Study Released on Environmental Awareness in TaiwanGeneral Policy
「Study Released on Environmental Awareness in TaiwanGeneral Policy」於資料集「Environmental Policy Monthly」由單位「行政院環境保護署」的楊先生所提供，聯繫電話是(02)23117722#2217,(02)23117722#2216，最近更新時間為：2022-01-15 01:13:03。 欄位編號的內容是417 ， 欄位標題的內容是Study Released on Environmental Awareness in Taiwan ， 欄位摘要的內容是The EPA recently finished a study on students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection. The study revealed that the public's level of knowledge about recycling fell with age and that although 70% of college-level students could recognize the EPA’s eco-label, the Green Mark, only 25% of students were willing to give priority to Green Mark products in their purchasing habits.
In order to better understand students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection and their recognition of and satisfaction with public awareness oriented policies, in 1998 the EPA commissioned Tung Wu University to organize a study on the environmental knowledge of students and the general public. The results of the study were recently released.
In the section dealing with air quality and noise pollution, the study points out that 37% of students and the public feel that there are unbearable levels of noise near their residence. For elementary, middle and high school students, 52%, 41% and 44%, respectively, felt the same. Of these, between 48% and 56% felt traffic to be the main cause.
As for resource recycling and trash disposal, 57% of the general public recognized the recycling symbol while close to 70% of college level, high school and middle school students could recognize the symbol. Also, 87% of elementary school students, the youngest group surveyed, recognized the symbol. When asked whether they knew of the government’s effort to promote recycling, the general public ranked the highest at 91% while 87% of others surveyed said they were aware. When asked what “resourcable trash” was, the higher age groups were better informed with 78% college level students and 73% of the general public aware.
When asked about environmental education 45-86% said they got information about basic environmental protection from the television and newspapers. Over 40% of the public and college level students and 60% of middle and high school students said they also obtained information about the environment from publicity items about environmental activities.
The study further revealed that although 76% of the public and 66% of college-level students drink tap water, those living further south tend to drink more mountain spring water. There was an overall discrepancy of 26 to 30 percentage points between the north and south. Close to 60% of those polled first boiled the water before drinking, while close to 30% first used a water purifier and then boiled the water. Only 6-10% drank water directly after putting it through a water purifier. In areas where tap water tends to be hard, 67% of the public and college level students thought it should be softened more.
In looking at the sources of drinking water for schools, the study showed that the proportion of students who drink school water rises according to age, from 49% of high school students to only 23% of elementary students. Also, 67% of elementary students paid attention to the cleanliness of a water fountain before use, with more female than male students expressing concern with this point.
In the section pertaining to pollution, around 50% of both the public at large and college-level students felt that pig raising and factories were two serious sources of pollution to water resources and should be strictly prohibited. Second to these were trash dumps and the use of agricultural pesticides and fertilizers, with around 30% feeling that they should be prohibited. Additionally, 69% of high school and 55% of middle school students knew that "river pollution" means pollution to both the water and to the riverbed. Over 96% of students knew that dumping kitchen leftovers into drain pipes or ditches to increase the nutrients in lakes and rivers is wrong. 87% of high school students knew that septic tanks cannot go long periods of time without cleaning or else they lose effectiveness.
68% of college level students correctly identified the Green Mark, better than the general public's 50%. However, only 41% of college level students would give priority to purchasing a product with the Green Mark as opposed to 59% of the general public. Interestingly, public desire to purchase Green Mark products is higher than public recognition of the mark. Over 60% of the students and the general public were willing to apply for "environmental” credit cards (a fraction of the charge is donated to environmental activities) and over 70% were willing to participate in community environmental protection activities.
The EPA will continue to work to interpret the findings of the study and use them as a future administrative reference. ， 欄位全文的內容是The EPA recently finished a study on students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection. The study revealed that the public's level of knowledge about recycling fell with age and that although 70% of college-level students could recognize the EPA’s eco-label, the Green Mark, only 25% of students were willing to give priority to Green Mark products in their purchasing habits.
In order to better understand students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection and their recognition of and satisfaction with public awareness oriented policies, in 1998 the EPA commissioned Tung Wu University to organize a study on the environmental knowledge of students and the general public. The results of the study were recently released.
In the section dealing with air quality and noise pollution, the study points out that 37% of students and the public feel that there are unbearable levels of noise near their residence. For elementary, middle and high school students, 52%, 41% and 44%, respectively, felt the same. Of these, between 48% and 56% felt traffic to be the main cause.
As for resource recycling and trash disposal, 57% of the general public recognized the recycling symbol while close to 70% of college level, high school and middle school students could recognize the symbol. Also, 87% of elementary school students, the youngest group surveyed, recognized the symbol. When asked whether they knew of the government’s effort to promote recycling, the general public ranked the highest at 91% while 87% of others surveyed said they were aware. When asked what “resourcable trash” was, the higher age groups were better informed with 78% college level students and 73% of the general public aware.
When asked about environmental education 45-86% said they got information about basic environmental protection from the television and newspapers. Over 40% of the public and college level students and 60% of middle and high school students said they also obtained information about the environment from publicity items about environmental activities.
The study further revealed that although 76% of the public and 66% of college-level students drink tap water, those living further south tend to drink more mountain spring water. There was an overall discrepancy of 26 to 30 percentage points between the north and south. Close to 60% of those polled first boiled the water before drinking, while close to 30% first used a water purifier and then boiled the water. Only 6-10% drank water directly after putting it through a water purifier. In areas where tap water tends to be hard, 67% of the public and college level students thought it should be softened more.
In looking at the sources of drinking water for schools, the study showed that the proportion of students who drink school water rises according to age, from 49% of high school students to only 23% of elementary students. Also, 67% of elementary students paid attention to the cleanliness of a water fountain before use, with more female than male students expressing concern with this point.
In the section pertaining to pollution, around 50% of both the public at large and college-level students felt that pig raising and factories were two serious sources of pollution to water resources and should be strictly prohibited. Second to these were trash dumps and the use of agricultural pesticides and fertilizers, with around 30% feeling that they should be prohibited. Additionally, 69% of high school and 55% of middle school students knew that "river pollution" means pollution to both the water and to the riverbed. Over 96% of students knew that dumping kitchen leftovers into drain pipes or ditches to increase the nutrients in lakes and rivers is wrong. 87% of high school students knew that septic tanks cannot go long periods of time without cleaning or else they lose effectiveness.
68% of college level students correctly identified the Green Mark, better than the general public's 50%. However, only 41% of college level students would give priority to purchasing a product with the Green Mark as opposed to 59% of the general public. Interestingly, public desire to purchase Green Mark products is higher than public recognition of the mark. Over 60% of the students and the general public were willing to apply for "environmental” credit cards (a fraction of the charge is donated to environmental activities) and over 70% were willing to participate in community environmental protection activities.
The EPA will continue to work to interpret the findings of the study and use them as a future administrative reference. ， 欄位年度的內容是2000 ， 欄位月份的內容是3 ， 欄位卷的內容是3 ， 欄位期的內容是3 ， 欄位順序的內容是1 ， 欄位倒序的內容是2 ， 欄位分類的內容是General Policy ， 欄位標題2的內容是Study Released on Environmental Awareness in Taiwan ， 欄位檔案位置的內容是print/V3/V3-03 。
編號
417
標題
Study Released on Environmental Awareness in Taiwan
摘要
The EPA recently finished a study on students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection. The study revealed that the public's level of knowledge about recycling fell with age and that although 70% of college-level students could recognize the EPA’s eco-label, the Green Mark, only 25% of students were willing to give priority to Green Mark products in their purchasing habits. In order to better understand students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection and their recognition of and satisfaction with public awareness oriented policies, in 1998 the EPA commissioned Tung Wu University to organize a study on the environmental knowledge of students and the general public. The results of the study were recently released. In the section dealing with air quality and noise pollution, the study points out that 37% of students and the public feel that there are unbearable levels of noise near their residence. For elementary, middle and high school students, 52%, 41% and 44%, respectively, felt the same. Of these, between 48% and 56% felt traffic to be the main cause. As for resource recycling and trash disposal, 57% of the general public recognized the recycling symbol while close to 70% of college level, high school and middle school students could recognize the symbol. Also, 87% of elementary school students, the youngest group surveyed, recognized the symbol. When asked whether they knew of the government’s effort to promote recycling, the general public ranked the highest at 91% while 87% of others surveyed said they were aware. When asked what “resourcable trash” was, the higher age groups were better informed with 78% college level students and 73% of the general public aware. When asked about environmental education 45-86% said they got information about basic environmental protection from the television and newspapers. Over 40% of the public and college level students and 60% of middle and high school students said they also obtained information about the environment from publicity items about environmental activities. The study further revealed that although 76% of the public and 66% of college-level students drink tap water, those living further south tend to drink more mountain spring water. There was an overall discrepancy of 26 to 30 percentage points between the north and south. Close to 60% of those polled first boiled the water before drinking, while close to 30% first used a water purifier and then boiled the water. Only 6-10% drank water directly after putting it through a water purifier. In areas where tap water tends to be hard, 67% of the public and college level students thought it should be softened more. In looking at the sources of drinking water for schools, the study showed that the proportion of students who drink school water rises according to age, from 49% of high school students to only 23% of elementary students. Also, 67% of elementary students paid attention to the cleanliness of a water fountain before use, with more female than male students expressing concern with this point. In the section pertaining to pollution, around 50% of both the public at large and college-level students felt that pig raising and factories were two serious sources of pollution to water resources and should be strictly prohibited. Second to these were trash dumps and the use of agricultural pesticides and fertilizers, with around 30% feeling that they should be prohibited. Additionally, 69% of high school and 55% of middle school students knew that "river pollution" means pollution to both the water and to the riverbed. Over 96% of students knew that dumping kitchen leftovers into drain pipes or ditches to increase the nutrients in lakes and rivers is wrong. 87% of high school students knew that septic tanks cannot go long periods of time without cleaning or else they lose effectiveness. 68% of college level students correctly identified the Green Mark, better than the general public's 50%. However, only 41% of college level students would give priority to purchasing a product with the Green Mark as opposed to 59% of the general public. Interestingly, public desire to purchase Green Mark products is higher than public recognition of the mark. Over 60% of the students and the general public were willing to apply for "environmental” credit cards (a fraction of the charge is donated to environmental activities) and over 70% were willing to participate in community environmental protection activities. The EPA will continue to work to interpret the findings of the study and use them as a future administrative reference.
全文
The EPA recently finished a study on students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection. The study revealed that the public's level of knowledge about recycling fell with age and that although 70% of college-level students could recognize the EPA’s eco-label, the Green Mark, only 25% of students were willing to give priority to Green Mark products in their purchasing habits. In order to better understand students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection and their recognition of and satisfaction with public awareness oriented policies, in 1998 the EPA commissioned Tung Wu University to organize a study on the environmental knowledge of students and the general public. The results of the study were recently released. In the section dealing with air quality and noise pollution, the study points out that 37% of students and the public feel that there are unbearable levels of noise near their residence. For elementary, middle and high school students, 52%, 41% and 44%, respectively, felt the same. Of these, between 48% and 56% felt traffic to be the main cause. As for resource recycling and trash disposal, 57% of the general public recognized the recycling symbol while close to 70% of college level, high school and middle school students could recognize the symbol. Also, 87% of elementary school students, the youngest group surveyed, recognized the symbol. When asked whether they knew of the government’s effort to promote recycling, the general public ranked the highest at 91% while 87% of others surveyed said they were aware. When asked what “resourcable trash” was, the higher age groups were better informed with 78% college level students and 73% of the general public aware. When asked about environmental education 45-86% said they got information about basic environmental protection from the television and newspapers. Over 40% of the public and college level students and 60% of middle and high school students said they also obtained information about the environment from publicity items about environmental activities. The study further revealed that although 76% of the public and 66% of college-level students drink tap water, those living further south tend to drink more mountain spring water. There was an overall discrepancy of 26 to 30 percentage points between the north and south. Close to 60% of those polled first boiled the water before drinking, while close to 30% first used a water purifier and then boiled the water. Only 6-10% drank water directly after putting it through a water purifier. In areas where tap water tends to be hard, 67% of the public and college level students thought it should be softened more. In looking at the sources of drinking water for schools, the study showed that the proportion of students who drink school water rises according to age, from 49% of high school students to only 23% of elementary students. Also, 67% of elementary students paid attention to the cleanliness of a water fountain before use, with more female than male students expressing concern with this point. In the section pertaining to pollution, around 50% of both the public at large and college-level students felt that pig raising and factories were two serious sources of pollution to water resources and should be strictly prohibited. Second to these were trash dumps and the use of agricultural pesticides and fertilizers, with around 30% feeling that they should be prohibited. Additionally, 69% of high school and 55% of middle school students knew that "river pollution" means pollution to both the water and to the riverbed. Over 96% of students knew that dumping kitchen leftovers into drain pipes or ditches to increase the nutrients in lakes and rivers is wrong. 87% of high school students knew that septic tanks cannot go long periods of time without cleaning or else they lose effectiveness. 68% of college level students correctly identified the Green Mark, better than the general public's 50%. However, only 41% of college level students would give priority to purchasing a product with the Green Mark as opposed to 59% of the general public. Interestingly, public desire to purchase Green Mark products is higher than public recognition of the mark. Over 60% of the students and the general public were willing to apply for "environmental” credit cards (a fraction of the charge is donated to environmental activities) and over 70% were willing to participate in community environmental protection activities. The EPA will continue to work to interpret the findings of the study and use them as a future administrative reference.
年度
2000
月份
3
卷
3
期
3
順序
1
倒序
2
分類
General Policy
標題2
Study Released on Environmental Awareness in Taiwan
檔案位置
print/V3/V3-03
「Study Released on Environmental Awareness in TaiwanGeneral Policy」所屬的資料集：「Environmental Policy Monthly」的其他資料
編號：
161
標題：
Drinking Water Protection Zones to be Delineated in Two-Stages
摘要：
Water Quality An amendment to the Drinking Water Management Statutes implemented on May 21 1997 st
全文：
Water Quality An amendment to the Drinking Water Management Statutes implemented on May 21 1997 st
編號：
3
標題：
Environmental Permit Process Simplified
摘要：
General Policy According to the stipulations of the Air Pollution Control Act the Water Pollution C
全文：
General Policy According to the stipulations of the Air Pollution Control Act the Water Pollution C
編號：
130
標題：
EPA to Provide Dioxin Testing Technology Assistance
摘要：
Air Quality Once twenty-one publicly constructed incinerators and the first group of privately cons
全文：
Air Quality Once twenty-one publicly constructed incinerators and the first group of privately cons
編號：
88
標題：
Regulations Regarding Drinking Water Treatment Additives Announced
摘要：
Water Quality On November 24 1997, the EPA announced that tap water companies, small-scale tap wate
全文：
Water Quality On November 24 1997, the EPA announced that tap water companies, small-scale tap wate
編號：
885
標題：
EPA-MOEA Meeting Achieves Consensus
摘要：
The EPA and MOEA conducted their second inter-ministerial policy coordination meeting on January 28t
全文：
The EPA and MOEA conducted their second inter-ministerial policy coordination meeting on January 28t
編號：
654
標題：
EPA Assesses Feasibility of Establishing Industrial Waste Exchange Center
摘要：
Even as expansion of the Industrial Waste Control Center will bring at-source management and waste t
全文：
Even as expansion of the Industrial Waste Control Center will bring at-source management and waste t
編號：
963
標題：
2001 Outstanding Recycling Promotion Awards Ceremony
摘要：
The EPA held a ceremony on June 18 to commend government agencies that have contributed to the promo
全文：
The EPA held a ceremony on June 18 to commend government agencies that have contributed to the promo
編號：
864
標題：
Golf Course Development to Remain Frozen
摘要：
The 90th conference of the EPA EIA Review Committee passed the Criteria for the Review of Environmen
全文：
The 90th conference of the EPA EIA Review Committee passed the Criteria for the Review of Environmen
編號：
173
標題：
A Look Inside the EPA The Comprehensive Planning Bureau
摘要：
According to the series of regulations establishing the EPA's organizational structure the EPA's Com
全文：
According to the series of regulations establishing the EPA's organizational structure the EPA's Com
編號：
329
標題：
The Need for Third Generation Air Quality Monitoring Stations Under Review
摘要：
To facilitate total pollutant quantity controls the EPA recently launched a full review of plans for
全文：
To facilitate total pollutant quantity controls the EPA recently launched a full review of plans for
編號：
534
標題：
Taipei City to Implement Per-Bag Trash Collection Fee Beginning in July
摘要：
Director of Taipei City's Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Dr. Stephen Shen, announced o
全文：
Director of Taipei City's Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Dr. Stephen Shen, announced o
編號：
512
標題：
Reporting of Activated Carbon Use by Municipal Incinerators to be Enforced
摘要：
Public concern over dioxin emissions from municipal incinerators has recently become an important is
全文：
Public concern over dioxin emissions from municipal incinerators has recently become an important is
編號：
278
標題：
Refuse Incinerator Construction to Move Forward as Scheduled
摘要：
To satisfy Taiwan’s expanding infrastructural needs the EPA is picking up the pace of its refuse inc
全文：
To satisfy Taiwan’s expanding infrastructural needs the EPA is picking up the pace of its refuse inc
編號：
18
標題：
IDE Offers APEC Cleaner Production Training
摘要：
Others The pollution control industry ranks among Taiwan's top ten new industries. Limitations of t
全文：
Others The pollution control industry ranks among Taiwan's top ten new industries. Limitations of t
編號：
818
標題：
New Draft of Regulations Governing Disease Vector Control Firms
摘要：
The EPA has begun formulating the Draft Revised Regulations Governing Disease Vector Control Firms (
全文：
The EPA has begun formulating the Draft Revised Regulations Governing Disease Vector Control Firms (
編號：
793
標題：
Unlawful Labeling of Bottled Water to be Punished
摘要：
The EPA recently released the results of testing conducted on different brands of bottled drinking w
全文：
The EPA recently released the results of testing conducted on different brands of bottled drinking w
編號：
421
標題：
Environmental Database for Disputes Prone Areas Under Construction
摘要：
The EPA will continue to push the construction of an environmental database for dispute prone areas.
全文：
The EPA will continue to push the construction of an environmental database for dispute prone areas.
編號：
912
標題：
Formosa Plastics Completes Treatment of Mercury Sludge
摘要：
Formosa Plastics Corp. has finally completed the treatment of this waste which has drawn so much int
全文：
Formosa Plastics Corp. has finally completed the treatment of this waste which has drawn so much int
編號：
137
標題：
Water Pollution Fee to be Postponed
摘要：
Water Quality According to EPA Administrator Hsung-Hsiung Tsai public opinion following announcemen
全文：
Water Quality According to EPA Administrator Hsung-Hsiung Tsai public opinion following announcemen
編號：
661
標題：
New Year Means End of the Road for PCBs
摘要：
The days of PCB use in Taiwan are coming to an end as the count towards the new year winds down. As
全文：
The days of PCB use in Taiwan are coming to an end as the count towards the new year winds down. As
編號：
119
標題：
Resource Recycling and Reuse Act Draft Completed
摘要：
Recycling The EPA has once again modified a draft of the Resource Recycling and Reuse Act and will
全文：
Recycling The EPA has once again modified a draft of the Resource Recycling and Reuse Act and will
編號：
336
標題：
EPA to Integrate Zone-based Responsibility into Recycling System
摘要：
The amount of material recycled in Taiwan has steadily risen since the transfer of recycling duties
全文：
The amount of material recycled in Taiwan has steadily risen since the transfer of recycling duties
編號：
449
標題：
Technology Review Working Group To Be Added to Green Mark Review Committee
摘要：
The EPA has begun to revise the Guidelines for Promoting the Use of the Green Mark. According to the
全文：
The EPA has begun to revise the Guidelines for Promoting the Use of the Green Mark. According to the
編號：
387
標題：
Self-initiated Application Recall and Extension Stipulations to be Added to EIA Review Process
摘要：
When environmental agencies go through the environmental impact assessment (EIA) review process they
全文：
When environmental agencies go through the environmental impact assessment (EIA) review process they
編號：
342
標題：
Mobile source air pollution fees to be collected from fuel suppliers
摘要：
Existing air pollution fee collection regulations have been revised so that air pollution fees for m
全文：
Existing air pollution fee collection regulations have been revised so that air pollution fees for m
編號：
206
標題：
Drinking Water Protection Zone Delineation Hastened
摘要：
With drinking water source water quality protection zone delineation work behind schedule the EPA pl
全文：
With drinking water source water quality protection zone delineation work behind schedule the EPA pl
編號：
677
標題：
EPA Administrator Takes the Reins on Pollution in the Erhjen River
摘要：
The EPA is preparing heavy medicine to help fully implement cleanup of pollution on the Erhjen River
全文：
The EPA is preparing heavy medicine to help fully implement cleanup of pollution on the Erhjen River
編號：
234
標題：
Natural Gas Filling Station Promotion Efforts to Be Stepped Up
摘要：
Following the considerable efforts made by the EPA Administrator a breakthrough was made with the Ex
全文：
Following the considerable efforts made by the EPA Administrator a breakthrough was made with the Ex
編號：
281
標題：
Taiwan Integrates CO2 Reduction Models in Response to International Trends
摘要：
The Fourth Session of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Conference of the Pa
全文：
The Fourth Session of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Conference of the Pa
編號：
369
標題：
Regulations for Industrial Waste Clearance and Treatment to be Streamlined
摘要：
Regulations concerning waste clearance and treatment organizations will be streamlined in many areas
全文：
Regulations concerning waste clearance and treatment organizations will be streamlined in many areas
行政院環境保護署 的其他資料集
環評監督成果統計
不定期更新更新,45陳先生 | 04-2252-1718#51207 | 2022-01-15 01:13:28
行政院環境保護署車機型號妥善率報表
每月更新更新,119林先生 | 02-2325-7399#55232 | 2022-01-14 01:18:34
行政院環境保護署水污染實收罰鍰
每年更新更新,113謝小姐 | 02-23117722#2103 | 2022-01-14 01:22:28
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_南投縣_竹山站
每1時更新,258陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:57:28
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_金門縣_金門站
每1時更新,300陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:57:23
行政院環境保護署
六輕相關計畫環評監督委員會會議紀錄
每季更新更新,53陳先生 | 04-22521718#51207 | 2022-01-14 01:21:58
行政院環境保護署預鑄式建築物污水處理設施審定登記認可設施一覽表
不定期更新更新,52洪先生 | 02-23117722分機2833 | 2023-08-09 01:04:31
行政院環境保護署環境教育機構認證資料
每1月更新,47盧小姐 | 03-4020789#606 | 2023-07-27 01:02:47
行政院環境保護署彰濱工業區環境監測資料
每3月更新,51陳先生 | 04-22521718#51207 | 2023-08-09 01:05:05
行政院環境保護署列管毒性化學物質毒理資料
每年更新更新,123劉先生 | 02-23257399#55427 | 2022-01-14 01:22:55
行政院環境保護署
地方環保局環保罰鍰金額
每1月更新,147顏先生 | 02-23117722#2109 | 2023-07-27 01:01:11
行政院環境保護署列管毒性化學物質已取得許可業者查核家次
每年更新更新,141謝小姐 | 02-23117722#2103 | 2022-01-14 01:22:54
行政院環境保護署歷年環保署農地營運中含鉛製程事業之土壤污染潛勢調查
不定期更新更新,58詹小姐 | 02-23117722 #8204 | 2022-01-14 01:20:28
行政院環境保護署EPQSummary_EnvironmentalInformationSystem
不定期更新更新,153陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-07-30 01:01:46
行政院環境保護署環保標章產品(環保產品)
每1月更新,143盧小姐 | 02-23117722#2943 | 2023-07-27 01:01:49
行政院環境保護署
光化測站(小港)小時值資料
不定期更新更新,140陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-07 01:03:32
行政院環境保護署EPQSummary_WaterQualityProtection
不定期更新更新,151郭先生 | 02-2311-7722 EXT.2399 | 2022-01-15 01:13:47
行政院環境保護署降雨逕流非點源污染最佳管理技術(BMPs)指引
不定期更新,64林先生 | 02-2311-7722#2811 | 2022-01-15 01:13:03
行政院環境保護署事業廢棄物再利用申報量統計
每1月更新,100林先生 | 02-2311-7722#2671 | 2023-08-07 01:02:11
行政院環境保護署柴油新車審驗資料-合格證明
不定期更新更新,40李小姐 | 02-2311-7722#6311 | 2023-08-09 01:04:48
行政院環境保護署
環保專案摘要資料_噪音振動
不定期更新更新,108陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-07-30 01:02:05
行政院環境保護署環境音量監測結果統計(依管制區分)
不定期更新更新,145章小姐 | 02-23712121#6407 | 2023-08-03 01:04:06
行政院環境保護署行政院環境保護署毒物及化學物質局法定預算
每年更新更新,34魏小姐 | 02-23257399#55432 | 2022-01-15 01:09:49
行政院環境保護署花蓮縣水量水質自動監測連線傳輸監測紀錄值即時資料集
不定期更新更新,51許先生 | 02-2311-7722#2831 | 2022-01-18 01:24:53
行政院環境保護署新北市重要環保統計資料
每1月更新,125顏先生 | 02-23117722#2109 | 2023-08-03 01:01:17
行政院環境保護署
行政院環境保護署會計月報
每月更新更新,46陳小姐 | 02-2311-7722#2159 | 2022-01-14 01:22:16
行政院環境保護署大甲媽祖遶境即時空品監測成果(感測器#3)
不定期更新更新,208陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2341 | 2022-01-14 01:02:38
行政院環境保護署主要水庫優養指數
每1年更新,36顏先生 | 02-23117722#2109 | 2023-07-30 01:01:02
行政院環境保護署建檔公廁明細-澎湖縣
不定期更新更新,147曾小姐 | (02)2311-7722#2760,(02)2311-7722#2894 | 2022-01-15 01:15:15
行政院環境保護署國家溫室氣體排放清冊報告
每年更新更新,57張先生 | 02-23117722#2796 | 2022-01-15 01:15:49
行政院環境保護署