編號：
3269
標題：
Toxic Chemicals Management and POP Restrictions
摘要：
Toxic Substance Toxic Chemicals Management and POP Restrictions To minimize the long-term harmful e
全文：
Toxic Chemicals Management and POP Restrictions
行政院環境保護署 的其他資料集
CO_8hr平均值(每日提供17筆)
每1日更新,195陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-08 00:58:47
行政院環境保護署推動水污染總量管制作業規定
不定期更新,56簡小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2818 | 2022-01-15 01:13:04
行政院環境保護署地方環保局環保實收罰鍰
每月更新更新,184謝小姐 | 02-23117722#2103 | 2022-01-14 01:21:32
行政院環境保護署EPQSummary_Air
不定期更新更新,436郭先生 | 02-2311-7722 EXT.2399 | 2022-01-15 01:13:50
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_新北市_汐止站
每小時更新更新,243謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:03:20
行政院環境保護署
空氣品質監測小時值資料(一般污染物,每日更新)
每日更新更新,141謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:00:20
行政院環境保護署變更內容對照表專案小組初審會議紀錄
不定期更新更新,96劉先生 | 02-23117722#2743 | 2022-01-15 01:12:37
行政院環境保護署空氣污染實收罰鍰
每年更新更新,157謝小姐 | 02-23117722#2103 | 2022-01-14 01:22:40
行政院環境保護署模場試驗專案期末報告電子檔
不定期更新,60蘇先生 | 02-2311-7722#8110 | 2022-01-15 01:10:09
行政院環境保護署固定污染源設備元件揮發性有機物洩漏檢測申報資料
每3月更新,402戴先生 | 02-2311-7722#6208 | 2023-08-07 01:02:40
行政院環境保護署
環境影響評估開發案公開說明會資料
每2月更新,177黃先生 | 02-23117722#2748 | 2023-08-05 01:01:15
行政院環境保護署行政院環境保護署單位預算案
每年更新更新,46方先生 | 02-2311-7722#2153 | 2022-01-15 01:09:45
行政院環境保護署行政院環境保護署環境保護基金附屬單位決算
每1年更新,51林小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2169 | 2023-08-09 01:05:50
行政院環境保護署新北市重要環保統計資料
每1月更新,209顏先生 | 02-23117722#2109 | 2023-08-03 01:01:17
行政院環境保護署應回收廢棄物處理業者(廢鉛蓄電池類)最大處理量資料
每年更新更新,50廖小姐 | 02-2370-5888#3103 | 2022-01-14 01:23:59
行政院環境保護署
列管毒性化學物質毒理資料
每年更新更新,157劉先生 | 02-23257399#55427 | 2022-01-14 01:22:55
行政院環境保護署毒性化學物質禁止運作事項資料
不定期更新更新,55許先生 | 02-23257399#55328 | 2023-07-30 00:59:58
行政院環境保護署PM2.5日均值(每日提供)
每1日更新,102陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-08 00:58:45
行政院環境保護署應回收廢棄物(廢容器類)回收量資料
每1年更新,46廖小姐 | 02-2370-5888#3103 | 2023-07-27 00:59:50
行政院環境保護署光化測站(臺南)小時值資料
不定期更新更新,174陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-07 01:03:35
行政院環境保護署
一般民眾環境教育終身學習護照註冊及開通人數
每季更新更新,85李小姐 | 02-23117722#2724 | 2022-01-15 01:10:43
行政院環境保護署毒化物運作紀錄申報總量
每6月更新,180許先生 | 02-23257399#55328 | 2023-07-27 01:03:31
行政院環境保護署公民營廢棄物清除機構數
每1年更新,143顏先生 | 02-23117722#2109 | 2023-07-27 01:00:41
行政院環境保護署訴願審議委員會委員名單
不定期更新更新,50謝先生 | 02-2311-7722#2962 | 2022-01-15 01:12:54
行政院環境保護署光化測站(忠明)小時值資料
不定期更新更新,155陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-07 01:03:29
行政院環境保護署
建檔公廁明細-苗栗縣
不定期更新更新,145賴先生 | 04-2252-1718#53686 | 2023-07-27 01:02:05
行政院環境保護署行政院環境保護署環境保護人員訓練所單位決算
每1年更新,59江先生 | 03-4020789 #583 | 2023-08-09 01:05:48
行政院環境保護署總碳氫化合物(THC)監測小時值(每小時提供)
每小時更新更新,138謝小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2022-01-14 01:05:09
行政院環境保護署應回收廢棄物處理業者(廢家電資訊類)最大處理量資料
每年更新更新,59廖小姐 | 02-2370-5888#3103 | 2022-01-14 01:24:01
行政院環境保護署廢棄物實收罰鍰
每1年更新,147顏先生 | 02-23117722#2109 | 2023-08-03 01:00:26
行政院環境保護署