Study Released on Environmental Awareness in TaiwanGeneral Policy
「Study Released on Environmental Awareness in TaiwanGeneral Policy」於資料集「Environmental Policy Monthly」由單位「行政院環境保護署」的楊先生所提供，聯繫電話是(02)23117722#2217,(02)23117722#2216，最近更新時間為：2022-01-15 01:13:03。 欄位編號的內容是417 ， 欄位標題的內容是Study Released on Environmental Awareness in Taiwan ， 欄位摘要的內容是The EPA recently finished a study on students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection. The study revealed that the public's level of knowledge about recycling fell with age and that although 70% of college-level students could recognize the EPA’s eco-label, the Green Mark, only 25% of students were willing to give priority to Green Mark products in their purchasing habits.
In order to better understand students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection and their recognition of and satisfaction with public awareness oriented policies, in 1998 the EPA commissioned Tung Wu University to organize a study on the environmental knowledge of students and the general public. The results of the study were recently released.
In the section dealing with air quality and noise pollution, the study points out that 37% of students and the public feel that there are unbearable levels of noise near their residence. For elementary, middle and high school students, 52%, 41% and 44%, respectively, felt the same. Of these, between 48% and 56% felt traffic to be the main cause.
As for resource recycling and trash disposal, 57% of the general public recognized the recycling symbol while close to 70% of college level, high school and middle school students could recognize the symbol. Also, 87% of elementary school students, the youngest group surveyed, recognized the symbol. When asked whether they knew of the government’s effort to promote recycling, the general public ranked the highest at 91% while 87% of others surveyed said they were aware. When asked what “resourcable trash” was, the higher age groups were better informed with 78% college level students and 73% of the general public aware.
When asked about environmental education 45-86% said they got information about basic environmental protection from the television and newspapers. Over 40% of the public and college level students and 60% of middle and high school students said they also obtained information about the environment from publicity items about environmental activities.
The study further revealed that although 76% of the public and 66% of college-level students drink tap water, those living further south tend to drink more mountain spring water. There was an overall discrepancy of 26 to 30 percentage points between the north and south. Close to 60% of those polled first boiled the water before drinking, while close to 30% first used a water purifier and then boiled the water. Only 6-10% drank water directly after putting it through a water purifier. In areas where tap water tends to be hard, 67% of the public and college level students thought it should be softened more.
In looking at the sources of drinking water for schools, the study showed that the proportion of students who drink school water rises according to age, from 49% of high school students to only 23% of elementary students. Also, 67% of elementary students paid attention to the cleanliness of a water fountain before use, with more female than male students expressing concern with this point.
In the section pertaining to pollution, around 50% of both the public at large and college-level students felt that pig raising and factories were two serious sources of pollution to water resources and should be strictly prohibited. Second to these were trash dumps and the use of agricultural pesticides and fertilizers, with around 30% feeling that they should be prohibited. Additionally, 69% of high school and 55% of middle school students knew that "river pollution" means pollution to both the water and to the riverbed. Over 96% of students knew that dumping kitchen leftovers into drain pipes or ditches to increase the nutrients in lakes and rivers is wrong. 87% of high school students knew that septic tanks cannot go long periods of time without cleaning or else they lose effectiveness.
68% of college level students correctly identified the Green Mark, better than the general public's 50%. However, only 41% of college level students would give priority to purchasing a product with the Green Mark as opposed to 59% of the general public. Interestingly, public desire to purchase Green Mark products is higher than public recognition of the mark. Over 60% of the students and the general public were willing to apply for "environmental” credit cards (a fraction of the charge is donated to environmental activities) and over 70% were willing to participate in community environmental protection activities.
The EPA will continue to work to interpret the findings of the study and use them as a future administrative reference. ， 欄位全文的內容是The EPA recently finished a study on students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection. The study revealed that the public's level of knowledge about recycling fell with age and that although 70% of college-level students could recognize the EPA’s eco-label, the Green Mark, only 25% of students were willing to give priority to Green Mark products in their purchasing habits.
In order to better understand students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection and their recognition of and satisfaction with public awareness oriented policies, in 1998 the EPA commissioned Tung Wu University to organize a study on the environmental knowledge of students and the general public. The results of the study were recently released.
In the section dealing with air quality and noise pollution, the study points out that 37% of students and the public feel that there are unbearable levels of noise near their residence. For elementary, middle and high school students, 52%, 41% and 44%, respectively, felt the same. Of these, between 48% and 56% felt traffic to be the main cause.
As for resource recycling and trash disposal, 57% of the general public recognized the recycling symbol while close to 70% of college level, high school and middle school students could recognize the symbol. Also, 87% of elementary school students, the youngest group surveyed, recognized the symbol. When asked whether they knew of the government’s effort to promote recycling, the general public ranked the highest at 91% while 87% of others surveyed said they were aware. When asked what “resourcable trash” was, the higher age groups were better informed with 78% college level students and 73% of the general public aware.
When asked about environmental education 45-86% said they got information about basic environmental protection from the television and newspapers. Over 40% of the public and college level students and 60% of middle and high school students said they also obtained information about the environment from publicity items about environmental activities.
The study further revealed that although 76% of the public and 66% of college-level students drink tap water, those living further south tend to drink more mountain spring water. There was an overall discrepancy of 26 to 30 percentage points between the north and south. Close to 60% of those polled first boiled the water before drinking, while close to 30% first used a water purifier and then boiled the water. Only 6-10% drank water directly after putting it through a water purifier. In areas where tap water tends to be hard, 67% of the public and college level students thought it should be softened more.
In looking at the sources of drinking water for schools, the study showed that the proportion of students who drink school water rises according to age, from 49% of high school students to only 23% of elementary students. Also, 67% of elementary students paid attention to the cleanliness of a water fountain before use, with more female than male students expressing concern with this point.
In the section pertaining to pollution, around 50% of both the public at large and college-level students felt that pig raising and factories were two serious sources of pollution to water resources and should be strictly prohibited. Second to these were trash dumps and the use of agricultural pesticides and fertilizers, with around 30% feeling that they should be prohibited. Additionally, 69% of high school and 55% of middle school students knew that "river pollution" means pollution to both the water and to the riverbed. Over 96% of students knew that dumping kitchen leftovers into drain pipes or ditches to increase the nutrients in lakes and rivers is wrong. 87% of high school students knew that septic tanks cannot go long periods of time without cleaning or else they lose effectiveness.
68% of college level students correctly identified the Green Mark, better than the general public's 50%. However, only 41% of college level students would give priority to purchasing a product with the Green Mark as opposed to 59% of the general public. Interestingly, public desire to purchase Green Mark products is higher than public recognition of the mark. Over 60% of the students and the general public were willing to apply for "environmental” credit cards (a fraction of the charge is donated to environmental activities) and over 70% were willing to participate in community environmental protection activities.
The EPA will continue to work to interpret the findings of the study and use them as a future administrative reference. ， 欄位年度的內容是2000 ， 欄位月份的內容是3 ， 欄位卷的內容是3 ， 欄位期的內容是3 ， 欄位順序的內容是1 ， 欄位倒序的內容是2 ， 欄位分類的內容是General Policy ， 欄位標題2的內容是Study Released on Environmental Awareness in Taiwan ， 欄位檔案位置的內容是print/V3/V3-03 。
編號
417
標題
Study Released on Environmental Awareness in Taiwan
摘要
The EPA recently finished a study on students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection. The study revealed that the public's level of knowledge about recycling fell with age and that although 70% of college-level students could recognize the EPA’s eco-label, the Green Mark, only 25% of students were willing to give priority to Green Mark products in their purchasing habits. In order to better understand students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection and their recognition of and satisfaction with public awareness oriented policies, in 1998 the EPA commissioned Tung Wu University to organize a study on the environmental knowledge of students and the general public. The results of the study were recently released. In the section dealing with air quality and noise pollution, the study points out that 37% of students and the public feel that there are unbearable levels of noise near their residence. For elementary, middle and high school students, 52%, 41% and 44%, respectively, felt the same. Of these, between 48% and 56% felt traffic to be the main cause. As for resource recycling and trash disposal, 57% of the general public recognized the recycling symbol while close to 70% of college level, high school and middle school students could recognize the symbol. Also, 87% of elementary school students, the youngest group surveyed, recognized the symbol. When asked whether they knew of the government’s effort to promote recycling, the general public ranked the highest at 91% while 87% of others surveyed said they were aware. When asked what “resourcable trash” was, the higher age groups were better informed with 78% college level students and 73% of the general public aware. When asked about environmental education 45-86% said they got information about basic environmental protection from the television and newspapers. Over 40% of the public and college level students and 60% of middle and high school students said they also obtained information about the environment from publicity items about environmental activities. The study further revealed that although 76% of the public and 66% of college-level students drink tap water, those living further south tend to drink more mountain spring water. There was an overall discrepancy of 26 to 30 percentage points between the north and south. Close to 60% of those polled first boiled the water before drinking, while close to 30% first used a water purifier and then boiled the water. Only 6-10% drank water directly after putting it through a water purifier. In areas where tap water tends to be hard, 67% of the public and college level students thought it should be softened more. In looking at the sources of drinking water for schools, the study showed that the proportion of students who drink school water rises according to age, from 49% of high school students to only 23% of elementary students. Also, 67% of elementary students paid attention to the cleanliness of a water fountain before use, with more female than male students expressing concern with this point. In the section pertaining to pollution, around 50% of both the public at large and college-level students felt that pig raising and factories were two serious sources of pollution to water resources and should be strictly prohibited. Second to these were trash dumps and the use of agricultural pesticides and fertilizers, with around 30% feeling that they should be prohibited. Additionally, 69% of high school and 55% of middle school students knew that "river pollution" means pollution to both the water and to the riverbed. Over 96% of students knew that dumping kitchen leftovers into drain pipes or ditches to increase the nutrients in lakes and rivers is wrong. 87% of high school students knew that septic tanks cannot go long periods of time without cleaning or else they lose effectiveness. 68% of college level students correctly identified the Green Mark, better than the general public's 50%. However, only 41% of college level students would give priority to purchasing a product with the Green Mark as opposed to 59% of the general public. Interestingly, public desire to purchase Green Mark products is higher than public recognition of the mark. Over 60% of the students and the general public were willing to apply for "environmental” credit cards (a fraction of the charge is donated to environmental activities) and over 70% were willing to participate in community environmental protection activities. The EPA will continue to work to interpret the findings of the study and use them as a future administrative reference.
全文
The EPA recently finished a study on students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection. The study revealed that the public's level of knowledge about recycling fell with age and that although 70% of college-level students could recognize the EPA’s eco-label, the Green Mark, only 25% of students were willing to give priority to Green Mark products in their purchasing habits. In order to better understand students’ and the general public's knowledge about environmental protection and their recognition of and satisfaction with public awareness oriented policies, in 1998 the EPA commissioned Tung Wu University to organize a study on the environmental knowledge of students and the general public. The results of the study were recently released. In the section dealing with air quality and noise pollution, the study points out that 37% of students and the public feel that there are unbearable levels of noise near their residence. For elementary, middle and high school students, 52%, 41% and 44%, respectively, felt the same. Of these, between 48% and 56% felt traffic to be the main cause. As for resource recycling and trash disposal, 57% of the general public recognized the recycling symbol while close to 70% of college level, high school and middle school students could recognize the symbol. Also, 87% of elementary school students, the youngest group surveyed, recognized the symbol. When asked whether they knew of the government’s effort to promote recycling, the general public ranked the highest at 91% while 87% of others surveyed said they were aware. When asked what “resourcable trash” was, the higher age groups were better informed with 78% college level students and 73% of the general public aware. When asked about environmental education 45-86% said they got information about basic environmental protection from the television and newspapers. Over 40% of the public and college level students and 60% of middle and high school students said they also obtained information about the environment from publicity items about environmental activities. The study further revealed that although 76% of the public and 66% of college-level students drink tap water, those living further south tend to drink more mountain spring water. There was an overall discrepancy of 26 to 30 percentage points between the north and south. Close to 60% of those polled first boiled the water before drinking, while close to 30% first used a water purifier and then boiled the water. Only 6-10% drank water directly after putting it through a water purifier. In areas where tap water tends to be hard, 67% of the public and college level students thought it should be softened more. In looking at the sources of drinking water for schools, the study showed that the proportion of students who drink school water rises according to age, from 49% of high school students to only 23% of elementary students. Also, 67% of elementary students paid attention to the cleanliness of a water fountain before use, with more female than male students expressing concern with this point. In the section pertaining to pollution, around 50% of both the public at large and college-level students felt that pig raising and factories were two serious sources of pollution to water resources and should be strictly prohibited. Second to these were trash dumps and the use of agricultural pesticides and fertilizers, with around 30% feeling that they should be prohibited. Additionally, 69% of high school and 55% of middle school students knew that "river pollution" means pollution to both the water and to the riverbed. Over 96% of students knew that dumping kitchen leftovers into drain pipes or ditches to increase the nutrients in lakes and rivers is wrong. 87% of high school students knew that septic tanks cannot go long periods of time without cleaning or else they lose effectiveness. 68% of college level students correctly identified the Green Mark, better than the general public's 50%. However, only 41% of college level students would give priority to purchasing a product with the Green Mark as opposed to 59% of the general public. Interestingly, public desire to purchase Green Mark products is higher than public recognition of the mark. Over 60% of the students and the general public were willing to apply for "environmental” credit cards (a fraction of the charge is donated to environmental activities) and over 70% were willing to participate in community environmental protection activities. The EPA will continue to work to interpret the findings of the study and use them as a future administrative reference.
年度
2000
月份
3
卷
3
期
3
順序
1
倒序
2
分類
General Policy
標題2
Study Released on Environmental Awareness in Taiwan
檔案位置
print/V3/V3-03
「Study Released on Environmental Awareness in TaiwanGeneral Policy」所屬的資料集：「Environmental Policy Monthly」的其他資料
編號：
485
標題：
Toxic Chemical Labeling Requirements to be Amended
摘要：
The EPA is planning to modify regulations concerning toxic chemical labeling. In the future all tox
全文：
The EPA is planning to modify regulations concerning toxic chemical labeling. In the future all tox
編號：
188
標題：
Taiwan Heads up APEC Marine Resource Conservation Working Group
摘要：
EPA Water Quality Protection Bureau Director General Gwo-dong Roam lead a delegation from Taiwan to
全文：
EPA Water Quality Protection Bureau Director General Gwo-dong Roam lead a delegation from Taiwan to
編號：
3716
標題：
President Announces Amended Air Pollution Control Act
摘要：
Air
President Announces Amended Air Pollution Control Act
On 25 June 2018, after three readings the
全文：
President Announces Amended Air Pollution Control Act
On 25 June 2018, after three readings the Legi
編號：
837
標題：
Adopting a “No Regrets” Policy in Response to Kyoto Protocol
摘要：
The recently ended COP7 conference reached a resolution that the Kyoto Protocol will enter into forc
全文：
The recently ended COP7 conference reached a resolution that the Kyoto Protocol will enter into forc
編號：
246
標題：
EPA Studies Feasibility of Paper Recycling Stabilization Fund
摘要：
The worldwide decline in waste paper prices has put Taiwan’s paper recycling system on the verge of
全文：
The worldwide decline in waste paper prices has put Taiwan’s paper recycling system on the verge of
編號：
42
標題：
EPA Announces Recycling Fees for Containers and General Articles
摘要：
Recycling To encourage recycling the legislature revised the Waste Disposal Act in March of this ye
全文：
Recycling To encourage recycling the legislature revised the Waste Disposal Act in March of this ye
編號：
934
標題：
Industries Targeted for CEMS Installation Expanded
摘要：
The EPA is currently drafting regulations regarding the second set of stationary pollution sources t
全文：
The EPA is currently drafting regulations regarding the second set of stationary pollution sources t
編號：
688
標題：
Government Policy EIA Regulations Set
摘要：
The EPA recently announced Regulations Governing Environmental Impact Assessment of Government Polic
全文：
The EPA recently announced Regulations Governing Environmental Impact Assessment of Government Polic
編號：
635
標題：
2001 Proposed Environmental Budget Tops NT$9.6 Billion
摘要：
NT$9.6 billion was set aside for environmental protection in the 2001 central government budget. Co
全文：
NT$9.6 billion was set aside for environmental protection in the 2001 central government budget. Co
編號：
602
標題：
Drinking Water Quality Non-compliance Rate at 0.45%
摘要：
Results from island-wide analyses of tap water quality in the first half of 2000 were recently relea
全文：
Results from island-wide analyses of tap water quality in the first half of 2000 were recently relea
編號：
490
標題：
EPA Phases Out Leaded Gas Vehicles
摘要：
In light of the prohibition on the sale of leaded gasoline in Taiwan in October of 1999 the China Pe
全文：
In light of the prohibition on the sale of leaded gasoline in Taiwan in October of 1999 the China Pe
編號：
920
標題：
Restrictions on Plastic Bags and Disposable Dishes Coming Soon
摘要：
The EPA is planning the introduction of restrictions on the use of plastic shopping bags and plastic
全文：
The EPA is planning the introduction of restrictions on the use of plastic shopping bags and plastic
編號：
327
標題：
Semiconductor Industry Expenditures on Air Pollution Control Expected to Hit NT$1.2 Billion
摘要：
By July 2000 all current semiconductor production operations must meet emission standards as stipula
全文：
By July 2000 all current semiconductor production operations must meet emission standards as stipula
編號：
243
標題：
Dispute Settlement Act Enforcement Rules Partially Amended
摘要：
On October 7 an amendment to the Public Dispute Settlement Act Enforcement Rules was formally announ
全文：
On October 7 an amendment to the Public Dispute Settlement Act Enforcement Rules was formally announ
編號：
405
標題：
EPA Promotes Negotiations on Air Pollution Reduction with Four Northern Industries
摘要：
After years of providing assistance and implementing control measures to improve air quality in the
全文：
After years of providing assistance and implementing control measures to improve air quality in the
編號：
377
標題：
EIA Initial Review Guidelines Announced
摘要：
The EPA recently announced guidelines for performing the EPA’s environmental impact assessment (EIA)
全文：
The EPA recently announced guidelines for performing the EPA’s environmental impact assessment (EIA)
編號：
397
標題：
SOx Emissions and Odor Standards for Stationary Pollution Sources Amended
摘要：
On June 30 the EPA announced portions of the amended Stationary Source Air Pollutant Emissions Stand
全文：
On June 30 the EPA announced portions of the amended Stationary Source Air Pollutant Emissions Stand
編號：
359
標題：
EPA Readies Secure Internet Reporting Mechanisms
摘要：
The EPA launched access to electronic service by PIN on 30 April. As of that date members of the pub
全文：
The EPA launched access to electronic service by PIN on 30 April. As of that date members of the pub
編號：
936
標題：
Large Enterprises to Employ Waste Disposal Specialists
摘要：
In accordance with Article 28-2 of the Waste Disposal Act the EPA will announce in batches that larg
全文：
In accordance with Article 28-2 of the Waste Disposal Act the EPA will announce in batches that larg
編號：
701
標題：
EPA Drafts a Control Strategy for Persistent Organic Pollutants
摘要：
The presence of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in our environment has drawn the attention of t
全文：
The presence of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in our environment has drawn the attention of t
編號：
316
標題：
EPA Completes First Phase Investigation of Organic Compounds in Tamshui River Bed
摘要：
The EPA announced the results of its first year investigation and analysis of heavy metals and organ
全文：
The EPA announced the results of its first year investigation and analysis of heavy metals and organ
編號：
376
標題：
Efficiency of the Air Quality Monitoring Data System Improved
摘要：
The EPA's "air quality monitoring network" has collected thousands of reams of data and created a bo
全文：
The EPA's "air quality monitoring network" has collected thousands of reams of data and created a bo
編號：
429
標題：
New Delineation of Air Pollution Control Districts Comes Into Effect
摘要：
In line with recent amendments to the Air Pollution Control Act on September 18 the EPA promulgated
全文：
In line with recent amendments to the Air Pollution Control Act on September 18 the EPA promulgated
編號：
593
標題：
Feature Article: Draft Industrial Waste Treatment Plan In the Works
摘要：
The EPA and Industrial Development Bureau completed a draft Industrial Waste Treatment Promotion Pla
全文：
The EPA and Industrial Development Bureau completed a draft Industrial Waste Treatment Promotion Pla
編號：
403
標題：
Emergency Measures for Industrial Waste Management Underway
摘要：
Industrial waste control regulations have been tightened but because of insufficient treatment capac
全文：
Industrial waste control regulations have been tightened but because of insufficient treatment capac
編號：
105
標題：
A Word from the Office of Science and Technology Advisors: International Environmental Cooperation a
摘要：
International Affairs As societies have economically developed the impact of environmental pollutio
全文：
International Affairs As societies have economically developed the impact of environmental pollutio
編號：
622
標題：
EPA Presents Annual Awards for Excellence in Office Environmental Protection
摘要：
Results of the 2000 "Excellence in Office Environmental Protection" competition were recently releas
全文：
Results of the 2000 "Excellence in Office Environmental Protection" competition were recently releas
編號：
230
標題：
EPA to Help Large State-owned Companies Improve Industrial Waste Disposal
摘要：
Following the formal announcement that 10 state-owned companies must report industrial waste via an
全文：
Following the formal announcement that 10 state-owned companies must report industrial waste via an
編號：
47
標題：
Premier Orders Quick Resolution to Garbage Disposal Problems
摘要：
Waste Management Shortly after taking office Premier Vincent Siew, paid a visit to the EPA on Septe
全文：
Waste Management Shortly after taking office Premier Vincent Siew, paid a visit to the EPA on Septe
編號：
269
標題：
Spent Battery Recycling Fee Rates to Be Significantly Increased
摘要：
Proposed spent battery recycling fee rate increases for FY2000 have met with strong business opposit
全文：
Proposed spent battery recycling fee rate increases for FY2000 have met with strong business opposit
行政院環境保護署 的其他資料集
特殊性工業區測站資訊
不定期更新更新,50丁小姐 | 02-2371-2121#6101 | 2022-01-14 01:04:55
行政院環境保護署檢測機構環保標章檢測項目登錄認可清單
每季更新更新,43陳先生 | 02-23117722#2936 | 2022-01-14 01:17:45
行政院環境保護署紫外線測站基本資料
不定期更新更新,62陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-07 00:59:36
行政院環境保護署全國公廁建檔資料
每1日更新,124賴先生 | 04-2252-1718#53686 | 2023-08-05 00:59:29
行政院環境保護署噪音監測站資料
不定期更新更新,101王先生 | 02-23712121#6401 | 2022-01-14 01:18:45
行政院環境保護署
空氣品質小時值_新北市_林口站
每1時更新,235陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:58:15
行政院環境保護署環保署補助地方政府設置完成之現地處理設施
不定期更新,48黃先生 | 02-2311-7722#2839 | 2022-01-14 01:22:19
行政院環境保護署公民營製造業、用水、電力及燃氣供應業污染防治支出
每1年更新,44顏先生 | 02-23117722#2109 | 2023-07-30 01:00:38
行政院環境保護署EPQSummary_RegionalEnvironmentalManagement
不定期更新更新,87陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-07-30 01:01:44
行政院環境保護署縣市(臺北市)小時值-每小時
每1時更新,133陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:58:56
行政院環境保護署
紫外線測站位置圖
不定期更新更新,37陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-09 01:04:55
行政院環境保護署土壤319公頃_一公頃一採樣點位置圖
不更新更新,41謝先生 | (02)23832389*8302 | 2022-01-15 01:15:53
行政院環境保護署建檔公廁明細-宜蘭縣
不定期更新更新,162賴先生 | 04-2252-1718#53686 | 2023-07-27 01:02:08
行政院環境保護署土壤污染管制區範圍圖
不定期更新更新,34賴小姐 | 02-2383-2389#8102 | 2022-01-15 01:16:35
行政院環境保護署環境音量監測結果統計(依管制區分)
不定期更新更新,125章小姐 | 02-23712121#6407 | 2023-08-03 01:04:06
行政院環境保護署
中油三輕環境監測資料
每季更新更新,57陳先生 | 04-22521718#51207 | 2022-01-15 01:14:21
行政院環境保護署建檔公廁明細-嘉義縣
不定期更新更新,174曾小姐 | (02)2311-7722#2760,(02)2311-7722#2894 | 2022-01-15 01:15:04
行政院環境保護署苗栗縣水量水質自動監測連線傳輸監測紀錄值即時資料集
不定期更新更新,37許先生 | 02-2311-7722#2831 | 2022-01-18 01:24:44
行政院環境保護署臺北港物流倉儲區環境監測結果
不定期更新更新,80許先生 | 02-2311-7722#2641 | 2022-01-15 01:12:24
行政院環境保護署環保專案摘要資料
每月更新,97郭先生 | 02-2311-7722#2399 | 2022-01-15 01:13:31
行政院環境保護署
國際環保新聞週報
不更新更新,109楊先生 | (02)23117722#2217,(02)23117722#2216 | 2022-01-14 01:18:04
行政院環境保護署包裝及盛裝飲用水水源水質抽驗結果
每季更新更新,106黃先生 | 02-23117722#2881 | 2022-01-15 01:10:25
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_新竹縣_竹東站
每1時更新,134陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:58:04
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_金門縣_金門站
每1時更新,148陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:57:23
行政院環境保護署空氣品質小時值_桃園市_大園站
每1時更新,110陳先生 | 02-2311-7722#2386 | 2023-08-02 00:58:08
行政院環境保護署
點源網格空氣污染排放量(TWD97)
每2年更新,708劉小姐 | 02-23117722#6111 | 2023-07-30 01:04:45
行政院環境保護署歷年土壤調查_環保署土壤重金屬含量調查(100公頃)
不定期更新更新,142謝小姐 | (02)23832389*8302 | 2022-01-14 01:20:16
行政院環境保護署毒性化學物質釋放量公開資訊
不定期更新更新,112李小姐 | (02)23257399#55318 | 2023-07-27 01:00:19
行政院環境保護署道路交通音量監測結果統計(依管制區分)
每季更新更新,102林先生 | 02-23712121#6403 | 2022-01-14 01:18:41
行政院環境保護署行政院環境保護署毒物及化學物質局法定預算
每年更新更新,30魏小姐 | 02-23257399#55432 | 2022-01-15 01:09:49
行政院環境保護署